4\/13\/22, 9:06 PM Feedback for Draft Presentation – Spring 2022 – Principles of Biology I Lab (BIOL-1107L-OF2) – Georgia Southern University
\nhttps:\/\/georgiasouthern.desire2learn.com\/d2l\/lms\/dropbox\/user\/folder_user_view_feedback.d2l?db=723142&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=689491 1\/12
\nFinal Presentation Rubric
\nActivity: Draft Presentation
\nCourse: Spring 2022 – Principles of Biology I Lab (BIOL-1107L-OF2)
\nName: Priya Patel
\nProject title Slide Acceptable Developing Absent Criterion Score
\nDescriptive
\nProject Title
\n2 \/ 2
\nStudent Name
\nand Date
\n1 \/ 2
\n1 point
\nThe project ( help with nursing paper writing from experts with MSN & DNP degrees) title is
\nnot detailed or
\ndescriptive
\n0 points
\nThe project ( help with nursing paper writing from experts with MSN & DNP degrees) title is
\nabsent.
\n2 points
\nStudent name and
\nthe presentation
\ndate are included.
\n0 points
\nA title slide does not
\nexist.
\nCriterion Feedback
\nRefer to Postlab Ex.2 instructions and associated rubric to find the expectations for inclusion of
\nstudent names and date of presentation.
\nIntroduction Good Acceptable Developing Insufficient
\nCriterion
\nScore
\nWolbachia Background
\nInformation
\n9 \/ 9
\n6 points
\nPresentation
\nprovides some
\nrelevant
\ninformation
\nabout Wolbac
\nhia infection in
\ninsect &
\nnematode
\npopulations.
\n3 points
\nThe
\ndescription of
\nWolbachia is
\nprovided but is
\neither too
\ndetailed or not
\ndetailed
\nenough or is
\nincorrect.
\n0 points
\nNo
\nbackground
\ninformation
\nabout
\nWolbachia is
\nprovided.
\n2 points
\nTitle slide is detailed
\nand descriptive.
\n1 point
\nStudent name or the
\npresentation date is
\nmissing.
\n9 points
\nA concise yet
\ncomprehensiv
\ne description
\nof relevant
\ninformation
\nabout
\nWolbachia and
\nits impact on
\ninsect &
\nnematode
\npopulations is
\nprovided.
\n4\/13\/22, 9:06 PM Feedback for Draft Presentation – Spring 2022 – Principles of Biology I Lab (BIOL-1107L-OF2) – Georgia Southern University
\nhttps:\/\/georgiasouthern.desire2learn.com\/d2l\/lms\/dropbox\/user\/folder_user_view_feedback.d2l?db=723142&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=689491 2\/12
\nIntroduction Good Acceptable Developing Insufficient
\nCriterion
\nScore
\nHuman Health Relevance 9 \/ 9
\nProject Rationale 4 \/ 4
\n6 points
\nSome
\ninformation
\nabout human
\nhealth
\nrelevance of
\nWolbachia is
\ncorrectly
\npresented.
\n3 points
\nThe human
\nhealth
\nrelevance of
\nWolbachia is
\nprovided but is
\neither too
\ndetailed for
\none slide,
\nbarely
\nmentioned, or
\nincorrect.
\n0 points
\nThe human
\nhealth
\nrelevance of
\nWolbachia is
\nnot
\nmentioned.
\n0 points 2 points
\nAn attempt is
\nmade to
\naddress the
\nproject ( help with nursing paper writing from experts with MSN & DNP degrees)
\nrationale, but
\nit does not
\naddress the
\npurpose of all
\nBIOL 1107L
\nstudents, OR
\nthe individual
\nstudent
\nbenefit of the
\nWolbachia
\nproject ( help with nursing paper writing from experts with MSN & DNP degrees) is not
\nclearly
\ndescribed, OR
\nboth are
\npresented but
\nnot
\nspecifically
\nand clearly
\ndescribed.
