ASSESSMENT 2 BRIEF
\nSubject Code and Title PUBH6002: Global and Environmental Health Issues
\nAssessment Assessment 2: Report – Environmental Risk Assessment
\nIndividual\/Group Individual
\nLength 2500 words (+\/- 10%)
\nLearning Outcomes The Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful completion of the task below include:
\na) Examine environmental factors from the local to the global levels that influence health and interpret the relevance to the health of populations.
\nb) Interpret and analyse the impacts of globalisation on the social, economic, and political determinants of global and local health.
\nc) Critically analyse ethical elements relevant to environmental health protections, policies, and industry practices, including identification of vulnerable groups.
\nd) Investigate the relationships between environmental risk factors and social, economic, and political determinants of illness and injury.
\ne) Critically apply frameworks and interventions to mitigate environmental health issues
\nSubmission Due Sunday following the end of Module 9 (Week 9)
\n11:55pm AEST\/AEDT
\nWeighting 45%
\nTotal Marks 100 marks
\nContext
\nOne of the most important strategies to understand the impact of global and local environmental health issues is to conduct a critical analysis of the factors that lead to the problem. The DPSEEA (Driving forces, pressures, state, exposures, effects, actions) framework was developed on behalf of the World Health Organization (WHO), to establish and analyse the cause-to-effect chain of environmental issues. The DPSEEA frameworks enables the analysis of each factor that impact the health of a given population (WHO, 1999).
\nThe DPSEEA was designed to support actions to reduce the burden of disease linked to the environmental health issue and to improve communication between key stakeholders. Completing this assessment, the student will develop knowledge and understanding of the importance of establishing the structural drivers of environmental health issues, and the causal relationship between them. Critical analysis of these factors allows for a clear understanding of the nature of the health crisis, and the potential gaps in policy, procedure and legislation that trigger it.
\nTask:
\nWrite a report using the Driving forces, Pressures, States, Exposures, Effects and Actions (DPSEEA) framework to analyse the impact of an environmental health issue from in a specific region. Describe the links between cause and effect and develop actions to target the chosen issue. Please follow the task instructions below.
\nInstructions:
\nChoose a SPECIFIC geographical region in the world (such as a suburb, city, state, region, country) facing the impact of an environmental health issues CAUSED by one of the following:
\n– Unsafe drinking water\/Water insecurity\/Sanitation
\n– Solid waste and Hazardous\/toxic substances management
\n– Housing and the built environment (including noise and traffic accidents)
\n– Disasters due to natural or man-made hazards
\n– Food security and safety
\n– Vector-borne disease
\n– Climate and geography
\n– Ocean pollution
\nWHO DPSEEA framework link:
\nWorld Health Organization. (2002). Health in sustainable development planning: the role of indicators (No. WHO\/HDE\/HID\/02.11, pp 107-120). World Health Organization.
\nhttps:\/\/www.who.int\/mediacentre\/events\/IndicatorsChapter7.pdf?ua=1
\nWrite a report of the environmental health issue impacting your chosen region addressing the following key points:
\no Describe and link each of the Driving forces, Pressures, State changes, Exposures, Effects and current Actions relevant to the impact of the environmental health issue in the chosen region.
\no Identify and describe any vulnerable populations that are disproportionately affected by the problem.
\no What are the legislative and regulatory measures intended to control this health risk at the national, regional, and local levels? o Identify and describe any social, political, or economic influences that are not captured by the DPSEEA framework.
\no Research and discuss the gaps in management in different sectors (Government and non-government) that triggered the environmental health issue in the chosen region (based on your framework investigation).
\no What is the role of existing health agencies and other agencies, key stakeholders including community groups, critical infrastructure addressing the environmental health issue?
\no Based on your findings, review and analyse the literature related to the environmental health issue and propose 3-4 evidence-based recommendations addressing the gaps in current policy, regulation, and management in your chosen region.
