ASSESSMENT 3 BRIEFSubject Code and Title MGT600 Management,
\nASSESSMENT 3 BRIEF
\nSubject Code and Title MGT600 Management, People and Teams \/ MGMT6009 Managing People and Teams
\nAssessment Team Performance Assessment
\nIndividual\/Group Individual
\nLength Up to 1,500 words
\nLearning Outcomes The Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful completion of the task below include:
\na) Critically assess the key principles and theories underlying management to achieve high-performing organisations at project ( help with nursing paper writing from experts with MSN & DNP degrees)s, teams, and individual levels.
\nb) Critically evaluate and reflect on effective relationships between people and teams in organisations and project ( help with nursing paper writing from experts with MSN & DNP degrees)s.
\nc) Demonstrate effective communication and practical problem solving skills to manage people in a range of complex contexts.
\nd) Critically reflect on the roles and functions that managers perform in the context of the challenges and risks in the changing global environment.
\ne) Develop and justify contemporary management strategies to address a variety of people management issues to ensure best practice and quality outcomes.
\nSubmission 12-Week Duration: Due by 11:55pm AEST\/AEDT Sunday end of Module 6.1 (Week 11)
\n6-Week Duration: Due by 11:55pm AEST\/AEDT Sunday end of Module 6.1 (Week 6)
\nWeighting 30%
\nTotal Marks 100 marks
\nAssessment Task
\nYou are required to critically assess the performance of your team and recommend improvements based on the relevant concepts and frameworks you have learnt in this subject in a 1,500-word team Assessment report.
\nPlease refer to the Instructions for details on how to complete this task.
\nContext
\nManagers are responsible for the delivery of products\/services and results whether that be in an operational or project ( help with nursing paper writing from experts with MSN & DNP degrees) context. This invariably requires not only the creation and development of teams including performance improvement but also the management of a variety of team, organisational, and cultural dynamics. This assessment requires you to conduct a review of team performance and demonstrate and apply your understanding of team processes and dynamics. In doing so, you will review the performance of the group to which you were allocated for the purpose of Assessments 1 and 2. This will help you to demonstrate analytical, evaluative, and problem-solving skills to develop strategies and actions for performance improvement.
\nInstructions
\n1. Review your team\u2019s performance in completing the first two assessments and make recommendations for improvement.
\n\u2022 In reviewing the team performance, considerations must be given to the following:
\no How did your team come together and what phases or stages did it go through? o What roles did team members play? o What challenges were presented? o How did individual, team, and contextual dynamics impact performance?
\no What would you do differently to improve performance?
\no How would you apply your learnings in your current or future workplace?
\n\u2022 Please note that you are not required to review the quality and content of the assessments you produced as a team. Instead, you are required to review the performance of the team in completing the assessment tasks.
\n\u2022 You are required to specifically apply and discuss concepts from Modules 4, 5, and 6 as well as any relevant processes and concepts from earlier modules.
\n\u2022 The Assessment needs to be supported with evidence from academic research as well as examples from your own experiences and or observations. You will also find the module activities useful in prompting your thinking.
\n2. Write a team Assessment report of 1500 words using the following structure:
\n\u2022 Cover sheet: Student details (student name, ID number, subject code & name, assessment number and title)
\n\u2022 Executive summary
\n\u2022 Table of contents
\n\u2022 Introduction: Outline the purpose and structure of your report.
\n\u2022 Background: Briefly describe your team\u2019s purpose and relevant contextual issues.
\n\u2022 Main discussion: Review your team\u2019s performance covering key concepts from all modules. Exploring these within an appropriate theoretical framework would be appropriate here.
\n\u2022 Recommendations \/ action plan: Provide recommended strategies and actions to improve your team\u2019s performance.
\n\u2022 Conclusion
\n\u2022 Reference list
\n\u2022 Appendices
\n3. You are strongly advised to read the rubric, which is an Assessment guide with criteria for grading your assignment\u2014this will give you a clear picture of what a successful report looks like.
