Study Bay Coursework Assignment Writing Help<\/p>\n
Abstract<\/p>\n
Attachment is an imperative part of a child\u2019s survival and is the foundation for all future relationships.\u00a0 There are many factors that affect the attachment style of each infant, however, this paper will focus on the \u201cclear-cut\u201d attachment time period and how the absence of a caregiver affects an infant\u2019s desire to explore their environment in an unfamiliar situation with a stranger.\u00a0 Children with a secure attachment style were comfortable in their novel environment and displayed several explorative behaviors while their mothers were present.\u00a0 However, with the departure of their safety base, infants display far less exploratory behaviors and are likely to increase in attachment prior to reuniting, especially in the event of multiple departures.\u00a0 A healthy, secure attachment style is the best foundation for a child\u2019s development and is mostly characterized by the quality of care and parenting styles.\u00a0 Children with early, stable, loving caregivers are likely to develop secure attachment styles, characterized with a trust in self and environment.<\/p>\n
Strange Situation Review Paper<\/p>\n
Attachment serves several imperative functions for babies and children, human and non-human alike.\u00a0 Not only is attachment seen as a biological necessity for survival, it is also a foundation for a child\u2019s personality development, temperament, and future relationships (Berk, 2018).\u00a0 Ainsworth & Bell define attachment as \u201can affectional tie that one person or animal forms between himself and another specific one \u2013 a tie that binds them together in space and endures over time\u201d (1970, p.50) and their goal for this study was the illustrate the ever-changing relationship between the ethological-evolutionary attachment style and children\u2019s desire to explore.\u00a0 This ethological-evolutionary attachment style consists of an attachment in which a child desires to stay close to the object of attachment (in this case, the child\u2019s mother) and will display attachment behaviors, such as following, clinging to, calling out to, or crying for their mother (Ainsworth & Bell, 1970).\u00a0 The ethological-evolutionary attachment style comprises many natural, instinctual reflexes that babies display from birth in order to survive, however, this paper will focus on the purpose of attachment in terms of the internal working model, the basis of personality which serves as the foundation for all future relationships (Berk, 2018, p. 197).<\/p>\n
The study conducted by Ainsworth & Bell (1970) provided substantial evidence for their views on attachment, specifically, the delicate relationship between attachment styles and their effect on a child\u2019s reactions in strange situations or with unfamiliar people.\u00a0 Consisting of 56 middle class, Caucasian infants ranging from ages 49-51 weeks, each trial was divided into 8 episodes designed to produce natural responses to a novel yet normal, everyday life experience of meeting a stranger in a new place.\u00a0 Each stranger interacted with the child slowly and each episode became increasingly more \u201cdisturbing\u201d as the study progressed, but not so disturbing as to distress the child or arouse fear.\u00a0 Each episode was meticulously constructed and in summary consisted of the mother taking the child into the observation room, putting the child down to engage in 3 minutes of solo play, unless otherwise engaged with by the child.\u00a0 At this point, an unfamiliar person entered the room and sat quietly for 1 minute, followed by conversing with the mother for 1 minute and making initial contact with the child with a reinforcing object (a toy).\u00a0 Then, the mother exited the room without notifying the child, and the stranger did not interact with them unless the infant was inactive or distressed by the mother\u2019s absence.\u00a0 Next, after a max of 3 minutes, the mother re-entered the room but stopped at the doorway in order to observe the infant\u2019s natural response to the mother\u2019s return.\u00a0 The stranger then left, along with the mother after the infant was once again engaged in play.\u00a0 At this point, the mother exited with a verbal prompt of \u201cbye-bye\u201d and the child was left alone for a maximum of 3 minutes.\u00a0 The stranger then returned and interacted with the child as they did previously, only if they were inactive or distressed.\u00a0 Finally, the mother returned, the stranger departed, and the reunion was observed.<\/p>\n
The children in the study were initially open to exploring their environment, despite its unfamiliarity, so long as their mother was present and visible.\u00a0 This is a view consistent with Erikson\u2019s theory of basic trust versus mistrust; children who\u2019s needs are met can trust in self and environment to explore versus a child whose basic needs are not met (Berk, 2018, p. 184).\u00a0 As the study continued, each time the mother was absent, exploration behaviors decreased substantially.\u00a0 However, when the mother returned in episode 5, the children were able to recover from distress in conjunction with attempts to console from their mother only<\/em>, when approached and consoled by a stranger, who would not be viewed as an object of attachment, their attempts were futile and did little to comfort the child.\u00a0\u00a0 This is consistent with Bowlby\u2019s Ethological Theory, specifically the \u201cclear-cut\u201d attachment phase, which consists of a clear, defined attachment to a caregiver and takes place between 6-8 months and lasts until 18-24 months (Berk, 2018, p. 197).