ASSESSMENT 3 BRIEFSubject Code and Title MGT603: Systems
\nASSESSMENT 3 BRIEF
\nSubject Code and Title MGT603: Systems Thinking
\nAssessment Written Report
\nIndividual\/Group Individual
\nLength Up to 2000 words
\nLearning Outcomes c) Analyse, select and apply systems modelling tools in integrating, optimising and enhancing business processes within contemporary organisations
\nd) Synthesise technological and non-technological solutions to business problems that promote integration and that optimise whole-of-enterprise operations
\nSubmission By 11:55 pm (AEDT\/AEST Time) Sunday of Module 6.1 (Week 11) For intensive class:
\nBy 11:55 pm (AEDT\/AEST Time) Sunday of Module 6.1 (Week 5)
\nWeighting 40%
\nTotal Marks 40 Marks
\nAssessment Task and Context
\nThere are two approaches towards improving systems, short-term approaches that normally addresses the symptoms and rarely help understand and address the cause of the problem, and longterm approaches, which allow managers to address the real cause(s) of the problem. In this assessment, students will try to solve a practical problem by using Systems Thinking tools called System Archetypes combined with value stream mapping.
\nInstructions
\nMGT603 Assessment 3 is about uncovering the complexities in operations management generally, identifying key themes, intended and unintended consequences and proposing a holistic solution to the problem using a Systems Thinking lens. The following scenario study provides you with a brief overview of a hypothetical problem. Be aware that the scenario provided may not cover every detail that you will need to address in the Written Report, in which case, you will need to conduct additional research, including further research on how emergency departments function in any hospital.
\nScenario Overview
\nConsider yourself as part of a team responsible for managing the operations of an emergency department of a public hospital. The emergency department has received feedback from patients suggesting that the patient wait times need to be improved. The value stream map of the current operations is shown in the attached diagram.
\nThe Value Stream Map is can be Found via the Assessment Link.
\n\u201cYou have been tasked with improving patient turnaround time by reducing the current time to half\u201d. To complete the task you are required to \u201cidentify the various System Archetypes that affect the operations of the hospital and the emergency department itself\u201d and based on the archetypes, develop a future State Value Stream Map of the emergency department.
\nYou will require to identify and critically analyse the intended and unintended consequences, recommending holistic solutions that will optimise the operations of the emergency department without compromising the performance of other functions of the hospital.
\nSuggested format:
\nYour MGT603 written report should include all the following sections and sub-sections. Please make sure to number all sections and sub-sections.
\nAssignment Cover Sheet (Individual)
\n(Found via the following link: https:\/\/www.torrens.edu.au\/policies-forms)
\nExecutive Summary
\nTable of Contents
\n1. Introduction\/Background
\n2. Main Discussion
\n2.1. Analysis of the current state Value Stream Map of the emergency department based on system archetypes
\n2.2. Identification and analysis of the system archetypes that may impede performance
\n2.3. Recommended new State Value Stream Map with desired reduction in patient turnaround time
\n2.4. Discussion on Intended and unintended consequences of the modified system
\n3. Conclusion
\n4. Recommendations 5. References
\nStudents require to make significant references to the subject material and substantial wider reading. A minimum of five (5) academic-related (e.g. peer-reviewed journal articles, books chapters, university resources, conference papers) and a minimum of two (2) other references (e.g. newspaper articles, industry reports, and etc.) are required in this assessment. References to \u2018Wikipedia\u2019 or similar unsubstantiated sources will not be accepted.
\nStudents should use the assessment brief to guide what to include in the assessment and use the provided case study to help demonstrate understanding of the topic (sample nursing essay examples by the best nursing assignment writing service).
\nEnsure that your MGT603 Assessment 3 is original and does not self-plagiarise any previous content written for other assessments.
\nThe submission must be in WORD document format and must contain a \u201csigned\u201d assessment cover sheet.
\nReferencing
\nIt is essential that students use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. Please see more information on referencing here in the Academic Writing Guide found via the Academic Skills website.
\nAcademic Integrity
\nAll students are responsible for ensuring that all work submitted is their own and is appropriately referenced and academically written according to the Academic Writing Guide. Students also need to have read and be aware of Torrens University Australia Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure and subsequent penalties for academic misconduct. These are viewable online. Students also must keep a copy of all submitted material and any assessment drafts.
\nSubmission Instructions
\nPlease submit the MGT603 Assessment 3 via the Assessment link in the main navigation menu in MGT603 Systems thinking on the Student Portal. The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via Grade Centre in the Student Portal. Feedback can be viewed in \u201cMy Grades\u201d.
