*** case is pasted below after assignment description***<\/p>\n
There are eight required sections to this paper. \u00a0<\/p>\n
1. COMPANY NAME, WEBSITE, and INDUSTRY
State the company name, website address, and industry.<\/p>\n
2. BACKGROUND and HISTORY
Briefly describe the company in the case analysis. What is their primary business, who were the officers or key players described in the case study? If the case study company is currently in business, list the company\u2019s current CEO, total sales, and profit or loss for the last year where data is available. Identify key events or phases in the company\u2019s history. Describe the performance of this company in the industry. Visit the company\u2019s website and use \u00a0http:\/\/finance.yahoo.com and\/or some other financial search engine to find this data. <\/p>\n
NOTE:<\/p>\n
\u00a0Make sure to use APA citations throughout the paper. The textbook should be
cited if it is the source of information.\u00a0<\/p>\n
3. ANALYSIS VIA PORTER\u2019S FIVE FORCES MODEL
Analyze the competitive environment by listing the threat of new entrants, the bargaining power of buyers, the bargaining power of suppliers, the threat of substitute products and services, and the intensity of rivalry among competitors in the industry. You should have subheadings for each of your five paragraphs where you analyze each force against your company. \u00a0Summarize your key points in a figure.\u00a0<\/p>\n
4. STRATEGY USED
How does this company create and sustain a competitive advantage? What strategy from the readings was undertaken by this company? Were they successful? Can all companies use this strategy? How is the strategy affected by the life cycle in the industry? Remember to reference Porter\u2019s generic competitive strategies identified in the textbook.\u00a0<\/p>\n
5. Specific STRATEGY(S)
**This is the second of two required strategy sections in this paper. This is the heart of the paper** \u00a0
Choose two specific strategies from the below list of five strategies from the text.
Apply them in detail to the organization. Be sure to think strategically and show the results clearly. Use the strategy as a sub-header for each section so it is clear what is being applied.
Ensuring Coherence in Strategic Direction (pages 23\u201328)
Value Chain Analysis (pages 76\u201388)
Resource View of Firm (pages 88\u201396)
Industry Life Cycle Strategies (pages 167\u2013173)
Portfolio Management and the BCG Matrix (pages 192\u2013194)<\/p>\n
6. COURSE OF ACTION RECOMMENDED
If you were in a position to advise this company, what strategy would you recommend to sustain competitive advantage and achieve future growth? Be specific and list the steps the company should take for successful implementation of your course of action. Your recommendations need to connect to information you present earlier in your paper. \u00a0Think of this section as a conclusion along with action steps for implementing your recommended strategy enhancements or changes.\u00a0<\/p>\n
7. OPINION
What do you think of this case study? Describe what you believe are the lessons learned from this case.\u00a0<\/p>\n
8. REFERENCES
When you have completed the paper using the above sections, insert a page break and have a separate reference page. The references should be listed in accordance with the APA guidelines.<\/p>\n
FORMAT:
Use a title page.\u00a0<\/p>\n
Font: Use Times New Roman, 12 point.
Place your name in the upper left hand corner of the page.
Each section of your paper should be headed by the bolded, capitalized item
described above.
Indent paragraphs.
Insert page numbers bottom right.
Paper length should be four to six double-spaced pages not including title
page, references, or illustrations and tables. \u00a0For each page you are short 25
points will be deducted from the point total earned on the paper.
Use APA citations throughout the paper.
Include a separate reference page at the end of the paper.
Please prepare reference page as follows:<\/p>\n
References<\/p>\n
Dess, G., Lumpkin, G., & Eisner, A. (2016). Strategic Management (8e). Boston: McGraw-Hill Irwin.<\/p>\n
————here is the case that the paper needs to be written on——————-<\/strong><\/p>\n APPLE INC.: STILL TAKING A BITE OUT OF THE COMPETITION?<\/strong>*<\/strong><\/p>\n On February 11, 2015, Apple Inc. made history by becoming the first U.S. publicly traded company to close above $700 billion in market value. This put Apple\u2019s value nearly double that of the next three largest companies in the S&P 500 Index,1 and it firmly established expectations for future performance. Apple\u2019s market value had grown more than 50,600 percent since its initial public offering in December 1980.2 To satisfy investors, consumers, and company enthusiasts, Apple would have to continue to deliver, and doing so might not be easy. As Apple had grown, the pace of innovation had slowed. There were still opportunities, but would Apple be the company to see them through to fruition?<\/p>\n The year 2015 was not the first time Apple had wowed investors. In September 2012 Apple stock had hit a price high of $702.10, at that time making Apple the most valuable company in the world, but the company had not been able to sustain that lofty valuation. September 2012 had also marked Tim Cook\u2019s first full year as CEO and the first full year since the death of Apple\u2019s visionary founder, Steve Jobs. Although most Apple watchers had mourned Steve Jobs\u2019s death on October 5, 2011, most also realized that Jobs\u2019s appointed successor, Tim Cook, came to the position as CEO with an impressive track record. Cook had continued to grow the company, and the 2012 year-end numbers showed continued financial success across almost all product lines. However, expectations were still very high, and rumors of a reduction in Asian supplier component orders for the iPhone for 2013 led investors to worry about a drop-off in demand for the company\u2019s flagship product. This worry led to a subsequent drop in Apple\u2019s stock price of nearly 24 percent.3<\/p>\n CEO Cook subsequently defused concerns over supply chain issues, but that didn\u2019t stop analysts and media watchers from wondering whether Apple had lost its luster.4 This posed yet again the unavoidable question that had loomed large over the then 35-year-old Apple: What happens to a modern company whose innovations and inspirations are so closely tied to the vision of one leader when that leader\u2019s influence is no longer present?5By 2015, that question appeared to have been definitively answered: Apple, under CEO Cook, was not only the most valuable company in the world but was poised to grow even more (see Exhibits 1 and 2).