Description
\nOver the period of your Practicum Courses (NGR6616 & NGR6638), you’ll write a (Capstone Case Examine) scholarly paper addressing the prevailing information and administration associated to a major care observe downside (situation) that you’ll choose from Appendix A<\/p>\n
Choose one.
\nFor this part, you’ll submit your proposal and PICOT Question Assignment, detailing a well being downside that’s prevalent inside your group and demonstrating your analysis of evidence-based well being promotion methods and illness prevention for addressing this particular well being downside. The proposal should display Graduate Faculty stage writing and demanding Assessment. For this part, you’ll ship in your proposal and PICOT Question Assignment, which can describe a well being downside that’s widespread in your group and present that you’ve got executed analysis on evidence-based well being promotion and illness prevention methods for coping with this specific well being downside. The proposal should present that you may write and assume critically at a graduate college stage.<\/p>\n
The PICOT Question Assignment is due on week 5; please carry it to class for Assessment and approval.<\/p>\n
PICOT Question Assignment
\nThe phrase PICOT is a mnemonic derived from the weather of a medical analysis Question Assignment \u2013 affected person, intervention, comparability, end result, and (generally) time. The PICOT course of begins with a case state of affairs, and the Question Assignment is phrased to elicit a solution.<\/p>\n
P \u2013 Affected person\/Drawback I \u2013 Intervention<\/p>\n
C \u2013 Comparability O \u2013 End result<\/p>\n
T \u2013 Timeframe<\/p>\n
P Affected person with anemia<\/p>\n
I Iron complement<\/p>\n
C No Iron complement<\/p>\n
O Enhance anemia<\/p>\n
T 15 weeks<\/p>\n
Part I<\/p>\n
For this part of your task, embrace the next parts: (due on week 13)<\/p>\n
1.\tTitle web page.<\/p>\n
2.\tIntroduction (minimal two paragraphs).
\n\u25a0\tIntroduce the subject of the paper.
\n\u25a0\tDescribe the well being downside. Do not sort “Introduction.\u201d
\n\u25a0\tUtilizing information and statistics, Help your declare that your chosen concern is an issue.
\n\u25a0\tEmbrace your function assertion and what particularly you’ll deal with in your proposed program.
\n\u25a0\tBe certain your proposed end result is lifelike and measurable.<\/p>\n
Three.\tPICOT (minimal one paragraph).
\n\u25a0\tThis part ought to embrace your PICOT in a Question Assignment format, adopted by thorough descriptions of your inhabitants, intervention, comparability intervention, end result, and timing (if applicable to your Question Assignment).<\/p>\n
Four.\tDescribe the susceptible inhabitants (minimal two paragraphs).
\n\u25a0\tFocus on the affect of social determinants on well being on your chosen inhabitants.
\n\u25a0\tWhat are the chance components that make this a susceptible inhabitants?
\n\u25a0\tUse proof to Help the chance components you’ve got recognized.<\/p>\n
5.\tPresent a Assessment of literature from scholarly journals of evidence-based interventions that deal with the issue (minimal six paragraphs). Use the “Literature Assessment Template” as a tenet that can Help you type by means of your ideas, observe vital factors and assume by means of the similarities and variations: Appendix B
\n\u25a0\tEmbrace a minimal of at the least six scholarly, peer-reviewed analysis articles not older than 5 years (1 paragraph for every article).
\n\u25a0\tAfter finishing a literature search on interventions addressing your chosen well being downside, write a Assessment that evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of all of the sources you’ve got discovered. (minimal one paragraph).<\/p>\n
6.\tProposal (minimal two paragraphs. You could use bullets if applicable)
\n\u25a0\tSuggest addressing the chosen well being downside utilizing an evidence-based intervention in your literature search to handle the issue within the chosen inhabitants\/setting.
\n\u25a0\tEmbrace a radical dialogue of the specifics of this intervention which embrace sources obligatory, these concerned, and feasibility for a nurse in a sophisticated function.
\n\u25a0\tMake sure to embrace a timeline for the intervention proposed.<\/p>\n
Paper Necessities:
\n\u25a0\tComply with APA seventh Version format tips.
\n\u25a0\tScholarly, peer-reviewed, and analysis articles cited needs to be inside the final 5 years.
\n\u25a0\tThis part needs to be 5-6 pages lengthy (not together with the title and reference web page).
\n\u25a0\tUse correct in-text citations with a correctly formatted reference listing.
\n\u25a0\tAll papers should be written within the third particular person.<\/p>\n
Readability of Writing:
\na.\tUse normal English grammar and sentence construction.
\nb.\tThere needs to be no spelling errors or typographical errors.
