Touchstones are project ( help with nursing paper writing from experts with MSN & DNP degrees)s that illustrate your comprehension of the course material, help you refine skills, and demonstrate application of
\nknowledge. You can work on a Touchstone anytime, but you can’t submit it until you have completed the unit\u2019s Milestones. Once you’ve
\nsubmitted a Touchstone, it will be graded and counted toward your final course score.
\nTouchstone 3: Evaluating the Impact of Religion on Individuals, Society, and the
\nWorld
\nASSIGNMENT: In each of the three units in this course, you have learned about the role of religions in our world. You have already
\nreflected on some of the major approaches to studying religions, and compared and contrasted two religions. In Unit 3, you have
\ninvestigated the impact of religion on individuals and society, including learning about religion\u2019s role in shaping morality and ethics, as
\nwell as ritual and material culture. Finally, you also thought about religion\u2019s influence on government and global affairs.
\nFor your final Touchstone, you will evaluate the impact of religion on individuals, society, and the world.
\nIn a 400-600 word short essay, you will evaluate some of the ways in which religions both unite and divide, using specific examples from
\nthe lessons in Units 1, 2, and 3 to support your conclusions, by responding to this question: How do religions both unite and divide
\nhumanity?
\nA. Assignment Guidelines
\nNot Submitted
\nSubmitted Scored
\nYou can work on a Touchstone whenever you want, but
\nyou must complete the previous assessments in the Unit
\nbefore you can submit it.
\nSUBMIT TOUCHSTONE
\n\uf05a It takes 5-7 business days for a Touchstone to be graded once it’s been submitted.
\nUNIT 3 \u2014 TOUCHSTONE 3: Evaluating the Impact of
\nReligion on Individuals, Society, and the World
\nSCORE
\n-\/25
\nDIRECTIONS: Write a short essay of 400-600 words that responds to this question: How do religions both unite and divide humanity?
\nAs you develop your response, you should choose two of the following areas of religious influence from Unit 3 to analyze:
\nReligion & the Individual
\nReligions & Society
\nMorality & Ethics
\nRitual & Material Culture
\nReligion in Government
\nReligion in Global Affairs
\nYour short essay should include four parts:
\nBriefly introduce your topic (sample nursing essay examples by the best nursing assignment writing service) and develop a clear and succinct response to the question: How do religions both unite and divide humanity?
\nSupport your response by analyzing the first area of religious influence that you have selected from Unit 3. Use at least two specific
\nexamples from the lessons in any unit in your analysis.
\nSupport your response by analyzing the second area of religious influence that you have selected from Unit 3. Use at least two specific
\nexamples from the lessons in any unit in your analysis.
\nBriefly summarize and conclude your short essay.
\nYou will use information from the Sophia tutorials to support your response. When citing material from a tutorial, please include the name of
\nthe tutorial and use the following format (using Sophia’s Primal Religions tutorial as an example):
\nIn-text citation: (Primal Religions, n.d.)
\nReference: (n.d.). Primal Religions [MOOC]. In Approaches to Studying Religions. Sophia Learning.
\nhttps:\/\/app.sophia.org\/spcc\/approaches-to-studying-religions–2\/unit1\/study-guide\/7845\/primal-religions-2
\nRefer to the completion checklist below throughout the writing process. Do not submit your Touchstone until it meets these guidelines.
\n\u2752 Have you chosen two areas of religious influence from Unit 3 to analyze?
\n\u2752 Drawing on these areas of influence, have you written a clear and succinct response to the question: How do religions both unite and
\ndivide humanity?
\n\u2752 Have you supported your response by using at least two specific examples from the lessons in any unit, related to the first area of
\nreligious influence that you selected?
\n\u2752 Have you supported your response by using at least two specific examples from the lessons in any unit, related to the second area of
\nreligious influence that you selected?
\n\u2752 Have you ensured that your evidence supports your initial response? If not, now is a good time to go back and revise your response.
\n\u2752 Is your short essay between 400-600 words, double-spaced, and formatted in 12-point font?
\n\u2752 Have you cited examples with in-text citations?
\n\u2752 Have you proofread your short essay for mistakes in spelling, grammar, punctuation, and capitalization?
\nB. Rubric
\nAdvanced (100%) Proficient (80%) Needs Improvement
\n(60%)
\nNon-Performance
\n(0%)
\nQuestion Response (5
\npoints)
\nEssay provides a clear and
\nthoughtful response to the
\nprompt.
