Sample Consumer law IRAC answers:
\nConsumer Law
\nJoan
\nIssue
\nJoan bought a second hand car from Frank for leisure and personal use. According to the agreement signed between frank and Joan, the car would only need repairs after a period of 12 months of use. The car however breaks down after six months. Consequently, Joan refuses to complete payment. Frank threatens Joan\u2019s parents to pay for the whole debt behind Joan\u2019s knowledge.
\nRule
\nAccording to the Australian consumer law Joan is recognized as a consumer since she bought the van for personal use despite it costing over $40,000. The consumer guarantee rights ensure that goods sold must be in good condition (Corones, 2011).
\nApplication
\nJoan is entitled to repairs, maintenance and refund since the van broke down before the period specified elapsed. Consumer guarantee rights assure consumers that goods sold are in good condition (Carter, 2010, 221-247).
\nConclusion
\nJoan can sue frank for fraudulency and misleading advertisements and for failing to honor the terms of the agreement (Carter, 2010, 221-247).
\nKarl and Maria
\nIssue
\nKarl and Maria are guarantors of their daughter who buys a car from Frank. Frank noticing that Maria does not understand English, threatens them to pay for the Van despite it not meeting the standards of the agreement.
\nRule
\nUnfair practices rule found in chapter 3 part 1 of the ACL consumer law protects buyers from unfair practices in business. Frank used misleading conduct in trying to threaten Karl and Maria to pay for the goods despite it having defects. Similarly the consumer guarantees act ensures that goods sold must comply with the relevant guarantees spelled in the ACL law (Griggs, 2011, 1-9). The goods must fit their description, quality purpose for which they were bought to do. In this case the car breaks down after six months against the agreed 12 month period. It is not right for Frank to have used deceptive statements by taking advantage of the fact that Maria did not understand English well hence did not understand the terms of the contract (Corones, 2011).
\nApplication
\nKarl and Maria are entitled to protection from unlawful business practices displayed by Frank for engaging on misleading or deceptive conduct, unconscionable conduct and unfair contract terms (Carter, 2010, 221-247).
\nConclusion
\nFrank can be sued for engaging in deceptive and misleading conduct in commerce when he threatened Karl and Maria to pay for goods that did not meet the standards based on the agreement.
\nFrank
\nIssue
\nFrank is a trader in motor cars and has just entered an agreement which he agrees to by signing that he would sell a second hand car to Joan his customer. However, it turns out that the van does not meet the standards laid out in the agreement whereby it breaks down before the expiry of the agreed period of 12 months. Frank goes further to threaten Joan\u2019s parents who were the guarantors to pay for the Van with full knowledge that the car had defects. Perhaps he takes advantage of the fact that the parents did not fully understand English which he learnt through Joan\u2019s interaction with her parents during the process of making the agreement.
\nRule
\nThe Australian Consumer law is clear on how the seller and consumer should relate in any commercial agreement. Chapter of the ACL law warns against misleading conduct, unconscionable conduct, unfair contract terms, unfair practices such as false advertisement, harassment or coercion, and finally consumer guarantees. Unfortunately Frank is liable to all these laws as he has acted contrary to the requirements (Griggs, 2011, 1-9).
\nApplication
\nFrank can be sued in a court of law for harassment of Karl and Maria, selling goods with defects and failing to honor the agreement between him and his customer Joan.
\nConclusion
\nFrank is fully liable to the law and Joan, Karl and Maria can sue him for failing to honor the agreement and use of unfair means to solstice payment.<\/p>\n
References
\nCarter, J.W., 2010. The commercial side of Australian consumer protection law. Journal of \tContract Law, 26(3), pp.221-247.
\nCorones, S.G., 2011. The Australian Consumer Law. Thomson Reuters Lawbook Co.
\nGriggs, L.D., 2011. Australian Consumer Law-An overview, unfair contracts, consumer \tguarantees and remedies.In Australian Consumer Law (pp. 1-9).
\nHealey, D. and Terry, A., 1991. Misleading or deceptive conduct.CCH Australia.
\nPaterson, J., 2009. The Australian Unfair Contract Terms Law: The Rise of Substantive \tUnfairness as a Ground for Review of Standard Form Consumer Contracts. Melb.\tUL \tRev., 33, p.934.<\/p>\n
LAW110 – Business Law Sample Consumer law IRAC answers: Consumer Law Joan Issue Joan bought a second hand car from Frank for leisure and personal use. According to the\u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7316,7318,7317,7315,7319,7321],"tags":[441,7323,628,7326,7325,7322,7324],"class_list":["post-48642","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-best-dissertation-writers-uk","category-british-dissertation-writers","category-dissertation-help-online","category-dissertation-writing-services-uk","category-help-with-dissertation-writing","category-uk-dissertation-help","tag-cheap-dissertation-writing-services","tag-dissertation-help-london","tag-dissertation-help-online","tag-dissertation-tutor","tag-expert-assignment-help","tag-masters-dissertation-help","tag-university-assignment-help"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48642","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=48642"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48642\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=48642"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=48642"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=48642"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\nTable of Contents
\nSubject Summary …………………………………………………………………………………………………….2
\nSubject Coordinator …………………………………………………………………………………………………2
\nSubject Coordinator……………………………………………………………………………………..2
\nEmail …………………………………………………………………………………………………………..2
\nPhone………………………………………………………………………………………………………….2
\nConsultation procedures ………………………………………………………………………………2
\nSubject Overview……………………………………………………………………………………………………..2
\nAbstract……………………………………………………………………………………………………….3
\nLearning outcomes……………………………………………………………………………………….3
\nSubject content ……………………………………………………………………………………………3
\nKey subjects…………………………………………………………………………………………………6
\nSubject Schedule & Delivery ……………………………………………………………………………………..6
\nPrescribed text……………………………………………………………………………………………..6
\nClass\/tutorial times and location …………………………………………………………………..6
\nSchedule……………………………………………………………………………………………………..6
\nLearning materials………………………………………………………………………………………10
\nLearning, teaching and support strategies ……………………………………………………10
\nRecommended student time commitment …………………………………………………..14
\nAssessment Items …………………………………………………………………………………………………..14
\nEssential requirements to pass this subject…………………………………………………..14
\nItems …………………………………………………………………………………………………………14
\nMultiple Choice Quiz ……………………………………………………………………….15
\nProblem Solving Questions ……………………………………………………………..17
\nFinal Exam ……………………………………………………………………………………..26
\nAssessment Information …………………………………………………………………………………………31
\nAcademic integrity ……………………………………………………………………………………..31
\nReferencing………………………………………………………………………………………………..31
\nHow to submit your assessment items …………………………………………………………31
\nOnline submission process………………………………………………………………31
\nPostal submission process ………………………………………………………………32
\nHand delivered submission process …………………………………………………32
\nAlternative submission process ……………………………………………………….32
\nExtensions………………………………………………………………………………………………….32
\nHow to apply for special consideration…………………………………………………………33
\nPenalties for late submission……………………………………………………………………….33
\nResubmission …………………………………………………………………………………………….33
\nFeedback processes ……………………………………………………………………………………34
\nAssessment return………………………………………………………………………………………34
\nStudent Feedback & Learning Analytics ……………………………………………………………………34
\nAssessment of subjects …………………………………………………………………………………34
\nChanges and actions based on student feedback ………………………………………….34
\nCharles Sturt University Subject Outline
\nLAW110 201930 S I
\nVersion 1 – Published 11 February 2019
\nPage 1 of 36
\nLearning analytics ………………………………………………………………………………………34
\nServices & Support …………………………………………………………………………………………………35
\nDevelop your study skills …………………………………………………………………………….35
\nLibrary Services ………………………………………………………………………………………….35
\nCSU Policies & Regulations………………………………………………………………………………………35
\nSubject Outline as a reference document……………………………………………………..35
\nSubject Summary
\nLAW110 – Business Law
\nSession 1 2019
\nFaculty of Business, Justice and Behavioural Sciences
\nSchool of Accounting and Finance
\nInternal Mode
\nCredit Points 8
\nWelcome to a new session of study at Charles Sturt University. Please refer to the University’s
\nAcknowledgement of Country (http:\/\/student.csu.edu.au\/study\/acknowledgement-ofcountry).
\nSubject Coordinator
\nSubject Coordinator Mr Shibly Abdullah
\nEmail SAbdullah@studygroup.com
\nPhone 02 9291 9355
\nConsultation procedures
\nLecturer Konrad Bohleke
\nEmail KBohleke@studygroup.com
\nThe best way to contact me is via email if you have any questions concerning the contents and
\nteaching of this subject. However, you should consider if your question is already addressed
\nelsewhere (e.g. Subject outline, Announcements and iLearn within Interact2 site) and if you
\nare contacting the most appropriate person.
\nEmail Etiquette: In order to receive responses to your email on time ensure that you address
\nthe issue meeting the basic requirements of professional communication. You should
\ninclude your ID number, full name, subject code and type of Question Assignment in the header\/subject to
\nenable me to read and identify who has sent the email. This will also avoid your email being
\ntreated as SPAM.
\nSubject Overview
\nCharles Sturt University Subject Outline
\nLAW110 201930 S I
\nVersion 1 – Published 11 February 2019
\nPage 2 of 36
\nAbstract
\nThis subject examines key Australian legal concepts and principles directly relevant to
\nbusiness operations and their legal underpinnings. It explores the structure of the Australian
\nlegal system, sources of law, principles of statutory interpretation, the court system and the
\ndoctrine of precedent. It then examines the law of negligence and substantive areas of
\ncontract and property law.