\nReferencing
\nIt is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. Please see more information on referencing in the Academic Skills webpage.
\nSubmission Instructions
\nSubmit this task via the Assessment 3 link in the main navigation menu in MGT600 \/ MGMT6009 Management, People, and Teams. The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades.
\nNote: All submissions must be in MS Word (.doc or .docx) format. and contain a signed cover sheet.
\nAcademic Integrity
\nAll students are responsible for ensuring that all work submitted is their own and is appropriately referenced and academically written according to the Academic Writing Guide. Students also need to have read and be aware of Torrens University Australia Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure and subsequent penalties for academic misconduct. These are viewable online. Students also must keep a copy of all submitted material and any assessment drafts.
\nAssessment Rubric
\nAssessment Attributes Fail
\n(Yet to achieve
\nminimum standard) 049% Pass
\n(Functional)
\n50-64% Credit (Proficient) 65-74% Distinction
\n(Advanced)
\n75-84% High Distinction
\n(Exceptional)
\n85-100%
\nKnowledge and
\nunderstanding
\nUnderstands the relevant theoretical
\nmodels and concepts
\nPercentage for this
\ncriterion = 40%
\nLimited understanding of the relevance of models, concepts, and theories.
\nPassable knowledge or understanding of the relevance of models, concepts, and theories.
\nOften confuses assertion of personal opinion with information substantiated by evidence from the research\/course materials.
\nThorough knowledge or understanding of the models, concepts, and theories.
\nSupports personal opinion and information substantiated by evidence from the research\/course materials.
\nDemonstrates capacity to explain and discuss relevant concepts.
\nHighly developed understanding of the models, concepts, and theories.
\nDiscriminates between assertion of personal opinion and information substantiated by robust evidence from the research\/course materials and extended reading.
\nWell-demonstrated capacity to explain and discuss relevant concepts.
\nSophisticated understanding of the models, concepts, and theories.
\nSystematically and critically discriminates between assertion of personal opinion and information substantiated by robust evidence from the research\/course materials and extended reading.
\nExpertly explains and discusses relevant concepts.
\nApplication and discussion
\nCritical assessment of the team performance through the application and discussion of the
\nrelevant concepts
\nLimited application and discussion of the concepts relevant to the assessment of team performance.
\nRudimentary level of application and discussion of the relevant concepts to provide an assessment of the
\nteam performance. Shows ability to interpret information.
\nWell-developed application and discussion of relevant concepts to provide a critical assessment of the team performance with recommendations for improvement.
\nThoroughly developed application of relevant concepts to provide a critical assessment of the team performance.
\nIn-depth discussion on how learnings will be applied to manage team performance
\nHighly sophisticated application of relevant concepts to provide a critical assessment of the team performance.
\nStrong discussion on how learnings will be applied to improve team performance.
\nMGT600-MGMT6009_Assessment_3_Brief_Team Performance Assessment_Module 6.1 Page 4 of 5
\nProvides
\nrecommendations for
\nimprovement
\nPercentage for this criterion = 40%
\nwith justified
\nrecommendations linked to the discussion.
\nProvides clearly justified recommendations based on the discussion.
\nUse of academic and
\ndiscipline conventions
\nCritical discussion report meets the requirements
\noutlined in the
\nassignment brief
\nWell-structured report with clear flow of ideas
\nAppropriate use of credible resources
\nCorrect citation of key resources using APA
\nreferencing
\nPercentage for this
\ncriterion = 20%
\nPoorly written. Does not adhere to the assignment brief.
\nDifficult to understand for audience; no logical\/clear structure; poor flow of ideas; argument lacks supporting evidence. Audience cannot follow the line of reasoning.
\nInconsistent and inadequate use of good quality, credible, and relevant resources to support and develop ideas.
\nNo use of in-text references or no reference list. Many mistakes in using the APA style.