\n0 points
\nDescription of
\nthe project ( help with nursing paper writing from experts with MSN & DNP degrees)
\nrationale is not
\npresent.
\nExperimental
\nDesign
\nAcceptable Developing Absent Criterion Score
\n9 points
\nA brief and
\nrelevant
\ndescription of
\nthe human
\nhealth
\nrelevance of
\nWolbachia is
\nprovided.
\nOne filariasis
\nand one viral
\ndisease are
\nmentioned.
\n4 points
\nBoth the
\npurpose of all
\nBIOL 1107L
\nstudents’
\ninvolvement
\nAND the
\nindividual
\nstudent
\nbenefit of the
\nWolbachia
\nproject ( help with nursing paper writing from experts with MSN & DNP degrees) are
\nspecifically
\nand clearly
\ndescribed.
\n4\/13\/22, 9:06 PM Feedback for Draft Presentation – Spring 2022 – Principles of Biology I Lab (BIOL-1107L-OF2) – Georgia Southern University
\nhttps:\/\/georgiasouthern.desire2learn.com\/d2l\/lms\/dropbox\/user\/folder_user_view_feedback.d2l?db=723142&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=689491 3\/12
\nExperimental
\nDesign
\nAcceptable Developing Absent Criterion Score
\nFlowchart 3 \/ 6
\n6 points
\nComplete flowchart
\nis clearly presented.
\n0 points
\nNo flowchart is
\npresented.
\nCriterion Feedback
\nOutline of activities as in the Lab Manual.
\nRefer to Postlab Ex.2 instructions and associated rubric to find the expectations for presentation
\nof the experimental design flowchart.
\nInsect
\nCollection, ID,
\nand
\nBackground
\nAcceptable Developing Developing Absent Criterion Score
\nInsect
\nCollection
\n5 \/ 5
\n3 points
\nSome descriptive
\ndetails (of day,
\ntime, location,
\nhabitat,
\ncollection
\ntechnique) are
\nmissing.
\n1 point
\nSome descriptive
\ndetails (of day,
\ntime, location,
\nhabitat,
\ncollection
\ntechnique) are
\nmissing.
\n0 points
\nNo descriptive
\ndetails (of day,
\ntime, location,
\nhabitat,
\ncollection
\ntechnique) from
\ninsect sample
\ncollection were
\ngiven.
\n3 points
\nA flowchart is
\npresented but
\nproblems exist.
\n5 points
\nAll descriptive
\ndetails (day, time,
\nlocation, habitat,
\ncollection
\ntechnique) from
\ninsect sample
\ncollection are
\npresented.
\n4\/13\/22, 9:06 PM Feedback for Draft Presentation – Spring 2022 – Principles of Biology I Lab (BIOL-1107L-OF2) – Georgia Southern University
\nhttps:\/\/georgiasouthern.desire2learn.com\/d2l\/lms\/dropbox\/user\/folder_user_view_feedback.d2l?db=723142&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=689491 4\/12
\nInsect
\nCollection, ID,
\nand
\nBackground
\nAcceptable Developing Developing Absent Criterion Score
\nInsect
\nDrawings
\n10 \/ 10
\nInsect
\nIdentification
\n4 \/ 4
\nInsect Order
\nBackground
\nInformation
\n3 \/ 3
\n6 points
\nProblems exist
\nwith the student
\ndrawings.
\nOriginal student
\ndrawings of
\nappropriate size
\nmust be clearly
\nand
\nappropriately
\nlabeled and
\npresented.
\n3 points
\nProblems exists
\nwith the student
\ndrawings.
\nOriginal student
\ndrawings of
\nappropriate size
\nmust be clearly
\nand
\nappropriately
\nlabeled and
\npresented.
\n0 points
\nOriginal student
\ndrawings are not
\npresent.
\n1 point
\nInsect Order is
\npresented but is
\nincorrect.
\n1 point
\nInsect Order is
\npresented but is
\nincorrect.
\n0 points
\nInsect Order is
\nnot identified.
