WEEK 7: Task: Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Stomach, Urological, and Gynecological Issues
\nCorrect historical past taking of belly, urological, and gynecological complaints is important for finishing an Assessment of the older grownup. For this Task, as you study this week\u2019s affected person case examine, contemplate the way you may consider and deal with older grownup sufferers who current with well being issues associated to the belly, urological, or gynecological To organize:
\nAssessment the case examine offered by your Teacher.
\nReplicate on the affected person\u2019s signs and elements of problems which may be current.
\nThink about the way you may assess, carry out diagnostic exams, and advocate drugs to deal with sufferers presenting with the signs within the case.<\/p>\n
RESOURCES:
\nREQUIRED RESOURCES
\nKennedy-Malone, L., Martin-Plank, L., & Duffy, E. (2019). Urological and gynecological problems. In Superior follow nursing within the care of older adults (2nd ed., pp. 280\u2013304). F. A. Davis.
\nDemarest, L. (2019). Gotta go proper now: What\u2019s overactive bladder? Nursing Made Extremely Straightforward!, 17(Four), 11\u201314. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.NME.0000559586.35631.37
\nJackson, P., & Vigiola, C. M. (2018). Intestinal obstruction: Analysis and administration. American Household Doctor, 98(6), 362\u2013367.
\nShian, B., & Larson, S. T. (2018). Stomach wall ache: Scientific analysis, differential analysis, and remedy. American Household Doctor, 98(7), 429\u2013436.
\nOTHER RESOURCES:
\nHave interaction-IL (Producer). (2017e). Neighborhood companies for the older grownup: Entry and cost programs [Video]. https:\/\/engageil.com\/modules\/community-services-for-the-older-adult-access-and-payment-systems\/
\nObserve: View the Neighborhood Companies for the Older Grownup: Entry and Cost Techniques video module out there on this free course.
\nHave interaction-IL (Producer). (2017x). Offering culturally applicable look after LGBTQ older adults [Video]. https:\/\/engageil.com\/modules\/primary-care-best-practices-for-lgbtq-older-adults\/
\nObserve: View the Offering Culturally Acceptable Look after LGBTQ Older Adults video module out there on this free course.
\nHave interaction-IL (Producer). (2017y). Sexuality and the older grownup [Video]. https:\/\/engageil.com\/modules\/sexuality-and-the-older-adult\/
\nObserve: View the Sexuality and the Older Grownup video module out there on this free course.<\/p>\n
INSTRUCTIONS::::!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
\nEntry the Centered SOAP Observe Template on this week\u2019s Sources. Make sure monitor modifications are OFF: see the directions in doc sharing. YOU CAN ALSO USE THE SOAP WORD DOC AS YOUR TEMPLATE FOR YOUR NOTE \u2013 REMOVE ALL THE EXTRA WORDING AND INSTRUCTIONS PLEASE.
\nThe Task: Full the Centered SOAP Observe Template offered for the affected person within the case examine. You’ll want to deal with the next:
\nSubjective: What was the affected person\u2019s subjective criticism? What particulars did the affected person present relating to their historical past of current sickness and private and medical historical past? Embody an inventory of prescription and over-the-counter medicine the affected person is presently taking. Examine this record to the American Geriatrics Society Beers Standards\u00ae and contemplate different medicine if applicable. Present a overview of programs.
\nGoal: What observations did you notice from the bodily Assessment? What had been the lab, imaging, or practical assessments outcomes?
\nAssessment: Present a minimal of three differential diagnoses. Listing them from prime precedence to least precedence. Examine the diagnostic standards for every and clarify what guidelines every differential in or out. Clarify you vital pondering course of that led you to the first analysis you chose. Embody pertinent positives and pertinent negatives for the precise affected person case.
\nPlan: Present an in depth remedy plan for the affected person that addresses every analysis, as relevant. Embody documentation of diagnostic research that will probably be obtained, referrals to different health-care suppliers, therapeutic interventions, schooling, disposition of the affected person, caregiver Help, and any deliberate follow-up visits. Present a dialogue of well being promotion and illness prevention for the affected person, taking into account affected person elements, previous medical historical past (PMH), and different danger elements. Lastly, embrace a mirrored image assertion on the case that describes insights or classes realized.