\nReferencing
\nIt is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. Please see more information on referencing here https:\/\/library.torrens.edu.au\/academicskills\/apa\/tool
\nSubmission Instructions
\nSubmit this task via the Assessment 2 link. Please save your Assessment and submit it as the title of your submission using the following naming convention: subj code_Module#_surname_first name initial_assessment title
\nE.g. PUBH6002_M2_Jones_S_case study
\nAcademic Integrity Declaration
\nI declare that except where I have referenced, the work I am submitting for this assessment task is my own work. I have read and am aware of Torrens University Australia Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure viewable online at http:\/\/www.torrens.edu.au\/policies-and-forms
\nI am aware that I need to keep a copy of all submitted material and their drafts, and I will do so accordingly.<\/p>\n
Assessment Rubric ASSESSMENT 2 BRIEF Subject Code and Title PUBH6002: Global and Environmental Health Issues Assessment Assessment 2: Report – Environmental Risk Assessment Individual\/Group Individual Length 2500\u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[9033,7586,1386,7589,9034,9031,7587,7588,7584,7585,9032],"tags":[8809,7838,8811,8808,8813,8807,8806,8814,8810,8812],"class_list":["post-107866","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-assignment-help-uae","category-best-dissertation-writing-service-in-australia","category-best-research-paper-writing-services-in-usa","category-capstone-project-writing-service","category-cheap-essay-writing-services-china","category-essay-writing-service-usa","category-legitimate-phd-dissertation-writing-services-usa","category-term-paper-writing-service","category-thesis-writing-service-in-canada","category-uae-best-dissertation-writing-help-service","category-write-my-essay-australia","tag-best-master-thesis-writing-service","tag-best-thesis-writing-services","tag-cheap-thesis-writing-services","tag-master-thesis-help","tag-master-thesis-writing-service","tag-thesis-help-online-free","tag-thesis-writing-help-online","tag-thesis-writing-services-cost","tag-thesis-writing-services-near-me","tag-thesis-writing-services-reviews"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/107866","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=107866"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/107866\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=107866"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=107866"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=107866"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\nAssessment Attributes 0-49%
\n(Fail)
\nPoor
\n50-64%
\n(Pass)
\nFunctional
\n65-74%
\n(Credit)
\nProficient
\n75-84%
\n(Distinction)
\nAdvanced
\n85-100%
\n(High Distinction)
\nExceptional
\nGrade description
\nEvidence of unsatisfactory achievement of one or more of the learning objectives of the subject, insufficient understanding of the subject content and\/or unsatisfactory level of skill development.
\nEvidence of satisfactory achievement of subject learning objectives, the development of relevant
\nskills to a competent level, and adequate interpretation and critical analysis skills.
\nEvidence of a good level of understanding, knowledge and skill development in relation to the content of the subject or work of a superior quality on the majority of the learning objectives of the subject. Demonstration of a high level of interpretation and critical analysis skills.
\nEvidence of a high level of achievement of the learning objectives of the subject demonstrated in such. areas as interpretation and critical analysis, logical argument, use. of methodology and communication skills.
\nEvidence of an exceptional level of achievement of learning objectives across the entire content of the course demonstrated in such.
\nareas as interpretation and
\ncritical analysis, logical argument,
\ncreativity, originality, use of methodology and communication skills.
\nExhibits knowledge and understanding of evidence-based approaches to environmental risk assessment and
\nmanagement (30%)
\nLimited understanding of required concepts and knowledge\/understanding of the use of the DPSEEA framework, the causal chain of events and understanding health challenges of a specific environmental health issue.
\nKey components of the assignment are not addressed
\nLimited or no summary of concepts of the cause and effect of environmental health .issues Demonstrates a functional Knowledge\/understanding of the use of the DPSEEA framework, the causal chain of events and understanding health challenges of a specific environmental health issue.
\nOften conflates\/confuses assertion of personal opinion with information substantiated by evidence from the research\/subject materials.
\nResemble a recall or summary of key concepts of the cause and effect of environmental health issues. It demonstrates complete knowledge and awareness of the DPSEEA framework, as well as a deep understanding of causal chains of events and the health difficulties associated with a specific environmental health problem.
\nPersonal opinions and facts should be backed up with proof gleaned from research\/subject materials.