\nEssay develops a clear and
\nsuccinct response to the
\nquestion prompt, and considers
\nhow religions both unite and
\ndivide.
\nEssay develops a response to
\nthe question prompt, but may
\nonly consider how religion unites
\nor only how it it divides.
\nEssay develops a response to the
\nquestion prompt, but the response
\nmay lack clarity and demonstrate a
\nlimited understanding of the
\ncontent.
\nEssay does not respond to the
\nquestion prompt, or response
\nis highly irrelevant.
\nAssessment of Religious
\nInfluence (1) (5 points)
\nEssay evaluates a first area of
\nreligious influence in support
\nof the response.
\nEssay evaluates the area of
\nreligious influence and its effect
\non uniting or dividing humanity.
\nThe analysis fully supports the
\nresponse.
\nEssay evaluates the area of
\nreligious influence and its effect
\non uniting or dividing humanity.
\nThe analysis may only weakly
\nsupport the response.
\nEssay minimally or inaccurately
\nevaluates the area of religious
\ninfluence and its effect on uniting
\nor dividing humanity, and\/or no
\nconnection to the response is
\nmade.
\nEssay does not identify or
\nevaluate an area of religious
\ninfluence and its effect on
\nuniting or dividing humanity.
\nAssessment of Religious
\nInfluence (2) (5 points)
\nEssay evaluates a second
\narea of religious influence in
\nsupport of the response.
\nEssay evaluates the area of
\nreligious influence and its effect
\non uniting or dividing humanity.
\nThe analysis fully supports the
\nresponse.
\nEssay evaluates the area of
\nreligious influence and its effect
\non uniting or dividing humanity.
\nThe analysis may only weakly
\nsupport the response.
\nEssay minimally or inaccurately
\nevaluates the area of religious
\ninfluence and its effect on uniting
\nor dividing humanity, and\/or no
\nconnection to the response is
\nmade.
\nEssay does not identify or
\nevaluate an area of religious
\ninfluence and its effect on
\nuniting or dividing humanity.
\nAdvanced (100%) Proficient (80%) Needs Improvement
\n(60%)
\nNon-Performance
\n(0%)
\nUse of Evidence (5 points)
\nEssay uses specific examples
\nthat support the response.
\nAt least 4 specific examples
\nfrom the lessons in Unit 3 are
\nused to support the response.
\nExamples are cited
\nappropriately.
\n2-3 specific examples from the
\nlessons in Unit 3 are used to
\nsupport the response. Examples
\nare cited appropriately.
\nAt least 1 specific example from
\nthe lessons in Unit 3 is used to
\nsupport the response.
\nNo specific examples from the
\nlessons in Unit 3 are used to
\nsupport the response.
\nConventions (4 points)
\nEssay follows conventions for
\nstandard written English.
\nThere are one or no errors in
\ngrammar, punctuation, spelling,
\nand capitalization.
\nThere are minor errors in
\ngrammar, punctuation, spelling,
\nand capitalization that do not
\nimpede readability.
\nThere are frequent errors in
\ngrammar, punctuation, spelling,
\nand capitalization that impede
\nreadability.
\nThere are consistent errors in
\ngrammar, punctuation,
\nspelling, and capitalization that
\nsignificantly impede
\nreadability.
\nMeets Requirements (1
\npoint)
\nSubmission meets formatting
\nrequirements, including 12-
\npoint font, double-spacing,
\nand word count.
\nAll requirements for formatting
\nand length are met.
\nRequirements for formatting and
\nlength are mostly met.
\nRequirements for formatting and
\nlength are somewhat met.
\nRequirements for formatting
\nand length are not met at all.
\nC. Requirements
\nThe following requirements must be met for your submission to be graded:
\nComposition must be between 400-600 words.
\nDouble-space the composition and use one-inch margins.
\nUse a readable 12-point font.
\nAll writing must be appropriate for an academic context.
\nComposition must be original and written for this assignment.
\nPlagiarism of any kind is strictly prohibited.
\nSubmission must include your name, the name of the course, the date, and the title of your composition.
\nInclude all of the assignment components in a single file.
\nAcceptable file formats include .doc and .docx.
\nIn-text citations should use this style: (National Religions, n.d.)
\nReferences should use this style: (n.d.). National Religions [MOOC]. In Approaches to Studying Religions. Sophia Learning.
\nhttps:\/\/app.sophia.org\/spcc\/approaches-to-studying-religions–2\/unit3\/study-guide\/8190\/national-religions-2
\nAbout Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms of Use
\n\u00a9 2022 SOPHIA Learning, LLC. SOPHIA is a registered trademark of SOPHIA Learning, LLC.