\nPresent a minimum of three evidence-based peer-reviewed journal articles or evidenced-based tips, which relate to this case to Help your diagnostics and differentials diagnoses. Make sure they’re present (not more than 5 years outdated) and Help the remedy plan in following present requirements of care. Comply with APA seventh version formatting.
\nNOTE: SOAP notes are digital. Please fill in any lacking info. Don’t write in your cleaning soap notice \u201cinfo lacking\u201d. You fill this info in out of your previous experiences with sufferers. Factors are deducted for lacking info. *keep in mind all cleaning soap notes should include affected person well being promotion and schooling. ALSO: in the event you prescribe drugs, the identify, route, dose, length, and cease date is required. That is particularly necessary in acute care.
\nMORE DETAIL ON INSTRUCTIONS
\no put together:
\n\u2022\tAssessment the case examine offered by your Teacher.
\n\u2022\tReplicate on the affected person\u2019s signs and elements of problems which may be current.
\n\u2022\tThink about the way you may assess, carry out diagnostic exams, and advocate drugs to deal with sufferers presenting with the signs within the case.
\n\u2022\tEntry the Centered SOAP Observe Template on this week\u2019s Sources.
\nThe Task:
\nFull the Centered SOAP Observe Template offered for the affected person within the case examine. You’ll want to deal with the next:
\n\u2022\tSubjective: What was the affected person\u2019s subjective criticism? What particulars did the affected person present relating to their historical past of current sickness and private and medical historical past? Embody an inventory of prescription and over-the-counter medicine the affected person is presently taking. Examine this record to the American Geriatrics Society Beers Standards\u00ae, and contemplate different medicine if applicable. Present a overview of programs.
\n\u2022\tGoal: What observations did you notice from the bodily Assessment? What had been the lab, imaging, or practical assessments outcomes?
\n\u2022\tAssessment: Present a minimal of three differential diagnoses. Listing them from prime precedence to least precedence. Examine the diagnostic standards for every, and clarify what guidelines every differential in or out. Clarify you vital pondering course of that led you to the first analysis you chose. Embody pertinent positives and pertinent negatives for the precise affected person case.
\n\u2022\tPlan: Present an in depth remedy plan for the affected person that addresses every analysis, as relevant. Embody documentation of diagnostic research that will probably be obtained, referrals to different health-care suppliers, therapeutic interventions, schooling, disposition of the affected person, caregiver Help, and any deliberate follow-up visits. Present a dialogue of well being promotion and illness prevention for the affected person, taking into account affected person elements, previous medical historical past (PMH), and different danger elements. Lastly, embrace a mirrored image assertion on the case that describes insights or classes realized.
\n\u2022\tPresent a minimum of three evidence-based peer-reviewed journal articles or evidenced-based tips, which relate to this case to Help your diagnostics and differentials diagnoses. Make sure they’re present (not more than 5 years outdated) and Help the remedy plan in following present requirements of care. Comply with APA seventh version formatting.<\/p>\n
THE CASE SOAP NOTE:
\nWeek 7: Stomach, Urinary, and Gynecological
\nCase 1: UTI
\nR.B. 95-year-old, white male, presently dwelling in a talented nursing facility (SNF)<\/p>\n
Chief criticism: \u201cMy urine is de facto crimson.\u201d<\/p>\n
HPI: On Wednesday (2 days in the past) the affected person was dropped at your clinic by his son and complained that his urine seemed to be shiny crimson in colour. You ordered labs, urinalysis, tradition, and sensitivity, and the outcomes are under.<\/p>\n
Allergic reactions: Penicillin: Hives<\/p>\n
Drugs: Tamsulosin Zero.Four mcg, 2 capsules day by day, Aspirin 325 mg day by day, Atorvastatin 10 mg 1 pill day by day, Donepezil 10 mg 1 pill PO QHS, Metoprolol 25 mg Zero.5 mg pill each 12 hours, Acetaminophen 500 mg 1 pill BID<\/p>\n
Code standing: DNR Common eating regimen, pureed texture, honey-thickened liquids<\/p>\n
Vitals: BP 122\/70, HR 66, Temp 98.Zero F, Resp 18, Pulse ox 98% Weight:____ BMI:____<\/p>\n
