Department of Mechanical and Construction Engineering
\nFaculty of Engineering and Environment
\nMCE | Learning and Teaching Version 2.0 | Page 1 of 4
\nCoursework Specification
\n1 Module Information
\n1.1 Module Title Construction project ( help with nursing paper writing from experts with MSN & DNP degrees) planning and delivery
\n1.2 Module Code Number KB7039
\n1.3 Module Level and Credit Points 7 20 credits
\n1.4 Module Leader Hazel Ponton
\n1.5 Assessment Component Number (on Module Specification) 02
\n1.6 Assessment Weighting (on Module Specification) 60%
\n1.7 Coursework Title Solutions to a construction industry problem
\n1.8 Coursework Specification Author Hazel Ponton
\n1.9 Academic Year and Semester(s) 2019-20 Semester 2 only
\n2 Coursework Submission and Feedback
\n2.1 Release Date of Coursework Specification to Students W\/c 27th January 2020
\n2.2 Mechanism Used to Disseminate Coursework Specification to Students eLP
\n2.3 Date and Time of Submission of Coursework by Students 11:59 pm 12th May 2020
\n2.4 The mechanism for Submission of Coursework by Students eLP
\n2.5 Return Date of Unconfirmed Internally Moderated Mark(s) and Feedback to Students 9th June 2020
\n2.6 The mechanism for Return of Unconfirmed Internally Moderated Mark(s) and Feedback to
\nStudents eLP
\nMCE | Learning and Teaching Version 2.0 | Page 2 of 4
\n3 Assessment Details
\n3.1 Module Learning Outcomes (MLOs) Assessed by Coursework
\nWhat will I be expected to achieve?
\nKnowledge & Understanding:
\nMLO1 \u2013 Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the work-based practice through the analysis and
\nAssessment of research-based theory and relevant case studies, by formulating solutions to the effective
\nand efficient delivery of construction engineering project ( help with nursing paper writing from experts with MSN & DNP degrees)s.
\nIntellectual \/ Professional skills & abilities:
\nMLO2 \u2013 Critically evaluate innovative approaches to product, process and services delivery in
\nconstruction engineering through consideration of theory and practice.
\nPersonal Values Attributes:
\nMLO3 \u2013 Formulate strategies for improvement within the global construction engineering industry to
\ndemonstrate cultural, ethical and sustainable awareness.
\n3.2 Coursework Overview
\nThere are two assessed pieces of work in this module, which are connected and will allow the you to
\nshow a progression of learning within the module. The second component requires the you to consider
\nexisting problems related to waste in the construction industry. Once the you have selected a single
\nproblem and can define the problem, you need to critically analyse the potential solutions formulated from
\nthe module and provide considered solutions to the problem, with clear links between the problem and
\nthe potential solutions.
\n3.3 Coursework Tasks to be Completed by Students
\nYou will produce an individual illustrated journal of no more than 6no. A3 pages (landscape) (Excluding
\nfront page, Content page and Reference List). The illustrated journal needs to include all of the following:
\n1. Select a construction industry problem related to forms of waste discussed during the module, including a
\nshort description and a statement that clearly and concisely defines the scope of the problem.
\n2. Justify (through industry and academic literature) why this is a problem, who the problem affects, and the
\nimpact of the problem.
\n3. Critically analyse possible solutions to the problem from learning during this module AND independent
\nresearch.
\n4. Provide a visual illustration that links the problem to the solutions, i.e. fishbone diagram or another suitable
\nvisual tool.
\n5. A visual improvement model which summarises HOW the problem can be solved.
\n6. The illustrated journal should use an effective combination of text AND images to provide an interesting and
\nvisually engaging document. All images should be relevant and of an appropriate size and quality.
\nThe illustrated journal should include cited, good quality academic literature, as well as industry
\nbest practice. The content should be guided by the learning outcomes, the marking criteria and the
\nlearning from this module.
\n3.4 Expected Size of Submission
\nAn individual illustrated journal of no more than 6no. A3 pages (landscape) (Excluding front page,
\nContent page and Reference List). If more than 6 pages of content are provided, only the first 6 pages will
\nbe marked and assessed.The illustrated journal is to include approximately 50% text (using font size 10)
\nand approximately 50% images.