\nTouchstones are project ( help with nursing paper writing from experts with MSN & DNP degrees)s that illustrate your comprehension of the course material, help you refine skills, and demonstrate application of
\nknowledge. You can work on a Touchstone anytime, but you can’t submit it until you have completed the unit\u2019s Milestones. Once you’ve
\nsubmitted a Touchstone, it will be graded and counted toward your final course score.
\nTouchstone 1: Reflecting on Major Approaches to Studying Religions
\nASSIGNMENT: In this unit, you learned some of the reasons for studying religion. You also learned that religion is universally
\nrecognizable, yet difficult to define. A narrow definition of religion that ties it to a belief in and worship of a higher, supernatural power, can
\nexclude religions like Buddhism. On the other hand, definitions of religion that eliminate mention of the otherworldly or divine by equating
\nit simply with \u201cfaith\u201d or \u201cbelief\u201d yield an understanding that is overly-broad.
\nDue to the challenges of studying religion, various methodologies have arisen including: phenomenology, theology, historical
\napproaches, comparison, philosophy, and sociology. This Touchstone gives you an opportunity to reflect on these major approaches to
\nstudying religion.
\nIn a 400-600 word short essay, you will explain the difficulties involved in defining religion. Then you will select one method for studying
\nreligion that you believe to be most thought-provoking, and explain its strengths and weaknesses.
\nA. Assignment Guidelines
\nNot Submitted
\nSubmitted Scored
\nWhen you\u2019re ready to upload your document, click here. SUBMIT TOUCHSTONE
\n\uf05a It takes 5-7 business days for a Touchstone to be graded once it’s been submitted.
\nUNIT 1 \u2014 TOUCHSTONE 1: Reflecting on Major Approaches
\nto Studying Religions
\nSCORE
\n-\/25
\nDIRECTIONS: Explain, in your own words, two reasons why religion is difficult to define. Review the lessons in Unit 1 as you consider your
\nresponse. Then, select one method for studying religion that you believe to be most thought-provoking and explain what you believe to be its
\nstrengths and weaknesses.
\nYour short essay should include four parts:
\nExplain, in your own words, two reasons why religion is difficult to define.
\nSelect one method for studying religion that you believe to be most thought-provoking and summarize the approach in your own words.
\nExplain a strength of this approach to studying religion.
\nExplain a weakness of this approach to studying religion.
\nThe methods for studying religion discussed in Unit 1 include:
\nPhenomenology
\nTheology
\nHistorical Approaches
\nComparative Religion
\nPhilosophy of Religion
\nSociology of Religion
\nAs you develop your reflection, be sure to engage with the course material from Unit 1. You will use information from the Sophia tutorials to
\nsupport your response. When citing material from a tutorial, please include the name of the lesson and use the following format:
\nIn-text citation: (Primal Religions, n.d.)
\nReference: (n.d.). Primal Religions [MOOC]. In Approaches to Studying Religions. Sophia Learning.
\nhttps:\/\/app.sophia.org\/spcc\/approaches-to-studying-religions–2\/unit1\/study-guide\/7845\/primal-religions-2
\nRefer to the completion checklist below throughout the writing process. Do not submit your Touchstone until it meets these guidelines.
\n\u2752 Have you explained two reasons why religion is difficult to define, in your own words?
\n\u2752 Have you selected a method for studying religion from Unit 1 and summarized the approach?
\n\u2752 Have you explained a strength and a weakness of this approach to studying religion?
\n\u2752 Does your short essay demonstrate engagement with the course material from Unit 1?
\n\u2752 Is your short essay between 400-600 words, double-spaced, and formatted in 12-point font?
\n\u2752 Have you cited examples with in-text citations?
\n\u2752 Have you proofread your short essay for mistakes in spelling, grammar, punctuation, and capitalization?
\nB. Rubric
\nAdvanced (100%) Proficient (80%) Needs Improvement
\n(60%)
\nNon-Performance
\n(0%)
\nReflects on the Definition
\nof Religion
\nEssay reflects on the difficulty
\nof defining religion.
\nEssay offers a clear discussion
\nof two reasons why religion is
\ndifficult to define.
\nEssay offers a clear discussion
\nof at least one reason why
\nreligion is difficult to define.
\nEssay offers a discussion of at
\nleast one reason why religion is
\ndifficult to define, but discussion
\nmay be unclear or vague.
