instructions:
\nHealthcare organizations are constantly striving to improve healthcare performance. For many years, this approach was known as the Triple Aim, with efforts focusing on improved population health, improved patient experience, and lower healthcare costs.
\nMore recently, this approach has evolved to a Quadruple Aim by including a focus on improving the work life of healthcare providers. Each of these measures are impacted by decisions made at the organizational level, and organizations have increasingly turned to EBP to inform and justify these decisions.<\/p>\n
To Prepare:
\nRead the articles by Sikka, Morath, & Leape (2015); Crabtree, Brennan, Davis, & Coyle (2016); and Kim et al. (2016) provided in the Resources.
\nReflect on how EBP might impact (or not impact) the Quadruple Aim in healthcare.
\nConsider the impact that EBP may have on factors impacting these quadruple aim elements, such as preventable medical errors or healthcare delivery.<\/p>\n
To Complete:
\nWrite a brief analysis (no longer than 2 pages) of the connection between EBP and the Quadruple Aim.
\nYour analysis should address how EBP might (or might not) help reach the Quadruple Aim, including each of the four measures of:
\nPatient experience
\nPopulation health
\nCosts
\nWork life of healthcare providers
\n—
\nRubric Detail
\nSelect Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.
\nExcellent Good Fair Poor
\nWrite a brief analysis of the
\nconnection between evidence\u0002based practice and the
\nQuadruple Aim. Your analysis
\nshould address how evidence\u0002based practice might (or might
\nnot) help reach the Quadruple
\nAim, including each of the four
\nmeasures of:
\n\u00b7 Patient experience
\n\u00b7 Population health
\n\u00b7 Costs
\n\u00b7 Work life of healthcare
\nproviders
\n77 (77%) – 85 (85%)
\nThe analysis clearly and
\naccurately addresses in detail
\nhow evidence-based practice
\neither supports or does not
\nsupport the Quadruple Aim.
\nThe analysis accurately and
\nthoroughly explains in detail
\nhow the four measures of
\npatient experience, population
\nhealth, costs, and work-life of
\nhealthcare providers either
\nsupports or does not support
\nthe Quadruple Aim.
\nThe analysis provides a
\ncomplete, detailed, and speci!c
\nsynthesis of two outside
\nresources reviewed on the four
\nmeasures supporting or not
\nsupporting the Quadruple Aim.
\nThe response fully integrates at
\nleast two outside resources and
\ntwo or three course-speci!c
\nresources that fully support the
\nanalysis provided with credible
\nand detailed examples.
\n68 (68%) – 76 (76%)
\nThe analysis accurately
\naddresses how evidence-based
\npractice either supports or does
\nnot support the Quadruple Aim.
\nThe analysis accurately explains
\nhow the four measures of
\npatient experience, population
\nhealth, and work life of
\nhealthcare providers either
\nsupports or does not support
\nthe Quadruple Aim.
\nThe analysis provides an
\naccurate synthesis of at least
\none outside resource reviewed
\non the four measures
\nsupporting or not supporting the
\nQuadruple Aim. The response
\nintegrates at least 1 outside
\nresource and two or three
\ncourse-speci!c resources that
\nmay support the analysis
\nprovided and may include some
\ndetailed examples.
\n60 (60%) – 67 (67%)
\nThe analysis inaccurately or
\nvaguely addresses how
\nevidence-based practice either
\nsupports or does not support
\nthe Quadruple Aim.
\nThe analysis inaccurately or
\nvaguely explains how the four
\nmeasures of patient experience,
\npopulation health, and work life
\nof healthcare providers either
\nsupports or does not support
\nthe Quadruple Aim.
\nThe analysis provides an
\ninaccurate or vague analysis of
\nthe four measures supporting or
\nnot supporting the Quadruple
\nAim with a vague or inaccurate
\nanalysis of outside resources.
\nThe response minimally
\nintegrates resources that may
\nsupport the analysis provided
\nand may include vague or
\ninaccurate examples.
\n0 (0%) – 59 (59%)
\nThe analysis inaccurately and
\nvaguely addresses how
\nevidence-based practice either
\nsupports or does not support
\nthe Quadruple Aim or is missing.
\nThe analysis inaccurately and
\nvaguely explains how the four
\nmeasures of patient experience,
\npopulation health, and work life
\nof healthcare providers either
\nsupports or does not support
\nthe Quadruple Aim or is missing.
\nThe analysis provides a vague
\nand inaccurate analysis of the
\nfour measures supporting or not
\nsupporting the Quadruple Aim
\nwith a vague and inaccurate
\nanalysis of outside resources.
\nThe response fails to integrate
\nany resources to support the
\nanalysis provided or is missing.
\nWritten Expression and
\nFormatting\u2014Paragraph
\nDevelopment and
\nOrganization:
\nParagraphs make clear points
\nthat support well-developed
\nideas, !ow logically, and
\ndemonstrate continuity of
\nideas. Sentences are carefully
\nfocused\u2014neither long and
\nrambling nor short and lacking
\nsubstance. A clear and
\ncomprehensive purpose
\nstatement and introduction is
\nprovided which delineates all
\nrequired criteria.<\/p>\n
Correct grammar, mechanics,
\nand proper punctuation.
\n5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
\nUses correct grammar, spelling,
\nand punctuation with no errors.
\n4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
\nContains a few (one or two)
\ngrammar, spelling, and
\npunctuation errors.
\n3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
\nContains several (three or four)
\ngrammar, spelling, and
\npunctuation errors.