\nMCE | Learning and Teaching Version 2.0 | Page 3 of 4
\n3.5 Referencing Style
\nYou are to write your coursework using the Cite Them Right version of the Harvard referencing system.
\nAn online guide to Cite Them Right is freely available to Northumbria University students at:
\nhttps:\/\/www.citethemrightonline.com\/
\n3.6 Assessment Criteria
\nQuality of presentation (including the ability to generate audience interest) 10%
\nDepth of analysis of the industry problem 30%
\nAnalysis of possible solutions 40%
\nAbility to relate the problems to the solutions (visual illustration) 10%
\nClarity and relevance of the model. (Visual model to represent solution) 10%
\n4 Referral
\nThe Referral Attempt opportunity will generally take place after the end-of-level Progression and Awards
\nBoard (PAB). If you become eligible to complete a Referral Attempt but are subsequently unable to
\nundertake the opportunity when required, you will be permitted to re-sit the module at the next scheduled
\nsitting of the module assessment. This will typically entail the suspension of your progression on your
\nprogramme of study until such time that you have completed the level and become eligible to proceed.
\n5 Guidance for Students on Policies for Assessment
\nThe University has several policies for assessment. The following information, which is available to you
\nfrom the link below, provides guidance on these policies, including relevant procedures and forms.
\n(1) Assessment Regulations and Policies
\n(a) Assessment Regulations for Taught Awards
\n(b) Group Work Assessments Policy
\n(c) Moderation Policy
\n(d) Retention of Assessed Work Policy
\n(e) Word Limits Policy
\n(2) Assessment Feedback
\n(a) Anonymous Marking Policy
\n(3) Late Submission of Work and Extension Requests
\n(4) Personal Extenuating Circumstances
\n(5) Technical Extenuating Circumstances
\n(6) Student Complaints and Appeals
\n(7) Academic Misconduct
\n(8) Student Disability and Unforeseen Medical Circumstances
\nhttps:\/\/www.northumbria.ac.uk\/about-us\/university-services\/academic-registry\/quality-and-teachingexcellence\/assessment\/guidance-for-students\/
\nMCE | Learning and Teaching Version 2.0 | Page 4 of 4
\nKB7039 Construction Project Planning and Delivery \u2013 Assignment 2 [to be marked out of 100% and converted]
\nName \u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026 Mark:
\nOUTCOMES I CAN\u2019T BELIEVE
\nIT!
\n[ 100%]
\nWOW! [ 85%] DISTINCTIVE [ 75%] COMMENDABLE [
\n65%]
\nPASS [ 55%] FAIL [ 45%] POOR FAIL [ 0%]
\nQuality of
\npresentation
\n(including the ability
\nto generate
\naudience interest)
\n10%
\nThis work is of
\noutstanding quality
\nand has surprised
\nthe markers.
\nShows deeper learning
\nthan would normally be
\nexpected.
\nExcellent and very
\nclear with few
\nproblems.
\nVery good and
\nreasonably clear with
\nsome problems.
\nQuite a few problems
\nbut overall the
\nmessage was received
\nToo many problems so
\nthe presentation was
\nunclear.
\nVery poor with little
\nability to express the
\nideas in a clear and
\ninteresting manner.
\nDepth of analysis of
\nthe industry
\nproblems
\n30%
\nA good attempt with
\nfew mistakes \u2013 the
\nstudent clearly
\nunderstands the
\nproblems.
\nA good attempt with
\nsome mistakes \u2013 the
\nstudent\u2019s
\nunderstanding is
\ngenerally good
\nSome attempt with
\nsome mistakes \u2013 the
\nstudent\u2019s
\nunderstanding is
\nacceptable.
\nLittle attempt with
\nmany mistakes \u2013 the
\nstudents show little
\nunderstanding.
\nVery little effort has
\ngone into this – the
\nstudent shows no real
\nunderstanding.
\nAnalysis of possible
\nsolutions
\n40%
\nThe student has an
\nexcellent grasp of
\npossible solutions.
