Coursework Assessment Brief
\nAssessment Details
\nUnit Title: Accounting for Decision Makers
\nUnit Code: MBU504
\nUnit Leader:
\nLevel: 5
\nAssessment Title: Assessing Financial Performance
\nThere are several key financial performance measures that decision makers can use to assess the financial health of a business. Some common measures include:
\nNet income: This is the difference between a company’s total revenue and total expenses. It is a measure of the company’s profitability.
\nReturn on investment (ROI): This is a measure of the efficiency of an investment. It is calculated by dividing the net income by the total amount invested.
\nReturn on equity (ROE): This is a measure of the profitability of a company in relation to the equity invested in the business. It is calculated by dividing the net income by the total equity of the company.
\nEarnings per share (EPS): This is a measure of the profitability of a company in relation to the number of shares outstanding. It is calculated by dividing the net income by the number of shares outstanding.
\nDebt-to-equity ratio: This is a measure of the financial leverage of a company. It is calculated by dividing the total debt of the company by the total equity of the company.
\nBy analyzing these and other financial performance measures, decision makers can gain a better understanding of the financial health of a business and make informed decisions about its future direction.<\/p>\n
– Sample Assessment Assignment:
\nAssessment Number: AE2
\nAssessment Type: Poster
\nRestrictions on Time\/Word Count: A3 paper size
\nConsequence of not meeting
\ntime\/word count limit:
\nIt is essential that assignments keep within the
\ntime\/word count limit stated above. Any work beyond
\nthe maximum time\/word length permitted will be
\ndisregarded and not accounted for in the final grade.
\nIndividual\/Group: Individual
\nAssessment Weighting: 50%
\nIssue Date: Week commencing 06-Dec-21
\nHand In Date: 10-Jan-22
\nPlanned Feedback Date: within 20 working days of the submission date
\n(this does not apply to work submitted late)
\nMode of Submission: Online via turnitin
\nNumber of copies to be submitted: 1
\nAnonymous Marking This assessment will be exempt from anonymous
\nmarking as it falls within an exempt category under the
\nUniversity\u2019s Anonymous Marking Policy.
\nAssessment Task
\nYou are to produce a landscape-oriented poster that illustrates and explains the financial
\nperformance of a listed shipping company. It should employ financial ratios, cover the past
\nfive years and benchmark the chosen company against four of its closest competitors. It
\nshould be visually appealing while ensuring that the figures or ratios you choose to display
\nare relevant and meaningful.
\nSuch 2-page advertisements appear in the financial papers as advertisement for the
\npurposes of attracting investors and you can use them as a reference.
\nTo proceed with this coursework, you must be able to access a shipping company\u2019s financial
\ninformation:
\n\u2022 You are not allowed to use the two benchmark companies we will use during our
\nseminars.
\n\u2022 Companies listed in most major stock exchanges are required to publish their annual
\nreports online.
\n\u2022 Make sure that at least 50% your company\u2019s revenue is generated from shipping related activities.
\n\u2022 If you have difficulties obtaining the annual report of a company, please try a
\ndifferent company before asking for guidance. It\u2019s your responsibility to choose
\ncompanies whose data is available.
\n2
\nAcademic Services
\nJune 2015
\nContent-wise, make sure you include ratios allowing you to apprehend the company from
\nall five perspectives covered in class. Do not forget comparison with four major competitors.
\nNote that 5 ratios for 5 companies over 5 years are really hard to parse in their raw data
\nform so you will have to use appropriate charting techniques to visually summarize all that
\ninformation.
\nPlease note that the assessment criteria (see below) do not include theory or academic
\nreferencing, so you do not need to (and indeed must NOT) include definitions for each ratio
\n(it will be considered off-topic (sample nursing essay examples by the best nursing assignment writing service)). The limited space of a poster means that you should not
\nindulge in stale repetition of theory.
\nInstead you are expected to use the limited space available to provide succinct explanations
\nconcerning each ratio: begin by underlining the most important figures and then attempt to
\nexplain your company’s financial performance by linking it to market conditions, specific
\nevents or company decisions. Make every word count!
\nTo help with the marking of the ratios used, you are to also submit a copy of the financial
\ndata used and, eventually, of your calculations (if a ratio is already calculated in the
\ncompany\u2019s annual report then please provide the respective page instead).
\nPresentation-wise, begin by making sure your poster is legible; what cannot be read cannot
\nbe marked. Since you are meant to focus on an individual company, it is expected that your
\nposter will feature prominently the company’s name, logo and eventual photos relating to
\ntheir activities. Additional marks will be allocated if the poster is visually appealing and has
\ninternal logic and coherence.