\n2 points
\nInformation
\nabout the diet,
\nlifecycle, habitat,
\nand an
\ninteresting fact
\nabout the insect
\nin the scientific
\nOrder is missing.
\n1 point
\nInformation
\nabout the diet,
\nlifecycle, habitat,
\nand an
\ninteresting fact
\nabout the insect
\nin the scientific
\nOrder is missing.
\n0 points
\nNo background
\ninformation
\nabout the insect
\nOrder is
\nprovided.
\nPrediction and
\nSupporting
\nInformation
\nAcceptable Developing Developing Absent Criterion Score
\n10 points
\nOriginal student
\ndrawings of
\nappropriate size
\nare clearly
\npresented.
\nAppropriate
\nlabels are legible.
\n4 points
\nInsect Order is
\nclearly and
\ncorrectly
\nidentified.
\n3 points
\nThe diet,
\nlifecycle, habitat,
\nand one
\ninteresting fact
\nabout the insect
\nin the scientific
\nOrder are
\ndescribed.
\n4\/13\/22, 9:06 PM Feedback for Draft Presentation – Spring 2022 – Principles of Biology I Lab (BIOL-1107L-OF2) – Georgia Southern University
\nhttps:\/\/georgiasouthern.desire2learn.com\/d2l\/lms\/dropbox\/user\/folder_user_view_feedback.d2l?db=723142&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=689491 5\/12
\nPrediction and
\nSupporting
\nInformation
\nAcceptable Developing Developing Absent Criterion Score
\nJournal Article
\n#1
\n6 \/ 6
\nJournal Article
\n#2
\n4 \/ 6
\n4 points
\nInformation from
\na peer-reviewed
\nsource is missing.
\n2 points
\nInformation from
\na peer-reviewed
\nsource is missing.
\n0 points
\nNo information
\nfrom a peerreviewed
\nscientific journal
\narticle is
\npresented.
\n6 points
\nInformation
\nabout Wolbachia
\nprevalence,
\nreproductive
\nphenotypes,
\nlocation, climate,
\nand habitat from
\na peer-reviewed
\nscientific journal
\nis presented.
\n2 points
\nInformation from
\na peer-reviewed
\nsource is missing.
\n0 points
\nNo information
\nfrom a peerreviewed
\nscientific journal
\narticle is
\npresented.
\nCriterion Feedback
\nIdentify your second article with 62% prevalence.
\nRefer to the directions and associated rubric for Postlab Exercise 3 to find the expectations for
\nthe presentation of Wolbachia infection information from a peer-reviewed scientific article.
\n6 points
\nInformation
\nabout Wolbachia
\nprevalence,
\nreproductive
\nphenotypes,
\nlocation, climate,
\nand habitat from
\na peer-reviewed
\nscientific journal
\nis presented.
\n4 points
\nInformation from
\na peer-reviewed
\nsource is missing.
\n4\/13\/22, 9:06 PM Feedback for Draft Presentation – Spring 2022 – Principles of Biology I Lab (BIOL-1107L-OF2) – Georgia Southern University
\nhttps:\/\/georgiasouthern.desire2learn.com\/d2l\/lms\/dropbox\/user\/folder_user_view_feedback.d2l?db=723142&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=689491 6\/12
\nPrediction and
\nSupporting
\nInformation
\nAcceptable Developing Developing Absent Criterion Score
\nLocal
\nCollection
\nInformation
\n3 \/ 3
\nPrediction 6 \/ 6
\n2 points
\nInformation from
\nthe local
\ncollection data is
\nmissing.
\n1 point
\nInformation from
\nthe local
\ncollection data is
\nmissing.
\n0 points
\nNo information
\nfrom the local
\ncollection data is
\npresented.
\n4 points
\nA prediction and
\nthe supporting
\nrationale are
\npresented, but
\nproblems exist.
\n2 points
\nA prediction and
\nthe supporting
\nrationale are
\npresented, but
\nproblems exist.