PMH: Cognitive communication deficit, pneumonitis resulting from inhalation of meals and vomit, dysphagia, R-side hemiplegia and hemiparesis previous ischemic CVA, average vascular dementia, malignant neoplasm of prostate, new-onset atrial fibrillation (12\/2019), DVT on left decrease extremity, gross hematuria
\nLabs:
\nRBC three.53 (L)
\nHemoglobin 10.2 (L)
\nMicroscopic Assessment, Urine, straight Cath
\nPart:
\nWBC UA 42 (H) (Zero-5\/ HPF)
\nRBC, UA >900 (H) (Zero-5\/HPF)
\nEpithelial cells, urine 2 (Zero-Four \/HPF)
\nHyaline casts, UA Zero (Zero-2 \/LPF)
\nUrinalysis
\nShade Crimson
\nLook (Urine) Clear
\nKetones, UA Hint
\nParticular gravity 1.Zero20 (1.005-1.025)
\nBlood, UA Massive
\nPH, Urine 7.Zero (5.Zero-Eight.Zero)
\nLeukocytes Small
\nNitrites Constructive<\/p>\n
C&S outcomes weren’t out there but.<\/p>\n
TEMPLATE IN SEPARATE FILE:<\/p>\n
Rubric Element<\/p>\n
Choose Grid View or Listing View to vary the rubric’s structure.
\nTitle: NRNP_6540_Week7_Assignment_Rubric
\n\u2022\tGrid View
\n\u2022\tListing View
\nGlorious\tGood\tHonest\tPoor
\nCreate documentation within the Centered SOAP Observe Template concerning the affected person within the case examine to which you had been assigned.<\/p>\n
Within the Subjective part, present:<\/p>\n
\u2022 Chief criticism<\/p>\n
\u2022 Historical past of current sickness (HPI)<\/p>\n
\u2022 Present drugs, checked in opposition to Beers Standards<\/p>\n
\u2022 Allergic reactions<\/p>\n
\u2022 Affected person medical historical past (PMHx)<\/p>\n
\u2022 Assessment of programs\t9 (9%) – 10 (10%)
\nThe response throughly and precisely describes the affected person’s subjective criticism, historical past of current sickness, present drugs, allergic reactions, medical historical past, and overview of all programs that will inform a differential analysis. A radical cross-check of medicines in opposition to the Beers Standards has been accomplished and applicable different medicine really useful if relevant.\tEight (Eight%) – Eight (Eight%)
\nThe response precisely describes the affected person’s subjective criticism, historical past of current sickness, present drugs, allergic reactions, medical historical past, and overview of all programs that will inform a differential analysis. A cross-check of medicines in opposition to the Beers Standards has been accomplished and applicable different medicine really useful if relevant.\t7 (7%) – 7 (7%)
\nThe response describes the affected person’s subjective criticism, historical past of current sickness, present drugs, allergic reactions, medical historical past, and overview of all programs that will inform a differential analysis, however is considerably obscure or accommodates minor innacuracies. A cross-check of medicines in opposition to the Beers Standards has been accomplished however alternate options could also be lacking.\tZero (Zero%) – 6 (6%)
\nThe response offers an incomplete or inaccurate description of the affected person’s subjective criticism, historical past of current sickness, present drugs, allergic reactions, medical historical past, and overview of all programs that will inform a differential analysis. A cross-check of medicines in opposition to the Beers Standards has not been accomplished. Or, subjective documentation is lacking.
\nWithin the Goal part, present:<\/p>\n
\u2022 Bodily examination documentation of programs pertinent to the chief criticism, HPI, and historical past<\/p>\n
\u2022 Diagnostic outcomes, together with any labs, imaging, or different assessments wanted to develop the differential diagnoses\t9 (9%) – 10 (10%)
\nThe response completely and precisely paperwork the affected person’s bodily examination for pertinent programs. Diagnostic exams and their outcomes are completely and precisely documented.\tEight (Eight%) – Eight (Eight%)
\nThe response precisely paperwork the affected person’s bodily examination for pertinent programs. Diagnostic exams and their outcomes are precisely documented.\t7 (7%) – 7 (7%)
\nDocumentation of the affected person’s bodily examination is considerably obscure or accommodates minor innacuracies. Diagnostic exams and their outcomes are documented however include minor innacuracies.\tZero (Zero%) – 6 (6%)
\nThe response offers incomplete or inaccurate documentation of the affected person’s bodily examination. Techniques might have been unnecessarily reviewed, or, goal documentation is lacking.