<\/p>\n Apple, Fortune<\/em> magazine\u2019s \u201cworld\u2019s most admired company\u201d since 2008,6 had distinguished itself by excelling over the years not only in product innovation but also in revenue and margins (since 2006 Apple had consistently reported gross margins of over 30 percent). Founded as a computer company in 1976 and known early on for its intuitive adaptation of the graphical user interface, or GUI (via the first mouse and the first on-screen \u201cwindows\u201d),7 Apple dropped the word computer<\/em> from its corporate name in 2007. Apple Inc. in 2015 was known for having top-selling products not only in desktop (iMac) and notebook (MacBook) personal computers but also in portable digital music players (iPod), online music and \u201capp\u201d services (iTunes and App Store), mobile communication devices (iPhone), digital consumer entertainment (Apple TV), handheld devices able to download third-party applications, including games (iPod Touch via the App Store), tablet computers (iPad), and online services (iCloud), and the company was poised to enter and dominate the market of wearable technology (Apple Watch) and mobile payment systems (Apple Pay) (see Exhibit 3).<\/p>\n Although most of those innovations occurred after 1998, when Apple was under Steve Jobs\u2019s leadership, there was a 12-year period in which Jobs was not in charge. The company\u2019s ongoing stated strategy had been to leverage \u201cits unique ability to design and develop its own operations systems, hardware, application software, and services to provide its customers new products and solutions with superior ease-of-use, seamless integration and innovative industrial design.\u201d8 This strategy required not only product design and marketing expertise but also scrupulous attention to operational details. Given Apple\u2019s global growth in multiple product categories, and the associated complexity in strategic execution, would CEO Tim Cook be able to sustain the level of innovation the company had been known for? In the coming years, would Apple still<\/em> be able to take a bite out of all competition?<\/p>\n Company Background<\/strong><\/p>\n Founder Steve Jobs<\/strong><\/p>\n C118<\/p>\n Apple Computer was founded in Mountain View, California, on April 1, 1976, by Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak. Jobs was the visionary and marketer, Wozniak was the technical genius, and A. C. \u201cMike\u201d Markkula Jr., who had joined the team several months earlier, was the businessman. Jobs set the mission of empowering individuals, one person\u2013one computer, and doing so with elegance of design and fierce attention to detail. In 1977 the first version of the Apple II became the first computer ordinary people could use right out of the box, and its instant success in the home market caused a computing revolution, essentially creating the personal computer industry. By 1980 Apple was the industry leader, and the company went public in December of that year.<\/p>\n EXHIBIT 1<\/strong><\/p>\n Apple Sales<\/strong><\/p>\n Go to library tab in Connect to access Case Financials.<\/p>\n *Includes revenue from the iTunes Store, the App Store, the Mac App Store, the iBooks Store, AppleCare, licensing, and other services.<\/p>\n \u2020Includes sales of Apple-branded and third-party accessories for the iPhone, iPad, Mac, and iPod.<\/p>\n Source: Apple 10-K SEC filing, 2014.<\/p>\n In 1983 Wozniak left the firm, and Jobs hired John Sculley away from PepsiCo to take the role of CEO at Apple, citing the need for someone to spearhead marketing and operations while Jobs worked on technology. The result of Jobs\u2019s creative focus on personal computing was the Macintosh. Introduced in 1984 through the now-famous Super Bowl television ad based on George Orwell\u2019s novel Nineteen Eighty-Four,<\/em>9 the Macintosh was a breakthrough in terms of elegant design and ease of use. Its ability to handle large graphic files quickly made it a favorite with graphic designers, but its performance was slow and available compatible software was limited. That meant the product as designed at the time was unable to significantly help Apple\u2019s failing bottom line. In addition, Jobs had given Bill Gates at Microsoft some Macintosh prototypes to use to develop software, and in 1985 Microsoft subsequently came out with the Windows operating system, a version of GUI for use on IBM PCs.<\/p>\n C119<\/p>\n EXHIBIT 2<\/strong><\/p>\n Apple First Quarter 2015 Sales<\/strong><\/p>\n Go to library tab in Connect to access Case Financials.<\/p>\n *Includes deferrals and amortization of related nonsoftware services and software upgrade rights.<\/p>\n \u2020Includes revenue from iTunes, AppleCare, Apple Pay, licensing, and other services.<\/p>\n \u2021Includes sales of iPod, Apple TV, Beats Electronics, and Apple-branded and third-party accessories.<\/p>\n Source: Apple 10-K SEC filing, 2015.<\/p>\n EXHIBIT 3<\/strong><\/p>\n Apple Innovation Timeline<\/strong><\/p>\n C120<\/p>\n Source: http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Timeline_of_Apple_Inc._products<\/em>.<\/p>\n Steve Jobs\u2019s famous volatility led to his resignation from Apple in 1985. Jobs then founded NeXT Computer. The NeXT Cube computer proved too costly for the business to become commercially profitable, but its technological contributions could not be ignored. In 1997 Apple CEO Gilbert Amelio bought out NeXT, hoping to use its Rhapsody, a version of the NeXTStep operating system, to jump-start the Mac OS development, and Jobs was brought back as a part-time adviser.<\/p>\n Under CEOs Sculley, Spindler, and Amelio<\/strong><\/p>\n C121<\/p>\n John Sculley tried to take advantage of Apple\u2019s unique capabilities. Because of this, Macintosh computers became easy to use, with seamless integration (the original plug-and-play) and reliable performance. This premium performance meant Apple could charge a premium price. However, with the price of IBM compatibles dropping and Apple\u2019s costs, especially R&D, way above industry averages (in 1990 Apple spent 9 percent of sales on R&D, compared to 5 percent at Compaq and 1 percent at many manufacturers of IBM clones),10 this was not a sustainable scenario.