{"id":115600,"date":"2022-12-07T21:18:56","date_gmt":"2022-12-07T21:18:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/nursingstudybay.com\/?p=115600"},"modified":"2022-12-07T21:18:59","modified_gmt":"2022-12-07T21:18:59","slug":"mba503-operations-management-and-decision-making-models","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/mba503-operations-management-and-decision-making-models\/","title":{"rendered":"MBA503 Operations Management and Decision-Making Models"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Assessment 1 Information<br \/>\nSubject Code: MBA503<br \/>\nSubject Name: Operations Management and Decision-Making Models<br \/>\nAssessment Title: Operational Strategy<br \/>\nAssessment Type: Length: Individual report<br \/>\n1500 words (+\/- 10% allowable range)<br \/>\nWeighting: 30%<br \/>\nTotal Marks:<br \/>\nSubmission: 100<br \/>\nOnline<br \/>\nDue Date: Week 5<br \/>\nYour task<br \/>\nUsing the most recent year\u2019s (2022) award winners and then choosing between either Senex Energy, Downer Group or Sanford Ltd of the Australasian Reporting Awards \u2013 Sustainability section, you are required to prepare a 1500-word report explaining how your chosen company\u2019s operational strategies, supply and logistics systems and strategic decisions have supported the company to achieve its desired business outcomes.<br \/>\nAssessment Description.<br \/>\nIn this individual assessment, students will be given an opportunity to explain operational strategies and demonstrate the skills needed to build effective supply and logistics systems that support desired business outcomes by applying strategies integrating ethical, social and global considerations, which will benefit organisational performance.<br \/>\nAssessment Instructions<br \/>\nThe Australasian Reporting Awards celebrate and acknowledge excellence in preparing annual reports. The awards are held annually, with companies from Australia, New Zealand and the Asia Pacific area being eligible to apply. The company chosen by students must be either Senex Energy, Downer Group or Sanford Ltd. The link to the relevant section of the awards is http:\/\/www.arawards.com.au\/SustainabilityAward.<br \/>\nWhen you selected the company you will discuss, firstly perform significant research into their activities in terms of supply chains, operations and logistic systems. You may have selected a company with multiple divisions that perform a variety of activities and which have different supply chains and operations. In that case you may select a division When you&#8217;ve decided on the company to discuss, conduct extensive research into their supply chains, operations, and logistics systems. You may have chosen a company with several divisions that perform different activities and have different supply chains and operations. In that case, you can choose a division and conduct additional research on their supply chain, operations, and logistical systems. In the introduction, you will elaborate on the scope of your paper and provide an overview of the specifics. and further research their supply chain, operations and logistical systems. In the introduction you will further explain the chosen scope of your paper and provide an overview about the specific division or supply chain. Then you will need to perform significant research into the characteristics of your chosen supply chain or division: you may find information in Industry papers, company websites, business magazines etc.. Furthermore, reflecting on the assessment requirements you need to describe the supply chain, then the economic, environmental and social impacts and lastly the operational and management approaches. Considering these three topic (sample nursing essay examples by the best nursing assignment writing service)s for your report you are required to demonstrate you competency in describing and applying the concepts as well as critically evaluating their effectiveness.<br \/>\nThe assessment needs to include the following headings:<br \/>\n1. INTRODUCTION &#8211; (150 words) \u2013 Provide an overview of the company.<br \/>\n2. REPORT \u2013 Address the following questions under each of the headings:<br \/>\n? Supply Chain \u2013 How has the company built an effective supply chain and\/or logistics system which supports the company\u2019s operational and sustainability processes. (300 words)<br \/>\n? Economic, environmental and social impacts \u2013 What are the critical factors (ethical, social or global) impacting the company in relation to sustainability and organisational performance. (450 words)<br \/>\n? Operational\/ management approaches \u2013 What are the key operational\/management matters the company has needed to address in the year covered by the report. (450 words)<br \/>\n3. CONCLUSION (150 words).<br \/>\n4. REFERENCE LIST (following Kaplan Harvard Referencing Style) \u2022 The primary source of information with this assessment is the chosen company\u2019s annual report. This information needs to be augmented by a minimum of 10 academic references.