\nWritten according to academic genre.
\nInformation, arguments, and evidence are presented in a way that is not always clear and logical. Line of reasoning is often difficult to follow.
\nConsistent use of credible and relevant research sources to support and develop ideas, but these are not always explicit or well developed.
\nLittle use of in-text referencing, or inadequate references consulted and added to references. Some mistakes in using APA style.
\nWritten according to academic genre.
\nInformation, arguments, and evidence are well presented; mostly clear flow of ideas and arguments. Line of reasoning is easy to follow.
\nGood use of in-text referencing and appropriate number of references used and listed in the reference list.
\nMinor errors in using the APA style.
\nWell-written and adheres to the academic genre.
\nInformation, arguments, and evidence are very well presented; the presentation is logical, clear, and well supported by evidence.
\nVery good use of in-text referencing. All in-text references match with references listed.
\nNo mistakes in using the APA style.
\nExpertly written and adheres to the academic genre.
\nExpertly presented; the presentation is logical, persuasive, and well supported by evidence, demonstrating a clear flow of ideas and arguments.
\nEngages and sustains audience\u2019s interest in the topic (sample nursing essay examples by the best nursing assignment writing service).
\nExcellent and meticulous use of in-text referencing. All in-text references match with references listed in the reference list.
\nNo mistakes in using the APA style.
\nMGT600-MGMT6009_Assessment_3_Brief_Team Performance Assessment_Module 6.1 Page 5 of 5<\/p>\n
—-<\/p>\n
BRIEFING FOR THE THIRD ASSESSMENT MGT600 Management, ASSESSMENT 3 BRIEF (Subject Code and Title)<\/p>\n
MGT600 Management, People, and Teams \/ MGMT6009 Managing People and Teams is a subject code and title for MGT600 Management, People, and Teams.<\/p>\n
Team Performance Assessment Assessment<\/p>\n
Individual versus group<\/p>\n
Length Up to 1,500 words<\/p>\n
Learning Objectives The Matter Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful completion of the task below include:<\/p>\n
a) Critically assess the key principles and theories underlying management to achieve high-performing organisations at project ( help with nursing paper writing from experts with MSN & DNP degrees)s, teams, and individual levels.<\/p>\n
b) Critically evaluate and reflect on effective relationships between people and teams in organisations and project ( help with nursing paper writing from experts with MSN & DNP degrees)s.<\/p>\n
c) Demonstrate effective communication and practical problem solving skills to manage people in a range of complex contexts.<\/p>\n
d) Critically reflect on the roles and functions that managers perform in the context of the challenges and risks in<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
ASSESSMENT 3 BRIEFSubject Code and Title MGT600 Management, ASSESSMENT 3 BRIEF Subject Code and Title MGT600 Management, People and Teams \/ MGMT6009 Managing People and\u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[9033,7586,1386,7589,9034,9031,7587,7588,7584,7585,9032],"tags":[8809,7838,8811,8808,8813,8807,8806,8814,8810,8812],"class_list":["post-106947","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-assignment-help-uae","category-best-dissertation-writing-service-in-australia","category-best-research-paper-writing-services-in-usa","category-capstone-project-writing-service","category-cheap-essay-writing-services-china","category-essay-writing-service-usa","category-legitimate-phd-dissertation-writing-services-usa","category-term-paper-writing-service","category-thesis-writing-service-in-canada","category-uae-best-dissertation-writing-help-service","category-write-my-essay-australia","tag-best-master-thesis-writing-service","tag-best-thesis-writing-services","tag-cheap-thesis-writing-services","tag-master-thesis-help","tag-master-thesis-writing-service","tag-thesis-help-online-free","tag-thesis-writing-help-online","tag-thesis-writing-services-cost","tag-thesis-writing-services-near-me","tag-thesis-writing-services-reviews"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/106947","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=106947"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/106947\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=106947"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=106947"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=106947"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}