\nFinally, you will record and upload a short video, no more than two minutes long,
\nhighlighting the key takeaway points of your poster. Your objective should be to convince a
\nventure capitalist (your examiner) to invest in your chosen company (what we call an
\n\u201celevator pitch\u201d). Remember: your examiner is already familiar with your poster so focus
\non what\u2019s REALLY essential lest you run out of time.
\n3
\nAcademic Services
\nJune 2015
\nAssessment
\nCriteria A1 \u2013 A2 A3 \u2013 A4 B1 \u2013 B3 C1 \u2013 C3 D1 \u2013 D3 F1 F2 \u2013 N
\nCoverage of
\nthe past five
\nyears
\n(33%)
\nRivals the
\ncoverage of an
\ninvestment
\nprospectus.
\nProvides
\ninformation
\nthat goes
\nbeyond what
\nwas covered
\nin class
\nAll headings
\nand
\nimportant
\nratios
\ncovered in
\nclass are
\nincluded
\nMost of the
\nratios and\/or
\nheadings
\ncovered in class
\nare included.
\nAny omission is
\nnot considered
\ncritical to the
\nanalysis.
\nSome of the ratios
\nand\/or headings
\ncovered in class
\nare included. Any
\nomission is
\nconsidered to be
\ncritical to the
\nanalysis.
\nThe scale of
\nomission means
\nthat there is no
\nreal analysis OR
\nthe objectivity of
\nthe analysis is
\ncompromised by
\nfollowing the
\ncorporate report
\ntoo close.
\nFailure to
\nprovide
\nrelevant
\nfinancial
\ninformation.
\nLayout and
\ngraphic
\ndesign
\n(33%)
\nQuasi professional
\ndesign.
\nAn eye catching and
\ncreative
\ndesign.
\nThe
\ninformation
\nflows well
\nand the
\nlayout is
\nappealing.
\nAn attractive
\nor creative
\ndesign.
\nThe
\ninformation
\nflows well
\nand is easy to
\nunderstand
\nUse of diagrams
\nand words and
\nis easy to
\nunderstand. A
\nweakness may
\nbe too few or
\ntoo many words
\nor charts or
\nimages.
\nGraphics or font
\nis too large or
\ntoo small.
\nEither too
\ncrowded or too
\nsparse.
\nFont\/graph
\ncolour\/shape
\ncombination make
\nsome sections
\nindecipherable.
\nUnappealing or
\nconflicting colour
\nscheme.
\nEither difficult to
\nunderstand or
\nfollow due to a
\nlayout that does
\nnot flow\/is not
\nlogical\/is outright
\nIllegible; or large
\nsections have
\nbeen \u201ccut and
\npasted\u201d into the
\nposter.
\nNo attempt to
\ncreate an
\ninvestment
\ncentrefold, as
\nper
\ninstructions.
\nAccompanying
\nrecoded
\npresentation
\n(33%)
\nElevator pitch
\ndemonstrates
\nan excellent
\ngrasp of the
\ncompany\u2019s
\nstrengths and
\nan investor\u2019s
\nneeds.
\nConvincing
\npitch while
\nfully
\nrespecting
\nthe time
\nlimit.
\nPresentation I
\nis catchy and
\nto the point.
\nFactually
\ncorrect but not
\nentirely
\nconvincing;
\nmarginally
\nexceeded the
\ntime limit.
\nFlawed delivery
\nand\/or factually
\nincoherent with
\nthe poster figures;
\nover the time
\nlimit.
\nMinimal effort to
\nprepare the pitch
\nand\/or respect
\nthe time limit.
\nNo effort to
\nprepare the
\npitch; failure
\nto address
\nfundamental
\nissues; no
\nrespect for
\nthe time
\nlimit.
\n4
\nAcademic Services
\nJune 2015
\nLearning Outcomes
\nThis assessment will enable students to demonstrate in full or in part the learning outcomes
\nidentified in the unit descriptors.
\nKnowledge and Understanding
\nK1 Explain how financial information is produced and used by managers.
\nCognitive Skills
\nC1 Use financial information to investigate business situations, processes or
\nissues.
\nPractical and Professional Skills
\nP1 Use a range of financial skills and tools, including spreadsheets, to evaluate
\nand support management decisions.
\nTransferable and Key Skills
\nT1 Effectively communicate qualitative and quantitative financial information
\nand findings.
