which should
\nCoursework Essay
\nWrite an individual essay, which should about 3,500 words (excluding appendices and bibliographies):
\nA critical analysis on ONE Sustainable Development Goal namely: Goal 13 Climate Action.
\nThe requirements of the essay are:
\nExamine the significance of the Sustainable Development Goals as a whole with an emphasis on how accounting for the goals advances social, environmental and ethical development
\nUse a theoretical framework to critically evaluate the purpose and relevance of your chosen Goal from an ethical perspective
\nDescribe the context, indicators and targets of your chosen Goal that seeks to promote ethical and sustainable progress
\nProvide an evidential based analysis with a specific focus on an organisation or country that demonstrates progress and future outlook of the Goal
\nSupport your arguments with personal opinions and recommendations with a recognition of whether targets of the goals can be met
\nUse International Examples, Scholarly Articles, Case Studies, Academic Articles, News Magazines to support Arguments
\nFormat of the Essay:
\no Structure your essay with sub-headings and paragraphs (as described further below in the end of the doc), following the exact order of the requirements, adding a brief introduction and a conclusion.
\no Add a table of contents for the essay
\no Ideas and arguments should be laid out logically and coherently.
\no References\/sources should be properly cited in the text (Harvard style of citation recommended), with full bibliography section provided at the end of the essay.
\no Add In Text Citations (Havard Style) where appropriate
\no Bibliography should be listed according to alphabetical order of the surname of first author.
\no Pay attention to format and overall readability
\no Use Visual aid \/ Pictures \/ Timeline of SDGs throughout the paragraphs where it suits to support the arguments
\no Consistent and clear font size throughout
\no Line space 1 \u2013 depending on font<\/p>\n
Note: Additional Links & resources on all the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to include in the Essay:
\n\u2022 The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2021
\n\u2022 The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2020
\n\u2022 SDG INDICATORS
\n\u2022 A GUIDE TO SDG INTERACTIONS: FROM SCIENCE TO IMPLEMENTATION
\n\u2022 https:\/\/dashboards.sdgindex.org\/profiles
\n\u2022 https:\/\/sdg-tracker.org\/
\n\u2022 https:\/\/sdgacademylibrary.mediaspace.kaltura.com\/
\nACC3145 SDG COURSEWORK Structure & Criteria
\n1. Introduction (5%) Introduce scope of the coursework. Focus is on chosen SDG not all SDGs
\nWhy do you think the chosen SDG is important?
\nGive a brief outline of the main sections and\/or content of the essay
\n2. SDGs as a whole (10%) Provide a brief background and history on SDGs. Discussion should be generic
\nWhat issues led to the emergence of the SDGs
\nWhat are the objectives of the SDGs
\nHow do the SDGs contribute to ethical (principles of human dignity, rights, justice, equality, fairness \u2013 see Unit 1) and sustainability (whether they are useful in the future Unit 2) perspectives
\nThe state of SDG related disclosures by companies, organisations, consultancies governments and so on \u2013 all constitute accounting for SDGs and whether the disclosures (in whatever form) are needed
\nSome criticisms of the SDGs
\n3. Assessment of chosen SDG (30%) What is the main issue of the Goal? e.g. for Goal 1, the main issue is poverty, so describe poverty and issues around the state of those experiencing poverty. Explain, from your perspective, why and how poverty is an important issue in global environment.
\nPresent the Goal as a way of addressing the challenges from the issues raised above (all Goals have their issues poverty as an example above only applies to Goal 1)
\nPresent facts on the Goal \u2013 what progress has been made on the goal overall?
\nThe SDG report (available in UniHub) has latest details on all the goals
\nCritically discuss ethical and sustainability arguments specifically on the Goal. Use logical arguments to review the theoretical perspectives on the goal.
\nGuidance on critical Assessment is provided below
\nSpecify the number of indicators and targets of the Goal, e.g. the goal has 2 targets and 3 indicators
\nDescribe any 2 indicators\/targets of the Goal
\nThe 2 indicators will be used in evaluating evidence in the following section (section 4)<\/p>\n
4. Evidence of SDG application (35%) Discuss any 2 evidence that demonstrates application of the Goal.
\nThe evidence can be any country (e.g. Germany) or company (e.g. Tesco) or organisation (e.g. Oxfam) or project ( help with nursing paper writing from experts with MSN & DNP degrees) (e.g. a defined activity)
\nEach evidence must be given a brief background. If a company, a brief introduction and overview of the company is required. The same applies to a country. Context of the evidence should be adequately described
\nAnalyse each evidence to specific detail. Mentions of achievements and outcomes are not enough, discuss processes (ideally from multiple reliable sources) of how the achievements were attained.