\nLearning outcomes
\nUpon successful completion of this subject, students should:
\n\u2022 be able to describe the Australian legal system, including its history, development, and
\nthe current the-oretical frameworks within which it and its institutions operate;
\n\u2022 be able to compare and contrast the Australian legal system with other legal systems;
\n\u2022 be able to synthesise knowledge of the doctrine of precedent with knowledge of the
\nhierarchy of the courts – at a state and federal level – to explain which court has
\njurisdiction in a particular matter;
\n\u2022 be able to investigate the different sources of Australian law in order to contrast these
\nsources and explain their significance and interrelationships when applying them to
\nlegal problems;
\n\u2022 be able to independently apply rules of statutory interpretation, including Latin
\nmaxims, common law approaches and the legislative provisions that apply at a state
\nand federal level;
\n\u2022 be able to demonstrate knowledge of tort, contract, and property law by identifying
\nthe relevant issue(s) arising out of novel factual situations, stating the relevant legal
\nprinciples, and explaining how these relate to the legal issue(s), in addition to
\nsuggesting potential remedies when providing a conclusion;
\n\u2022 be able to compare different methods of dispute resolution and evaluate their
\neffectiveness.
\nSubject content
\nStudents are expected to spend a total of 140-160 hours engaged in the learning and teaching
\nactivities.This means an average of 10 to 12 hours each week. The modules for the subject are
\navailable through the subject’s Interact2 site. These have been specifically designed to guide
\nyou through the sections of the prescribed textbook and readings relevant to each topic (sample nursing essay examples by the best nursing assignment writing service). I
\nsuggest that for each topic (sample nursing essay examples by the best nursing assignment writing service) you read the learning objectives carefully, read the overview and the
\nprescribed pages of the textbook. Please be advised that Firefox is CSU’s preferred browser for
\naccessing Interact2.
\nIn this subject there are lots of opportunities for you to engage with me and your peers. Forum
\ndiscussions, online learning activities and meetings will be scheduled throughout the session.
\nThe first On-line meeting will be held on Week three. The second On-line meeting will be held
\nbefore the second assessable task is due, that is, 26 April 2018. Our last On-line meeting will
\ntake place on Week 11. I will now share with you more about the subject and how you are
\nexpected to engage with its content.
\nCharles Sturt University Subject Outline
\nLAW110 201930 S I
\nVersion 1 – Published 11 February 2019
\nPage 3 of 36
\nHow I structured the subject
\nI begin the delivery of my subject by showing you the relevance of the subject to your future
\ncareers. I decided that to hear it from me, your lecturer who is also a lawyer, was not sufficient.
\nYou needed to hear it from someone that already walked in your shoes, such as a non-legal
\npractitioner that took this subject a few years ago, and who is now able to use the knowledge
\nhe acquired in his practice as a registered accountant. This is why you find in the modules the
\nvoice of a professional who explains toyou why studying law is important.
\nIntroducing you to the learning methodology that will allow you to succeed in a legal subject
\nwas next.This included an introduction to the ILAC model, and the use of legal research tools
\nsuch as AustLII. ILAC stands for and consists of four elements; Issue (identifying the legal issue),
\nLaw (state the relevant law – cases and legislation), Application of the law to the facts, and
\nConclusion. This method of legal analysis allows you to organise your thinking and writing
\nand allows you to address each issue identified before drawing a final overall conclusion. ILAC
\nalso becomes the scaffolded structure on which the subject content, activities and assignments
\nare built, and this structure serves to reinforce the methodology (see Getting started; how to
\nsucceed in a legal subject: Legal Research and ILACmethod. The module also teaches you the
\ndifferent pathways to prepare for each assessment task, see Preparation for assessments and
\nexams, module one).
\nAfter giving you the tools and methodology, I then make the content applicable, relevant and
\nmeaningful by including the voice of a practicing professional. In this case, Nathan Pearce, who
\nis a successful accountant in one of our local firms. Nathan discusses the ways in which he was
\nable to apply the knowledge and insights gained from each topic (sample nursing essay examples by the best nursing assignment writing service) from the subject, and how
\nthis relates to his professional practice. This strategy should appeal to those of you who are
\ngoal-oriented learners, and who don\u2019t want to be lawyers, but wish to succeed in their different
\nrespective careers. Visual and auditory learners will also enjoy this activity. The videos Business
\nLaw in Action will introduce you to each module. These are followed by a scenario in which
\nyou are given the opportunity to apply the concepts and legal principles learnt using the ILAC
\nmodel. The forum discussions will then be carefully structured to allow you to practice the ILAC
\nmethod of writing. I will actively provide feedback and guidance. This activity will teach you to
\nelaborate complex arguments, and you will realise that in law there is no right or wrong answer;
\nthat is, your prospects of success depend on how well you substantiate your arguments by
\nusing the relevant law (see the Business law in action sections, you will find a scenario per each
\nmodule). I have also designed some revision quizzes for you to complete at the end of each
\ntopic (sample nursing essay examples by the best nursing assignment writing service). Feedback on the correct answers will be offered once you have completed the quizzes.
\nThis activity will assess yourunderstanding of the topic (sample nursing essay examples by the best nursing assignment writing service)s covered, and it will also prepare you
\nfor the first assessment item.
\nLAW110 teaches different causes of actions, hence its modules were designed so that each
\none of them discusses one cause of action at a time. The final product is a flowchart that
\nincludes the elements of each cause of action, and the law required to succeed in proving
\nthem. The flowcharts recapitulate the content learnt, and also illustrate, via visual learning,
\nCharles Sturt University Subject Outline
\nLAW110 201930 S I
\nVersion 1 – Published 11 February 2019
\nPage 4 of 36
\nhow each topic (sample nursing essay examples by the best nursing assignment writing service) is interrelated.The flowcharts are also explained via screencast technology.
\nThe combination of these tools avoids one of the biggest problems associated with modular
\nteaching, that is, completion of a theme often means that you do not revisit prior learning. At
\nthe end of each module you will know how each part of the puzzle fits together (see topic (sample nursing essay examples by the best nursing assignment writing service) 2
\nSources of law and interpretation of statutes).
\nRather than making the assumption that you have strong academic skills, forum activities
\nand tasks have been designed to facilitate your successful submission of the assessable
\ncomponents (assignments). You will learn to read marking rubrics and effectively respond to
\nfeedback. The former are skills that will strongly benefit your academic life. Another key aspect
\nof this scaffolded structure of learning is the self-Assessment and critical thinking activity. To
\nfacilitate your understanding of how the rubric is used to effectively mark your assessments,
\nI prepared a Law Assignment Grading Activity. This activity, reinforced by the ILAC method,
\nwill clearly outline the expectations and standards that I have as a lecturer. It will also Help
\nyou to successfully prepare for your second assignment. I will remind you of the importance
\nof substantiating your arguments, thinking critically, and structuring your paragraphs in a way
\nthat your academic writing is cohesive, and your arguments
\ncogent. You will learn business academic skills by doing the task, rather than by simply reading
\nabout it (see Practice and feedback activities and Law Assignment Grading Activity in module
\none Getting
\nstarted). Other resources include lecture notes, PowerPoints, and model answers. All of them
\nare fully aligned with the modules and the assessment tasks.
\nWith respect to your assessment tasks, I have created a folder on Interact with all the
\ninformation that you require for each assessable task. The introductory module for the subject
\nwill provide you with specific guidelines on how to prepare for each task. It is important that
\nyou use this resource as it will help you to become well acquaintted with LAW110, its
\nmethodology, learning activities and assessments. I suggest that for each topic (sample nursing essay examples by the best nursing assignment writing service) you read the
\nlearning objectives carefully, read the overview, have a quick skim of the text, read the lecture
\nnotes and then watch the videos prepared per each module. Once you have got a feel for
\nwhat the topic (sample nursing essay examples by the best nursing assignment writing service) is about you should attempt the revision quizzes. Then you should proceed
\nto answer the exercises at the end of each topic (sample nursing essay examples by the best nursing assignment writing service) using the forum. Your participation on these
\nonline activities, in conjunction with your assessments will allow me to monitor your level of
\nengagement. If I identify that there is a lack of engagement with the subject, I will be contacting
\nyou via email.
\nYour workload in this subject
\nEach week you should spend between 10 and 12 hours studying the subject. Obviously some
\nweeks may require more time than others depending on how you work.
\nAreas covered
\nThe subject covers the following areas
\nCharles Sturt University Subject Outline
\nLAW110 201930 S I
\nVersion 1 – Published 11 February 2019
\nPage 5 of 36
\nThe Australian Legal System and The Interpretation of Statutes
\nTorts
\nContracts, and
\nProperty Law
\nKey subjects
\nPassing a key subject is one of the indicators of satisfactory academic progress through your
\ncourse. You must pass the key subjects in your course at no more than two attempts. The first
\ntime you fail a key subject you will be at risk of exclusion; if you fail a second time you will be
\nexcluded from the course.
\nThe Academic Progress Policy (https:\/\/policy.csu.edu.au\/view.current.php?id=00250) sets out
\nthe requirements and procedures for satisfactory academic progress, for the exclusion of
\nstudents who fail to progress satisfactorily and for the termination of enrolment for students
\nwho fail to complete in the maximum allowed time.
\nSubject Schedule & Delivery
\nPrescribed text
\nThe textbooks required for each of your enrolled subjects can also be found via the Student
\nPortal Textbooks (http:\/\/student.csu.edu.au\/study\/study-essentials\/textbooks) page.
\nAndy Gibson, Business Law (Pearson Australia, Custom Edition, 2018).