\n0 points
\nNo attempt at a
\nprediction or
\nsupporting
\nrationale are
\nprovided.
\nMolecular
\nBiology
\nResults
\nAcceptable Developing Developing Absent Criterion Score
\nDNA
\nExtraction
\n8 \/ 12
\n12 points
\nA complete table
\nof the results
\nfrom DNA
\nextraction with
\nonly necessary
\nelements is
\npresented.
\n4 points
\nThe table of
\nresults from
\nDNA extraction
\nis missing
\ninformation or
\nincludes
\nunnecessary
\ninformation.
\n0 points
\nNo table that
\npresents the
\nresults of DNA
\nextraction is
\npresented.
\n3 points
\nInformation
\nabout Wolbachia
\nprevalence,
\nlocation, and
\nclimate from the
\nthe local
\ncollection data is
\npresented.
\n6 points
\nAn
\nappropriatelyconstructed
\nprediction is
\npresented
\nclearly.
\nAppropriate
\nrationale for the
\nprediction is
\npresented.
\n8 points
\nThe table of
\nresults from
\nDNA extraction
\nis missing
\ninformation or
\nincludes
\nunnecessary
\ninformation.
\n4\/13\/22, 9:06 PM Feedback for Draft Presentation – Spring 2022 – Principles of Biology I Lab (BIOL-1107L-OF2) – Georgia Southern University
\nhttps:\/\/georgiasouthern.desire2learn.com\/d2l\/lms\/dropbox\/user\/folder_user_view_feedback.d2l?db=723142&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=689491 7\/12
\nMolecular
\nBiology
\nResults
\nAcceptable Developing Developing Absent Criterion Score
\nExpected
\nResults of
\nPCR
\n5 \/ 8
\nGel
\nElectrophoresi
\ns
\n2 \/ 8
\nCriterion Feedback
\nRefer to the directions and associated rubric for Postlab Exercise 5 to find the expectations for
\nthe tabular presentation of DNA extraction data.
\n8 points
\nA complete table
\nthat describes
\nthe expected
\nPCR results of
\ncontrol and
\nunknown
\nsamples with
\nonly necessary
\nelements is
\npresented.
\n2 points
\nTable of
\nexpected PCR
\nresults of control
\nand unknown
\nsamples is
\nmissing
\ninformation or
\nincludes
\nunnecessary
\ninformation.
\n0 points
\nNo table that
\npresents the
\nexpected results
\nfrom PCR for
\ncontrols and
\nunknown
\nsamples is
\npresented.
\nCriterion Feedback
\nRefer to the directions and associated rubric for Postlab Exercise 7B to find the expectations for
\nthe tabular presentation of expected PCR results from controls and student samples.
\n8 points
\nGel image is
\nclearly labeled
\nand presented
\nwith only
\nnecessary
\ninformation
\nabout the results
\nof gel
\nelectrophoresis.
\n5 points
\nProblems exist
\nwith the
\npresentation of
\ngel
\nelectrophoresis
\nresults.
\n0 points
\nGel image is not
\nincluded.
\n5 points
\nTable of
\nexpected PCR
\nresults of control
\nand unknown
\nsamples is
\nmissing
\ninformation or
\nincludes
\nunnecessary
\ninformation.
\n2 points
\nProblems exist
\nwith the
\npresentation of
\ngel
\nelectrophoresis
\nresults.
\n4\/13\/22, 9:06 PM Feedback for Draft Presentation – Spring 2022 – Principles of Biology I Lab (BIOL-1107L-OF2) – Georgia Southern University
\nhttps:\/\/georgiasouthern.desire2learn.com\/d2l\/lms\/dropbox\/user\/folder_user_view_feedback.d2l?db=723142&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=689491 8\/12
\nMolecular
\nBiology
\nResults
\nAcceptable Developing Developing Absent Criterion Score
\nCriterion Feedback
\nYou were required to download the provided gels.
\nRefer to the directions and associated rubric for Postlab Exercise 7B to find the expectations for
\nthe presentation gel electrophoresis results.