\nThe ability to describe and apply key concepts that are associated with environmental health issues is demonstrated.
\nDemonstrates extensive knowledge and a highly developed understanding of the application of the DPSEEA framework, the causal chain of events, and the health concerns associated with a specific environmental health problem.
\nIt distinguishes between assertions of personal opinion and knowledge that has been substantiated by substantial evidence from research\/course materials and extended reading.
\nCapacity to describe and apply essential concepts relating to the causes and effects of environmental health issues has been established.
\nThe candidate demonstrates extraordinary expertise as well as a deep comprehension of the DPSEEA framework, the causal chain of events, and the health concerns associated with a specific environmental health issue.
\nThe ability to distinguish between assertions of personal opinion and facts justified by substantial evidence from research\/course materials and extensive reading is demonstrated through systematic and critical thinking.
\nAbility to describe and apply key concepts related to the source and effect of environmental health issues in a clear and concise manner.
\nCritical reasoning, the presenting of an argument and\/or the defense of a position are all important skills.
\nThe identification and debate of economic, social, and political causes of environmental health challenges, as well as a critical investigation of the DPSEEA framework assessment brief assignment writing help UK<\/a> causal relationships, are all part of this project ( help with nursing paper writing from experts with MSN & DNP degrees).
\nAn examination of the relationship between the aforementioned elements and the ways in which they contribute to the current health problem.
\nCritical examination of the legislative, procedural, and policy shortcomings that have resulted in the current crisis
\n(35% of the total)
\nOne’s specific position (perspective or argument) does not take into consideration the intricacies of the issue(s) or the scope of the task.
\nThere has been little or no analysis and reasoning about the relationship between the issues listed above and how they contribute to the health crisis.
\nThere has been little or no analysis and explanation of the legislative, procedural, and policy inadequacies that have resulted in the current predicament.
\nThe analysis, reasoning, and defense of the DPSEEA framework causal relationships, as well as the identification and discussion of the economic, social, and political drivers of environmental health issues, were all acceptable, albeit with certain arguments that were not quite supported in the end.
\nWhile providing an acceptable explanation and rationale of the relationship between the aforementioned components and how they contribute to health crises, the study also demonstrated several shortcomings in its analysis.
\nAlthough an adequate analysis and rationale of the legislative, procedural, and policy shortcomings that have contributed to the crisis were provided, some connections between the gaps and the issue were not made.
\nA competent understanding of the DPSEEA framework causal relationships, as well as the identification and debate of the economic, social, and political determinants of environmental health challenges.
\nA competent analysis and reasoning of the relationship between the components listed above and how they contribute to the health issue, demonstrating certain shortcomings in the analysis.
\nA competent examination and reasoning of the legislative, procedural, and policy deficiencies that have resulted in the crisis has missed certain connections between the gaps and the topic (sample nursing essay examples by the best nursing assignment writing service) under consideration.
\nAn advanced analysis, reasoning, and defense of the DPSEEA framework causal relationships, as well as the identification and debate of the economic, social, and political drivers of environmental health challenges, will be presented.
\na more in-depth examination and deductive reasoning of the relationship between the aforementioned components and how they contribute to the health problem, which reveals some weaknesses in the analysis
\nAn sophisticated study and reasoning of the legislative, procedural, and policy shortcomings that have resulted in the current state of affairs
\nA detailed examination, justification, and defense of the DPSEEA framework causal relationships, as well as the identification and discussion of the economic, social, and political drivers of environmental health challenges, are all presented.
\nA sophisticated examination and deductive reasoning of the relationship between the elements listed above and how they contribute to the current health crisis.
\nThe legislative, procedural, and policy shortcomings that have led to the current crisis have been thoroughly examined and reasoned about.
\nAnalysis and application, as well as the synthesis of fresh information
\nUnderstanding of present policies, regulations, and management of the issue, as well as the application of evidence to offer recommendations for improvements are required (25 percent )
\nYou conducted a limited synthesis and analysis of the literature relating to the environmental health issue, and you offered three to four evidence-based solutions to close the gaps in present policy, regulation, and management in your selected location.