\nThe student has a
\ngood grasp of possible
\nsolutions although
\nthere are some minor
\nproblems.
\nThe student does not
\nfully grasp the
\nsolutions but there is
\nsome merit in what is
\nsaid.
\nThe student is not able
\nto analyse solutions
\nthough there is
\nevidence of a fair
\nattempt.
\nThe student has little
\nor no grasp of the
\nissues.
\nAbility to relate the
\nproblems to the
\nsolutions (visual)
\n10%
\nSolutions are clearly
\nand cogently linked to
\nproblems.
\nSolutions arise from
\nproblems in most
\ninstances although
\nthere is some lack of
\nclarity.
\nSome linkage of
\nsolutions and problems
\nbut the work lacks
\ndepth.
\nEvidence of only
\nsurface understanding
\nof linkages.
\nLittle evidence of ability
\nto derive the solutions
\nfrom the problems.
\nClarity and
\nrelevance of the
\nimprovement model
\n10%
\nThe clarity of
\nexpression and
\ncogency of the
\nargument are generally
\nexcellent with few
\nproblems.
\nThe clarity of
\nexpression and
\ncogency of the
\nargument are generally
\ngood though there are
\na few problems.
\nThe clarity of
\nexpression and
\ncogency of the
\nargument are generally
\nacceptable but there is
\nsome confusion.
\nThe work lacks clarity
\nand cogency \u2013 difficult
\nto follow
\nThe work is confusing
\nand has little merit.
\nFeedback – 3 areas of good practice, 3 areas for potential improvement:<\/p>\n
—————-<\/p>\n
Faculty of Engineering and Environment Department of Mechanical and Construction Engineering<\/p>\n
Page 1 of 4 | MCE | Learning and Teaching Version 2.0<\/p>\n
Coursework Specification<\/p>\n
1 Module Information<\/p>\n
1.1 Module Title Construction project ( help with nursing paper writing from experts with MSN & DNP degrees) planning and delivery<\/p>\n
1.2 Module Code Number KB7039<\/p>\n
1.3 Module Level and Credit Points 7 20 credits<\/p>\n
1.4 Module Leader Hazel Ponton<\/p>\n
1.5 Assessment Component Number (on Module Specification) 02<\/p>\n
1.6 Assessment Weighting (on Module Specification) 60%<\/p>\n
1.7 Coursework Title Solutions to a construction industry problem<\/p>\n
1.8 Coursework Specification Author Hazel Ponton<\/p>\n
1.9 Academic Year and Semester(s) 2019-20 Semester 2 only<\/p>\n
2 Coursework Submission and Feedback<\/p>\n
2.1 Release Date of Coursework Specification to Students W\/c 27th January 2020<\/p>\n
2.2 Mechanism Used to Disseminate Coursework Specification to Students eLP<\/p>\n
2.3 Date and Time of Submission<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Department of Mechanical and Construction Engineering Faculty of Engineering and Environment MCE | Learning and Teaching Version 2.0 | Page 1 of 4 Coursework Specification\u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[9033,7586,1386,7589,9034,9031,7587,7588,7584,7585,9032],"tags":[8809,7838,8811,8808,8813,8807,8806,8814,8810,8812],"class_list":["post-106889","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-assignment-help-uae","category-best-dissertation-writing-service-in-australia","category-best-research-paper-writing-services-in-usa","category-capstone-project-writing-service","category-cheap-essay-writing-services-china","category-essay-writing-service-usa","category-legitimate-phd-dissertation-writing-services-usa","category-term-paper-writing-service","category-thesis-writing-service-in-canada","category-uae-best-dissertation-writing-help-service","category-write-my-essay-australia","tag-best-master-thesis-writing-service","tag-best-thesis-writing-services","tag-cheap-thesis-writing-services","tag-master-thesis-help","tag-master-thesis-writing-service","tag-thesis-help-online-free","tag-thesis-writing-help-online","tag-thesis-writing-services-cost","tag-thesis-writing-services-near-me","tag-thesis-writing-services-reviews"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/106889","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=106889"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/106889\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=106889"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=106889"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=106889"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}