\nConclusions\/R
\neflections
\nAcceptable Developing Developing Absent Criterion Score
\nAssessment of
\nPrediction
\n6 \/ 6
\nRelevance of
\nConclusions
\n2 \/ 6
\n4 points
\nStudent data are
\nnot clearly linked
\nto the prediction,
\nand\/or student
\ndid not clearly
\ndescribe whether
\nthe prediction
\nwas supported or
\nnot.
\n2 points
\nStudent data are
\nnot clearly linked
\nto the prediction,
\nand\/or student
\ndid not clearly
\ndescribe whether
\nthe prediction
\nwas supported or
\nnot.
\n0 points
\nStudent did not
\nevaluate the
\nprediction after
\ncompleting the
\nexperiment.
\n6 points
\nRelevance of
\nconclusions is
\ndiscussed as they
\nrelate to
\ninformation
\nobtained from
\npeer-reviewed
\nscientific journal
\narticles and the
\nlocal collection
\ndata.
\n4 points
\nAn attempt to
\ndiscuss the
\nrelevance of the
\nconclusions as
\nthey relate to
\ndata obtained
\nfrom peerreviewed
\nscientific journal
\narticles and the
\nlocal collection
\ndata.
\n0 points
\nRelevance of the
\nconclusions was
\nnot discussed.
\n6 points
\nPresentation
\nclearly and
\ncorrectly
\ndescribes how
\nthe results
\nsupport or do
\nnot the
\nprediction.
\n2 points
\nAn attempt to
\ndiscuss the
\nrelevance of the
\nconclusions as
\nthey relate to
\ndata obtained
\nfrom peerreviewed
\nscientific journal
\narticles and the
\nlocal collection
\ndata.
\n4\/13\/22, 9:06 PM Feedback for Draft Presentation – Spring 2022 – Principles of Biology I Lab (BIOL-1107L-OF2) – Georgia Southern University
\nhttps:\/\/georgiasouthern.desire2learn.com\/d2l\/lms\/dropbox\/user\/folder_user_view_feedback.d2l?db=723142&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=689491 9\/12
\nConclusions\/R
\neflections
\nAcceptable Developing Developing Absent Criterion Score
\nReflection 2 \/ 3
\nCriterion Feedback
\nRefer to the directions and associated rubric for Postlab Exercise 7B to find the expectations for
\nthe presentation gel electrophoresis results.
\n3 points
\nA thoughtful,
\nunique reflection
\nis presented in
\ndetail.
\n1 point
\nA reflection is
\npresented but is
\nnot detailed,
\nunique, or
\nthoughtful.
\n0 points
\nNo reflection is
\npresented.
\nCriterion Feedback
\nRefer to the directions and associated rubric for Postlab Exercise 7B to find the expectations for
\nthe presentation gel electrophoresis results.
\nReferences Acceptable Developing Developing Absent Criterion Score
\nComprehensiv
\ne Citations
\n8 \/ 8
\nStyle Guide
\nSuperscript
\nNumbering
\nSystem
\n8 \/ 8
\n5 points
\nMost information
\nand\/or images
\nthat require
\ncitations are
\nreferenced.
\n2 points
\nSome
\ninformation
\nand\/or images
\nthat require
\ncitations are
\nreferenced.
\n0 points
\nReferences are
\nnot included.
\n5 points
\nA few references
\nare missing
\nsuperscript
\nreferences.
\n2 points
\nMany references
\nare missing
\nsuperscript
\nreferences.
\n0 points
\nNo superscript
\nreferences are
\nused.
\n2 points
\nA reflection is
\npresented but is
\nnot detailed,
\nunique, or
\nthoughtful.
\n8 points
\nAll information
\nand images that
\nrequire citations
\nare referenced.
\n8 points
\nPresentation
\nfollows the
\ninstructions in
\nthe Postlab
\nassignments and
\nin the Style
\nGuide.
