{"id":128473,"date":"2023-02-14T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2023-02-14T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/nursingstudybay.com\/2023\/02\/14\/35-clinical-epidemiology-some-questions-are-quite-technical-and-may\/"},"modified":"2023-02-14T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2023-02-14T00:00:00","slug":"35-clinical-epidemiology-some-questions-are-quite-technical-and-may","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/35-clinical-epidemiology-some-questions-are-quite-technical-and-may\/","title":{"rendered":"$35 clinical epidemiology some questions are quite technical and may"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><\/p>\n<div>\n<p>\u00a0Introduction to Clinical Epidemiology (401173)<br \/>FINAL ASSIGNMENT<br \/>Autumn, 2019<br \/>Due date: 11.59pm , May 29 2019<br \/>This assignment is based on the learning objectives and concepts as \u00a0described in the Unit Learning Guide. There are 9 questions worth a \u00a0total of 64 marks and this assignment will contribute 64% towards the \u00a0total assessment for this subject.<br \/>Your assignment should be typed, with adequate space left between \u00a0questions. Assignments should be submitted via vUWS. Be as concise as \u00a0possible in your answers, and use the number of marks allocated to each \u00a0question as a guide for how much to write.<br \/>Please note this is an individual exercise.<br \/>Late assignments will not be accepted without prior approval.<br \/>You are required to answer ALL questions (1-9)<br \/>Page 1 of 7<br \/>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Answer questions 1-2 based on the following scenarios:<br \/>Q1: Fred, a 65-year-old obese man with a history of type 2 diabetes \u00a0mellitus and hypertension presents to the GP practice for a follow-up \u00a0appointment. During the consultation, he asks whether there is a better \u00a0medication to glicazide and metformin, his oral hypoglycemic \u00a0medications, which he has been taking to control his blood sugar. His \u00a0friend has recently been put on a newer oral hypoglycemic medication \u00a0(Liraglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue), which has been shown \u00a0to help with weight management in patients with diabetes and obesity. \u00a0Fred has been finding it very difficult to lose weight for a few years \u00a0now as he has tried various lifestyle modifications. He asks whether the \u00a0new oral hypoglycemic medications could be an option for him in weight \u00a0reduction.<br \/>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Task [2 marks]<br \/>a. Write a focused research question for this particular problem that \u00a0will help you organise a search of the literature for an answer (use the \u00a0PICO elements as appropriate).<br \/>b. Identify the PICO elements in your research question<br \/>Q2: In the past 2 years, as an Infectious Disease Specialist in one of \u00a0the tertiary hospitals in Australia, you have attended to 23 migrant \u00a0patients who were referred by their General Practitioners with symptoms \u00a0not typical of pulmonary tuberculosis. After taking a detailed history \u00a0and performing appropriate physical examinations, as well as reviewing a \u00a0range of relevant investigations, you clinically diagnosed and \u00a0microbiologically confirmed that those patients have multi-drug \u00a0resistance pulmonary tuberculosis (MDR-TB). The Public Health Department \u00a0was notified of disease and the patients were managed accordingly. Now, \u00a0you and some colleagues from Western Sydney University want to \u00a0investigate the risk factors for MDR-TB.<br \/>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Task [2 marks]<br \/>a. Write a focused research question for this particular problem that \u00a0will help you organise a search of the literature for an answer (use the \u00a0PICO elements as appropriate).<br \/>b. Identify the PICO elements in your research question<br \/>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Q3: Please select the single best answer for each of questions 3.I \u2013 VII<br \/>I. Randomised controlled trials provide strong evidence that an observed \u00a0effect is due to the intervention. One main reason is because [1 mark]:<br \/>a) When the study participants are randomised, many characteristics and \u00a0potential confounders are likely to be evenly distributed in the groups<br \/>b) It is easier to measure the outcome variable with great precision in \u00a0randomised controlled trials compared to other study designs.