\n0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
\nContains many (!ve or more)
\ngrammar, spelling, and
\npunctuation errors that interfere
\nwith the reader\u2019s understanding.
\nWritten Expression and
\nFormatting\u2014The paper follows
\ncorrect APA format for title
\npage, headings, font, spacing,
\nmargins, indentations, page
\nnumbers, running head,
\nparenthetical\/in-text citations,
\nand reference list.
\n5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
\nUses correct APA format with no
\nerrors.
\n4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
\nContains a few (one or two) APA
\nformat errors.<\/p>\n
Name: NURS_6052_Module01_Week01_Assignment_Rubric EXIT
\nGrid View List View
\n—
\nSample Answer:<\/p>\n
Relationship between Evidence-Based Practice and the Quadruple Aim<\/p>\n
Evidence-based practice is a medical approach that entails evidence from research that medical practitioners apply in problem-solving and decision-making concerning a patient’s health care. Evidence-based practice entails gathering, analyzing, and implementing research findings to improve patient\u2019s clinical healthcare (Crabtree, Brennan, Davis & Coyle, 2016). One unique feature of the evidence-based analysis is that health practitioners apply the best evidence in making medical decisions and conclusions. This uniqueness is what differentiates evidence-based practice from any other form of research that develops evidence through scientific inquiry.
\nOn the other hand, Quadruple Aim is a framework that seeks to address four main goals in health practices of improving the: patients\u2019 experience, population health, costs of healthcare, and work-life of healthcare providers (Sikka, Morath & Leape, 2015). Previously, the Quadruple Aim framework existed as a three-aim framework before medical experts developed it into a four-aim framework. The three-aim framework focused on improving the welfare of patients in healthcare facilities. Later, medical practitioners introduced the fourth aim of improving the work-life of healthcare providers.
\nSince both the Evidence-based practice and Quadruple Aim are both health practices, there is a relationship that exists between the two practices. Health practitioners can apply Evidence-based practice to achieve Quadruple Aim’s effectiveness. However, to achieve Quadruple aim’s effectiveness, the nurses need to conceptualize themselves with Evidence-based practice knowledge (Crabtree, Brennan, Davis & Coyle, 2016). Also, nurses need to have a deeper understanding of the Quadruple aims and how they can relate it to Evidence-based practice. The following discussion is how Evidence-based practice can help achieve the four aspects of Quadruple Aim.
\nThe first aspect of the Quadruple Aim addresses the patient\u2019s experience, which entails all the activities a patient engages in within the health center (Sikka, Morath & Leape, 2015). Health practitioners can therefore apply evidence-based practice skills in improving the activities a patient encounters thereby enhancing the patient’s experience in a healthcare facility. Experiences a patient can benefit from evidence-based practices include improved healthcare plans and accessing standard health care facilities. The second aspect of the Quadruple Aim concerns the population health of public members (Sikka, Morath & Leape, 2015). In this case of population health, medical practitioners can apply research findings from evidence-based practice in improving public population health. A good example through which nurses can improve public population health is using information from evidence-based practice to address risk factors that can lead to contagious infections.
\nThe third aspect of Quadruple Aim is to address the high cost of health care services available to patients. The high price of health care services acts as a hindrance to many people accessing these health services (Sikka, Morath & Leape, 2015). Therefore, medical practitioners can apply evidence-based practices in developing new health strategies with lower costs that regular patients can afford. A good example of a strategy that nurses can apply to ensure patients receive medical services at lower costs is taking medical services closer to the patients.
\nThe fourth aspect of Quadruple Aim is improving the lives of health care workers in health centers. Most of the health care workers providing services to patients in health facilities undergo several challenges (Kim, Stichler, Ecoff, Brown, Gallo & Davidson, 2016). These challenges health care workers face tending to make the life of health workers somehow challenging in return interfering with health workers’ effectiveness. Study findings from evidence-based practice can help provide alternatives to improve the efficiency of the health workers and overcome the challenges they face.
\nEvidence based-practice may have a positive impact on the factors that influence the Quadruple Aim\u2019s elements. Some of these factors include preventable medical errors and the healthcare delivery system (Kim, Stichler, Ecoff, Brown, Gallo & Davidson, 2016). Addressing the issue of preventable medical error can help improve patient\u2019s experience and also improve public population health. Nurses can address this issue of preventable medical errors by using information from Evidence-based practice on how to minimize medical errors. Concerning the healthcare delivery system, nurses can apply findings from Evidence-based practice on how to deliver effective medical services.<\/p>\n
References
\nCrabtree, E., Brennan, E., Davis, A., & Coyle, A. (2016). Improving Patient Care Through Nursing Engagement in Evidence\u2010Based Practice. Worldviews on Evidence\u2010Based Nursing, 13(2), 172-175.
\nKim, S. C., Stichler, J. F., Ecoff, L., Brown, C. E., Gallo, A. M., & Davidson, J. E. (2016). Predictors of evidence\u2010based practice implementation, job satisfaction, and group cohesion among regional fellowship program participants. Worldviews on Evidence\u2010Based Nursing, 13(5), 340-348.
\nSikka, R., Morath, J. M., & Leape, L. (2015). The quadruple aim: care, health, cost, and meaning in work.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
instructions: Healthcare organizations are constantly striving to improve healthcare performance. For many years, this approach was known as the Triple Aim, with efforts focusing on\u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8816],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-115537","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-thesis-writing-help-online"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/115537","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=115537"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/115537\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=115537"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=115537"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=115537"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}