<\/p>\n Sculley\u2019s innovative efforts were not enough to substantially improve Apple\u2019s bottom line, and he was replaced as CEO in 1993 by company president Michael Spindler. Spindler continued the focus on innovation, producing the PowerMac, based on the PowerPC microprocessor, in 1994. Even though this combination produced a significant price-performance edge over both previous Macs and Intel-based machines, the IBM clones continued to undercut Apple\u2019s prices. Spindler\u2019s response was to allow other companies to manufacture Mac clones, a strategy that ultimately led to clones stealing 20 percent of Macintosh unit sales.<\/p>\n Gilbert Amelio, an Apple director and former semiconductor turnaround expert, was asked to reverse the company\u2019s financial direction. Amelio intended to reposition Apple as a premium brand, but his extensive reorganizations and cost-cutting strategies couldn\u2019t prevent Apple\u2019s stock price from slipping to a new low. However, Amelio\u2019s decision to stop work on a brand-new operating system and jump-start development by using NeXTStep brought Steve Jobs back to Apple in 1997.<\/p>\n Steve Jobs\u2019s Return<\/strong><\/p>\n One of Jobs\u2019s first strategies on his return was to strengthen Apple\u2019s relationships with third-party software developers, including Microsoft. In 1997 Jobs announced an alliance with Microsoft that would allow for the creation of a Mac version of the popular Microsoft Office software. He also made a concerted effort to woo other developers, such as Adobe, to continue to produce Mac-compatible programs.<\/p>\n In late October 2001, Apple released its first major noncomputer product, the iPod. This device was an MP3 music player that packed up to 1,000 CD-quality songs into an ultraportable, 6.5-ounce design: \u201cWith iPod, Apple has invented a whole new category of digital music player that lets you put your entire music collection in your pocket and listen to it wherever you go,\u201d said Steve Jobs. \u201cWith iPod, listening to music will never be the same again.\u201d11 This prediction became even truer in 2002, when Apple introduced an iPod that would download from Windows\u2014its first product that didn\u2019t require a Macintosh computer and thus opened up the Apple \u201cmagic\u201d to everyone. In 2003 all iPod products were sold with a Windows version of iTunes, making it even easier to use the device regardless of computer platform.<\/p>\n In April 2003, Apple opened the online iTunes Music Store to everyone. This software, downloadable on any computer platform, sold individual songs through the iTunes application for 99 cents each. When announced, the iTunes Music Store already had the backing of five major record labels and a catalog of 200,000 songs. Later that year, the iTunes Music Store was selling roughly 500,000 songs a day. In 2003 the iPod was the only portable digital player that could play music purchased from iTunes, and this intended exclusivity helped both products become dominant.<\/p>\n After 30 years of carving a niche for itself as the premier provider of technology solutions for graphic artists, web designers, and educators, Apple appeared to be reinventing itself as a digital entertainment company, moving beyond the personal computer industry. The announcement in 2007 of the iPhone, a product incorporating a wireless phone, a music and video player, and a mobile Internet browsing device, meant Apple was also competing in the cell phone\/smartphone industry.<\/p>\n Also introduced in 2007, the iPod Touch incorporated Wi-Fi connectivity, allowing users to purchase and download music directly from iTunes without a computer. Then, in 2008, Apple opened the App Store. Users could now purchase applications written by third-party developers specifically for the iPhone and iPod Touch. These applications included games, prompting analysts to wonder whether Apple was becoming a competitor in the gaming market.<\/p>\n In 2010 Apple launched the large-screen touch-based tablet called the iPad and sold over 2 million of these devices in the first two months.12 That same year, Apple\u2019s stock value increased to the extent that the company\u2019s market cap exceeded Microsoft\u2019s, making it the biggest tech company in the world.13 In 2011 Steve Jobs made his last product launch appearance to introduce iCloud, an online storage and syncing service. On October 4, 2011, Apple announced the iPhone 4S, which included \u201cSiri,\u201d the \u201cintelligent software Helpant.\u201d The next day, on October 5, came the announcement that Steve Jobs had died.<\/p>\n Apple continued to innovate, however, and on September 21, 2012, Apple had its biggest iPhone launch ever, with the iPhone 5. Over 2 million preorders for this larger and more powerful phone pushed the delivery date back to late October.14 Later in the fall, Apple released the iPad Mini with a smaller screen. On September 19, 2012, Apple stock reached $702.10, its highest level to date, which made Apple the most valuable company in the world. The year 2013 saw the iPhone5C and the high-range iPhone5S, which introduced the Touch ID fingerprint recognition system. The iPhone 6 and 6 Plus, with larger displays, faster processors, and support for mobile payments, were released in September 2014 and allowed Apple to extend its already-strong market position with a record-setting sales performance over the 2014 holiday season.15 The prototype of the Apple Watch was unveiled in 2014, with production scheduled to begin in 2015. Also introduced in 2014 was Apple Pay, a mobile payment system meant to augment all Apple mobile products. February 2015 saw Apple reach the highest market cap of any U.S.-traded company, indicating investor support and confidence in the company\u2019s innovative output.<\/p>\n C122<\/p>\n Apple had become a diversified digital entertainment corporation. All the way back in 2005, analysts had believed Apple had \u201cchanged the rules of the game for three industries\u2014PCs, consumer electronics, and music . . . and appears to have nothing to fear from major rivals.