\nLink the performance of each evidence with the indicator\/target as described in the previous section (section 3)
\nEnsure that each evidence is, at least, evaluated against one indicator\/target
\nCritically discuss the evidence from a theoretical point of view using perspectives from ethical and\/or sustainability arguments
\nSee critical Assessment below
\nPresent logical linkages between the Goal and other SDGs
\nHow does progress, achievement, failure of the Goal affect and influence other SDGs?
\n5. Conclusion and recommendatio ns (15%) Present a summary of key findings and observations from the collective analysis undertaken
\nFrom the evidence presented, what is the direction of the Goal and indicator covered? Are the issues getting better or indications to suggest improvements?
\nCan the Goal be achieved by 2030?
\nAre key problems with the issue being addressed by the SDG?
\nOffer clear recommendations on the Goal and issue
\nPresentation and references (5%) Consistent in-text (in the body of write-up) and after text (in the bibliography section) references
\nClean and logical structure<\/p>\n
Critical thinking and Assessment
\nAn inquisitive approach of using evidence and reasoning to form opinion. In the context of the coursework, apply the theories (ethical and sustainability arguments) on evidence used i.e. how has the evidence (company\/ country\/organisation) performed against theoretical arguments and assumptions.
\nCritical thinking is not about:
\nbeing negative questioning randomly nit picking
\nCritical thinking encourages:
\nAttitude of not accepting content at face value
\nAsking and answering constructively and systematically
\nNot accepting everything without rationale, justification and evidence Willingness to accept new evidence that emerge to shape understanding Continuous learning process
\nCritical writing emerges from critical thinking and should be presented with the following attributes:
\nA balanced account of pros and cons Assumptions and assertions are supported Clear account that scrutinises what\u2019s been said
\nExpand ideas beyond mentions \u2013 fewer points that are explained well rather than presentation of numerous ideas
\nBackup argument with evidence and recognise limitations Avoid simple conclusion
\nAssessment marking criteria rubric \u2013 coursework
\nSection 1-4 5-8 9-12 13-16 17-20
\nIntroduction Excellent introduction with clear specification of SDG of focus and scope that highlights all the main issues in the coursework. Very good introduction with clear specification of SDG of focus and scope that highlights the main issues in the coursework. Introduction specifies SDG of focus and scope that highlights some of the main issues in the coursework. Adequate introduction with specification of SDG of focus and scope that highlights some of the main issues in the
\ncoursework. Absence of introduction or failure to meet introduction requirements.
\n5% 5 \u2013 3.5 3.49 \u2013 3 2.99 \u2013 2.5 2.49 \u2013 2 1.99 \u2013 0
\nSDGs A thorough examination of the SDGs based on its history, justification, objectives with general theoretical insights, application and criticisms An examination of the SDGs based on most of its history, justification, objectives with general theoretical insights, application and criticisms Examination of the SDGs included its history, justification, objectives with general theoretical insights, application and
\ncriticisms A review of the SDGs based on some of its history, justification, objectives with general theoretical insights, application and criticisms Limited review of the SDGs that lacked most of the required elements
\n10% 10 \u2013 7 6.99 \u2013 6 5.99 \u2013 5 4.99 \u2013 4 3.99 \u2013 0
\nSDG Assessment Outstanding analysis of chosen SDG and relevant issues the goal was designed to address. Arguments brilliantly included a critical Assessment on progress of the goal with description of indicators\/targets. A very well-expressed analysis of chosen SDG and relevant issues the goal was designed to address. Arguments included a critical Assessment on progress of the goal with description of indicators\/targets. A good analysis of chosen SDG and\/or relevant issues the goal was designed to address. Arguments considers critical Assessment on progress of the goal with description of
\nindicators\/targets. Adequate analysis of chosen SDG and\/or relevant issues the goal was designed to address. Some Assessment on progress of the goal with description of indicators\/targets. Inadequate analysis of chosen SDG and\/or relevant issues the goal was designed to address. Limited or absent Assessment and\/or indicators.
