Assignment 1: Lab Assignment: Assessing the Stomach<\/p>\n
Please observe this assignment is due week 6. Please consult with your useful resource listing in addition to your grading rubrics and examine information for week 6. On this Lab Assignment, you’ll analyze an Episodic observe case examine that describes irregular findings in sufferers seen in a medical setting. You’ll think about what historical past ought to be collected from the sufferers in addition to which bodily exams and diagnostic exams ought to be performed. Additionally, you will formulate a differential analysis with a number of potential circumstances. Please use your Useful resource listing and grading rubric as a information. Please attain out to me when you’ve got any questions relating to this assignment<\/p>\n
ABDOMINAL ASSESSMENT<\/p>\n
Subjective:<\/p>\n
CC: \u201cMy abdomen hurts, I’ve diarrhea and nothing appears to Help.\u201d
\nHPI: JR, 47 yo WM, complains of getting generalized stomach ache that began three days in the past. He has not taken any medicines as a result of he didn’t know what to take. He states the ache is a 5\/10 immediately however has been as a lot as 9\/10 when it first began. He has been in a position to eat, with some nausea afterwards.
\nPMH: HTN, Diabetes, hx of GI bleed four years in the past
\nMedicines: Lisinopril 10mg, Amlodipine 5 mg, Metformin 1000mg, Lantus 10 models qhs
\nAllergy symptoms: NKDA
\nFH: No hx of colon most cancers, Father hx DMT2, HTN, Mom hx HTN, Hyperlipidemia, GERD
\nSocial: Denies tobacco use; occasional etoh, married, three kids (1 lady, 2 boys)
\nGoal:<\/p>\n
VS: Temp 99.eight; BP 160\/86; RR 16; P 92; HT 5\u201910\u201d; WT 248lbs
\nCoronary heart: RRR, no murmurs
\nLungs: CTA, chest wall symmetrical
\nPores and skin: Intact with out lesions, no urticaria
\nAbd: delicate, hyperactive bowel sounds, pos ache within the LLQ
\nDiagnostics: None
\nAssessment:<\/p>\n
Left decrease quadrant ache
\nGastroenteritis
\nPLAN: This part just isn’t required for the assignments on this course (NURS 6512) however can be required for future programs.<\/p>\n
To Put together<\/p>\n
Assessment the Episodic observe case examine your teacher offers you for this week\u2019s Assignment. Please see the \u201cCourse Bulletins\u201d part of the classroom in your Episodic observe case examine.<\/p>\n
With regard to the Episodic observe case examine supplied:
\nAssessment this week\u2019s Studying Sources, and think about the insights they supply in regards to the case examine.
\nContemplate what historical past could be essential to gather from the affected person within the case examine.
\nContemplate what bodily exams and diagnostic exams could be applicable to assemble extra details about the affected person\u2019s situation. How would the outcomes be used to make a analysis?
\nEstablish no less than 5 potential circumstances that could be thought-about in a differential analysis for the affected person.
\nThe Assignment<\/p>\n
Analyze the subjective portion of the observe. Checklist further data that ought to be included within the documentation.
\nAnalyze the target portion of the observe. Checklist further data that ought to be included within the documentation.
\nIs the Assessment supported by the subjective and goal data? Why or why not?
\nWhat diagnostic exams could be applicable for this case, and the way would the outcomes be used to make a analysis?
\nWould you reject\/settle for the present analysis? Why or why not? Establish three potential circumstances that could be thought-about as a differential analysis for this affected person. Clarify your reasoning utilizing no less than three completely different references from present evidence-based literature.<\/p>\n
Rubric Element<\/p>\n
Choose Grid View or Checklist View to alter the rubric’s format.<\/p>\n
Title: NURS_6512_Week_6_Assignment_1_Rubric
\n[removed]<\/p>\n
Grid View
\nChecklist View
\nWonderful\tGood\tHonest\tPoor
\nWith regard to the SOAP observe case examine supplied, deal with the next:<\/p>\n
Analyze the subjective portion of the observe. Checklist further data that ought to be included within the documentation.