\nc.\tThe paper needs to be organized across the required parts utilizing applicable headers.<\/p>\n
Grading Standards (I)\tRankings\tPts<\/p>\n
Introduction
\n25 pts (Glorious)
\nThe introduction describes the well being downside and aligns information and statistics supporting the issue with a sensible and measurable end result proposal.\t20 pts (Good)
\nThe introduction aligns with the knowledge requested and exhibits good mastery of the content material. Offers ample data however could have missed some particulars or examples.
\n15 pts (Acceptable)
\nThe introduction aligns partially with the knowledge requested and exhibits partial mastery of the content material. It Offers ample data however lacks particulars and\/or examples.\t10 pts (Wants work)
\nThe data content material doesn’t align with the knowledge requested. Doesn’t present mastery of the ideas and lacks data, particulars and\/or examples.<\/p>\n
zero pts
\nNot submitted<\/p>\n
25 pts<\/p>\n
PICOT Question Assignment\t15 pts (Glorious)
\nThe PICOT Question Assignment aligns with the core parts and tasks particulars of the inhabitants description, intervention, comparability intervention, end result, and timing.\t10 pts (Good)
\nThe PICOT Question Assignment aligns with the core parts and tasks particulars of the inhabitants description, intervention, comparability intervention, and end result however lacks lifelike timing utility.\t5 pts (Wants work)
\nThe PICOT Question Assignment aligns with the core parts and tasks however lacks particulars of the inhabitants description, intervention, comparability intervention, end result, and timing\tThree pts (Poor)
\nThe PICOT lacks a number of core parts. Doesn’t align with inhabitants particulars, description, intervention, comparability, end result, and timing.<\/p>\n
zero pts
\nNot submitted<\/p>\n
15 pts<\/p>\n
Description of the inhabitants\t15 pts (Glorious)
\nCompletely recognized or described inhabitants supported by proof.\t12 pts (Good)
\nBriefly recognized or described inhabitants supported by proof.\t9 pts (Wants work)
\nVaguely recognized or described inhabitants supported by proof.\tThree pts (Poor)
\nPoorly recognized or described inhabitants supported by proof.\tzero pts
\nDidn’t determine the inhabitants supported by proof.<\/p>\n
15 pts<\/p>\n
Info Literacy Supporting Info
\n15 pts (Glorious)
\nSupporting data is pertinent to the dialogue, updated, and from educational and trusted sources.\t12 pts (Good)
\nSupporting data is pertinent to the dialogue subject. Sources should not the latest however are from educational and trusted sources.\t9 pts (Restricted)
\nSupporting data is pertinent to the dialogue subject however not all sources are from educational and trusted sources; could or might not be the latest.\tThree pts (Wants work)
\nSupporting data just isn’t pertinent to the dialogue and\/or not one of the sources are from educational or trusted sources.\tzero pts Unacceptable No supporting data<\/p>\n
15 pts<\/p>\n
Proposal
\n10 pts (Glorious)
\nCompletely offered an summary of the implementation plan with a abstract of the communication concepts and a timeline.
\neight pts (Good)
\nBriefly offered an summary of your implementation plan with a abstract of communication concepts and a timeline
\n6 pts (Wants work)
\nVaguely offered an summary of your implementation plan and a abstract of communication concepts and a timeline.
\nFour pts (Poor)
\nPoorly offered an summary of your implementation plan and a abstract of the communication concepts and a timeline.
\nzero pts
\nDidn’t present an summary of the proposed plan.<\/p>\n
10 pts<\/p>\n
Writing Mechanics\t10 pts (Glorious)
\nWriting is totally freed from typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.\teight pts (Good)
\nMinimal (1-Three) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.\t5 pts (Wants work)
\nA number of (Four-9) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.\t2 pts (Problematic)
\n10 or extra typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.
\nzero pts
\nNot submitted
\n10 pts<\/p>\n
Info Literacy Appropriate utility of APA seventh Version\t10 pts (Glorious)
\nFlawless execution of APA. Appropriate formatting, setup, title web page, and excellent citations and references.\teight pts (Good)
\nAppropriate formatting, setup, title web page, with minimal formatting or punctuation errors within the citations or references.\t6 pts (Wants work)
\nAppropriate formatting, setup, title web page, however vital errors with citations and references.\t2 pts (Problematic) Incorrect formatting, setup or lacking title web page, and\/or
\nproblematic citations and references.\tzero pts Not used
\nAPA model not used.
\n10 pts<\/p>\n
THE MAXIMUM SCORE FOR THIS ACTIVITY IS 100 POINTS, ACCOUNTING FOR A TOTAL OF 15 PERCENT OF THE STUDENT\u2019S FINAL GRADE.\tSCORE (POINTS):
\nGRADE (PERCENT):<\/p>\n
Grading Standards (I)\tRankings\tPts<\/p>\n
Introduction
\n25 pts (Glorious)
\nThe introduction describes the well being downside and aligns information and statistics supporting the issue with a sensible and measurable end result proposal.\t20 pts (Good)
\nThe introduction aligns with the knowledge requested and exhibits good mastery of the content material. Offers ample data however could have missed some particulars or examples.