\nNote – Please purchase a hardcopy version of the textbook rather than an electronic one. The
\nfinal exam is open book and only hard copies are allowed.
\nClass\/tutorial times and location
\nYour class times can be found at Timetable @ CSU (http:\/\/timetable.csu.edu.au\/). Find out
\nhow to use Timetable @ CSU via the Student Portal Class Timetable
\n(http:\/\/student.csu.edu.au\/study\/study-essentials\/timetable) page.
\nSchedule
\nWeek Week
\nStarting
\nTopic Module (as
\ndisplayed in i2)
\nReadings Activity
\nCharles Sturt University Subject Outline
\nLAW110 201930 S I
\nVersion 1 – Published 11 February 2019
\nPage 6 of 36
\n1
\n4 March
\nThe Australian
\nLegal System
\nThe Australian
\nLegal System
\nRead the Subject
\nOutline
\nRead the resource
\n\u2018Surviving a legal
\nsubject\u2019
\nPart 1 of your
\ntextbook \u2013The
\nAustralian Legal
\nSystem
\nLecture notes and
\nmodule content
\n(Topic 1)
\nComplete
\nrevision
\nquizzes and
\nonline
\nexercises using
\nthe forum
\n2
\n11
\nMarch
\nSources of
\nLaw and
\nInterpretation
\nof Statutes
\nThe Australian
\nLegal System
\nRead and respond
\nto the exercises of
\nthe module \u2018
\nConducting legal
\nresearch\u2019, and \u2018How
\nto ILAC\u2019
\nPart 2 \u2013 Sources of
\nLaw & the
\nInterpretation of
\nStatutes
\nLecture notes and
\nmodule content
\n(Topic 2)
\nComplete
\nrevision
\nquizzes and
\nonline
\nexercises using
\nthe forum.
\nPlease
\ncomplete the
\nBusiness Law
\nin Action
\nScenario (end
\nof the module)
\n3
\n18
\nMarch
\nTorts
\n(Elements of
\nliability)
\nNegligence
\nPart 3 \u2013 Elements of
\nNegligence
\nLecture notes and
\nmodule content
\n(Topic 3)
\nComplete
\nrevision
\nquizzes and
\nonline
\nexercises using
\nthe forum
\nMultiple
\nChoice Test
\n(10%). The
\ntest will be
\navailable on
\nTuesday 19th
\nMarch 2019
\n4
\n25
\nMarch
\nTorts
\n(Damages and
\ndefences)
\nNegligence
\nPart 4 \u2013 Defences &
\nApplications of
\nNegligence to
\nBusiness
\nLecture notes and
\nmodule content
\nComplete
\nrevision
\nquizzes and
\nonline
\nexercises using
\nthe forum.
\nCharles Sturt University Subject Outline
\nLAW110 201930 S I
\nVersion 1 – Published 11 February 2019
\nPage 7 of 36
\n(Topic 4) Please
\ncomplete the
\nBusiness Law
\nin Action
\nScenario (end
\nof the module)
\n5
\n1 April
\nContracts
\n(Formation)
\nContracts
\nPart 5 \u2013 Contractual
\nElements
\nLecture notes and
\nmodule content
\n(Topic 5)
\nComplete
\nrevision
\nquizzes and
\nonline
\nexercises using
\nthe forum
\n6
\n8 April
\nMid-session
\nBreak
\nMid-session
\nBreak
\nMid-session Break Mid-session
\nBreak
\n7
\n15 April
\nMid-session
\nBreak
\nMid-session
\nBreak
\nMid-session Break Mid-session
\nBreak
\nPH: Good
\nFriday, Friday
\n19 April 2019
\n22 April
\nContracts
\n(Validity and
\nconsent)
\nContracts Part 6 \u2013 Contracts
\n(Validity & Consent)
\nLecture notes and
\nmodule content
\n(Topic 6)
\nComplete
\nrevision
\nquizzes and
\nonline
\nexercises using
\nthe
\nforum
\nPH: Easter
\nMonday,
\nMonday 22
\nApril 2019
\nPH: Anzac Day,
\nThursday25
\nApril 2019
\n9
\n29 April Contracts (
\nContent)
\nContracts
\nPart 7 \u2013 Contracts
\n(Terms)
\nLecture and
\nmodule content
\n(topic (sample nursing essay examples by the best nursing assignment writing service) 7)
\nComplete
\nrevision
\nquizzes and
\nonline
\nexercises using
\nthe forum.
\nCharles Sturt University Subject Outline
\nLAW110 201930 S I
\nVersion 1 – Published 11 February 2019
\nPage 8 of 36
\nMajor
\nAssignment
\ndue on 26
\nApril 2019 (
\n30%)
\n10
\n6 May
\nContracts
\n(Discharge)
\nContracts
\nPart 8 \u2013 Contracts
\n(Rights, Liabilities &
\nRemedies)
\nLecture notes and
\nmodule content
\n(Topic 8)
\nComplete
\nrevision
\nquizzes and
\nonline
\nexercises using
\nthe forum
\n11
\n13 May
\nStatutory
\nmodification of
\ncontract law
\nContracts
\nPart 9 \u2013 Statutory
\nModification of
\nContract Law
\nLecture notes
\nand module
\ncontent (Topic 9)
\nRevision
\nquizzes
\nOnline
\nexercises using
\nthe forum.
\nPlease
\ncomplete the
\nBusiness Law
\nin Action
\nScenario (end
\nof the module)
\n12
\n20 May
\nProperty law Property
\nPart 10 –
\nProperty Lecture
\nnotes and module
\ncontent (Topic 10)
\nComplete
\nrevision
\nquizzes and
\nonline
\nexercises using
\nthe forum.
\nPlease
\ncomplete the
\nBusiness Law
\nin Action
\nScenario (end
\nof the module)
\n13
\n27 May
\nRevision All topic (sample nursing essay examples by the best nursing assignment writing service)s
\ncovered by the
\nsubject
\nPractice paper
\nand
\npreparation for
\nthe exam
\nSee resources
\ncontained in the
\nfolder ‘Final exam’.
\nRead and attempt
\nthe practice exam
\nDiscussion of
\nthe final exam.
\nPlease answer
\nthe practice
\nexam using the
\nforum.
\nCharles Sturt University Subject Outline
\nLAW110 201930 S I
\nVersion 1 – Published 11 February 2019
\nPage 9 of 36
\n14
\n3 June
\nRevision As required by
\neach cohort
\nContinue
\nyour preparation
\nfor the final exam
\nShare your
\nquestions and
\nconcerns
\nabout the
\nexam with your
\nlecturer and
\npeers
\nPlease see below Additional\/Replacement Class Requirements for this session: Classes
\nrunning on the following Public Holidays should have a replacement class:
\n– Monday 22th April 2019 (Easter Monday)
\n– Thursday 25th April 2019(Anzac Day)
\nThis study schedule has been devised to Help in your planning during the session, and is
\nintended as a guide only.
\nAttendance is required at all scheduled lectures and tutorials.
\nLearning materials
\nDetails of learning materials that support your success in this subject can be found in the
\nInteract2 Subject Site.
\nLearning, teaching and support strategies
\nIn this subject we will meet for a 3 hour session where we will discuss that week\u2019s topic (sample nursing essay examples by the best nursing assignment writing service).
\nBefore you come to class you need to have looked at the online activities in the Interact site
\nand read the text so that you can contribute to the class and derive more meaning from the
\nactivities that we will do in class. We will spend class time working through the topic (sample nursing essay examples by the best nursing assignment writing service)
\nquestions, discussing them and preparing responses. In addition we may use video, games
\nand case studies to enhance understanding of certain topic (sample nursing essay examples by the best nursing assignment writing service) areas.
\nIt is helpful to have a small task to complete early in the session so that you have a focus in
\nthe subject from the very first day, and so the first assessment is set for this purpose. If you
\ndo not perform well in this assessment you may be contacted to discuss how we can
\nsupport you better in this subject.
\nThe modules for this subject have been written specifically to guide you through the sections
\n(and questions) of the prescribed textbook relevant to each topic (sample nursing essay examples by the best nursing assignment writing service).
\nYou should check the Interact2 Site at least weekly for postings, announcements, lecture
\ninformation and other resources that will Help your studies or additional information and
\nresources vital to your success in the subject.
\nStudying at university does not mean studying alone. During class you will have an
\nopportunity to interact with the lecturer as well as your peers.
\nCharles Sturt University Subject Outline
\nLAW110 201930 S I
\nVersion 1 – Published 11 February 2019
\nPage 10 of 36
\nUse the subject schedule to plan your studies over the session.
\nAcademic learning support
\nInformation on effective time management is available on the CSU Learning Support website
\nvia the following link: http:\/\/student.csu.edu.au\/
\nVisit the learning support website for advice about assignment preparation, academic reading
\nand note-taking, referencing, and preparing for exams at: http:\/\/student.csu.edu.au\/study
\nThe Study Centres also offers a range of workshops specifically targeting your needs as an
\ninternational student. These workshops run multiple times per week and build into the
\ncomprehensive Academic Skills Development Program that you should participate in.
\nAdditionally, a number of student volunteers are available to Help you in a program known as
\nDiscipline Support Sessions. Please see the timetables for these programs on the noticeboards
\non campus and also via the iLearn Interact2 Organisation site.