\nEvidence of new knowledge gained from the literature relevant to the environmental health concern, as well as 3-4 evidence-based recommendations to close gaps in present policy, legislation, and management in your selected location.
\nAnalysis and synthesis of relevant literature relating to environmental health issues, as well as the formulation of three to four evidence-based suggestions to close the gaps in present policy, legislation, and management in your chosen location, are required.
\nThoroughly developed and innovative analysis and synthesis of the literature linked to the environmental health issue, as well as the formulation of three to four evidence-based suggestions to close the gaps in present policy, legislation, and management in the region of your choosing.
\na highly comprehensive and imaginative review and synthesis of the literature relevant to the environmental health issue, and the formulation of three to four evidence-based suggestions to address the gaps in present policy and legislation, as well as management, in your chosen location.
\nThe recommendations are well supported by the findings of the analysis and synthesis.
\nSubstantiation\/research
\nDemonstrates thorough knowledge\/understanding of the use of the DPSEEA framework, the causal chain of events and understanding health challenges of a specific environmental health issue.
\nSupport personal opinion and information substantiated by evidence from the research\/subject materials.
\nDemonstrates a capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts cause and effect of environmental health issues.
\nDemonstrates advanced knowledge and highly developed understanding of the use of the DPSEEA framework, the causal chain of events and understanding health challenges of a specific
\nenvironmental health issue
\nDiscriminates between assertion of personal opinion and information substantiated by robust evidence from the research\/course materials and extended reading.
\nWell demonstrated capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts cause and effect of environmental health issues.
\nDemonstrates exceptional knowledge and a sophisticated understanding of the use of the DPSEEA framework, the causal chain of events and understanding health challenges of a specific environmental health issue.
\nSystematically and critically discriminates between assertion of personal opinion and information substantiated by robust evidence from the research\/course materials and extended reading.
\nExceptional capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts about cause and effect of environmental health issues.
\nCritical reasoning, presentation, and defence of an argument and\/or position:
\nCritical analysis of the
\nDPSEEA framework causal links and the identification and discussion of the economic, social and
\npolitical drivers of environmental health issues.
\nCritical analysis of the relationship between the above factors and how they drive health crisis.
\nCritical analysis of the legislative\/procedural\/poli cy gaps that lead to crisis
\n(35%)
\nSpecific position
\n(Perspective or argument) fails to take into account the complexities of the issue(s) or scope of the assignment.
\nLimited or no analysis and limited reasoning of the relationship between the above factors and how they drive health crisis.
\nLimited or no analysis and reasoning of the legislative, procedural and policy gaps that lead to crisis.
\nAn acceptable analysis, reasoning and defence of the DPSEEA framework causal links and the identification and discussion of the economic, social and political drivers of environmental health issues with some argument not completely justified.
\nAn acceptable analysis and reasoning of the relationship between the above factors and how they drive health crisis showing some limitations in the analysis.
\nAn acceptable analysis and reasoning of the legislative, procedural and policy gaps that lead to crisis missing some links between the gaps and the issue.
\nA proficient analysis, reasoning and defence of the DPSEEA framework causal links and the identification and discussion of the economic, social and political drivers of environmental health issues.
\nA proficient analysis and reasoning of the relationship between the above factors and how they drive health crisis showing some limitations in the analysis
\nA proficient analysis and reasoning of the legislative, procedural and policy gaps that lead to crisis missing some links between the gaps and the issue.
\nAn advanced analysis, reasoning and defence of the DPSEEA framework causal links and the identification and discussion of the economic, social and political drivers of environmental health issues.
\nAn advanced analysis and reasoning of the relationship between the above factors and how they drive health crisis showing some limitations in the analysis
\nAn advanced analysis and reasoning of the legislative, procedural and policy gaps that lead to crisis
\nA sophisticated analysis, reasoning and defence of the DPSEEA framework causal links and the identification and discussion of the economic, social and political drivers of environmental health issues.
\nA sophisticated analysis and reasoning of the relationship between the above factors and how they drive health crisis.