\n10 (10%) – 12 (12%)
\nThe response clearly, precisely, and completely analyzes the subjective portion of the SOAP observe and lists detailed further data to be included within the documentation.
\n7 (7%) – 9 (9%)
\nThe response precisely analyzes the subjective portion of the SOAP observe and lists further data to be included within the documentation.
\nfour (four%) – 6 (6%)
\nThe response vaguely and\/or with some inaccuracy analyzes the subjective portion of the SOAP observe and vaguely and\/or with some inaccuracy lists further data to be included within the documentation.
\nzero (zero%) – three (three%)
\nThe response inaccurately analyzes or is lacking Assessment of the subjective portion of the SOAP observe, with inaccurate and\/or lacking further data included within the documentation.
\nAnalyze the target portion of the observe. Checklist further data that ought to be included within the documentation.
\n10 (10%) – 12 (12%)
\nThe response clearly, precisely, and completely analyzes the target portion of the SOAP observe and lists detailed further data to be included within the documentation.
\n7 (7%) – 9 (9%)
\nThe response precisely analyzes the target portion of the SOAP observe and lists further data to be included within the documentation.
\nfour (four%) – 6 (6%)
\nThe response vaguely and\/or with some inaccuracy analyzes the target portion of the SOAP observe and vaguely and\/or inaccurately lists further data to be included within the documentation.
\nzero (zero%) – three (three%)
\nThe response inaccurately analyzes or is lacking Assessment of the target portion of the SOAP observe, with inaccurate and\/or lacking further data included within the documentation.
\nIs the Assessment supported by the subjective and goal data? Why or why not?
\n14 (14%) – 16 (16%)
\nThe response clearly and precisely identifies whether or not or not the Assessment is supported by the subjective and\/or goal data, with a radical and detailed clarification.
\n11 (11%) – 13 (13%)
\nThe response precisely identifies whether or not or not the Assessment is supported by the subjective and\/or goal data, with an evidence.
\neight (eight%) – 10 (10%)
\nThe response vaguely and\/or inaccurately identifies whether or not or not the Assessment is supported by the subjective and\/or goal data, with a imprecise clarification.
\nzero (zero%) – 7 (7%)
\nThe response inaccurately identifies whether or not or not the Assessment is supported by the subjective and\/or goal data, with an inaccurate or lacking clarification.
\nWhat diagnostic exams could be applicable for this case, and the way would the outcomes be used to make a analysis?
\n18 (18%) – 20 (20%)
\nThe response completely and precisely describes applicable diagnostic exams for the case and explains clearly, completely, and precisely how the take a look at outcomes could be used to make a analysis.
\n15 (15%) – 17 (17%)
\nThe response precisely describes applicable diagnostic exams for the case and explains clearly and precisely how the take a look at outcomes could be used to make a analysis.
\n12 (12%) – 14 (14%)
\nThe response vaguely and\/or with some inaccuracy describes applicable diagnostic exams for the case and vaguely and\/or with some inaccuracy explains how the take a look at outcomes could be used to make a analysis.
\nzero (zero%) – 11 (11%)
\nThe response inaccurately describes applicable diagnostic exams for the case, with an inaccurate or lacking clarification of how the take a look at outcomes could be used to make a analysis.
\n\u00b7 Would you reject or settle for the present analysis? Why or why not?
\n\u00b7 Establish three potential circumstances that could be thought-about as a differenial analysis for this affected person. Clarify your reasoning utilizing no less than three completely different references from present evidence-based literature.
\n23 (23%) – 25 (25%)
\nThe response states clearly whether or not to simply accept or reject the present analysis, with a radical, correct, and detailed clarification of sound reasoning. The response clearly, completely, and precisely identifies three circumstances as a differential analysis, with reasoning that’s defined clearly, precisely, and completely utilizing no less than three completely different references from present evidence-based literature.