\n15 pts (Acceptable)
\nThe introduction aligns partially with the knowledge requested and exhibits partial mastery of the content material. It Offers ample data however lacks particulars and\/or examples.\t10 pts (Wants work)
\nThe data content material doesn’t align with the knowledge requested. Doesn’t present mastery of the ideas and lacks data, particulars and\/or examples.<\/p>\n
zero pts
\nNot submitted<\/p>\n
25 pts<\/p>\n
PICOT Question Assignment\t15 pts (Glorious)
\nThe PICOT Question Assignment aligns with the core parts and tasks particulars of the inhabitants description, intervention, comparability intervention, end result, and timing.\t10 pts (Good)
\nThe PICOT Question Assignment aligns with the core parts and tasks particulars of the inhabitants description, intervention, comparability intervention, and end result however lacks lifelike timing utility.\t5 pts (Wants work)
\nThe PICOT Question Assignment aligns with the core parts and tasks however lacks particulars of the inhabitants description, intervention, comparability intervention, end result, and timing\tThree pts (Poor)
\nThe PICOT lacks a number of core parts. Doesn’t align with inhabitants particulars, description, intervention, comparability, end result, and timing.<\/p>\n
zero pts
\nNot submitted<\/p>\n
15 pts<\/p>\n
Description of the inhabitants\t15 pts (Glorious)
\nCompletely recognized or described inhabitants supported by proof.\t12 pts (Good)
\nBriefly recognized or described inhabitants supported by proof.\t9 pts (Wants work)
\nVaguely recognized or described inhabitants supported by proof.\tThree pts (Poor)
\nPoorly recognized or described inhabitants supported by proof.\tzero pts
\nDidn’t determine the inhabitants supported by proof.<\/p>\n
15 pts<\/p>\n
Info Literacy Supporting Info
\n15 pts (Glorious)
\nSupporting data is pertinent to the dialogue, updated, and from educational and trusted sources.\t12 pts (Good)
\nSupporting data is pertinent to the dialogue subject. Sources should not the latest however are from educational and trusted sources.\t9 pts (Restricted)
\nSupporting data is pertinent to the dialogue subject however not all sources are from educational and trusted sources; could or might not be the latest.\tThree pts (Wants work)
\nSupporting data just isn’t pertinent to the dialogue and\/or not one of the sources are from educational or trusted sources.\tzero pts Unacceptable No supporting data<\/p>\n
15 pts<\/p>\n
Proposal
\n10 pts (Glorious)
\nCompletely offered an summary of the implementation plan with a abstract of the communication concepts and a timeline.
\neight pts (Good)
\nBriefly offered an summary of your implementation plan with a abstract of communication concepts and a timeline
\n6 pts (Wants work)
\nVaguely offered an summary of your implementation plan and a abstract of communication concepts and a timeline.
\nFour pts (Poor)
\nPoorly offered an summary of your implementation plan and a abstract of the communication concepts and a timeline.
\nzero pts
\nDidn’t present an summary of the proposed plan.<\/p>\n
10 pts<\/p>\n
Writing Mechanics\t10 pts (Glorious)
\nWriting is totally freed from typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.\teight pts (Good)
\nMinimal (1-Three) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.\t5 pts (Wants work)
\nA number of (Four-9) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.\t2 pts (Problematic)
\n10 or extra typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.
\nzero pts
\nNot submitted
\n10 pts<\/p>\n
Info Literacy Appropriate utility of APA seventh Version\t10 pts (Glorious)
\nFlawless execution of APA. Appropriate formatting, setup, title web page, and excellent citations and references.\teight pts (Good)
\nAppropriate formatting, setup, title web page, with minimal formatting or punctuation errors within the citations or references.\t6 pts (Wants work)
\nAppropriate formatting, setup, title web page, however vital errors with citations and references.\t2 pts (Problematic) Incorrect formatting, setup or lacking title web page, and\/or
\nproblematic citations and references.\tzero pts Not used
\nAPA model not used.
\n10 pts<\/p>\n
THE MAXIMUM SCORE FOR THIS ACTIVITY IS 100 POINTS, ACCOUNTING FOR A TOTAL OF 15 PERCENT OF THE STUDENT\u2019S FINAL GRADE.\tSCORE (POINTS):
\nGRADE (PERCENT):<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Description Over the period of your Practicum Courses (NGR6616 & NGR6638), you’ll write a (Capstone Case Examine) scholarly paper addressing the prevailing information and administration\u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6906],"tags":[7080],"class_list":["post-47657","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-online-nursing-essay-writer-usa","tag-ngr6616-amp-ngr6638"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47657","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=47657"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47657\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=47657"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=47657"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=47657"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}