\nAn exceptional analysis and reasoning of the legislative, procedural and policy gaps that lead to crisis.
\nAnalysis and application with synthesis of new
\nknowledge
\nUnderstanding of current policies, regulation, and management of the issue, and use of evidence to make recommendations for improvements (25%)
\nLimited synthesis and analysis of the literature related to the environmental health issue and proposed 3-4 evidence-based recommendations addressing the gaps in
\ncurrent policy, regulation, and management in your chosen region.
\n.
\nDemonstrated analysis and synthesis of new knowledge of the literature related to the environmental health issue and proposed 3-4 evidence-based recommendations addressing the gaps in current policy, regulation, and management in your chosen region.
\nWell-developed analysis and synthesis of the literature related to the environmental health issue and proposed 3-4 evidencebased recommendations addressing the gaps in current policy, regulation, and management in your chosen region.
\nThoroughly developed and creative analysis and synthesis of the literature related to the environmental health issue and proposed 3-4 evidencebased recommendations addressing the gaps in
\ncurrent policy, regulation, and management in your chosen region.
\nHighly sophisticated and creative analysis and synthesis of the literature related to the environmental health issue and proposed 3-4 evidencebased recommendations addressing the gaps in
\ncurrent policy, regulation, and management in your chosen region.
\nRecommendations are
\nclearly justified based on the analysis\/synthesis.
\nSubstantiation\/research
\n(5%)
\nDemonstrates inconsistent use of good quality, credible and relevant research sources to support and develop ideas.
\nThe report does not discriminate personal opinion and information and shows limited or no evidence of independent research.
\nDemonstrates consistent use of credible and relevant research sources to support and develop ideas, but these are not always explicit or well developed.
\nThe report shows some mistakes between assertion of personal opinion and information with some evidence from independent research.
\nDemonstrates consistent use of high quality, credible and relevant research sources to support and develop ideas.
\nThe report discriminates between
\nassertion of personal opinion and information substantiated by evidence from independent research.
\nConsistently demonstrates expert use of good quality, credible and relevant research sources to support and develop appropriate arguments and statements. Shows evidence of reading beyond the key reading.
\nThe report discriminates between
\nassertion of personal opinion and information substantiated by evidence from independent research.
\nDemonstrates expert use of high-quality, credible, and relevant research sources to support and develop arguments and position statements. Shows extensive evidence of reading beyond the key reading.
\nThe report systematically
\nand critically discriminates
\nbetween
\nassertion of personal opinion and information substantiated by robust evidence from independent research.
\nGrammar and referencing (5%) Poorly written, does not adheres to the academic genre e.g., with introduction, conclusion,
\nor summary) and has errors in spelling, grammar, sentence, and paragraph construction.
\nThere are mistakes in using the APA style.
\nIs written according to academic genre (e.g., with introduction, conclusion, or summary) and has accurate spelling, grammar, sentence, and paragraph construction.
\nThere are some mistakes in using the APA style.
\nIs well-written, adheres to
\nthe academic genre (e.g., with introduction, conclusion, or summary) and has accurate spelling, grammar, sentence, and paragraph construction.
\nThere are no mistakes in using the APA style. Is very well-written, adheres to the academic genre and has accurate spelling, grammar, sentence, and paragraph construction.
\nThere are no mistakes in using the APA style.
\nExpertly written, adheres to the academic genre and has accurate spelling, grammar, sentence, and paragraph construction.
\nThere are no mistakes in using the APA Style.
\nThe following Subject Learning Outcomes are addressed in this assessment
\nSLO a) Examine environmental factors from the local to the global levels that influence health and interpret the relevance to the health of populations.
\nSLO b) Interpret and analyse the impacts of globalisation on the social, economic, and political determinants of global and local health.
\nSLO c) Critically analyse ethical elements relevant to environmental health protections, policies, and industry practices, including identification of vulnerable groups.
\nSLO d) Investigate the relationships between environmental risk factors and social, economic, and political determinants of illness and injury.
\nSLO e) Critically apply frameworks and interventions to mitigate environmental health issues
\nof 10<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"