\nEssay does not attempt to reflect
\non the difficulty of defining
\nreligion.
\nSummarizes a Method for
\nStudying Religion
\nEssay selects and
\nsummarizes a method for
\nstudying religion.
\nEssay selects a method for
\nstudying religion and clearly
\nand accurately summarizes it.
\nEngagement with course
\nmaterial is evident.
\nEssay selects a method for
\nstudying religion and
\nsummarizes it. Engagement with
\ncourse material is less evident.
\nEssay selects a method for
\nstudying religion and attempts to
\nsummarize it, but summary may
\nbe inaccurate or unclear.
\nEssay does not select or
\nsummarize a method for studying
\nreligion.
\nReflects on a Strength of
\nthe Method
\nEssay reflects on a strength
\nof the selected method for
\nstudying religion.
\nEssay demonstrates insightful
\nreflection on a strength of the
\nmethod. Engagement with
\ncourse material is evident.
\nEssay demonstrates a more
\nsuperficial reflection on a
\nstrength of the method.
\nEngagement with course
\nmaterial is less evident.
\nEssay demonstrates a more
\nsuperficial reflection on a
\nstrength of the method. No
\nengagement with course
\nmaterial is evident.
\nEssay does not attempt to reflect
\non the strengths of any method
\nfor studying religion.
\nReflects on a Weakness of
\nthe Method
\nEssay reflects on a weakness
\nof the selected method for
\nstudying religion.
\nEssay demonstrates insightful
\nreflection on a weakness of the
\nmethod. Engagement with
\ncourse material is evident.
\nEssay demonstrates a more
\nsuperficial reflection on a
\nweakness of the method.
\nEngagement with course
\nmaterial is less evident.
\nEssay demonstrates a more
\nsuperficial reflection on a
\nweakness of the method.
\nEngagement with course
\nmaterial is less evident.
\nEssay does not attempt to reflect
\non the weaknesses of any
\nmethod for studying religion.
\nAdvanced (100%) Proficient (80%) Needs Improvement
\n(60%)
\nNon-Performance
\n(0%)
\nConventions
\nSubmission follows
\nconventions for standard
\nwritten English.
\nThere are one or no errors in
\ngrammar, punctuation, spelling,
\nand capitalization. Examples
\nare cited appropriately.
\nThere are minor errors in
\ngrammar, punctuation, spelling,
\nand capitalization that do not
\nimpede readability. Examples
\nare cited appropriately.
\nThere are frequent errors in
\ngrammar, punctuation, spelling,
\nand capitalization that impede
\nreadability. Examples may not be
\ncited appropriately.
\nThere are consistent errors in
\ngrammar, punctuation, spelling,
\nand capitalization that
\nsignificantly impede readability.
\nExamples are not cited
\nappropriately.
\nMeets requirements
\nSubmission meets formatting
\nrequirements, including 12-
\npoint font, double-spacing,
\nand word count.
\nAll requirements for formatting
\nand length are met.
\nRequirements for formatting and
\nlength are mostly met.
\nRequirements for formatting and
\nlength are somewhat met.
\nRequirements for formatting and
\nlength are not met at all.
\nC. Requirements
\nThe following requirements must be met for your submission to be graded:
\nComposition must be between 400-600 words.
\nDouble-space the composition and use one-inch margins.
\nUse a readable 12-point font.
\nAll writing must be appropriate for an academic context.
\nComposition must be original and written for this assignment.
\nPlagiarism of any kind is strictly prohibited.
\nSubmission must include your name, the name of the course, the date, and the title of your composition.
\nInclude all of the assignment components in a single file.
\nAcceptable file formats include .doc and .docx.
\nIn-text citations should use this style: (Primal Religions, n.d.)
\nReferences should use this style: (n.d.). Primal Religions [MOOC]. In Approaches to Studying Religions. Sophia Learning.
\nhttps:\/\/app.sophia.org\/spcc\/approaches-to-studying-religions–2\/unit1\/study-guide\/7845\/primal-religions-2
\nAbout Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms of Use
\n\u00a9 2022 SOPHIA Learning, LLC. SOPHIA is a registered trademark of SOPHIA Learning, LLC.
\nTouchstones are project ( help with nursing paper writing from experts with MSN & DNP degrees)s that illustrate your comprehension of the course material, help you refine skills, and demonstrate application of
\nknowledge. You can work on a Touchstone anytime, but you can’t submit it until you have completed the unit\u2019s Milestones. Once you’ve
\nsubmitted a Touchstone, it will be graded and counted toward your final course score.