\nWithin the Assessment part, present:<\/p>\n
The response lists so as of precedence a minimum of three distinctly totally different and detailed potential situations for a differential analysis of the affected person within the assigned case examine, and offers a radical, correct, and detailed justification for every of the situations chosen.\t20 (20%) – 22 (22%)
\nThe response lists so as of precedence a minimum of three totally different potential situations for a differential analysis of the affected person within the assigned case examine and offers an correct justification for every of the situations chosen.\t18 (18%) – 19 (19%)
\nThe response lists three potential situations for a differential analysis of the affected person within the assigned case examine, with some vagueness and\/or inaccuracy within the situations and\/or justification for every.\tZero (Zero%) – 17 (17%)
\nThe response lists two or fewer, or is lacking, potential situations for a differential analysis of the affected person within the assigned case examine, with inaccurate or lacking justification for every situation chosen.
\nWithin the Plan part, present:<\/p>\n
\u2022 An in depth remedy plan for the affected person that addresses every analysis, as relevant. Consists of documentation of diagnostic research that will probably be obtained, referrals to different health-care suppliers, therapeutic interventions, schooling, disposition of the affected person, and any deliberate observe up visits.<\/p>\n
\u2022 A dialogue associated to well being promotion and illness prevention taking into account affected person elements, PMH, and different danger elements.
\n\u2022 Reflections on the case describing insights or classes realized.\t27 (27%) – 30 (30%)
\nThe response completely and precisely outlines a remedy plan for the affected person that addresses every analysis and contains diagnostic research neeed, referrals, therapeutic interventions, affected person schooling and disposition, and deliberate follow-up visits. A radical and correct dialogue of well being promotion and illness prevention associated to the case is offered. Reflections on the case reveal robust vital pondering and synthesis of concepts.\t24 (24%) – 26 (26%)
\nThe response precisely outlines a remedy plan for the affected person that addresses every analysis and contains diagnostic research neeed, referrals, therapeutic interventions, affected person schooling and disposition, and deliberate follow-up visits. An correct dialogue of well being promotion and illness prevention associated to the case is offered. Reflections on the case reveal vital pondering.\t21 (21%) – 23 (23%)
\nThe response considerably vaguely or inaccurately outlines a remedy plan for the affected person. The dialogue on well being promotion and illness prevention associated to the case is considerably obscure or accommodates innaccuracies. Reflections on the case reveal sufficient understanding after all matters.\tZero (Zero%) – 20 (20%)
\nThe response doesn’t deal with all diagnoses or is lacking components of the remedy plan. The dialogue on well being promotion and illness prevention associated to the case is obscure, innaccurate, or lacking. Reflections on the case are obscure or lacking.
\nPresent a minimum of three evidence-based peer-reviewed journal articles or evidenced-based tips which relate to this case to Help your diagnostics and differentials diagnoses. Make sure they’re present (not more than 5 years outdated) and Help the remedy plan in following present requirements of care.\t9 (9%) – 10 (10%)
\nThe response offers a minimum of three present, evidence-based assets from the literature to Help the remedy plan for the affected person within the assigned case examine. Every useful resource represents the newest in requirements of care and offers robust justification for remedy choices.\tEight (Eight%) – Eight (Eight%)
\nThe response offers a minimum of three present, evidence-based assets from the literature to Help the remedy plan for the affected person within the assigned case examine. Every useful resource represents present requirements of care and helps remedy choices.\t7 (7%) – 7 (7%)
\nThree evidence-based assets are offered to Help remedy choices, however might not signify the newest in requirements of care or<\/p>\n
Paragraphs clarify factors that Help well-developed concepts, circulation logically, and reveal continuity of concepts. Sentences are fastidiously focused–neither lengthy and rambling nor brief and missing substance. A transparent and complete goal assertion and introduction are offered that delineate all required standards.\t5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
\nParagraphs and sentences observe writing requirements for circulation, continuity, and readability.<\/p>\n
A transparent and complete goal assertion, introduction, and conclusion are offered that delineate all required standards.\tFour (Four%) – Four (Four%)
\nParagraphs and sentences observe writing requirements for circulation, continuity, and readability 80% of the time.<\/p>\n
Objective, introduction, and conclusion of the project ( help with nursing paper writing from experts with MSN & DNP degrees) are said, but are temporary and never descriptive.\tthree (three%) – three (three%)
\nParagraphs and sentences observe writing requirements for circulation, continuity, and readability 60%\u201379% of the time.<\/p>\n
Objective, introduction, and conclusion of the project ( help with nursing paper writing from experts with MSN & DNP degrees) is obscure or off subject.\tZero (Zero%) – 2 (2%)
\nParagraphs and sentences observe writing requirements for circulation, continuity, and readability < 60% of the time.<\/p>\n
No goal assertion, introduction, or conclusion had been offered.