\nLate Submissions
\nStudents are reminded that:
\ni. If this assessment is submitted late i.e. within 5 working days of the submission
\ndeadline, the mark will be capped at 40% if a pass mark is achieved;
\nii. If this assessment is submitted later than 5 working days after the submission deadline,
\nthe work will be regarded as a non-submission and will be awarded a zero;
\niii. If this assessment is being submitted as a referred piece of work then it must be
\nsubmitted by the deadline date; any Refer assessment submitted late will be regarded
\nas a non-submission and will be awarded a zero.
\nhttp:\/\/portal.solent.ac.uk\/documents\/academic-services\/academic-handbook\/section 2\/2o-assessment-principles-and-regulations.pdf?t=1534423842941
\nExtenuating Circumstances
\nThe University\u2019s Extenuating Circumstances procedure is in place if there are genuine
\ncircumstances that may prevent a student submitting an assessment. If students are not ‘fit
\nto study\u2019, they can either request an extension to the submission deadline of 5 working days
\nor they can request to submit the assessment at the next opportunity (Defer). In both
\ninstances students must submit an EC application with relevant evidence. If accepted by
\nthe EC Panel there will be no academic penalty for late submission or non-submission
\ndependent on what is requested. Students are reminded that EC covers only short term
\nissues (20 working days) and that if they experience longer term matters that impact on
\nlearning then they must contact the Student Hub for advice.
\nA summary of guidance notes for students is given below:
\nhttp:\/\/portal.solent.ac.uk\/documents\/academic-services\/academic-handbook\/section 2\/2p-extenuating-circumstances.pdf?t=1534423896787
\n5
\nAcademic Services
\nJune 2015
\nAcademic Misconduct
\nAny submission must be students\u2019 own work and, where facts or ideas have been used from
\nother sources, these sources must be appropriately referenced. The University\u2019s Academic
\nHandbook includes the definitions of all practices that will be deemed to constitute
\nacademic misconduct. Students should check this link before submitting their work.
\nProcedures relating to student academic misconduct are given below:
\nhttp:\/\/portal.solent.ac.uk\/support\/official-documents\/information-for students\/complaints-conduct\/student-academic-misconduct.aspx
\nEthics Policy
\nThe work being carried out by students must be in compliance with the Ethics Policy. Where
\nthere is an ethical issue, as specified within the Ethics Policy, then students will need an
\nethics release or an ethical approval prior to the start of the project ( help with nursing paper writing from experts with MSN & DNP degrees).
\nThe Ethics Policy is contained within Section 2S of the Academic Handbook:
\nhttp:\/\/portal.solent.ac.uk\/documents\/academic-services\/academic-handbook\/section 2\/2s-university-ethics-policy.pdf
\nGrade marking
\nThe University uses a letter grade scale for the marking of assessments. Unless students
\nhave been specifically informed otherwise their marked assignment will be awarded a letter
\ngrade. More detailed information on grade marking and the grade scale can be found on the
\nportal and in the Student Handbook.
\nhttp:\/\/portal.solent.ac.uk\/documents\/academic-services\/academic-handbook\/section 2\/2o-annex-2-assessment-regulations-grade-marking-scale.pdf?t=1534424273208
\nGuidance for online submission through Solent Online Learning (SOL)
\nhttp:\/\/learn.solent.ac.uk\/onlinesubmission<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Coursework Assessment Brief Assessment Details Unit Title: Accounting for Decision Makers Unit Code: MBU504 Unit Leader: Level: 5 Assessment Title: Assessing Financial Performance There are\u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10231,10240,10237,10241,10233,10238,10234,10242,10239,10235,10236,10243,10244],"tags":[10257,10254,10252,10258,10248,10251,10256,10247,10245,10249,10246,10255,10253],"class_list":["post-119077","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-can-someone-help-me-write-my-essay","category-essay-help-websites","category-help-in-writing-an-essay","category-help-with-my-essay","category-i-need-help-writing-my-whole-class-coursework","category-need-help-with-essay","category-need-help-writing-a-essay","category-online-essay-writing-help","category-pay-someone-to-take-my-online-class-online-course-help","category-pay-someone-to-write-my-coursework-for-me","category-plagiarism-free-help-writing-an-essay","category-take-your-class","category-write-my-coursework","tag-best-assignment-help-australia","tag-can-someone-write-my-assignment-for-me","tag-can-you-write-my-dissertation","tag-do-my-assignment-australia","tag-do-my-dissertation","tag-do-my-dissertation-for-me","tag-do-my-dissertation-uk","tag-help-me-write-my-dissertation","tag-hire-a-professional-to-write-my-dissertation-for-me","tag-pay-to-write-my-assignment-for-me-uk","tag-write-dissertation-for-me","tag-write-dissertation-paper","tag-write-my-dissertation-for-me"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/119077","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=119077"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/119077\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=119077"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=119077"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=119077"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}