<br \/>\n\u2022 Please refer to the assessment marking guide to Help you in completing all the assessment criteria.<\/p>\n<p>Penalties will be imposed on late assignment submissions in accordance with Kaplan Business School \u201clate assignment submission penalties\u201d policy.<br \/>\nNumber of days Penalty<br \/>\n1* &#8211; 9 days 5% per day for each calendar day late deducted from the total marks available<br \/>\n10 &#8211; 14 days 50% deducted from the total marks available.<br \/>\nAfter 14 days Assignments that are submitted more than 14 calendar days after the due date will not be accepted, and the student will receive a mark of zero for the assignment(s).<br \/>\nNote Notwithstanding the above penalty rules, assignments will also be given a mark of zero if they are submitted after assignments have been returned to students<br \/>\n*Assignments submitted at any stage within the first 24 hours after the deadline will be considered to be one day late and therefore subject to the associated penalty<br \/>\nFor more information, please read the full policy via https:\/\/www.kbs.edu.au\/about-us\/school-policies<br \/>\nImportant Study Information<br \/>\nAcademic Integrity Policy<br \/>\nKBS values academic integrity. All students must understand the meaning and consequences of cheating, plagiarism and other academic offences under the Academic Integrity and Conduct Policy.<br \/>\nWhat is academic integrity and misconduct?<br \/>\nWhat are the penalties for academic misconduct?<br \/>\nWhat are the late penalties?<br \/>\nHow can I appeal my grade?<br \/>\nClick here for answers to these questions: https:\/\/www.kbs.edu.au\/about-us\/school-policies<br \/>\nWord Limits for Written Assessments<br \/>\nSubmissions that exceed the word limit by more than 10% will cease to be marked from the point at which that limit is exceeded.<br \/>\nStudy Helpance<br \/>\nStudents may seek study Helpance from their local Academic Learning Advisor or refer to the resources on the MyKBS Academic Success Centre page. Click here for this information.<br \/>\nMBA503 Assessment 1 Marking Rubric &#8211; Operational Strategy Report 30%<br \/>\nMarking<br \/>\nCriteria (__\/100) F (Fail)<br \/>\n0 \u2013 49% P (Pass) 50 \u2013 64% C (Credit) 65 \u2013 74% D (Distinction) 75 \u2013 84% HD (High Distinction) 85 -100%<br \/>\nIntroduction and conclusion<br \/>\n__\/10 marks Either the introduction and\/or the conclusion is missing. If present poorly written, with grammatical and spelling errors detracting from what is written. Your introduction and conclusion are present but not well written, vague and unstructured. Some effort at indicating what will be<br \/>\ncovered in the paper included but not clear. The conclusion, also<br \/>\npresent but vague and reiterates<br \/>\npoints made in the paper, without highlighting key points Your intro is effectively written. It provides an overview of the<br \/>\ndirection of the paper but is not<br \/>\ncompelling. The reader has an idea of what to expect. The<br \/>\nconclusion recaps the main points, summarising the central and significant points. Your intro is engagingly written. It<br \/>\nprovides an overview of the direction<br \/>\nof the paper and gives the reader an idea of what to expect without<br \/>\nengaging. The conclusion recaps the<br \/>\nmain points, summarising the central and significant points. Both could have more impact on the reader Your intro is compellingly and<br \/>\nengagingly written. Provides a<br \/>\nprecise and succinct, overview of the direction of the paper \u2013<br \/>\nengaging the reader. The<br \/>\nconclusion recaps the critical points, summarising the central and significant points.<br \/>\nSupply Chain<br \/>\n__\/20 marks Your analysis of the supply chain is poorly written. Errors in the writing make the report<br \/>\nhard to understand. Few, if any, connections made<br \/>\nbetween the supply chain and operations of the organisation. Your analysis of the supply chain is developing, but grammatical and spelling errors detract from the document. Vague connections<br \/>\nsupply chain \/logistics and impact on the operational practice of the company. A basic understanding<br \/>\nof the concepts communicated but<br \/>\nnot developed Your analysis of the supply chain is adequate. Connections<br \/>\napparent between supply chain<br \/>\n\/logistics and impact on the operational and sustainability practice of the company.<br \/>\nComments and observations are indicating an understanding of the concepts. Your analysis of the supply chain is sufficient and detailed connections made between supply chain<br \/>\n\/logistics and impact on the<br \/>\noperational and sustainability<br \/>\npractice of the company. Some<br \/>\ninsightful comments made indicating a notable understanding of the concepts. Your analysis of the supply chain is convincing, credible and compelling connections made between supply<br \/>\nchain \/logistics and impact on the operational and sustainability<br \/>\npractice of the company\u2014insightful, discerning and perceptive comments, indicating<br \/>\ncomprehensive understanding.