\nWritten Expression and Formatting\u2014English writing requirements:<\/p>\n
Right grammar, mechanics, and correct punctuation\t5 (5%) – 5
\nIncorporates many (\u2265 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that intervene with the reader\u2019s understanding.
\nWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows appropriate APA format for title web page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, web page numbers, working heads, parenthetical\/in-text citations, and reference record.\t5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
\nMakes use of appropriate APA format with no errors.\tFour (Four%) – Four (Four%)
\nIncorporates a number of (one or two) APA format errors.\tthree (three%) – three (three%)
\nIncorporates a number of (three or 4) APA format errors.\tZero (Zero%) – 2 (2%)
\nIncorporates many (\u2265 5) APA format errors.
\nWhole Factors: 100
\nTitle: NRNP_6540_Week7_Assignment_Rubric<\/p>\n
Pattern reply Centered SOAP Observe<\/p>\n
Affected person Data:
\nR.B. 95-year-old, white,
\nS (subjective)
\nCC (chief criticism): \u201cMy urine is de facto crimson.\u201d
\nHPI (historical past of current sickness): R.B. 95-year-old, white male, presently dwelling in a talented nursing facility (SNF). On Wednesday (2 days in the past) the affected person was dropped at your clinic by his son and complained that his urine seemed to be shiny crimson in colour. You ordered labs, urinalysis, tradition, and sensitivity, and the outcomes are under.
\nPresent Drugs: Tamsulosin Zero.Four mcg, 2 capsules day by day, Aspirin 325 mg day by day, Atorvastatin 10 mg 1 pill day by day, Donepezil 10 mg 1 pill PO QHS, Metoprolol 25 mg Zero.5 mg pill each 12 hours, Acetaminophen 500 mg 1 pill BID.
\nAllergic reactions: Penincilin and hives
\nPMHx: Cognitive communication deficit, pneumonitis resulting from inhalation of meals and vomit, dysphagia, R-side hemiplegia and hemiparesis previous ischemic CVA, average vascular dementia, malignant neoplasm of prostate, new-onset atrial fibrillation (12\/2019), DVT on left decrease extremity, gross hematuria.
\nSoc and Substance Hx: Embody occupation and main hobbies, household standing, tobacco and alcohol use (earlier and present use), and every other pertinent knowledge. At all times add some well being promo Question Assignment right here, reminiscent of whether or not they use seat belts on a regular basis or whether or not they have working smoke detectors in the home, dwelling setting, textual content\/mobile phone use whereas driving, and Help system.
\nFam Hx: Married and widowed. Kids and grandchildren are alive. Lives in a nursing house.
\nSurgical Hx: Splenectomy at 55 years.
\nPsychological Hx: Historical past of melancholy and suicidal ideation. Handled with no reoccurrence.
\nViolence Hx: No historical past of violence self-harm.
\nReproductive Hx: Not sexually lively. Has three daughters.
\nROS (overview of signs):
\nGENERAL: No unintentional weight modifications or fever.
\nHEENT:
\n\u2022\tEyes: No visible loss or watery eyes.
\n\u2022\tEars, Nostril, Throat: No listening to loss, congestion of the nostril, or sore throat.
\nSKIN: No rashes.
\nCARDIOVASCULAR: No palpitation or edema.
\nRESPIRATORY: No shortness of breath.
\nGASTROINTESTINAL: No nausea or vomiting.