\nTouchstone 2: Comparing and Contrasting the Common Elements of Religions
\nASSIGNMENT: For this Touchstone, you will demonstrate your knowledge and understanding of religions so far by comparing and
\ncontrasting two of the world\u2019s religions.
\nIn a 400-600 word short essay, you will compare and contrast one \u201ceastern\u201d religion and one \u201cwestern\u201d religion discussed so far in this
\ncourse. Using specific examples from the lessons in Unit 1 and Unit 2 to support your conclusions, you will analyze some of the ways in
\nwhich these religions are both similar and different.
\nA. Assignment Guidelines
\nDIRECTIONS: Select one \u201ceastern\u201d religion and one \u201cwestern\u201d religion discussed so far in this course. Review the lessons in Unit 1 and Unit 2
\nas you consider how these religions are both similar and different.
\nYour short essay should include four parts:
\nBriefly introduce the two religions you have selected to compare and contrast.
\nNot Submitted
\nSubmitted Scored
\nWhen you\u2019re ready to upload your document, click here. SUBMIT TOUCHSTONE
\n\uf05a It takes 5-7 business days for a Touchstone to be graded once it’s been submitted.
\nUNIT 2 \u2014 TOUCHSTONE 2: Comparing and Contrasting the
\nCommon Elements of Religions
\nSCORE
\n-\/25
\nIdentify and explain at least two commonalities between these two religions, using specific examples from the lessons.
\nIdentify and explain at least two differences between these two religions, using specific examples from the lessons.
\nBriefly summarize & conclude your short essay. In your conclusion, explain what we can learn about religions in general by noticing both
\ntheir similarities and differences.
\nAs you develop your response, you should compare or contrast at least one example from each of the following elements of religion:
\nHistorical & geographic origins
\nCore beliefs & doctrines
\nCore rituals & practices
\nImportant texts & narratives
\nYour examples should be specific, and should cite the lesson from which your information comes, using in-text citations. Citations should use
\nthis style: (Monotheism, n.d.) or (Primal Religions, n.d.).
\nRefer to the completion checklist below throughout the writing process. Do not submit your Touchstone until it meets these guidelines.
\n\u2752 Have you selected one \u201ceastern\u201d religion and one \u201cwestern religion\u201d discussed so far in this course?
\n\u2752 Have you briefly introduced the two religions you selected?
\n\u2752 Have you identified and explained at least two commonalities between these religions?
\n\u2752 Have you identified and explained at least two differences between these religions?
\n\u2752 Have you included at least one example from each of the given elements of religion: historical & geographic origins; core beliefs &
\ndoctrines; core rituals & practices; and important texts & narratives?
\n\u2752 Is your short essay between 400-600 words, double-spaced, and formatted in 12-point font?
\n\u2752 Have you cited examples with in-text citations?
\n\u2752 Have you proofread your short essay for mistakes in spelling, grammar, punctuation, and capitalization?
\nB. Rubric
\nAdvanced (100%) Proficient (80%) Needs Improvement
\n(60%)
\nNon-Performance
\n(0%)
\nSelection of Religions
\nEssay identifies an \u201ceastern\u201d
\nand a \u201cwestern\u201d religion
\ndiscussed in the course.
\nEssay correctly identifies an
\n\u201ceastern\u201d religion and a
\n\u201cwestern\u201d religion to compare
\nand contrast, and accurately
\ndescribes both.
\nEssay correctly identifies an
\n\u201ceastern\u201d religion and a
\n\u201cwestern\u201d religion to compare
\nand contrast, but may describe
\none or both less accurately.
\nEssay may incorrectly categorize
\nreligions as \u201ceastern\u201d or
\n\u201cwestern,\u201d or may provide a
\nmarkedly inaccurate description of
\none or both.
\nEssay fails to identify an
\n\u201ceastern\u201d religion and a
\n\u201cwestern\u201d religion to compare
\nand contrast, or to provide any
\ndescription of either.
\nAnalysis of Similarities
\n(Comparison)
\nEssay analyzes similarities
\nbetween religions and
\nprovides specific examples
\nthat support the analysis.
\nEssay accurately identifies and
\nexplains at least two similarities
\nbetween religions, using at least
\ntwo specific examples from the
\nlessons as support.
\nEssay accurately identifies and
\nexplains at least two similarities
\nbetween religions, using at
\nleast 1 specific example from
\nthe lesson as support.