\n4\/13\/22, 9:06 PM Feedback for Draft Presentation – Spring 2022 – Principles of Biology I Lab (BIOL-1107L-OF2) – Georgia Southern University
\nhttps:\/\/georgiasouthern.desire2learn.com\/d2l\/lms\/dropbox\/user\/folder_user_view_feedback.d2l?db=723142&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=689491 10\/12
\nReferences Acceptable Developing Developing Absent Criterion Score
\nCitation
\nStyle\/Format
\n6 \/ 6
\n4 points
\nMost references
\nare properly
\npresented.
\n2 points
\nSome references
\nare properly
\npresented.
\n0 points
\nReferences are
\nnot included.
\nProfessional
\nPresentation
\nAcceptable Developing Developing Absent Criterion Score
\nSlide Titles 6 \/ 6
\nInformation
\nFlow
\n6 \/ 6
\nParaphrasing 6 \/ 6
\n4 points
\nSome slide titles
\nare missing,
\nand\/or some
\nslide titles are
\nnot descriptive.
\n2 points
\nMany slide titles
\nare missing,
\nand\/or many
\nslide titles are
\nnot descriptive.
\n0 points
\nNo slide titles are
\npresent.
\n4 points
\nSlides were not
\nwell-organized,
\nor some slides
\nwere missing.
\n2 points
\nSlides were not
\nwell-organized,
\nor some slides
\nwere missing.
\n0 points
\n4 points
\nWork exhibits at
\nleast one or a
\nfew quotation(s),
\nand\/or
\ninformation is
\nparaphrased
\npoorly, indicating
\na poor
\nunderstanding of
\nthe material.
\n2 points
\nWork includes
\nextensive
\nquotations (more
\nthan two)
\nindicating little
\nto no
\nunderstanding of
\nthe material.
\n0 points
\n6 points
\nAll references
\nare properly
\npresented.
\n6 points
\nAll slides have
\nappropriate,
\ndescriptive titles.
\n6 points
\nSlides are
\norganized so that
\npresentation tells
\na clear, concise
\nstory.
\n6 points
\nInformation is
\nappropriately
\nparaphrased in
\nan easy flow of
\nwords that
\nindicates
\nunderstanding of
\nthe content.
\n4\/13\/22, 9:06 PM Feedback for Draft Presentation – Spring 2022 – Principles of Biology I Lab (BIOL-1107L-OF2) – Georgia Southern University
\nhttps:\/\/georgiasouthern.desire2learn.com\/d2l\/lms\/dropbox\/user\/folder_user_view_feedback.d2l?db=723142&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=689491 11\/12
\nProfessional
\nPresentation
\nAcceptable Developing Developing Absent Criterion Score
\nAmount of
\nText
\n6 \/ 6
\nFont Size 4 \/ 6
\nOverlapping
\nText\/Images
\n6 \/ 6
\nSpelling and
\nGrammar
\n6 \/ 6
\nScientific
\nNames
\n3 \/ 3
\n4 points
\nToo much or too
\nlittle text was
\nincluded on a
\nfew slides.
\n2 points
\nToo much or too
\nlittle text was
\nincluded on
\nmany slides.
\n0 points
\n6 points
\nFont size of text
\nis appropriate.
\n2 points
\nFont size is too
\nsmall on many
\nslides.
\n0 points
\nCriterion Feedback
\nThe Style Guide includes guidelines for the appropriate font size of text on PowerPoint slides and
\nexamples.
\n4 points
\nA few slides
\nexhibited text
\nand\/or images
\nthat overlapped
\nor were not
\nclear.
\n2 points
\nMost slides
\nexhibited text
\nand\/or images
\nthat overlapped
\nor were not
\nclear.
\n0 points
\n4 points
\nSome spelling or
\ngrammar
\nproblems exist.
\n2 points
\nMany problems
\nwith spelling
\nand\/or grammar
\nexist.
\n0 points
\n2 points
\nScientific names
\nare not written
\nappropriately.