\nYou may also contact:
\n\u2022 Angela Maag
\nStudy Support Manager
\nPhone: 02 9291 9358
\nE-mail: AMaag@studygroup.com (mailto:AMaag@studygroup.com)
\n\u2022 Miranda Alagich
\nSnr. Study Support Coordinator
\nPhone: 02 9291 9360
\nE-mail: MAlagich@studygroup.com (mailto:MAlagich@studygroup.com)
\n\u2022 Mazin Yousif
\nStudy Support Coordinator
\nPhone: 02 9291 9361
\nE-mail: MYousif@studygroup.com (mailto:MYousif@studygroup.com)
\nFor appointments, please see Reception.
\nQueries regarding the content of this subject should be directed to your Subject Lecturer.
\nLibrary services
\nCharles Sturt University Subject Outline
\nLAW110 201930 S I
\nVersion 1 – Published 11 February 2019
\nPage 11 of 36
\nThe Library is located on campus as well online. Your campus Library
\n(https:\/\/www.appessaywriters.com\/write-my-paper\/csustudycentres.edu.au\/about-csu-study-centres\/academic-support\/
\nstudent-library) will support your learning journey by providing the following:
\n\u2022 A Self-Check kiosk for borrowing books: no more queues!
\n\u2022 Library orientation, database searching and information literacy workshops run
\nduring the semester
\n\u2022 Computer terminals to conduct online research and complete written work
\n\u2022 Photocopiers, scanners and printers
\n\u2022 State of the art study and research facilities
\n\u2022 Access to all subject texts including reserve copies for 2 hour loan
\n\u2022 Qualified Information professionals to Help with all your information needs.
\n\u2022 And for loan renewals and making requests, check your StudyGroup Library account
\nby accessing the StudyGroup Library catalogue (http:\/\/sgaprimo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com\/primo_library\/libweb\/action\/
\nsearch.do?vid=SGA)
\nCheck with your Campus Library for opening hours and visit Library News for updates on
\nInteract2 (https:\/\/idp.csu.edu.au\/idp\/profile\/SAML2\/Redirect\/SSO?execution=e3s1).
\nCSU Library
\nFor 24\/7 access, go to CSU Library online
\n(https:\/\/library.csu.edu.au\/) http:\/\/student.csu.edu.au\/library
\nThe CSU Library provides access to online resources. These are:
\n\u2022 Peer-reviewed journal articles
\n\u2022 eBooks
\n\u2022 Company and government reports
\n\u2022 eJournals
\n\u2022 Dissertations & theses
\n\u2022 Newspapers including Business & Financial newspapers in Factiva (see Business & IT
\nJournal databases)
\n\u2022 Other Reference resources (eg. Australian Bureau of Statistics, Australian standards,
\nonline encyclopaedias & dictionaries to be read on the computer
\n\u2022 Online Helpance via free call on 1800 808 369, or \u2018Ask a Librarian\u2019 – Live Chat or Web
\nForm.
\nOther CSU Library services and resources:
\nhttps:\/\/student.csu.edu.au\/library\/study-research
\n\u2022 Video tutorials in research skills, finding journal articles for assignments, topic (sample nursing essay examples by the best nursing assignment writing service)
\nanalysis
\n\u2022 Endnote referencing software
\nCharles Sturt University Subject Outline
\nLAW110 201930 S I
\nVersion 1 – Published 11 February 2019
\nPage 12 of 36
\n\u2022 Other online library services to help you successfully complete your assignments
\nOnline Tutorials
\nhttp:\/\/student.csu.edu.au\/library\/study-research\/training-tutorials-videos
\nLearn how to:
\n\u2022 Use Primo Search to find eReserve study materials and journal articles
\n\u2022 Search journal databases and web resources for information for your assessment
\ntasks
\n\u2022 Identify appropriate sources of information and peer reviewed material, to evaluate
\nresources
\nSubject Library Resource Guides
\nhttp:\/\/libguides.csu.edu.au\/
\nSubject Library Guides are a great way to get started with research. Each online guide is
\ntailored to a specific area of study, including Accounting, Business and Information
\nTechnology outlining how to research in your area and where to look for information.
\nLibrary Help
\nhttp:\/\/student.csu.edu.au\/library\/help-contacts
\nFriendly and quick Helpance is available. Ask for help finding information and navigating the
\nlibrary\u2019s extensive eResources.
\nNational Library of Australia – Trove database
\nhttp:\/\/trove.nla.gov.au\/
\nThe Trove database from the National Library of Australia provides access to many different
\nonline resources on any subject.
\nUniversity of Technology Sydney – Blake Library
\nhttp:\/\/find.lib.uts.edu.au\/
\nAll students with a CSU student card can access University of Technology, Sydney (UTS) library
\nfor free 10 times per year or paying $50 per year to join CAUL scheme to borrow books and use
\nthe UTS library within the guidelines set down by UTS. Access restrictions may be in place
\nduring exam periods. The UTS Blake library is located near Chinatown: corner Quay Street &
\nUltimo Road, Haymarket. Phone: 02 9514 3666.
\nContact Details below for any student enquiries:
\nCSU Study Centre Darlinghurst Library
\nMs Mireille Eid
\nLibrary Manager
\nPhone: 02 9291 9326
\nCharles Sturt University Subject Outline
\nLAW110 201930 S I
\nVersion 1 – Published 11 February 2019
\nPage 13 of 36
\nEmail: Meid@studygroup.com (mailto:Meid@studygroup.com)
\nMs Angie Baho
\nLibrary Officer
\nPhone: 02 9291 9315
\nEmail: darlibrary@studygroup.com (mailto:darlibrary@studygroup.com)
\nRecommended student time commitment
\nEach week you should spend between 10 and 12 hours studying the subject. Obviously some
\nweeks may require more time than others depending on how you work. The following is a
\nguide for your information;
\nInteract2 videos, interactive flowcharts, screencasts and supporting readings 4 hours
\nRevision quizzes and preparation of answers to review exercises 2 hours
\nParticipation in weekly face-to-face classes 3 hours
\nPreparation for assessment items 2 hours
\nAssessment Items
\nEssential requirements to pass this subject
\nYou must obtain at least 50% in both the examination and the total mark in order to pass this
\nsubject.
\nYou must pass the exam to pass the subject.
\nTo be eligible for the grade AA or AE you must have submitted all assessment items in the
\nsubject, including the final exam. If you choose not to complete an assessment item or do not
\nsit the final exam then you will not be granted an AA or an AE grade.
\nItems
\nItem No. Title Value Due Date* Return Date**
\n1 Multiple Choice Quiz 10% 19-Mar-2019 09-Apr-2019
\n2 Problem Solving Questions 30% 26-Apr-2019 20-May-2019
\n3 Final Exam 60% To be advised –
\n* Due date is the last date for assessment items to be received at the University
\n** Applies only to assessment items submitted by the due date
\nCharles Sturt University Subject Outline
\nLAW110 201930 S I
\nVersion 1 – Published 11 February 2019
\nPage 14 of 36
\nAssessment item 1
\nMultiple Choice Quiz
\nValue: 10%
\nDue Date: 19-Mar-2019
\nReturn Date: 09-Apr-2019
\nSubmission method options: N\/A – submission not required\/applicable
\nTask
\nThis on-line test covers Topics 1 and 2 of the curriculum. You must complete ten multiple
\nchoice questions online within 45 minutes using the Test Centre feature on Interact, between
\n00:01 on Tuesday 19 March 2019 and 23.59 on Tuesday 26 March 2019. You must complete the
\ntest in one sitting – you cannot log off and log on again.
\nRationale
\nSubject learning outcomes
\nThis assessment task will assess the following learning outcome\/s:
\n\u2022 be able to describe the Australian legal system, including its history, development, and
\nthe current the-oretical frameworks within which it and its institutions operate.
\n\u2022 be able to compare and contrast the Australian legal system with other legal systems.
\n\u2022 be able to synthesise knowledge of the doctrine of precedent with knowledge of the
\nhierarchy of the courts – at a state and federal level – to explain which court has
\njurisdiction in a particular matter.
\nThis assessment task assesses the following learning outcomes:
\n– be able to describe the Australian legal system, including its history, development, and the
\ncurrent theoretical frameworks within which it and its institutions operate;
\n– be able to compare and contrast the Australian legal system with other legal systems;
\n– be able to investigate the different sources of Australian law in order to contrast these
\nsources and explain their significance and interrelationships when applying them to legal
\nproblems;
\n– be able to independently apply rules of statutory interpretation, including Latin maxims,
\ncommon law approaches and the legislative provisions that apply at a state and federal level;
\nGraduate learning outcomes
\nThis task also contributes to the assessment of the following CSU Graduate Learning
\nOutcome\/s (https:\/\/student.csu.edu.au\/study\/glo):
\n\u2022 Information and Research Literacies (Knowledge) – CSU Graduates demonstrate that
\ndisciplinary knowledge is developed through research and evidence.
\n\u2022 Indigenous Cultural Competence (Knowledge) – CSU Graduates understand specific
\ncultural and historical patterns that have structured Indigenous lives in the past and
\nthe ways in which these patterns continue to be expressed in contemporary Australia.
\n\u2022 Sustainable Practices (Knowledge) – CSU Graduates demonstrate a multidisciplinary
\nknowledge that empowers graduates to understand and critically analyse the
\nCharles Sturt University Subject Outline
\nLAW110 201930 S I
\nVersion 1 – Published 11 February 2019
\nPage 15 of 36
\nchallenges of balancing the social, economic and environmental factors essential for
\necological sustainability.
\nMarking criteria and standards
\nCRITERIA HD DI CR P FL
\nStudents will
\nbe required
\nto:
\nanswer theory
\nand practical
\nbased
\nmultiple
\nchoice
\nquestions by
\nselecting the
\nbest option
\nfrom five
\navailable
\nchoices to
\ndemonstrate
\ntheir
\nunderstanding
\nof basic legal
\nconcepts.