\u201d16 On top of steady sales increases on its computers, the iPod, and iTunes, the added categories of iPhone and iPad had shown substantial growth. Apple had taken bites out of the competition on all fronts (see Exhibit 4). However, by 2013, Samsung had outperformed Apple in worldwide smartphone sales,17 and Google\u2019s Android had captured the largest market share of cell phone operating systems. At the same time, both the Amazon Kindle Fire HD tablet and Microsoft\u2019s Surface tablet were nipping at the iPad\u2019s heels. The year 2015 was marked by competition in the wearable-tech space, and some were wondering if Apple had gotten too big to be nimble. Could Apple continue to grow and, if so, in what categories?<\/p>\n Apple\u2019s Operations<\/strong><\/p>\n Maintaining a competitive edge required more than innovative product design. Operational execution was also important. For instance, while trying to market its increasingly diverse product line, Apple believed that its own retail stores could serve customers better than could third-party retailers. By the end of 2014, Apple had 437 stores open, including 178 international locations, with average store revenue of about $50.6 million, and had received trademark protection for its retail stores\u2019 \u201cdistinctive design and layout.\u201d18<\/p>\n In further operational matters, regarding a head-to-head competition against Dell in the computer market, for instance, while Dell\u2019s perceived early dominance might have been partly the result of its efficient supply chain management, Apple had outperformed Dell in inventory and other metrics since 2001.19 To solidify its own supply chain, Apple entered into multiyear agreements with suppliers of key components. In addition, Apple had historically had the best margins, partly because of its simpler product line, leading to lower manufacturing costs.20 Also, Apple had been outsourcing manufacturing and final assembly to its Asian partners, paying close attention to scheduling and quality issues.<\/p>\n Outsourcing to Asian manufacturers was not without its problems, however. In 2012, headlines worldwide accompanied the exposure of China\u2019s Foxconn manufacturing facility for labor abuses that led to worker suicide threats. Apple, as well as most other technology companies, used Foxconn facilities to assemble products, including the iPad and iPhone. After the story broke, Apple CEO Tim Cook visited the Foxconn plant and reviewed an audit of working conditions that found violations in wages, overtime, and environmental standards. Apple stated that it remained \u201ccommitted to the highest standards of social responsibility across our worldwide supply chain,\u201d21 and Cook announced that Apple might be bringing some of the production of Mac computers back to the U.S., starting in 2013. Apple could do this without affecting its profitability, because of automation cost savings. As one supply chain expert said, \u201cApple\u2019s product line is highly standardized, with a very small number of products and very few configurations, and that makes it much easier to do automation.\u201d22<\/p>\n C123<\/p>\n Supply chain, product design, and manufacturing efficiencies were not the only measures of potential competitive superiority. Apple had also historically paid attention to research and development, increasing its R&D investment year after year. In the first quarter of 2015, Apple spent $1.9 billion on R&D, an increase of 42 percent from the previous year. Among its current rivals, Apple\u2019s R&D investment had previously been beaten only by Microsoft (number one), Google, Hewlett-Packard, and Amazon.23<\/p>\n EXHIBIT 4<\/strong><\/p>\n Apple\u2019s Product Lines and Major Competitors<\/strong><\/p>\n *Includes only the software that is sold separately to use on either Windows or Mac computers.<\/p>\n As one of Steve Jobs\u2019s legacies, Apple had traditionally kept the specifics of its research and development a closely guarded secret and fiercely protected its innovative patents. A well-publicized series of lawsuits in 2012 highlighted rifts between Apple and Samsung, both a rival and a supplier. Samsung smartphones had captured more market share than Apple\u2019s iPhones in the beginning of 2012, and Apple argued that Samsung had succeeded with both its phones and tablets only by copying Apple\u2019s designs. Samsung replied by claiming that Apple had infringed on Samsung\u2019s patents.24 U.S. intellectual property courts found in favor of Apple, but Japanese courts found in favor of Samsung. The ongoing battle meant Apple needed to look for other suppliers of chips and displays. In November 2014, supply chain watchers pointed out that Apple still had a major challenge ahead finding reliable suppliers for increasingly scarce components and that the continued reliance on Foxconn as the sole manufacturer of the iPhone 6 Plus meant that any disruption there could have major consequences for delivery.25<\/p>\n Status of Apple\u2019s Business Units in 2015<\/strong><\/p>\n The Apple Computer Business<\/strong><\/p>\n In the computer market, Apple had always refused to compete on price, relying instead on its products\u2019 reliability, design elegance, ease of use, and integrated features to win customers. From the beginning, some analysts had believed Apple had the opportunity to steal PC market share as long as its system was compatible, no longer proprietary, and offered upgrades at a reasonable cost.26 This opportunity for increased market share was realized when Apple began using Intel processors in the iMac desktop and the MacBook portables, which allowed them to run Microsoft Office and other business software.<\/p>\n Apple\u2019s worldwide Mac computer sales during the first quarter of 2015 increased 9 percent over the same quarter in the previous year. Although there had been fears that sales of desktop computers, especially, would slow worldwide as the tablet and smartphone markets grew, the introduction of the MacBook Air allowed Apple to compete favorably even in the face of overall contraction. Apple computers had been able to gain market share for 33 of the 34 quarters since 2007. Sales of Apple computers worldwide during the third quarter of 2014 did see an increase over the previous year, consistently outgrowing the market and allowing Apple to take over the number-five slot from ASUS (Exhibit 5). According to market analysis done by IDC, the Mac\u2019s domestic market share grew from 12.4 to 13 percent, putting the Mac in third place overall in IDC\u2019s survey of PC vendor units shipped in the third quarter of 2014.27 This was up substantially from 2010, when Apple had only 7.4 percent of the U.S. market.28<\/p>\n Personal Digital Entertainment Devices: iPod<\/strong><\/p>\n Although many analysts at the time felt that the MP3 player market was oversaturated, Apple introduced the iPod Touch in 2007, intending it to be \u201can iPhone without the phone,\u201d a portable media player and Wi-Fi Internet device without the AT&T phone bill.29 The iPod Touch borrowed most of its features from the iPhone, including the finger-touch interface, but it remained mainly an iPod, with a larger viewing area for videos. Apple released the fifth-generation iPod Touch in September 2012, with upgraded features like support for recording 1080p video and panoramic still photos and support for Apple\u2019s \u201cSiri.