\nAssessment Rubric: MGT603 Systems Thinking Assessment 3 Written Report
\nAssessment Attributes Fail
\n(Yet to achieve minimum standard)
\n0-49% Pass
\n(Functional)
\n50-64% Credit
\n(Proficient) 65-74% Distinction
\n(Advanced)
\n75-84% High Distinction
\n(Exceptional)
\n85-100%
\nUnderstanding of research principles and methods
\napplicable to
\nMBA
\nPercentage for
\nthis criterion =
\n20%
\nThe focus for the research question(s) or basis for the project ( help with nursing paper writing from experts with MSN & DNP degrees) is unclear.
\nThe rational for the research methodology is inappropriate for the research question\/project ( help with nursing paper writing from experts with MSN & DNP degrees). The focus for the research question(s) or basis for project ( help with nursing paper writing from experts with MSN & DNP degrees) is adequately clear.
\nThe rationale for the research methodology is appropriate for the research question\/project ( help with nursing paper writing from experts with MSN & DNP degrees). The focus for the research question(s) or basis for project ( help with nursing paper writing from experts with MSN & DNP degrees) is clear.
\nThe rationale for the research methodology is stated and appropriate for the research question\/project ( help with nursing paper writing from experts with MSN & DNP degrees). The focus for the research question(s) or basis for project ( help with nursing paper writing from experts with MSN & DNP degrees) is very clear.
\nThe rationale for the research methodology is compared with alternatives and the chosen method is appropriate for the research question\/project ( help with nursing paper writing from experts with MSN & DNP degrees). The focus for the research question(s) or basis for project ( help with nursing paper writing from experts with MSN & DNP degrees) is exceptionally clear.
\nThe rationale for the research methodology is critically compared and evaluated against alternatives and the chosen method is appropriate for the research question\/project ( help with nursing paper writing from experts with MSN & DNP degrees).
\nKnowledge and understanding (technical and theoretical knowledge).
\nUnderstands theoretical models and concepts and tools and techniques of systems thinking Limited understanding of required concepts and knowledge.
\nKey components of the assignment are not addressed.
\nNo discussion on systems principles and tools such as system dynamic, system archetypes, causal loop diagrams. Knowledge or understanding of the field or discipline.
\nResembles a recall or summary of key ideas.
\nOften confuses assertion of personal opinion with information substantiated by evidence from the Thorough knowledge or understanding of the field or discipline\/s. Supports personal opinion and information substantiated by evidence from the research\/course materials.
\nDemonstrates a capacity to explain Highly developed understanding of the field or discipline\/s.
\nDiscriminates between assertion of personal opinion and information substantiated by robust evidence from the research\/course materials and extended reading.
\nA sophisticated understanding of the field or discipline\/s.
\nSystematically and critically discriminates between assertion of personal opinion and information substantiated by robust evidence from the research\/course materials and extended reading.
\nand their applications to operations management practices.
\nPercentage for
\nthis criterion =
\n30% Lack of understanding and application of value stream mapping to operations management decision making.
\nresearch\/course materials on systems principles and tools such as system dynamic, system archetypes, casual loop diagrams. Lack of clear understanding and application of value stream mapping to operations management decision making. and apply relevant concepts of systems principles and tools such as system dynamic, system archetypes, causal loop diagrams. Demonstrates understanding and application of value stream mapping.
\nWell demonstrated capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts of systems principles and tools such as system dynamic, system archetypes, causal loop diagrams. Demonstrates good understanding and application of value stream mapping. Mastery of concepts and application to new situations\/further Learning of systems principles and tools such as system dynamic, system archetypes, causal loop diagrams. Demonstrates excellent understanding and
\napplication of value stream mapping
\nEffective Written
\nCommunication
\nPercentage for this criterion =
\n15% Difficult to understand for audience, no logical\/clear structure, poor flow of ideas, argument lacks supporting evidence.
\nAudience cannot follow the line of reasoning. Information, arguments and evidence are presented in a way that is not always clear and logical.
\nLine of reasoning is often difficult to follow. Information, arguments and evidence are well presented, mostly clear flow of ideas and arguments.
\nLine of reasoning is easy to follow. Information, arguments and evidence are very well presented; the presentation is logical, clear and well supported by evidence.
\nDemonstrates cultural sensitivity. Expertly presented; the presentation is logical, persuasive, and well supported by evidence, demonstrating a clear flow of ideas and arguments.