\nTo meet this
\nlevel you will
\nattain a
\ncumulative
\nmark between
\n85 and 100%.
\nA mark in this
\nrange
\nindicates you
\nhave
\ndemonstrated
\nan exceptional
\nand a high
\nlevel of
\nknowledge
\nand
\nunderstanding
\nof the
\nconcepts.
\nTo meet this
\nlevel you will
\nattain a
\ncumulative
\nmark between
\n75 and 84%. A
\nmark in this
\nrange indicates
\nyou have
\ndemonstrated
\na
\ncomprehensive
\nand high level
\nof knowledge
\nand
\nunderstanding
\nof the
\nconcepts.
\nTo meet this
\nlevel you will
\nattain a
\ncumulative
\nmark between
\n65 and 74%. A
\nmark in this
\nrange
\nindicates you
\nhave
\ndemonstrated
\na sound
\nknowledge
\nand
\nunderstanding
\nof the
\nconcepts.
\nTo meet this
\nlevel you will
\nattain a
\ncumulative
\nmark between
\n50 and 64%. A
\nmark in this
\nrange
\nindicates you
\nhave
\ndemonstrated
\na basic
\nknowledge
\nand
\nunderstanding
\nof the
\nconcepts.
\nAt this level
\nyou will attain
\na cumulative
\nmark between
\n0-49%. A mark
\nin this range
\nindicates you
\nhave not
\ndemonstrated
\na basic
\nknowledge
\nand
\nunderstanding
\nof the
\nconcepts.
\nPresentation
\nOnline risks – please note that whenever you work in a live online environment there are risks
\nof system failure (internet connections, logging out, user problems etc.). When doing work
\nonline this means there is always a risk of losing all your work in the event of a system failure.
\nCSU systems provide a very secure online environment. In addition, Test Centre has been
\ndesigned to minimise risks associated with being online but you do need to take all
\nprecautions to ensure a successful online assessment experience:
\n\u2022 Familiarise yourself with the Test Centre system prior to completing any major assessment
\ntask
\n\u2022 Read your subject outline and instructions carefully
\n\u2022 Keep the security window open when doing a test. Close the window when you have
\ncompleted the test to ensure your personal security within the CSU online system
\n\u2022 Make sure you SUBMIT your completed test within the specified time on limited time tests
\nRequirements
\nThe online test consists of 10 multiple choice questions. Each question is worth 1 mark, for an
\naggregate score of 10% of your marks in this subject. Marks will be awarded for each correct
\nanswer (only if all correct options for a question are selected and no incorrect options are
\nselected). No marks will be deducted for incorrect answers. The questions will be drawn from
\nCharles Sturt University Subject Outline
\nLAW110 201930 S I
\nVersion 1 – Published 11 February 2019
\nPage 16 of 36
\na pool, so your test will have some different questions from that of another student. Note also
\nthat even where a question appears in two students’ tests, the order of the answers will be
\nrandomised – so that, for example, the correct answer may be option D in one test and C in
\nanother.
\nAssessment item 2
\nProblem Solving Questions
\nValue: 30%
\nDue Date: 26-Apr-2019
\nReturn Date: 20-May-2019
\nLength: 2000
\nSubmission method options: Alternative submission method
\nTask
\nAnswer the following questions using the ILAC method of problem solving.
\nQuestion 1 [15 marks]
\nMagnolia graduated from the Delicious Cooking College with a major in thermo-mixing.
\nImmediately after graduating, she set up her own cooking business ( \u2018Thermo-delicious\u2019). In
\nearly 2018 things were going really well and she was thinking about expanding her business.
\nShe met Laura Smartypants, an accountant and financial adviser. They discussed Magnolia\u2019s
\nexpansion plans and Laura agreed to prepare a business plan for Magnolia and her growing
\nbusiness. Laura advised Magnolia that she was in a sound position to expand and
\nrecommended that she borrow money to set up a cooking store in a trendy part of Bleak-heath.
\nMagnolia relied on Laura and acted on her advice. In July 2018, she borrowed $69000 from
\nUsurer\u2019s Credit, a small credit union that provided a loan and overdraft facilities. Magnolia then
\nsigned a five-year lease, bought seven additional thermomixers and hired Tracey\u2019s Designs &
\nGraphics to design a webpage for her. Then things went sour. Laura admitted that she had
\nnot adequately factored in her pre-existing debts, had underestimated the significant
\nestablishment costs associated with setting up a business in Bleak-heath. Laura explained
\nto Magnolia that in addition to reviewing Magnolia\u2019s financial position, she also consulted
\nher tarot cards on the matter and the reading showed that Magnolia\u2019s business would reach
\nfinancial glory. Magnolia has suffered loss as a result of this advice. She is unable to pay
\nUsurer\u2019s Credit.
\nAdvise Magnolia on any rights and liabilities arising from these facts, citing relevant statutory
\nand case law authority, using ILAC format.
\nMagnolia\u2019s boyfriend, Jake, is a successful property developer in New South Wales. He is
\ninterested in purchasing a large property for re-developing purposes in Blackheath. On 15 April
\nCharles Sturt University Subject Outline
\nLAW110 201930 S I
\nVersion 1 – Published 11 February 2019
\nPage 17 of 36
\n2018, Jake contacted The Blue Mountains City Council requesting several statutory certificates
\nabout various planning issues related to the property. He specifically requested information
\nabout prospective road-widening proposals relevant to the property. On 10 July, Jake received
\na letter from the Council, annexed to a planning certificate, indicating that there were no
\nroad-widening proposals relevant to the property. On the strength of this statement, Jake
\nwent ahead and purchased the land. Two months after finalising the purchase he was advised
\nthat a road widening proposal had been approved on 26 July 2018 and that it required the
\nacquisition of more than one half of Jake’s property. What remained was unsuitable for Jake’s
\nre-development. Jake suffered a financial loss of $1,600,000. As a result of this loss, Jake’s
\nbusiness experienced serious financial difficulty which led to Jake developing a serious mental
\ndisorder.
\nAdvise the Council on any liabilities arising from these facts, citing relevant statutory and case
\nlaw authority, using the ILAC format. Please focus on the liability of the council.
\nQuestion 2 [15 marks]
\nDonald Frump owns several restaurants in New South Wales. He and his family has solicited
\nyour advice as to their contractual liabilities and rights arising out of these circumstances:
\nOn 20 September, Donald meets Margarita over lunch. Margarita owns a small dairy farm called
\n\u2018The Milky Cow’\u2019. After some negotiations, Margarita offers to sell Donald 200 kgs of Wagyu beef
\nfor $3500. She also tells him that she will keep the offer open for the next 24 hours. Two hours
\nlater, Margarita receives a call from Carlos who offers $3700 for the meat. She immediately
\naccepts Carlos’s offer. Donald calls three hours later ( within the 24 hours period) and informs
\nMargarita that he accepts the offer, want his meat delivered and that he will sue her for breach
\nof contract if she does not comply with their deal.
\nDonald agrees to buy a new truck for home deliveries. He approaches Mario’s Trucks and
\nMotors Pty Ltd and makes enquiries about a couple of vehicles. He agrees to purchase a
\nPantech 2018 for $60,000. After the contract is signed he asks Jeff, the sales manager, if they
\nwill provide the first service free of charge. Jeff agrees. Two months after the purchase, the car
\nneeds to be serviced and Jeff is reluctant to honour his promise.
\nDonald commenced negotiations to lease some commercial premises to be used for their new
\nrestaurant in Leura. Part of the negotiation concerned the ability of Donald to demolish a wall
\nin order to remodel the interior and build an oven. Nacho, the landlord, shook Donald’s hand
\nand told him they had a deal and that he could go ahead and get started. Donald took a
\nlarge bank loan to finance the re-modelling. Four weeks later, Donald received a letter from
\nNacho indicating that he did not intend to proceed with the lease. Donald has already spent
\n$150 000 on the remodelling but has not received a signed lease as yet. He has also hired two
\nInternational chefs to work at the new restaurant.
\nDonald’s parents, Mr and Mrs Frump, migrated to Australia from Romania in 1963. They are
\ndependent on their two sons, Donald and Ricardo, for advice and support. They have limited
\neducation, no business acumen and poor language skills. Their only income is their age
\npension. They own their home which is valued at around $750,000. Ricardo is a charming but
\nfeckless business man who is always on the verge of something great. In 2018, he needed
\n$265,000 to pursue a dot com opportunity that would make him as rich as his brother Donald.
\nCharles Sturt University Subject Outline
\nLAW110 201930 S I
\nVersion 1 – Published 11 February 2019
\nPage 18 of 36
\nHe is able to borrow money from The Con Bank but only after he persuades his parents to act
\nas guarantors. He misleads his parents as to the extent and purpose of the loan. The bank is
\nunaware of this. After investigating their financial position the bank manager meets with Mr
\nand Mrs Frump and go over the guarantee contract. He asks whether they had any questions
\nand when they do not, they signed the documents as required. Ricardo uses the money in an
\ninternet company. The company becomes insolvent and Ricardo loses his entire investment.
\nWhen he is unable to repay the loan, Com Bank looks to the parents to honour their obligations
\nas guarantors.
\nAssume that you are Donald\u2019s solicitor and that he has asked you for legal advice. Advise him as
\nto what contractual liability, if any, he and, or his family have in the above circumstances, citing
\nrelevant case law authority and using the ILAC format.