\u201d A new version, the sixth generation of this product, debuted in 2015.<\/p>\n C124<\/p>\n Apple reported selling 6 million of the iPod MP3 players over the 2013 holiday season, down from over 12 million iPod units during the previous season, and in the 2014 year-end report iPod sales were not singled out as a separate category. As with desktop computer sales, the MP3 player market was contracting overall as smartphone and tablet devices took over many music-related tasks. Even with the decline in iPod sales, Apple was still leading well over its rivals. Traditionally, the iPod had had a 70 percent share of the MP3 player market in the United States, and it was the top-selling player in the world.30 Microsoft\u2019s entry into this space, the Zune, was discontinued in October 2011. Its market share never exceeded 1 percent.31<\/p>\n EXHIBIT 5<\/strong><\/p>\n Worldwide PC Market Share, Third Quarter 2014 (units in thousands)<\/strong><\/p>\n Source: IDC, Worldwide Quarterly PC Tracker, October 8, 2014, www.idc.com\/getdoc.jsp?containerId=prUS25187214<\/em>.<\/p>\n Mobile Communication Devices: iPhone<\/strong><\/p>\n In 2007 further competition for the iPod had come from the blurring of lines between digital music players and other consumer electronic devices. While others may have seen the computer as central to the future of digital music, telecom companies worked to make the mobile phone a center of the digital world. Apple\u2019s entry, the iPhone, combined an Internet-enabled smartphone and video iPod. The iPhone allowed users to access all iPod content and play music and video content purchased from iTunes. More recent smartphone models increased the quality of the photo and video components to make even the digital camera or camcorder appear obsolete. The smartphone market in 2007 had been estimated at 10 percent of all mobile phone sales, or 100 million devices a year. Steve Jobs had said he \u201cwould like to see the iPhone represent 1 percent of all mobile phone sales by the end of 2008.\u201d32 This proved to be a conservative estimate, and by 2015 Apple had achieved almost 20 percent, in a close tie with Samsung (see Exhibit 6).<\/p>\n By 2015, smartphones had become the device of choice for most manufacturers. Smartphones were also often the electronic data consumers\u2019 device of choice, with multiple features, including cameras and the ability to surf the Internet while being held in the hand, rather than taking up the space of a tablet or ultra-thin computer. However, the smartphone market was increasingly turning into a battle between mobile operating systems (OSs).<\/p>\n Apple\u2019s iPhone, running on iOS, had had considerable competition from Samsung\u2019s Galaxy smartphones. This was partly due to Samsung\u2019s use of Google\u2019s Android operating system. Historical worldwide leader Nokia had stumbled badly with its outdated Symbian operating system and was trying to regain a foothold by partnering with Microsoft, using the Windows Phone operating system. Although Research In Motion (RIM) still had some long-term BlackBerry fans, RIM had had problems updating its BlackBerry line of phones. The market share by operating-system map was now worth watching, with Android devices expected to continue to capture the majority of market share through 2016 (see Exhibit 7).33<\/p>\n C125<\/p>\n In recent years it appeared that some of the \u201ccool\u201d factor had disappeared from the iPhone. In Asian markets, especially, Apple\u2019s shares of mobile devices had fallen sharply, losing considerable ground to Samsung and HTC smartphones. Younger users, the 20-something college students and recent graduates, were looking for the next new thing, and that was increasingly an Android-driven device. A social media expert in Singapore noted, \u201cApple is still viewed as a prestigious brand, but there are just so many other cool smartphones out there now that the competition is just much stiffer.\u201d This was a problem, because, starting in 2012, this Asian market was also where consumers were adopting very quickly.34 In addition, CEO Tim Cook\u2019s visit to China in the fall of 2012, presumably to woo China Mobile\u2019s chief executive into subsidizing the iPhone, hadn\u2019t had the expected result. China Mobile\u2019s wireless network, the world\u2019s largest, wouldn\u2019t be adding the iPhone without better terms from Apple. Instead, it offered its subscribers the Nokia Lumia Windows 8 phone.35 Given all these challenges, could Apple continue to ride the success of the iPhone to greater profits? Many were skeptical.<\/p>\n EXHIBIT 6<\/strong><\/p>\n Worldwide Market Share\u2014Cell Phones, Fourth Quarter 2014<\/strong><\/p>\n Source: IDC, Worldwide Quarterly Mobile Phone Tracker, January 29, 2015, www.idc.com\/getdoc.jsp?containerId=prUS25407215<\/em>.<\/em><\/p>\n EXHIBIT 7<\/strong><\/p>\n Smartphone Operating-System Market Share, Third Quarter 2014<\/strong><\/p>\n Source: IDC, Smartphone OS Market Share, Q3 2014, www.idc.com\/prodserv\/smartphone-os-market-share.jsp<\/em>.