<br \/>c) The exposure level and the outcome are measured at the same time<br \/>d) The study participants are volunteers and therefore motivated to take part in the study<br \/>e) None of the above<br \/>II.Blinding is an important feature of a randomised controlled trials because [1 marks]:<br \/>a) It helps prevent measurement bias \u2013 the biased assessment of outcomes<br \/>b) It helps reduce contamination and compliance problems<br \/>c) It helps reduce confounding and selection bias<br \/>d) It is required to do an intention-to-treat analysis<br \/>e) It helps improve chance event and reduce misclassification III. Which of the following is true [1 mark]?<br \/>a) Loss to follow-up can lead to selection bias in cohort studies.<br \/>b) Selection bias can arise from conditioning on the common effect of \u00a0the exposure and an uncontrolled independent risk factor for the \u00a0outcome.<br \/>c) Case-control studies are no more prone to selection bias than are cohort studies.<br \/>d) Loss to follow-up is not a major source of bias in cohort studies.<br \/>e) None of the above.<br \/>IV. When epidemiologists judge the evidence to establish a possible cause of a health outcome, they<br \/>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>consider [1 mark]:<br \/>a) The strength of the association between an exposure and the outcome<br \/>b) Evidence that the exposure of interest has appeared before the outcome.<br \/>c) Evidence showing that reductions in the exposure level will reverse the risk of the outcome.<br \/>d) A, B and C<br \/>e) A and B only<br \/>V. A double-blind study was designed to test the efficacy of a drug. One \u00a0group of the patients consisting of 1227 participants were given a \u00a0placebo and the other group of patients consisting of 1220 were given \u00a0the active drug. Both groups were to be followed up for one year. After \u00a06-months of the trial, 35% of participants in the placebo groups dropped \u00a0out of the study and 4% of the participants taking the active drug \u00a0dropped out of the study. What is the SINGLE BEST explanation for this \u00a0occurrence [1 mark]?<br \/>a) Failure of the active drug<br \/>b) Insufficient information to interpret data<br \/>c) Systematic error<br \/>d) Chance event<br \/>e) Breakdown of the double-blind study<br \/>VI. The highest level of evidence provided for cancer treatment usually comes from: [1 mark]<br \/>a) Randomised control trials<br \/>b) Phase II clinical trials<br \/>c) Phase III clinical trials<br \/>d) Systematic reviews of observational studies<br \/>e) Meta-analyses of intervention studies<br \/>Page 3 of 7<br \/>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>VII. A recent study examined the association between tea consumption and \u00a0ovarian cancer. The study included 414 women with primary epithelial \u00a0ovarian, fallopian, or peritoneal cancer and 868 age-and region-matched \u00a0women with non-neoplastic conditions. The adjusted odds ratio was 0.39 \u00a0for those drinking tea daily and 0.23 for those drinking tea for 30 \u00a0years, compared with non-tea drinkers. The study concluded that \u00a0increasing frequency and duration of tea drinking, especially green tea, \u00a0can reduce the risk of ovarian cancer.<br \/>What type of study was conducted? [1 mark]<br \/>a) Cross-sectional study<br \/>b) Prospective cohort study<br \/>c) Randomised controlled trial<br \/>d) Retrospective cohort study<br \/>e) Case control study<br \/>Q4: Now select ONLY ONE research question from either Question 1 or 2 \u00a0above that will help you organize a search of the clinical literature \u00a0for an answer. If you were to search Medline\/PubMed\/Web of science for \u00a0original research on this question:<br \/>a. Describe what your search strategy would be, including keywords, MeSH \u00a0terms, inclusion and exclusion criteria, as well as evidence of the \u00a0Boolean operators used [4 marks].<br \/>b. What type of study design would best be able to address your selected research question? State why [1 mark].<br \/>c. Cite the best article from among those you find, using any referencing style of your choice [1 mark].