\nEngages and sustains audience\u2019s interest in the topic (sample nursing essay examples by the best nursing assignment writing service), demonstrates high levels of cultural sensitivity Effective use of diverse presentation aids, including graphics and multimedia.
\nAnalysis and application with synthesis of new
\nknowledge
\nLimited synthesis and analysis.
\nLimited
\napplication\/recommenda Demonstrated analysis and synthesis of new knowledge with application.
\nWell-developed analysis and synthesis with application of recommendations Thoroughly developed and creative analysis and synthesis with application of pretested models and \/ or independently Highly sophisticated and creative analysis, synthesis of new with existing knowledge. Strong application by way of
\nPercentage for this criterion =
\n25% tions based upon analysis. Shows the ability to interpret relevant information and literature. linked to analysis\/synthesis. developed models and
\njustified
\nrecommendations linked to analysis\/synthesis. pretested models and \/ or independently developed models. Recommendations
\nare clearly justified based on the analysis\/synthesis. Applying knowledge to new situations\/other cases.
\nCorrect citation of key resources
\nand evidence
\nPercentage for
\nthis criterion =
\n10% Demonstrates inconsistent use of resources to support and develop ideas. Demonstrates use of credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas, but these are not always explicit or well developed. Demonstrates use of high quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas. Demonstrates use of good quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop statements. Shows evidence of wide scope for sourcing evidence. Demonstrates use of highquality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop statements. Shows evidence of wide scope for sourcing evidence.
\nThe following Subject Learning Outcomes are addressed in this assessment
\nSLO a) Critically evaluate the paradigms of Systems Thinking conceptualisation and its application to contemporary business issues
\nSLO b) Create a visual depiction of a multi-dimensional complex situation that represents differing views
\nSLO c) Analyse, select and apply systems modelling tools in integrating, optimising and enhancing business processes within contemporary organisations
\nSLO d) Synthesise technological and non-technological solutions to business problems that promote integration and that optimise whole-ofenterprise operations<\/p>\n
——<\/p>\n
BRIEFING FOR THE THIRD ASSESSMENT MGT603: Systems (Subject Code and Title)
\nBRIEFING FOR THE THIRD ASSESSMENT<\/p>\n
MGT603: Systems Thinking (Subject Code and Title)<\/p>\n
Written Assessment Report<\/p>\n
Individual versus group<\/p>\n
Up to 2000 words in length<\/p>\n
Learning Objectives c) Analyze, choose, and use systems modeling tools to integrate, optimize, and improve business processes in today’s organizations.<\/p>\n
d) Combine technical and non-technological solutions to business difficulties in order to enhance integration and improve overall operations.<\/p>\n
Submission Module 6.1 is due by 11:55 p.m. (AEDT\/AEST) on Sunday (Week 11) For a more intensive class, try:<\/p>\n
Module 6.1 is due by 11:55 p.m. (AEDT\/AEST) on Sunday (Week 5)<\/p>\n
Weighting 40%<\/p>\n
Total Marks 40 Marks<\/p>\n
Assessment Task and Context<\/p>\n
There are two approaches towards improving systems, short-term approaches that normally addresses the symptoms and rarely help understand and address the cause of the<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
ASSESSMENT 3 BRIEFSubject Code and Title MGT603: Systems ASSESSMENT 3 BRIEF Subject Code and Title MGT603: Systems Thinking Assessment Written Report Individual\/Group Individual Length Up\u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[9033,7586,1386,7589,9034,9031,7587,7588,7584,7585,9032],"tags":[8809,7838,8811,8808,8813,8807,8806,8814,8810,8812],"class_list":["post-106945","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-assignment-help-uae","category-best-dissertation-writing-service-in-australia","category-best-research-paper-writing-services-in-usa","category-capstone-project-writing-service","category-cheap-essay-writing-services-china","category-essay-writing-service-usa","category-legitimate-phd-dissertation-writing-services-usa","category-term-paper-writing-service","category-thesis-writing-service-in-canada","category-uae-best-dissertation-writing-help-service","category-write-my-essay-australia","tag-best-master-thesis-writing-service","tag-best-thesis-writing-services","tag-cheap-thesis-writing-services","tag-master-thesis-help","tag-master-thesis-writing-service","tag-thesis-help-online-free","tag-thesis-writing-help-online","tag-thesis-writing-services-cost","tag-thesis-writing-services-near-me","tag-thesis-writing-services-reviews"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/106945","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=106945"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/106945\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=106945"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=106945"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=106945"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}