<\/em><\/p>\n However, during 2014, Apple\u2019s new iPhone with its larger screen size, in the 6 and 6 Plus models, was able to capture the consumer\u2019s attention, allowing Apple to close the gap with Samsung. This was especially notable in China, where Apple\u2019s refusal to drop the price allowed it to achieve almost a luxury status with the growing middle class in that country. Sales in China had grown substantially\u2014achieving $38 billion in 2014, up from only $1 billion in 2009.36 Elsewhere in 2014, iPhone sales had grown by 44 percent in the United States and were up more than 96 percent in Brazil, Russia, India and China, but by 2015 the overall smartphone market was slowing down as mature markets were increasingly dependent on replacement purchases and emerging markets appeared more interested in low-cost devices.37<\/p>\n However, in 2015, Apple was poised to capture market share in two distinct areas: among those consumers who had previously been \u201cinhibited\u201d by the smaller screen size of older phones and therefore were unwilling to go completely mobile until the iPhone 6\/6 Plus appeared; and within the enterprise market, as corporate users began to appreciate Apple\u2019s interactivity and the robustness of the iOS. Also, although a \u201cstaggering\u201d 1.06 billion Android-based smartphones were shipped in 2014, while the iOS market share declined slightly (until the fourth quarter, when the iPhone 6 began shipping), according to data from industry watchers the difference in operating profit per phone was equally staggering: Android OS profit per phone was $2.26, while iOS phones yielded $97.50. In the Android\/iOS war, \u201cstrangling\u201d profits in the quest for increased market share might not have been the best long-term strategy. Apple had the resources to grow and win.38<\/p>\n Tablet Computer: iPad<\/strong><\/p>\n In April 2010 Apple released the iPad, a tablet computer, as a platform for audiovisual media, including books, periodicals, movies, music, games, and web content. More than 300,000 iPads were scooped up by eager tech consumers during the device\u2019s first day on store shelves. Weighing only 1.5 pounds, this lightweight, portable touch-screen device was seen as a gigantic iPod Touch.39<\/p>\n Considering that previous tablet computers had failed to catch on in the mass market, Apple made a bold move by introducing the iPad. Upon its release, some users criticized the iPad for a lack of features, such as a physical keyboard, a webcam, USB ports, and Flash support, and for its inability to multitask, share files, and print. However, features like the sleek design, touch screen, multiple apps, and fast and easy-to-navigate software made the iPad popular in business, education, and the entertainment industry. The iPad was selected by Time<\/em> magazine as one of the \u201c50 Best Inventions of the Year 2010.\u201d40<\/p>\n Until September 2010, Apple iPads accounted for 95 percent of tablet computer sales, according to research firm Strategy Analytics.41 But by the end of 2012, that figure had fallen to 78.9 percent. The loss of share was due to the arrival of new tablet devices, such as Samsung\u2019s Galaxy, based on Google\u2019s open-source Android system. Other platforms and devices had also begun to appear, including Google\u2019s Nexus, Amazon\u2019s Kindle Fire HD, and Microsoft\u2019s Windows 8 Surface tablet.42 By 2015, devices running the Android operating system had achieved a market share of 66 percent of new tablet shipments.43<\/p>\n In October 2014 Apple released the iPad Air 2, the fifth-generation iPad. With similarities to the iPad Mini, the Air was thinner, with a smaller screen bezel, yet still used the same 9.7-inch Retina Display as the previous iPad model. In addition to the physical redesign, the Air had more powerful cameras and slightly increased processing speed, but it was otherwise only a slight improvement over previous iPad versions.44 Going into 2015 there were signs that the iPad models\u2019 sales, as well as the entire tablet industry, were \u201cgoing downhill,\u201d partly due to the \u201cjumbo\u201d phones coming from the likes of Samsung (and Apple) and the low-cost Google-based Chromebook laptops (Exhibit 8).45<\/p>\n In this category, Microsoft\u2019s Surface Pro 3 was the only tablet that appeared to be growing: 24 percent increase in sales, year over year, during the fourth quarter of 2014. This indicated that a performance-oriented tablet appealed to users.46 Apple needed to consider an upgrade.<\/p>\n The Software Market<\/strong><\/p>\n C126<\/p>\n Although Apple had always created innovative hardware, software development was also an important goal. Software had increasingly become Apple\u2019s core strength, especially in its computers, due to its reliability and resistance to virus infections and resulting crashes.47 The premier piece of Apple software was the operating system. The iOS allowed Apple to develop software applications such as Final Cut Pro, a video-editing program for professionals\u2019 digital camcorders, and the simplified version for regular consumers, called iMovie. The iLife software package provided five integrated applications, allowing the computer to become a home studio: iMovie; iDVD, for recording photos, movies, and music onto DVDs; iPhoto, for touching up digital photos; GarageBand, for making and mixing personally created music; and the iTunes digital music jukebox. Also available was iWork, containing a PowerPoint-type program called Keynote and a word-processor\/page-layout program called Pages. Both iLife and iWork underwent major upgrades in 2009, further increasing their respective abilities to compete with Microsoft applications.<\/p>\n EXHIBIT 8<\/strong><\/p>\n Worldwide Quarterly Tablet Market Share, Fourth Quarter 2014<\/strong><\/p>\n Source: IDC, Worldwide Quarterly Tablet Tracker, February 2, 2015, http:\/\/seekingalpha.com\/article\/2944766-apple-ipad-sales-may-surprise-in-fy-2016<\/em>.<\/em><\/p>\n Apple\u2019s web browser, Safari, was upgraded in 2009 to compete with Windows Internet Explorer, Mozilla Firefox, and the new entrant, Chrome from Google. Apple announced, \u201cSafari 4 is the world\u2019s fastest and most innovative browser,\u201d but analysts were quick to point out that Google\u2019s Chrome, which debuted six months earlier, was perhaps the first to take the browser interface in a new direction. One commentator called Chrome \u201ca wake-up call for the Safari UI guys.\u201d Browser market share data at the end of 2014 showed Chrome in the top spot, with a 45 percent global market share. Internet Explorer held a slim second place with 20 percent, and Firefox was a close third with 18 percent. Safari had a 10 percent share.<\/p>\n In 2011 iCloud was introduced during one of Steve Jobs\u2019s last public appearances. The web-based storage service initially struggled to get traction, but in 2014 it was upgraded to iCloud Drive, allowing users to interoperate with Windows and connect all iOS devices. As an alternative to Google Drive and Dropbox, iCloud Drive gave Apple an intro into the enterprise\/corporate user space, a market CEO Tim Cook had begun to target.