<\/p>\n The \u201cclear-cut\u201d attachment phase was indeed illustrated in the study, as this time period consists of many proximity-seeking and contact-maintaining behaviors.\u00a0 According to Berk (2018), this stage in the ethological theory of attachment can also contain instances of separation anxiety and can be defined with an infant\u2019s reluctancy to be separated from their caregivers and engaging in proximity-maintaining behaviors such as climbing on, shadowing, and displaying preference to their caregiver over others.\u00a0 This timeframe is also characterized as a time in which the caregiver is seen as a secure base, allowing the infant to confidently explore their surroundings.\u00a0 These are all characteristics of a secure attachment style and were illustrated in the strange situation.\u00a0 Ainsworth & Bell (1970) found that interaction with the mothers in the first few episodes was minimal and exploratory behaviors were at their highest, a characteristic of a secure attachment.\u00a0 However, when the mothers left the room, proximity-seeking behaviors dramatically increased and intensified, as well as the sharp decline in exploratory behaviors.\u00a0 In addition, contact-maintaining behaviors increased after the first separation, and increased sharply after the second separation.\u00a0 This is also a component of a secure attachment, especially when children are easily consoled upon their mother\u2019s return (Berk, 2018, p. 198).<\/p>\n There were also instances in the study that were consistent with an insecure-resistant attachment style, one that consists of distress when a caregiver leaves, but is typically ambivalent upon their return and may continue to be distressed despite efforts to console (Berk, 2018).\u00a0\u00a0 Ainsworth & Bell (1970) found that one third of the children displayed contact-resistant conduct upon their mother\u2019s return, and one half after their mother\u2019s second return.\u00a0 These behaviors consisted of wanting to be near their mother, but at the same time being displeased with their mother\u2019s second departure and resistant to contact.\u00a0 However, after this initial displeasure, the period after the reunion increased a child\u2019s attachment to their mother and decreased their likelihood to explore or interact with other people or their environment (Ainsworth & Bell, 1970).<\/p>\n There are several ways to ensure a secure attachment style is being developed when child rearing, and fortunately, healthy attachment styles can still form even if they are not present in a child\u2019s life initially.\u00a0 One major factor affecting attachment style is the early presence of a reliable caregiver.\u00a0 As Berk (2018) states, children can form a strong first attachment as late as 4-6 years of age, suggesting that adoptive children who are unable to find homes initially can still form a close, secure attachment with a caregiver.\u00a0 However, these children are more at risk for an insecure-resistant attachment, as well as emotional and personal issues.\u00a0 One factor to ensure a close, secure attachment is formed is to focus on the quality of the relationship between the caregiver and the child and the quality of care provided to the child.\u00a0 Many studies show that sensitive caregiving, which consists of being in tune with the infants need, ensuring their needs are met promptly and with love, and frequent discussion of the child\u2019s thoughts and feelings (Berk, 2018, p. 200).<\/p>\n Lastly, other environmental factors play a major role in the development of attachment styles, to include specific individual characteristics of both the caregiver and the child, as well as the collective characteristics seen in the family unit.\u00a0 One reading that was particularly interesting was the Parental Depression and Child Development, which summarized that infants of depressed parents sleep less, are far less interactive with their environment, and display delays in cognitive functioning, emotional issues, and behavioral problems (Berk, 2018, p.187).\u00a0 This ultimately boils down to the quality of parenting the child is receiving and how depression can negatively affect a child\u2019s attachment style.\u00a0 Further, individual characteristics of the infant can put them at risk to developing an insecure attachment style.\u00a0 However, these children born with complications or prematurely can still build a secure attachment with patient parents and quality caregiving.\u00a0 Family circumstances also contribute to a child\u2019s attachment style.\u00a0 Unfortunately, sometimes families break apart, either due to divorce or the unfortunate loss of a parent.\u00a0 Still, these factors are also related to the quality of care.\u00a0 The driving force of family circumstances that affect attachment are directly related to the emotional stress felt by the child either through parental stress, lack of communication, or the absence routine (Berk, 2018, p.200).<\/p>\n It is evident that attachment style profoundly affects a child\u2019s ability to survive and grow into a healthy, secure human being.\u00a0 Ainsworth & Bell\u2019s (1970) work illustrates the importance of a secure attachment and the detrimental effects the lack of attachment can have on their future relationships with others and self!\u00a0 It is apparent that the importance of a stable, quality caregiver early on in an infant\u2019s life and that there is a shifting change between exploration behaviors in children and their attachment styles.<\/p>\n References<\/p>\n