\nEssay accurately identifies and
\nexplains only one similarity
\nbetween religions, and\/or no
\nspecific examples from the lesson
\nare used as support.
\nEssay does not accurately
\nidentify and explain similarities
\nbetween religions.
\nAnalysis of Differences
\n(Contrast)
\nEssay analyzes differences
\nbetween religions and
\nprovides specific examples
\nthat support the analysis.
\nEssay accurately identifies and
\nexplains at least two differences
\nbetween religions, using at least
\n2 specific examples from the
\nlessons as support.
\nEssay accurately identifies and
\nexplains at least two differences
\nbetween religions, using at
\nleast 1 specific example from
\nthe lessons as support.
\nEssay accurately identifies and
\nexplains only one difference
\nbetween religions is accurately
\nidentified and explained, or no
\nspecific examples from the lesson
\nare used as support.
\nEssay does not accurately
\nidentify and explain differences
\nbetween religions.
\nElements of Religion
\nEssay draws on disparate
\nelements of religion for
\nanalysis.
\nEssay describes examples from
\neach of the four given elements
\nof religion:
\n-historical & geographic origins
\n-core beliefs & doctrines
\n-core rituals & practices
\n-important texts & narratives
\nEssay describes examples from
\nthree of the four given elements
\nof religion:
\n-historical & geographic origins
\n-core beliefs & doctrines
\n-core rituals & practices
\n-important texts & narratives
\nEssay describes examples from
\none or two of the four given
\nelements of religion:
\n-historical & geographic origins
\n-core beliefs & doctrines
\n-core rituals & practices
\n-important texts & narratives
\nEssay does not describe
\nexamples from any of the four
\nfour given elements of religion:
\n-historical & geographic origins
\n-core beliefs & doctrines
\n-core rituals & practices
\n-important texts & narratives
\nConventions
\nEssay follows conventions
\nfor standard written English.
\nThere are one or no errors in
\ngrammar, punctuation, spelling,
\nand capitalization. Examples are
\ncited appropriately.
\nThere are minor errors in
\ngrammar, punctuation, spelling,
\nand capitalization that do not
\nimpede readability. Examples
\nare cited appropriately.
\nThere are frequent errors in
\ngrammar, punctuation, spelling,
\nand capitalization that impede
\nreadability. Examples may not be
\ncited appropriately.
\nThere are consistent errors in
\ngrammar, punctuation, spelling,
\nand capitalization that
\nsignificantly impede readability.
\nExamples are not cited
\nappropriately.
\nAdvanced (100%) Proficient (80%) Needs Improvement
\n(60%)
\nNon-Performance
\n(0%)
\nMeets requirements
\nSubmission meets formatting
\nrequirements, including 12-
\npoint font, double-spacing,
\nand word count.
\nAll requirements for formatting
\nand length are met.
\nRequirements for formatting
\nand length are mostly met.
\nRequirements for formatting and
\nlength are somewhat met.
\nRequirements for formatting and
\nlength are not met at all.
\nC. Requirements
\nThe following requirements must be met for your submission to be graded:
\nComposition must be between 400-600 words.
\nDouble-space the composition and use one-inch margins.
\nUse a readable 12-point font.
\nAll writing must be appropriate for an academic context.
\nComposition must be original and written for this assignment.
\nPlagiarism of any kind is strictly prohibited.
\nSubmission must include your name, the name of the course, the date, and the title of your composition.
\nInclude all of the assignment components in a single file.
\nAcceptable file formats include .doc and .docx.
\nIn-text citations should use this style: (Monotheism, n.d.)
\nReferences should use this style: (n.d.). Monotheism [MOOC]. In Approaches to Studying Religions. Sophia Learning.
\nhttps:\/\/app.sophia.org\/spcc\/approaches-to-studying-religions–2\/unit2\/study-guide\/8161\/monotheism-2
\nAbout Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms of Use
\n\u00a9 2022 SOPHIA Learning, LLC. SOPHIA is a registered trademark of SOPHIA Learning, LLC.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Touchstones are project ( help with nursing paper writing from experts with MSN & DNP degrees)s that illustrate your comprehension of the course material, help\u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[9518],"tags":[9580,9579,9578],"class_list":["post-116137","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-do-my-homework-paper","tag-and-the-world","tag-society","tag-touchstone-3-evaluating-the-impact-of-religion-on-individuals"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/116137","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=116137"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/116137\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=116137"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=116137"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=116137"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}