\n20 (20%) – 22 (22%)
\nThe response states whether or not to simply accept or reject the present analysis, with an correct clarification of sound reasoning. The response precisely identifies three circumstances as a differential analysis, with reasoning that’s defined precisely utilizing three completely different references from present evidence-based literature.
\n17 (17%) – 19 (19%)
\nThe response states whether or not to simply accept or reject the present analysis, with a imprecise clarification of the reasoning. The response identifies two or three circumstances as a differential analysis, with reasoning that’s defined vaguely and\/or inaccurately utilizing three references from present evidence-based literature.
\nzero (zero%) – 16 (16%)
\nThe response inaccurately or is lacking a press release of whether or not to simply accept or reject the present analysis, with an evidence that’s inaccurate and\/or lacking. The response identifies two or fewer circumstances as a differential analysis, with reasoning that’s lacking or defined inaccurately utilizing three or fewer references from present evidence-based literature.
\nWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Improvement and Group:
\nParagraphs clarify factors that help well-developed concepts, circulate logically, and exhibit continuity of concepts. Sentences are fastidiously focused–neither lengthy and rambling nor quick and missing substance. A transparent and complete goal assertion and introduction are supplied that delineate all required standards.
\n5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
\nParagraphs and sentences observe writing requirements for circulate, continuity, and readability. A transparent and complete goal assertion, introduction, and conclusion are supplied that delineate all required standards.
\nfour (four%) – four (four%)
\nParagraphs and sentences observe writing requirements for circulate, continuity, and readability 80% of the time. Goal, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are acknowledged, but are temporary and never descriptive.
\nthree (three%) – three (three%)
\nParagraphs and sentences observe writing requirements for circulate, continuity, and readability 60%\u201379% of the time. Goal, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are imprecise or off matter.
\nzero (zero%) – 2 (2%)
\nParagraphs and sentences observe writing requirements for circulate, continuity, and readability < 60% of the time. No goal assertion, introduction, or conclusion had been supplied.
\nWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing requirements:
\nRight grammar, mechanics, and correct punctuation
\n5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
\nMakes use of right grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
\nfour (four%) – four (four%)
\nAccommodates a number of (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
\nthree (three%) – three (three%)
\nAccommodates a number of (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
\nzero (zero%) – 2 (2%)
\nAccommodates many (\u2265 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that intrude with the reader\u2019s understanding.
\nWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows right APA format for title web page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, web page numbers, operating heads, parenthetical\/in-text citations, and reference listing.
\n5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
\nMakes use of right APA format with no errors.
\nfour (four%) – four (four%)
\nAccommodates a number of (1 or 2) APA format errors.
\nthree (three%) – three (three%)
\nAccommodates a number of (three or four) APA format errors.
\nzero (zero%) – 2 (2%)
\nAccommodates many (\u2265 5) APA format errors.
\nComplete Factors: 100
\nTitle: NURS_6512_Week_6_Assignment_1_Rubric
\n[removed]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Assignment 1: Lab Assignment: Assessing the Stomach Please observe this assignment is due week 6. Please consult with your useful resource listing in addition to\u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1804,1801,1797,1799,1803,1800,1798,1802,1796],"tags":[1805,127,1807,1806],"class_list":["post-31139","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-how-to-write-a-soap-note","category-legit-nursing-paper-writing-help","category-soap-note","category-soap-note-assignment-writing-help","category-soap-note-example","category-soap-note-homework-help","category-soap-note-sample","category-what-is-a-soap-note","category-writing-soap-notes-step-by-step-examples-and-templates","tag-nursing-essays","tag-nursing-papers","tag-soap-note-essay-samples","tag-soap-note-example-essays"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31139","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=31139"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31139\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=31139"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=31139"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=31139"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}