\nOnline submission via Turnitin is required for this assignment. Details will be provided by your
\nsubject lecturer.
\nRationale
\nSubject learning outcomes
\nThis assessment task will assess the following learning outcome\/s:
\n\u2022 be able to synthesise knowledge of the doctrine of precedent with knowledge of the
\nhierarchy of the courts – at a state and federal level – to explain which court has
\njurisdiction in a particular matter.
\n\u2022 be able to investigate the different sources of Australian law in order to contrast these
\nsources and explain their significance and interrelationships when applying them to
\nlegal problems.
\nThis assignment is designed to assess the following subject learning outcomes:
\n\u2022 be able to investigate the different sources of Australian law in order to contrast these
\nsources and explain their significance and interrelationships when applying them to
\nlegal
\nproblems;
\n\u2022 be able to demonstrate knowledge of tort and contract law by identifying the relevant
\nissue(s) arising out of novel factual situations, stating the relevant legal principles, and
\nexplaining how these relate to the legal issue(s), in addition to suggesting potential
\nremedies when providing a conclusion;
\n\u2022 your ability to conduct basic legal research.
\nGraduate learning outcomes
\nThis task also contributes to the assessment of the following CSU Graduate Learning
\nOutcome\/s (https:\/\/student.csu.edu.au\/study\/glo):
\n\u2022 Academic Literacy and Numeracy (Skill) – CSU Graduates demonstrate the literacy and
\nnumeracy skills necessary to understand and interpret information and communicate
\neffectively according to the context.
\n\u2022 Academic Literacy and Numeracy (Application) – CSU Graduates consider the context,
\npurpose, and audience when gathering, interpreting, constructing, and presenting
\nCharles Sturt University Subject Outline
\nLAW110 201930 S I
\nVersion 1 – Published 11 February 2019
\nPage 19 of 36
\ninformation.
\n\u2022 Information and Research Literacies (Skill) – CSU Graduates demonstrate the skills
\nrequired to locate, access and critically evaluate existing information and data.
\n\u2022 Information and Research Literacies (Application) – CSU Graduates synthesize and
\napply information and data to different contexts to facilitate planning, problem
\nsolving and decision making.
\nMarking criteria and standards
\nThis assessment is designed to have students critically examining the problems presented in
\nthe two questions. They use their research, and other legal skills to discuss and answer the
\nquestions, demonstrating knowledge of tort and contract law. Students need to identify the
\nrelevant issue(s) arising out of the two novel factual situations, state the relevant legal
\nprinciples, and subsequently explain how these relate to the legal issue(s), in addition to
\nsuggesting potential remedies when providing a conclusion. Marks will also be awarded
\naccording to the following criteria:
\nMarking criteria
\nCRITERIA HD DI CR P FL
\nStudents are
\nrequired to
\nanswer two
\nproblem type
\nquestions in
\norder to
\ndemonstrate:
\nTo meet this level
\nyou will achieve a
\ncumulative mark
\nof 85-100%. A
\nmark in this
\nrange indicates
\nthat a student:
\nTo meet this
\nlevel you will
\nachieve a
\ncumulative
\nmark of
\n75-84%. A
\nmark in this
\nrange
\nindicates that
\na student:
\nTo meet this
\nlevel you will
\nachieve a
\ncumulative mark
\nof 65-74%. A
\nmark in this
\nrange indicates
\nthat a student:
\nTo meet this level you
\nwill achieve a
\ncumulative mark of
\n50-64%. A mark in this
\nrange indicates that a
\nstudent:
\nAt this le
\nobtain a mark of
\n0-49%. A mark in this
\nrange indic
\nstudent:
\nIdentification
\nof relevant
\nlegal issues
\nCorrectly
\nidentifies all legal
\nissues and
\nformulates them
\nclearly with
\nconsideration of
\nall links to
\nrelevant law, with
\nno errors.
\nCorrectly
\nidentifies al l
\nlegal issues
\nand
\nformulates
\nthem with
\nconsideration
\nof links to
\nrelevant law,
\nwith only
\nminor errors.
\nIdentifies and
\ncorrectly
\nformulates most
\nmajor legal
\nissues, taking
\ninto
\nconsideration
\nmost links to
\nrelevant law.
\nIdentifies some legal
\nissues, with some
\nerrors in formulation.
\nConsiders some links
\nto relevant law.
\nIdentifies no r
\nissues or only a f
\nthem. Some of these
\nmay be uncle
\nformulat
\nfew cont
\nto relevant law
\nExplanation
\nof law and
\ncitation of
\nProvides a
\ncomplete
\nexplanation of
\nProvides an
\nexplanation
\nof almost all
\nProvides an
\nexplanation of
\nmost points of
\nProvides a basic
\nexplanation of the
\nlaw, but with some
\nProvides inc
\nlimited e
\nthe law using no le
\nCharles Sturt University Subject Outline
\nLAW110 201930 S I
\nVersion 1 – Published 11 February 2019
\nPage 20 of 36
\nrelevant
\nlegal
\nauthority
\nthe law, with no
\nerrors. Explains
\nall relevant legal
\nauthority.
\npoints of the
\nlaw,
\nsubstantiated
\nby most of
\nthe relevant
\nauthority
\nwith only
\nminor errors.
\nlaw, with few
\nerrors,
\nsubstantiated by
\ncitation of most
\nof the relevant
\nlegal authority
\nwith few errors.
\nerrors, substantiated
\nby limited legal
\nauthority.
\nauthority
\nApplication
\nof legal
\nprinciples to
\nthe facts
\nApplies the law to
\nthe facts so as to
\naddress all issues
\nwith no
\nerrors. Argument
\ndiscusses
\nlinkages between
\nfacts and the law
\nand considers
\ncounterarguments.
\nConclusion
\nclearly draws
\ntogether advice.
\nApplies the
\nlaw correctly
\nto the facts
\nso as to
\naddress all
\nissues, with
\nonly minor
\nerrors.
\nArgument
\ndiscusses
\nlinkages
\nbetween
\nfacts and the
\nlaw.
\nConclusion
\nclearly draws
\ntogether
\nadvice.
\nApplies the law
\ncorrectly to most
\nissues arising
\nfrom the facts,
\nbut with some
\nerrors. Argument
\nsummarises
\napplication of
\nthe
\nlaw. Conclusion
\nsummarises
\nadvice.
\nMakes a basic attempt
\nto apply the law to the
\nfacts, but applies
\nwrong law and \/ or
\ncontains significant
\nerrors in the
\napplication.. Resultant
\nlegal advice is
\nincomplete.
\nPaper does no
\ncorrectly apply law t
\nthe facts and \/ or
\napplies inc
\nlaw. May be
\ndescriptiv
\nthan put
\na reasoned ar
\nCompliance
\nwith the Style
\nGuide and
\noverall
\nstructure.
\nUses Style Guide
\ncomprehensively,
\naccurately and
\nconsistently. Uses
\nILAC model.
\nExtremely well
\nstructured and
\norganised, with
\none main
\nargument per
\nparagraph,
\nsupported by
\nwell-written
\nsupporting
\nsentences.
\nUses Style
\nGuide
\naccurately
\nand with only
\nminimal
\nerrors.
\nUses ILAC
\nmodel. Well
\nstructured,
\nwith
\narguments
\nclearly
\ndifferentiated
\nbetween
\nparagraphs
\nUse of Style
\nGuide, with
\nsome errors or
\nlapses. Uses
\nILAC model and
\nis clearly
\nstructured.
\nLimited or
\ninconsistent use of
\nStyle Guide. Some
\nattempt at use of ILAC
\nmodel in structuring
\nof answer but with
\nerrors.
\nPoor, inc
\ninaccura
\nStyle Guide.
\nstructured.
\nInadequa
\nof paragr
\nhave disr
\nILAC model.
\nWritten
\nexpression
\nand editing.
\nUses appropriate
\nacademic writing
\nwhich is formal,
\nimpersonal and
\nwhich contains
\nno spelling,
\nUses
\nappropriate
\nacademic
\nwriting which
\nis formal, and
\nimpersonal
\nUses
\nappropriate
\nacademic
\nwriting which is
\nformal and
\nimpersonal, with
\nSignificant spelling,
\ngrammar and
\npunctuation errors
\nbut the paper is
\nreadable and
\ndemonstrates some
\nPoor grammar
\nspelling and\/ or
\npunctua
\ngives no e
\nhaving been pr
\nread.
\nCharles Sturt University Subject Outline
\nLAW110 201930 S I
\nVersion 1 – Published 11 February 2019
\nPage 21 of 36
\ngrammar and
\npunctuation
\nerrors. Paper
\ndemonstrates
\ncareful
\nproofreading.
\nwith only
\nvery minor
\nspelling,
\ngrammar and
\npunctuation
\nerrors. Paper
\ndemonstrates
\ncareful
\nproofreading.
\na few spelling,
\ngrammar and
\npunctuation
\nerrors. Paper
\ndemonstrates
\nevidence of
\nproofreading.
\nattempt at
\nproofreading.
\nPresentation
\nSTYLE GUIDE
\nPlease comply with the following rules:
\n1. Do not re-state the question.
\n2. Use in-text referencing. Do not use footnotes.
\n3. Names of statutes should be italicised, and followed by the jurisdiction not in italics, for
\nexample: Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth). Note the abbreviation for \u2018Commonwealth\u2019 is \u2018Cth\u2019
\nnot \u2018Cwlth\u2019.
\n4. The names of the parties must be italicised, but the citation must not, for example: Smith
\nv Jones (1967) 345 CLR 34. You must give the full citation of a case on every occasion that you
\nmention it.