<br \/>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Q5: Answer questions 5a-b based on the following information:<br \/>A total of 1800 patients have a screening test to identify a protein \u00a0called \u201cFEN-59\u2019 to determine patients at risk of lung carcinoma, \u00a0followed by a standardized lung biopsy procedure. Of the 1800 children, \u00a01533 have a negative FEN-59 and 267 have a positive FEN-59. In addition, \u00a0a lung biopsy (gold standard) was done on all patients. Of those \u00a0patients with a negative FEN-59, 1491 have a negative lung biopsy. In \u00a0the group with a positive FEN-59, 259 have a positive lung biopsy.<br \/>Construct a 2\u00d72 table using the information provided above, and answer the following questions (a and b):<br \/>a) Calculate the sensitivity of the FEN-59 [2 marks]<br \/>b) Calculate the positive predictive value of the FEN-59 [2 marks]<br \/>c) The negative predictive value is dependent on all of the following: \u00a0prevalence, incidence, sensitivity and specificity [True\/False] [1 mark]<br \/>Please select the SINGLE BEST answer in questions 5e to f<br \/>d) Using the image below, which value in the test result units is the point of maximum specificity? [1 mark]<br \/>a) 30<br \/>b) 15<br \/>c) 5<br \/>d) 20<br \/>e) 25<br \/>e) A study was conducted in which 10,000 women participated. All women \u00a0underwent a cervical smear. 1,000 of 10,000 women had a positive smear. \u00a0Of these, 100 developed cervical cancer. 10 women who had negative smear \u00a0developed cancer. What is the SINGLE most likely terminology to \u00a0describe the 10 women with negative results who developed cervical \u00a0cancer?<br \/>[1 mark]<br \/>a. True negative<br \/>b. False negative<br \/>c. True positive<br \/>d. False positive<br \/>e. Chance event<br \/>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Q6: Answer questions 6a-d based on the following information:<br \/>You have brought to the attention of the hospital medical services that a \u00a0published trial reported reduced body weight in patients with morbid \u00a0obesity who were treated with liraglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 \u00a0equivalent. You mentioned this published paper to your Director, and \u00a0given the evidence reported, he asked you to give a presentation about \u00a0the study findings during the weekly seminar series. In your \u00a0presentation, she has asked you to address the following questions \u00a0(6a-d) based on the results of the published paper (Edited abstract is \u00a0shown below):<br \/>A Randomized, Controlled Trial of 3.0 mg of Liraglutide in Weight \u00a0Management (Xavier Pi-Sunyer, M.D., Arne Astrup, M.D., D.M.Sc., Ken \u00a0Fujioka et al. N Engl J Med 2015;373:11-22.<br \/>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>DOI: 10.1056\/NEJMoa1411892)<br \/>Background: Obesity is a chronic disease with serious health \u00a0consequences, but weight loss is difficult to maintain through lifestyle \u00a0intervention alone. Liraglutide, a glucagonlike peptide-1 analogue, has \u00a0been shown to have potential benefit for weight management at a \u00a0once-daily dose of 3.0 mg, injected subcutaneously.<br \/>Methods: We conducted a 56-week, double-blind trial involving 3731 \u00a0patients who did not have type 2 diabetes and who had a body-mass index \u00a0of at least 30 or a BMI of at least 27 if they had treated or untreated \u00a0dyslipidemia or hypertension. We randomly assigned patients in a 2:1 \u00a0ratio to receive once-daily subcutaneous injections of liraglutide at a \u00a0dose of 3.0 mg (2487 patients) or placebo (1244 patients); both groups \u00a0received counselling on lifestyle modification.<br \/>Results: At week 56, patients in the liraglutide group had lost a mean \u00a0of 8.4\u00b17.3 kg of body weight, and those in the placebo group had lost a \u00a0mean of 2.8\u00b16.5 kg (a difference of -5.6 kg; 95% confidence interval, \u00a0-6.0 to -5.1; P 0.001). A total of 63.0% of the patients in the \u00a0liraglutide group as compared with 37.0% in the placebo group lost at \u00a0least 5% of their body weight (P 0.001).<br \/>Conclusion: In this study, 3.0 mg of liraglutide, as an adjunct to diet \u00a0and exercise, was associated with reduced body weight and improved \u00a0metabolic control.<br \/>Q6a. Construct a 2\u00d72 table using relevant figures shown in the abstract, and answer the following questions: [4 marks]<br \/>(i) What is the risk of losing at least 5% of body weight in all patients included in the study?<br \/>(ii) What is the risk of losing at least 5% of body weight in patients who were treated with liraglutide?