<\/p>\n In other software development areas, Apple had not been that successful. In 2012 Apple stumbled badly with its Maps software. Released in iOS6, Apple Maps was meant to replace Google Maps on the iPhone but instead produced distorted images and gave very bad directions. CEO Tim Cook had to apologize that Apple had fallen short of its commitment to making \u201cworld-class products,\u201d and he suggested customers go back to using its competitor\u2019s mapping software.<\/p>\n iTunes<\/strong><\/p>\n Arguably, Apple\u2019s most innovative software product was iTunes, a free downloadable software program for consumers that ran on either Mac or Windows operating systems. It was bundled with all Mac computers and iPods and connected with the iTunes Music Store, enabling purchases of digital music and movie files that could be downloaded and played by iPods, iPads, and the iPhone and, on PCs, by iTunes.<\/p>\n Although the volume was there, iTunes had not necessarily been a profitable venture. Traditionally, out of the 99 cents Apple charged for a song, about 65 cents went to the music label; 25 cents went for distribution costs, including credit card charges, servers, and bandwidth; and the balance went to marketing, promotion, and the amortized cost of developing the iTunes software. However, even if not wildly profitable, iTunes was still considered a media giant, especially with over 43 million DRM-free songs available in its database as of 2015.<\/p>\n Several competitors had tried to compete with the iTunes service. RealNetworks\u2019 Rhapsody subscription service, Yahoo MusicMatch, and AOL music downloads had all competed for the remaining market share, using the potentially buggy Microsoft Windows Media format, and all subsequently failed. Even though one commentator said in 2004 that \u201cultimately someone will build a piece of software that matches iTunes,\u201d as of 2015 the only serious competition was from Amazon.<\/p>\n At the start of 2013, iTunes accounted for over 60 percent of all digital music sales. In second place was Amazon\u2019s MP3 store, with 16 percent market share. Google Play, eMusic, Zune Music Pass, Rhapsody, and a few others each captured 5 percent or less of the remaining sales. Growth, however, was occurring in the streaming service market, especially with the rising popularity of online radio and Internet streaming providers Pandora and Spotify, and by 2015 music sales on iTunes had fallen by over 14 percent worldwide. This trend helped explain why Apple acquired the monthly subscription streaming service Beats Music in 2014. The $3 billion acquisition included headphone maker Beats Electronics.<\/p>\n C127<\/p>\n The App Store<\/strong><\/p>\n In March 2008, Apple announced that it was releasing the iPhone software development kit (SDK), allowing developers to create applications for the iPhone and iPod Touch and sell these third-party applications via the Apple App Store. The App Store was made available on iTunes, and it was directly available from the iPhone, iPad, and iPod Touch products. This opened the window for another group of Apple customers, the application developers, to collaborate with Apple. Developers could purchase the iPhone Developer Program from Apple for $99, create either free or commercial applications for the iPhone and iPod Touch, and then submit the applications to be sold in the App Store. Developers received 70 percent of the download fee that iPhone or iPod Touch customers paid to the App Store, and Apple got 30 percent of the revenue.<\/p>\n As of January 2015, over 75 billion apps had been downloaded from Apple\u2019s App Store, but Google Play, the app store for Android users, was gaining ground, indicating that Google might be attracting more top-tier developers and quality titles to its marketplace. However, downloads for both platforms slowed in 2014, causing market watchers to wonder if a plateau was coming. This might mean diminishing returns and a less prosperous business model for all concerned.<\/p>\n Apple Pay<\/strong><\/p>\n Introduced in late 2014, Apple Pay allowed iPhone 6 and 6 Plus users in the U.S. to make secure payments for goods and services using their phones. With over 1 million credit and debit card activations within the first 72 hours of its release, Apple Pay was intended to replace the user\u2019s wallet and, according to CEO Tim Cook, would \u201cforever change the way all of us buy things,\u201d primarily because the process was more secure than a traditional card-based transaction. As of 2015, major retailers such as Macy\u2019s, Walgreens, McDonald\u2019s, Whole Foods, and Disney had all agreed to accept Apple Pay. Apple reportedly received 0.15 percent of each purchase price, making the service a potentially lucrative venture. Major competition was coming from Google Wallet, especially given Google\u2019s 2015 acquisition of technology from Softcard. Google Wallet had also seen an increase in usage as the Apple Pay system was launched, indicating that 2015 might become an interesting year for alternative types of transactions to occur.<\/p>\n New Products: Apple Watch and Apple Car<\/strong><\/p>\n Apple Watch was the first all-new product since the iPad, and therefore CEO Tim Cook\u2019s most ambitious gamble. Once again, Apple was not the first company to enter the wearable-tech space; it was following the lead of Samsung, Sony, and Motorola and competing against fitness trackers produced by Nike, FitBit, and others. However, Apple\u2019s preorders for the launch in 2015 indicated demand would run to a combined 5 to 6 million units of the three watch models.61 This product category was a bit of a departure for Apple as the company positioned the Watch as a personalized device, with the market segmented between mass market and luxury. The features on all three models were the same, but status was indicated by differences in the precious metals and craftsmanship of the cases, therefore justifying the price range from $349 for the sports model to $20,000 for the Apple Watch Edition.