\n5. An in-text reference to a book should be structured as follows: (Latimer, 2010, p. 75).
\nThere is no need to put the author\u2019s initial. Note the positioning of brackets, stops and
\ncommas. You use \u2018pp.\u2019 only if referring to more than one page. If you are referring to a book
\nwith more than one author, the in-text reference would be as follows: (Smith et al, 2002, p. 78).
\n6. Do not start a new line simply because you are starting a new sentence.
\n7. Be careful of apostrophes: directors = of a director, directors’ = of many directors,
\ndirectors = many directors. Also particularly prevalent is confusion between its (it possessive)
\nand it’s (contraction of “it is”).
\n8. The following words always start with a capital letter: Commonwealth, State, Act, Bill,
\nRegulation, Constitution, Parliament. Do not unnecessarily capitalise other words.
\n9. One should not use terms such as can’t, won’t, don’t and shouldn’t, neither should one
\nuse “i.e.” and “e.g.” in formal writing.
\n10. A sentence must always begin with a full word and a capital letter \u2013 so a sentence would
\nstart \u2018Section 55 says\u2026\u2019 not \u2018S 55 says\u2026\u2019 or\u2018s 55 says\u2026\u2019
\n11. Start each paragraph on a new line, and leave a clear line gap after the preceding
\nCharles Sturt University Subject Outline
\nLAW110 201930 S I
\nVersion 1 – Published 11 February 2019
\nPage 22 of 36
\nparagraph.
\n12. You must put page numbers on your assignment.
\n13. Quotations and excerpts from legislation which are longer than two lines should be
\nindented from the rest of the text in a separate paragraph. The text in quotations should not be
\nin italics.
\n14. You must end your assignment with a bibliography that is divided into three parts, listing
\nstatutes, cases and books \/ articles.
\n15. A listing of a book in a bibliography should appear in accordance with the following
\nformat: Latimer, P (2010). Australian Business Law, 29th ed, North Ryde: CCH. If listing a book
\nwith multiple authors, do so as follows: Heilbron, G, Latimer, P, Nielsen, J and Pagone, T
\n(2008). Introducing the Law, 7th ed, North Ryde:CCH.
\n16. When listing statutes at the end of your assignment you should conform to the format:
\nActs Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth). List the statute only once \u2013 you do not list individual section
\nnumbers relied on. You should not list textbooks as the source of Acts \u2013 the Act itself is its own
\nsource.
\n17. When listing cases conform to the format: Gordon v Richards (1976) 123 CLR 32.
\n18. When listing article conform to the format: Jones, J ‘The new analysis of law’ (2010) 4
\nJournal of Recent Law 34.
\n19. Make sure that your sentences are grammatically correct \u2013it may be useful to read your
\nassignment out loud if you have any doubts about this.
\nRequirements
\nPlease do not consider the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) or the Sales of Goods Act
\n1923 (NSW) in answering these questions, as we have not yet covered that topic (sample nursing essay examples by the best nursing assignment writing service). Be advised
\nthat the word limit of 2,000 words is a total for both questions (not 2,000 words for each
\nquestion). Please make sure you follow the presentation and stylistic rules contained under
\n‘Presentation’ below.
\nFamiliarise yourself with the ILAC model by complying with the weekly activities. These
\nactivities have been designed to teach you how to structure a legal analysis of a problem
\nbased question. ILAC stands for Issue, Law, Application, and Conclusion. It allows us to
\nstructure legal analysis. Use ILAC as a tool for organising your thinking and your writing. Think
\nof it as a weaving loom that allows you to support the threads of your argument. Remember
\nthat when using ILAC you must:
\n1. Identify the legal issue. The issue is the most important element in the analysis and must be
\nstated in a way to show what is in controversy. You are required to articulate the issue by
\ncreating the legal question presented by the facts. To find the issue, ask: \u201cwhat is in
\ncontroversy in these facts.\u201d You should use the following language: \u201cThe issue is whether \u2026\u201d
\n2. State relevant law (cases and legislation). After you have identified the issue, you must state
\nthe relevant law. The law and the facts are inextricably linked. Your analysis of the facts will not
\nmake sense unless you identify the law that is required to answer the question that contains
\nCharles Sturt University Subject Outline
\nLAW110 201930 S I
\nVersion 1 – Published 11 February 2019
\nPage 23 of 36
\nthe legal issue.
\n3. Apply the law to the facts. You simply match up each element you have identified in the law
\n(in order) with a fact. You may use the word \u201cbecause\u201d to make the connection between law
\nand fact. Using the word \u201cbecause\u201d forces you to make the connection between law and fact.
\nYou may also use the words \u201cas\u201d and \u201csince\u201d. These serve the same function as \u201cbecause\u201d.
\n4. Conclude each issue before drawing your final overall conclusion. There is no right or wrong
\nanswer, only logical analysis based on the rule and the facts that then leads to a reasonable
\nconclusion.
\nPreparation for this assignment
\n\u2022 Read Topics 3-6 (Negligence and Contracts) in the Modules, taking detailed notes and
\ncompleting all exercises and questions as you study.
\n\u2022 Work through the “ILAC Method” presentation in the How to Succeed in a Legal Subject
\nmodule, and watch the How to Succeed video there.
\n\u2022 Participate actively in the forum discussions of the Business Law in Action scenarios for each
\nmodule. This will give you an opportunity to practice writing with the ILAC method, to learn
\nfrom other students’ writing, and to get feedback and guidance from your lecturer. Participate
\nin the Law Assignment Grading Activity to familiarise yourself with the marking rubric and
\nexpectations. In this activity, you will use the marking rubric to mark two student answers to a
\nproblem solving question similar to Assessment Item 2. Then you will discuss the process with
\nyour lecturer and other students, so you fully understand how your answer will be marked.
\nThis understanding should guide you in preparing an answer that meets your lecturer’s
\nexpectations on this assessment
\nFurther guidance and general observations
\nBeing the subject convenor and the task moderator has provided me with an opportunity to
\nbecome aware of the most common mistakes made by students when they are preparing and
\ndrafting their assignment. The comments below contain some of my general observations:
\n1. Some students struggle to follow the guidelines provided to them orally and through the
\nsubject outline. It is important that students contact their lecturer, if they require further
\nclarifications about the task before they start drafting it. Also, make sure that you proofread
\nand edit your assignment before submitting it to the marker. The folder \u2018Assessment two\u2019
\ncontains a series of documents that have been especially created to Help you with your
\nassignment.
\n2. Do not write an essay. Some students submit an essay and totally disregarded the ILAC
\nmodel. Please check the materials posted electronically about the model and the samples
\nwhich show how it can be used effectively. See also the model answers
\n3. Headings and subheadings are essential. Use the headings of the ILAC model. You may wish
\nto use the following headings and subheadings:
\nQuestion 1
\nScenario A
\nIssue
\nLaw
\nApplication
\nConclusion
\nCharles Sturt University Subject Outline
\nLAW110 201930 S I
\nVersion 1 – Published 11 February 2019
\nPage 24 of 36
\nScenario B
\nIssue
\nLaw
\nApplication
\nConclusion
\nThe same structure can be used for question two. You may also opt for addressing both
\nscenarios simultaneously, that is, one ILAC per question.
\n4. Students tend to include too many ideas\/ arguments in one paragraph. They should discuss
\none argument per paragraph and such argument should be developed logically, and should
\nalso be supported by a primary source. Please substantiate your arguments. Primary sources
\nare cases and legislation.
\n5. Some papers are comprised of a series of general assertions or statements totally
\nunsupported by a legal source.
\n6. Instead of using primary sources (cases and legislation), some students use comments
\nextracted from the textbook to support their arguments. They also cite the book as law, when
\nin fact students were taught during the first two weeks of the semester that the textbook is
\nonly a secondary source. If you cannot find primary sources, then it is best to cite the book
\nrather than nothing. Not referencing your authorities may be considered as plagiarism.
\n7. Some students fail to refer to the Civil Liability Act and its relevant provisions. While others
\nrefer to the Act in a very vague way, and without pinpointing its relevant sections or
\nsubsections. There is no need to copy a whole section either. You can summarise its content
\ninstead and insert the respective reference to it inside brackets.
\n8. Students need to understand that although some of the provisions of the Civil Liability Act
\nare a re-statement of the common law, cases are still important and must be used in a
\npersuasive way. These two sources of law should be used together.
\n9. If you are dealing with a case scenario, please do not stretch the facts. Work only with the
\nfacts that you have been given.
\n10. Do not discuss the facts of any case. When making reference to some case law, several
\nstudents explain the facts of these cases instead of using their rationes only. Remember that
\nthe ratio of a case is the only binding part of the case. It is the reason for the decision.
\n11. It is not recommended that students copy the questions to their papers. Think about the
\nword limit.
\n12. Read the marking guide carefully before starting the drafting process. You must also read
\nthe Style Guide and the Presentation Guidelines contained in the Subject Outline.
\n13. It is preferable for students to use cases discussed by the textbook and the lecture notes
\nrather than cases found somewhere else. Students may inadvertently assume the risk that
\ncases, which were not discussed during class, may not be entirely relevant to their scenarios,
\nor these may lack judicial strength as precedents.
\n14. Proof read your paper before submitting it.
\nCharles Sturt University Subject Outline
\nLAW110 201930 S I
\nVersion 1 – Published 11 February 2019
\nPage 25 of 36
\nPlease feel free to contact your lecturer should you require further clarification on this task.
\nThis assignment must be submitted through Turnitin.
\nIt is recommended that your name, student ID and page number are included in the header
\nor footer of every page of the assignment.