\nScientific names
\nlike Wolbachia
\nare italicized or
\nunderlined.
\n1 point
\nScientific names
\nare not written
\nappropriately.
\nScientific names
\nlike Wolbachia
\nare italicized or
\nunderlined.
\n0 points
\nScientific names
\nare not included.
\nScientific names
\nlike Wolbachia
\nare italicized or
\nunderlined.
\n6 points
\nAppropriate
\namount of text
\nwas included on
\nthe slides.
\n4 points
\nFont size is too
\nsmall on a few
\nslides.
\n6 points
\nText and images
\non slides did not
\noverlap. Slides
\nwere clearly
\npresented.
\n6 points
\nNo spelling or
\ngrammar errors
\nexist.
\n3 points
\nScientific names
\nare written
\nappropriately.
\n4\/13\/22, 9:06 PM Feedback for Draft Presentation – Spring 2022 – Principles of Biology I Lab (BIOL-1107L-OF2) – Georgia Southern University
\nhttps:\/\/georgiasouthern.desire2learn.com\/d2l\/lms\/dropbox\/user\/folder_user_view_feedback.d2l?db=723142&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=689491 12\/12
\nTotal 184 \/ 210
\nOverall Score
\nImages Good Acceptable Developing Absent Criterion Score
\nAppropriate
\nImages
\n9 \/ 9
\nImage
\nAppearance
\n4 \/ 4
\n6 points
\nSome additional,
\nrelevant images
\nare included.
\n3 points
\nOnly a few
\nrelevant images
\nare present.
\n0 points
\nNo relevant
\nimages are
\npresent.
\n0 points 2 points
\nImages are
\ndistorted or
\ninappropriately
\ncropped or
\npresented.
\n0 points
\nNo relevant
\nimages are
\npresent.
\nGeneral
\nAppearance
\nGood Acceptable Developing Developing Criterion Score
\nGeneral
\nAppearance
\n12 \/ 12
\n8 points
\nPresentation
\npresents
\ninformation
\nappropriately.
\n4 points
\nPresentation
\nappears in the
\n‘draft’ stage:
\nmore effort is
\nneeded to
\ngenerate a
\nprofessional
\npresentation.
\n0 points
\nPresentation is
\nmissing slides
\nand important
\ninformation.
\nA
\n189 points
\nminimum
\nB
\n168 points
\nminimum
\nC
\n147 points
\nminimum
\nD
\n126 points
\nminimum
\nF
\n0 points
\nminimum
\n9 points
\nMany additional,
\nrelevant images
\nare included.
\n4 points
\nAll images
\nappear without
\ndistortion and
\nare appropriately
\npresented.
\n12 points
\nPresentation is
\npolished, and
\nsignificant
\nstudent effort is
\nobvious.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
4\/13\/22, 9:06 PM Feedback for Draft Presentation – Spring 2022 – Principles of Biology I Lab (BIOL-1107L-OF2) – Georgia Southern University https:\/\/georgiasouthern.desire2learn.com\/d2l\/lms\/dropbox\/user\/folder_user_view_feedback.d2l?db=723142&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=689491 1\/12 Final Presentation\u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[648,647,646],"tags":[649,652,651,650,659,658,42,660,661,657,655,656,653,654],"class_list":["post-20927","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uk-research-essays","category-usa-essays","category-write-my-essay-today","tag-write-my-dissertation-in-a-week","tag-write-my-dissertation-ireland","tag-write-my-dissertation-literature-review","tag-write-my-dissertation-proposal","tag-write-my-essay-4-me","tag-write-my-essay-for-cheap","tag-write-my-essay-free","tag-write-my-essay-today","tag-write-my-essay-uk","tag-write-my-research-paper-for-cheap","tag-write-my-research-paper-free","tag-write-my-research-paper-proposal-for-me","tag-write-my-thesis-paper-for-me","tag-write-my-thesis-proposal"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20927","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=20927"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20927\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=20927"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=20927"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=20927"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}