<\/p>\n Rumors surfaced in 2015 that Apple had acquired resources, primarily engineers and related technology, that would enable it to develop an automobile, ready for market by 2020. Speculation was that Apple would not do the actual assembly but, as with its other products, would use its sophisticated supply chain expertise to outsource manufacturing, focusing its considerable innovation skills on the design and sale of a product that incorporated Apple technology in multiple configurations. As one observer said, \u201cIn this strategy, Apple\u2019s current products would act as building blocks and core components of future, more important products. The ecosystem would become much<\/em> larger,\u201d therefore enabling Apple to continue to grow and dominate the innovation landscape.<\/p>\n The Future of Apple<\/strong><\/p>\n In 2012, during Tim Cook\u2019s first year as CEO, he had to deal with a flat economy, supplier troubles, increasing competition, investor panic, and possibly unrealistic expectations in the wake of Steve Jobs\u2019s demise, and yet the company still grew by 60 percent. By 2015, Apple\u2019s value had more than doubled. Although many observers feared that Apple would have to yield to the \u201claw of large numbers\u201d\u2014the concept that companies which grow rapidly cannot maintain that growth pace over time\u2014CEO Cook rejected this view as being \u201cdogma\u201d and believed that Apple still had major opportunities ahead. And many of those opportunities existed because of Steve Jobs\u2019s and now Tim Cook\u2019s single-minded emphasis on pursuing only those project ( help with nursing paper writing from experts with MSN & DNP degrees)s where Apple could be the best at making a \u201csignificant, lasting difference\u201d (and never \u201ccheapening\u201d the product offering), where Apple could use this philosophy and vision to attract the best and brightest key personnel, and where it could leverage its considerable skill in managing its distribution and supply chain while simultaneously delivering a complete customer experience.65<\/p>\n C128<\/p>\n As Cook explained, in each of the markets Apple had entered, it was not the first to market. It was not the first to produce MP3 players, smartphones, or tablets, and it was not the first with wearable technology or a mobile pay system. Apple\u2019s strategy had always been to carefully analyze each market and then design products that were more attractive to users than any competitor\u2019s products could be.66 Under Cook, Apple had transitioned itself \u201cfrom being a hypergrowth company to being a premium, branded consumer company.\u201d67 Apple was becoming \u201ca wildly profitable company that continues to be a major (or dominant) player in various product categories,\u201d68 and those categories appeared to be expanding beyond consumer electronics. Apple was becoming a truly vertically integrated designer and marketer of products that increasingly inhabited a world \u201cdominated by the Internet of Things\u201d\u2014Apple just loved \u201cdesigning great stuff,\u201d and it could use its current products as \u201cbuilding blocks and core components of future, more important products.\u201d69 Some of those future products might include enterprise software, magnetic locks, automobiles, solar power systems, and anything else that could take advantage of the Apple ecosystem. As one commentator said, \u201cTim Cook has a dream. Apple Everywhere.<\/em> Coming to a world near you. In time.\u201d70 Why not?<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" *** case is pasted below after assignment description*** There are eight required sections to this paper. \u00a0 1. COMPANY NAME, WEBSITE, and INDUSTRYState the company\u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10601,10596,10882,479,537,172,478,10597,10599,10595],"tags":[10524,10522,10890,10561,10883,10889,10515,10521,10696,10518,10888,10887,10886,10885,10884,10525],"class_list":["post-128198","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-assignment-help-by-uks-no-1-writing-service","category-assignment-writers-canada-university-cost","category-free-ai-english-assignment-writers-china","category-nursing-course-hero","category-nursing-essay-pro","category-nursing-study-bay","category-nursing-study-pool","category-professional-assignment-writers-usa","category-uae-1-cheap-assignment-writing-service","category-write-a-word-essay","tag-apa-citation-format-assignment","tag-assignment-writers-australia-college-student","tag-best-nursing-case-study-writing-services","tag-buy-essay-usa","tag-case-study-nursing-writing-services-for-care-plans","tag-free-nursing-case-study-writing-services","tag-help-write-a-page-assignment","tag-i-need-someone-to-do-my-assignment-within-hours","tag-need-assistance-completing-the-assignment","tag-need-to-write-an-essay","tag-nursing-case-studies-with-answers","tag-nursing-case-study-paper-example","tag-nursing-case-study-template-examples-of-case-studies-nursing","tag-pharmacology-case-study","tag-soap-note-case-study","tag-write-pages"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/128198","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=128198"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/128198\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=128198"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=128198"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=128198"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}![\"images\"](\"https:\/\/jigsaw.vitalsource.com\/books\/1259278212\/epub\/OEBPS\/images\/pagec31a.jpg\")
<\/p>\n![\"images\"](\"https:\/\/jigsaw.vitalsource.com\/books\/1259278212\/epub\/OEBPS\/images\/pagec118.jpg\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n![\"images\"](\"https:\/\/jigsaw.vitalsource.com\/books\/1259278212\/epub\/OEBPS\/images\/pagec119.jpg\")
<\/p>\n![\"images\"](\"https:\/\/jigsaw.vitalsource.com\/books\/1259278212\/epub\/OEBPS\/images\/pagec119a.jpg\")
<\/p>\n![\"images\"](\"https:\/\/jigsaw.vitalsource.com\/books\/1259278212\/epub\/OEBPS\/images\/pagec120.jpg\")
<\/p>\n![\"images\"](\"https:\/\/jigsaw.vitalsource.com\/books\/1259278212\/epub\/OEBPS\/images\/pagec122.jpg\")
<\/p>\n![\"images\"](\"https:\/\/jigsaw.vitalsource.com\/books\/1259278212\/epub\/OEBPS\/images\/pagec123.jpg\")
<\/p>\n![\"images\"](\"https:\/\/jigsaw.vitalsource.com\/books\/1259278212\/epub\/OEBPS\/images\/pagec124.jpg\")
<\/p>\n![\"images\"](\"https:\/\/jigsaw.vitalsource.com\/books\/1259278212\/epub\/OEBPS\/images\/pagec124a.jpg\")
<\/p>\n![\"images\"](\"https:\/\/jigsaw.vitalsource.com\/books\/1259278212\/epub\/OEBPS\/images\/pagec126.jpg\")
<\/p>\n