<br \/>(iii) What is the risk of losing at least 5% of body weight in patients who were treated with placebo?<br \/>(iv) What is the relative risk of treatment with liraglutide verus \u00a0placebo with regard to weight management? How would you interpret this \u00a0relative risk estimate?<br \/>Q6b. If equal numbers of patients in the population were treated with \u00a0liraglutide vs placebo treatment, what would be the expected population \u00a0relative risk reduction (RRR) for liraglutide treatment? How would you \u00a0interpret this measure? [4 marks]<br \/>Q6c. How many patients need to be treated with liraglutide for one more \u00a0patient to benefit compared with the placebo? What is this measure \u00a0called? How would you interpret this measure [4 marks]?<br \/>Q6d. How does the measure in question 5b differ from question 5c? [4 marks]<br \/>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Read the attached original research article (Khorana et al., 2019), available in vUWS), and now answer Questions 7 to 9:<br \/>Q7. What characteristics of the study would you consider in order to \u00a0determine if its findings are valid? Include wider considerations of \u00a0study quality\/validity and give examples. (Q8 will address relevance, \u00a0and the next question will ask how to determine the importance of the \u00a0findings\u2026for this question, focus on the internal validity of the study) \u00a0[8 marks]<br \/>Q8. What characteristics of the findings would you consider, in order, \u00a0to determine if they are clinically meaningful and statistically \u00a0significant? Include examples. (You\u2019ve already addressed validity\u2026for \u00a0this question, focus on how to determine the clinical significance and \u00a0statistical significance of an effect reported in the study) [8 marks]<br \/>Q9. What characteristics of the study would you consider, in order, to \u00a0determine if it is generalizable to your context? Explain your answers \u00a0and provide examples. (Questions 6 and 7 have asked how to determine if \u00a0the study is valid, and how important the findings are\u2026.for this \u00a0question, focus on how to determine if it is really relevant or \u00a0generalizable to your practice.) [8 marks]<br \/>Note:<br \/>0 Please do not list the characteristics in questions 8\u201310, but explain your answers succinctly.<br \/>0 You can also download the article from the University Library using your student login details.\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u00a0Introduction to Clinical Epidemiology (401173)FINAL ASSIGNMENTAutumn, 2019Due date: 11.59pm , May 29 2019This assignment is based on the learning objectives and concepts as \u00a0described in\u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10601,10596,10882,479,537,172,478,10597,10599,10595],"tags":[10524,10522,10890,10561,10883,10889,10515,10521,10696,10518,10888,10887,10886,10885,10884,10525],"class_list":["post-128473","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-assignment-help-by-uks-no-1-writing-service","category-assignment-writers-canada-university-cost","category-free-ai-english-assignment-writers-china","category-nursing-course-hero","category-nursing-essay-pro","category-nursing-study-bay","category-nursing-study-pool","category-professional-assignment-writers-usa","category-uae-1-cheap-assignment-writing-service","category-write-a-word-essay","tag-apa-citation-format-assignment","tag-assignment-writers-australia-college-student","tag-best-nursing-case-study-writing-services","tag-buy-essay-usa","tag-case-study-nursing-writing-services-for-care-plans","tag-free-nursing-case-study-writing-services","tag-help-write-a-page-assignment","tag-i-need-someone-to-do-my-assignment-within-hours","tag-need-assistance-completing-the-assignment","tag-need-to-write-an-essay","tag-nursing-case-studies-with-answers","tag-nursing-case-study-paper-example","tag-nursing-case-study-template-examples-of-case-studies-nursing","tag-pharmacology-case-study","tag-soap-note-case-study","tag-write-pages"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/128473","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=128473"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/128473\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=128473"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=128473"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=128473"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}