\nGENITOURINARY: Urine is crimson.
\nNEUROLOGICAL: No headache or modifications in bladder management.
\nMUSCULOSKELETAL: No again ache or muscle stiffness.
\nHEMATOLOGIC: No bleeding.
\nLYMPHATICS: Historical past of splenectomy.
\nPSYCHIATRIC: Historical past of melancholy or nervousness.
\nENDOCRINOLOGIC: No sweating.
\nREPRODUCTIVE: Not sexually lively.
\nALLERGIES: Penicillin and hives.
\nO (goal)
\nBodily examination:
\nVery important indicators: BP 122\/70, HR 66, Temp 98.Zero F, Resp 18, Pulse ox 98.
\nDiagnostic outcomes:
\nLabs:
\nRBC three.53 (L)
\nHemoglobin 10.2 (L)
\nMicroscopic Assessment, Urine, straight Cath
\nPart:
\nWBC UA 42 (H) (Zero-5\/ HPF)
\nRBC, UA >900 (H) (Zero-5\/HPF)
\nEpithelial cells, urine 2 (Zero-Four \/HPF)
\nHyaline casts, UA Zero (Zero-2 \/LPF)
\nUrinalysis
\nShade Crimson
\nLook (Urine): Clear
\nKetones, UA Hint
\nParticular gravity 1.Zero20 (1.005-1.025)
\nBlood, UA Massive
\nPH, Urine 7.Zero (5.Zero-Eight.Zero)
\nLeukocytes Small
\nNitrites Constructive<\/p>\n
A (Assessment)
\nDifferential diagnoses:
\nCancerous and noncancerous tumors
\nA tumor within the urinary system may cause a change within the colour of the urine. Aged individuals above 50 years have a tumor or modifications in urine colour resulting from an enlarged prostate gland (McIntire et al., 2020).
\nUrinary tract an infection (UTI)
\nUTI is an an infection of the urinary system inflicting crimson colour on the urine. Signs of UTI embrace intense urge to pee, darkish or crimson colour of the urine, fever, or chills. Sufferers with UTI require pressing care (Cavanaugh & Perazella, 2019).
\nKidney cysts
\nKidney cysts might trigger no hostile signs however sufferers can expertise crimson urine if the cysts burst. Sufferers with kidney cysts are prone to expertise intense and frequent urges to urinate (Alaygut et al., 2021).
\nP (plan)
\nThe affected person ought to be referred for an X-ray and extra examination of the urine to find out the suitable analysis. The affected person ought to begin taking treatment and report back to the clinic after two weeks.
\nI realized that aged males are susceptible to the enlarged prostate gland which will increase the danger of crimson and darkish urine. It’s important to diagnose the affected person to make sure applicable remedy.
\nThe affected person ought to drink ample water day by day and keep away from exhausting duties that will trigger sweating. You will need to eat a nutritious diet to spice up immunity. The practitioner ought to keep confidentiality within the supply of care.<\/p>\n
References
\nAlaygut, D., Erfidan, G., Soyalt\u0131n, E., Sivi\u015f, Z. \u00d6., \u00c7amlar, S. A., Mutluba\u015f, F., & Demir, B. Okay. (2021). What does acute kidney damage and darkish red-brown urine that seem after bone marrow transplantation inform us: Questions. Pediatric Nephrology, 36(1), 65-66.
\nCavanaugh, C., & Perazella, M. A. (2019). Urine sediment examination within the analysis and administration of kidney illness: core curriculum 2019. American Journal of Kidney Illnesses, 73(2), 258-272.
\nMcIntire, P. J., Kilic, I., Wojcik, E. M., Barkan, G. A., & Pambuccian, S. E. (2020). The colour of urine: then and now\u2014a complete overview of the literature with emphasis on intracytoplasmic pigments encountered in urinary cytology. Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology, 9(1), 9-19.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
WEEK 7: Task: Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Stomach, Urological, and Gynecological Issues Correct historical past taking of belly, urological, and gynecological complaints is important for\u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6744],"tags":[6856,6857],"class_list":["post-46965","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-nursing-studybay","tag-r-b-95-year-old","tag-white"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/46965","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=46965"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/46965\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=46965"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=46965"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=46965"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}