\n30% 30 \u2013 21 20.99 \u2013 18 17.99 \u2013 15 14.99 \u2013 12 11.99 \u2013 0
\nEvidence analysis Excellent description of required evidence with logical and critical
\ntheoretical perspectives that A fantastic description of required evidence with logical and critical
\ntheoretical perspectives A good description of required evidence with logical and critical
\ntheoretical Limited description of required evidence with meagre critical
\ntheoretical perspectives. Failure to adequately describe evidence
\nand\/or theoretical<\/p>\n
are linked to relevant indicators. Strong linkages established with other SDGs that are well linked to relevant indicators. Good Linkages established with other SDGs perspectives that are linked to relevant indicators. Linkages reasonably established
\nwith other SDGs Some linkages to relevant indicators and\/or consideration of other SDGs perspectives. Weak linkages to relevant indicators and\/or consideration of
\nother SDGs
\n35% 35 \u2013 24.5 24.44 \u2013 21 20.99 \u2013 17.5 17.49 \u2013 14 13.99 \u2013 0
\nConclusion, recommendation, presentation and references Excellent summary of key findings that touches on practical and theoretical positions. Coherent recommendations. Effective, consistent and broad use of references. Brilliant presentation with very little errors. Very good summary of key findings that touches on practical and theoretical positions. Coherent recommendations.
\nEffective, and consistent use of references.
\nConfident presentation with little errors. Good summary of key findings that touches on practical and\/or theoretical positions. Reasonable recommendations with consistent use of references. Clear presentation with
\nsome errors. Adequate summary of key findings with little practical and theoretical positions. Good recommendations. Could improve references and\/or presentation with errors. Limited or no summary of key findings and\/or recommendations. Incomplete or no references. Can easily improve presentation.
\n20% 20 \u2013 14 13.99 \u2013 12 11.99 \u2013 10 9.99 \u2013 8 7.99 \u2013 0<\/p>\n
Assignment status: Already Solved By Our Experts<\/p>\n
————<\/p>\n
which should Coursework Essay<\/p>\n
Write an individual essay, which should about 3,500 words (excluding appendices and bibliographies):<\/p>\n
A critical analysis on ONE Sustainable Development Goal namely: Goal 13 Climate Action.<\/p>\n
The requirements of the essay are:<\/p>\n
Examine the significance of the Sustainable Development Goals as a whole with an emphasis on how accounting for the goals advances social, environmental and ethical development<\/p>\n
Use a theoretical framework to critically evaluate the purpose and relevance of your chosen Goal from an ethical perspective<\/p>\n
Describe the context, indicators and targets of your chosen Goal that seeks to promote ethical and sustainable progress<\/p>\n
Provide an evidential based analysis with a specific focus on an organisation or country that demonstrates progress and future outlook of the Goal<\/p>\n
Support your arguments<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
which should Coursework Essay Write an individual essay, which should about 3,500 words (excluding appendices and bibliographies): A critical analysis on ONE Sustainable Development Goal\u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[479,537,172,478],"tags":[543,539,541,549,545,542,548,550,558,551,538,555,540,560,552,557,559,554,561,556,553,546,547,544],"class_list":["post-13064","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-nursing-course-hero","category-nursing-essay-pro","category-nursing-study-bay","category-nursing-study-pool","tag-ama","tag-apa-citation-generator","tag-apa-essay-writer-free","tag-apa-format-7th-edition","tag-apa-format-example","tag-apa-in-text-citation","tag-buy-custom-college-essays-online","tag-buy-mla-paper-online","tag-chicago","tag-custom-academic-writing-services","tag-custom-mla-style-papers","tag-harvard","tag-ieee","tag-is-mla-format-double-spaced","tag-mla-citation-generator","tag-mla-format-font","tag-mla-format-font-size","tag-mla-format-purdue-owl","tag-mla-format-spacing","tag-mla-header-format","tag-mla-in-text-citation","tag-purdue-owl-apa","tag-purdue-owl-apa-citation","tag-write-my-paper-in-apa-format"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13064","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13064"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13064\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13064"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13064"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13064"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}