<br \/>\nEconomic environmental and social impacts<br \/>\n__\/25 marks Key areas inadequately covered. Understanding of the critical factors not clear.<br \/>\nUnderdeveloped or nonexistent development of the linkages. Some of the key areas covered \u2013 others missed. Some explanation of critical factors but could be<br \/>\nmore convincingly developed.<br \/>\nGrammar and\/or spelling errors are detracting from the development of the ideas. Some discussion re the economic, environmental and social impacts.<br \/>\nLinkages with operational and sustainability evident, but explicitly explained\u2014good understanding of the critical factors evident \u2013 but<br \/>\nunder-developed. Position evident but not strongly presented. Your discussion provides a clear<br \/>\nposition regarding the economic,<br \/>\nenvironmental, and social impacts of the company. Critical factors well explained some insightful<br \/>\ncommentary included. Advanced<br \/>\nconceptual understanding evident. Some commentary could be better developed. Your discussion around impacts is detailed, considered, and well-<br \/>\ndeveloped position re the impacts of<br \/>\neconomic, environmental and social impacts on the company \u2013<br \/>\nperformance and sustainability. Astute commentary included re critical factors. Advanced<br \/>\nconceptual understanding evident.<br \/>\nOperational\/ management approaches<br \/>\n__\/25 marks Limited explanation of the key operational \/ management<br \/>\nissues. Lists issues but little or no development. Your explanation is basic, but not developed of key concepts.<br \/>\nLimited development of linkages between company context and operational \/ management<br \/>\nconcepts. Issues with written English impacting the flow of the report Your explanation covers key concepts. Understanding the impacts on operational \/<br \/>\nmanagement matters explained<br \/>\nclearly. Concepts could be better developed. Your explanation is in-depth coverage of the key operational \/ management matters of the<br \/>\ncompany. Explanation of the impact demonstrated a full and detailed understanding of central issues. Your explanation is comprehensive and in-depth, covering the key<br \/>\noperational \/ management matters<br \/>\nof the company. Explanation of the impact demonstrated a full and detailed understanding of central issues.<br \/>\nUse of<br \/>\nsources\/supportive evidence __\/10 marks Your research lacks focus and\/or you have chosen<br \/>\nunsuitable or bogus sources, which do not link to the required assessment task. You have demonstrated a basic level of research, supported by a reasonable selection of primary and\/or secondary sources. You have demonstrated substantial research, supported by a reasonable selection of primary and secondary sources. You have demonstrated substantial research supported by an<br \/>\nappropriate selection and range of primary and secondary sources. You have demonstrated extensive research supported by an<br \/>\nappropriate selection and range of primary and secondary sources.<br \/>\nIn-text citations and referencing<br \/>\n__\/10 marks Neither in-text referencing nor reference list adheres to<br \/>\nKaplan Harvard Referencing Style. In-text referencing or the resultant reference list adheres to Kaplan<br \/>\nHarvard Referencing Style, with some errors. Both in-text referencing and the<br \/>\nresultant reference list adhere to<br \/>\nKaplan Harvard Referencing Style, with some errors. Both in-text referencing and the<br \/>\nresultant reference list adhere to<br \/>\nKaplan Harvard Referencing Style, with only occasional minor errors. Both in-text referencing and the resultant reference list adhere strictly to Kaplan Harvard<br \/>\nReferencing Style, with no errors.<br \/>\nFeedback and grades will be released via MyKBS<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Assessment 1 Information Subject Code: MBA503 Subject Name: Operations Management and Decision-Making Models Assessment Title: Operational Strategy Assessment Type: Length: Individual report 1500 words (+\/-\u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5196,7414],"tags":[9451],"class_list":["post-115600","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-management-homework-help","category-management-essay-writers","tag-operations-management-and-decision-making-models"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/115600","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=115600"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/115600\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=115600"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=115600"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=115600"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}