\nFurther details about submission in Turnitin are provided in On-line submission.
\nAssessment item 3
\nFinal Exam
\nValue: 60%
\nDue Date: To be advised
\nDuration: 3 hours
\nSubmission method options: Alternative submission method
\nRequirements
\nThe final examination is a three hour open book exam. It is worth 60% of your assessment for
\nthe subject.
\nThe exam will have THREE (3) Parts. Parts A, B and C are COMPULSORY.
\nPart A will consist of 15 multiple-choice questions worth 1 mark each
\nPart B will consist of FIVE (5) short-answer questions worth 3 marks each
\nPart C has SIX (6) questions problem-type questions. You must attempt ANY THREE of these.
\nEach of these questions is worth 10 marks. The review questions and problem questions for
\neach topic (sample nursing essay examples by the best nursing assignment writing service) are of Helpance in guiding you into the topic (sample nursing essay examples by the best nursing assignment writing service)s that will feature in the exam.
\nRationale
\nSubject learning outcomes
\nThis assessment task will assess the following learning outcome\/s:
\n\u2022 be able to describe the Australian legal system, including its history, development, and
\nthe current the-oretical frameworks within which it and its institutions operate.
\n\u2022 be able to compare and contrast the Australian legal system with other legal systems.
\n\u2022 be able to synthesise knowledge of the doctrine of precedent with knowledge of the
\nhierarchy of the courts – at a state and federal level – to explain which court has
\njurisdiction in a particular matter.
\n\u2022 be able to investigate the different sources of Australian law in order to contrast these
\nsources and explain their significance and interrelationships when applying them to
\nlegal problems.
\n\u2022 be able to independently apply rules of statutory interpretation, including Latin
\nCharles Sturt University Subject Outline
\nLAW110 201930 S I
\nVersion 1 – Published 11 February 2019
\nPage 26 of 36
\nmaxims, common law approaches and the legislative provisions that apply at a state
\nand federal level.
\n\u2022 be able to demonstrate knowledge of tort, contract, and property law by identifying
\nthe relevant issue(s) arising out of novel factual situations, stating the relevant legal
\nprinciples, and explaining how these relate to the legal issue(s), in addition to
\nsuggesting potential remedies when providing a conclusion.
\n\u2022 be able to compare different methods of dispute resolution and evaluate their
\neffectiveness.
\nThe final examination has been designed to assess your understanding of the operation of the
\nAustralian legal system, your understanding of the major areas of law relating to business and
\nfundamental to your ability to integrate and apply information from various topic (sample nursing essay examples by the best nursing assignment writing service)s covered in
\nthe subject to factual situations. The final exam assesses all the learning outcomes of the
\nsubject.
\nGraduate learning outcomes
\nThis task also contributes to the assessment of the following CSU Graduate Learning
\nOutcome\/s (https:\/\/student.csu.edu.au\/study\/glo):
\n\u2022 Academic Literacy and Numeracy (Knowledge) – CSU Graduates understand the use
\nand structure of appropriate language in written, oral, visual, mathematical, and
\nmulti-modal communication.
\n\u2022 Academic Literacy and Numeracy (Skill) – CSU Graduates demonstrate the literacy and
\nnumeracy skills necessary to understand and interpret information and communicate
\neffectively according to the context.
\n\u2022 Academic Literacy and Numeracy (Application) – CSU Graduates consider the context,
\npurpose, and audience when gathering, interpreting, constructing, and presenting
\ninformation.
\n\u2022 Indigenous Cultural Competence (Knowledge) – CSU Graduates understand specific
\ncultural and historical patterns that have structured Indigenous lives in the past and
\nthe ways in which these patterns continue to be expressed in contemporary Australia.
\n\u2022 Sustainable Practices (Knowledge) – CSU Graduates demonstrate a multidisciplinary
\nknowledge that empowers graduates to understand and critically analyse the
\nchallenges of balancing the social, economic and environmental factors essential for
\necological sustainability.
\nMarking criteria and standards
\nMarking Criteria (Part A):
\nCRITERIA HD DI CR P FL
\nStudents will
\nbe required
\nto:
\nanswer theory
\nand practical
\nbased
\nTo meet this
\nlevel you will
\nattain a
\ncumulative
\nmark between
\n85 and 100%.
\nTo meet this
\nlevel you will
\nattain a
\ncumulative
\nmark between
\n75 and 84%. A
\nTo meet this
\nlevel you will
\nattain a
\ncumulative
\nmark between
\n65 and 74%. A
\nTo meet this
\nlevel you will
\nattain a
\ncumulative
\nmark between
\n50 and 64%. A
\nAt this level
\nyou will attain
\na cumulative
\nmark between
\n0-49%. A mark
\nin this range
\nCharles Sturt University Subject Outline
\nLAW110 201930 S I
\nVersion 1 – Published 11 February 2019
\nPage 27 of 36
\nmultiple
\nchoice
\nquestions by
\nselecting the
\nbest option
\nfrom five
\navailable
\nchoices to
\ndemonstrate
\ntheir
\nunderstanding
\nof basic legal
\nconcepts.
\nA mark in this
\nrange
\nindicates you
\nhave
\ndemonstrated
\nan exceptional
\nand a high
\nlevel of
\nknowledge
\nand
\nunderstanding
\nof the
\nconcepts.
\nmark in this
\nrange indicates
\nyou have
\ndemonstrated
\na
\ncomprehensive
\nand high level
\nof knowledge
\nand
\nunderstanding
\nof the
\nconcepts.
\nmark in this
\nrange
\nindicates you
\nhave
\ndemonstrated
\na sound
\nknowledge
\nand
\nunderstanding
\nof the
\nconcepts.
\nmark in this
\nrange
\nindicates you
\nhave
\ndemonstrated
\na basic
\nknowledge
\nand
\nunderstanding
\nof the
\nconcepts.
\nindicates you
\nhave not
\ndemonstrated
\na basic
\nknowledge
\nand
\nunderstanding
\nof the
\nconcepts.
\nMarking Criteria (Part B):
\nCRITERIA HD DI CR P FL
\nStudents will
\nbe required to
\nanswer five
\nshort answer
\ntheory and
\nproblem-type
\nquestions to
\ndemonstrate
\ntheir
\nunderstanding
\nof legal
\nconcepts and
\nprinciples and
\nability to
\napply the law
\nbriefly and
\nconcisely to a
\nset of facts
\nand to reach a
\ncorrect
\nconclusion on
\nthe issue.
\nTo meet this
\nlevel you will
\nattain a
\ncumulative
\nmark between
\n85%-100% for
\nthis section of
\nthe
\nexamination. A
\nmark in this
\nrange indicates
\nthat, in
\naggregate, you
\nhave
\ndemonstrated
\nexceptional
\nknowledge,
\nunderstanding,
\nand ability
\nacross a range
\nof topic (sample nursing essay examples by the best nursing assignment writing service)s in this
\nsubject.
\nTo meet this
\nlevel you will
\nattain a
\ncumulative
\nmark between
\n75%-84% for
\nthis section of
\nthe
\nexamination. A
\nmark in this
\nrange indicates
\nthat, in
\naggregate, you
\nhave
\ndemonstrated
\na
\ncomprehensive
\nknowledge,
\nunderstanding,
\nand ability
\nacross a range
\nof topic (sample nursing essay examples by the best nursing assignment writing service)s in this
\nsubject.
\nTo meet this
\nlevel you will
\nattain a
\ncumulative
\nmark between
\n65%-74% for
\nthis section of
\nthe
\nexamination. A
\nmark in this
\nrange indicates
\nthat, in
\naggregate,
\nhave
\ndemonstrated
\na sound
\nknowledge,
\nunderstanding,
\nand ability
\nacross a range
\nof topic (sample nursing essay examples by the best nursing assignment writing service)s in this
\nsubject.
\nTo meet this
\nlevel you will
\nattain a
\ncumulative
\nmark between
\n50%-64% for
\nthis section of
\nthe
\nexamination. A
\nmark in this
\nrange indicates
\nthat, in
\naggregate, you
\nhave
\ndemonstrated
\na basic
\nknowledge,
\nunderstanding,
\nand ability
\nacross the
\nrange of topic (sample nursing essay examples by the best nursing assignment writing service)s
\nselected for
\nexaminations
\nin this subject
\nAt this level
\nyou will attain
\na cumulative
\nmark between
\n0%-49% for
\nthis section of
\nthe
\nexamination.
\nA mark in this
\nrange
\nindicates that
\nyou have
\ndemonstrated
\nlimited
\nknowledge,
\nunderstanding
\nand ability
\nacross the
\nrange of
\ntopic (sample nursing essay examples by the best nursing assignment writing service)s
\nselected for
\nexamination
\nin this subject.
\nMarking Criteria (Part C):
\nCharles Sturt University Subject Outline
\nLAW110 201930 S I
\nVersion 1 – Published 11 February 2019
\nPage 28 of 36
\nCRITERIA HD DI CR P FL
\nStudents are
\nrequired to
\nanswer two
\nproblem type
\nquestions in
\norder to
\ndemonstrate:
\nTo meet this
\nlevel you will
\nachieve a
\ncumulative mark
\nof 85-100%. A
\nmark in this
\nrange indicates
\nthat a student:
\nTo meet this
\nlevel you will
\nachieve a
\ncumulative
\nmark of
\n75-84%. A
\nmark in this
\nrange
\nindicates that
\na student:
\nTo meet this
\nlevel you will
\nachieve a
\ncumulative mark
\nof 65-74%. A
\nmark in this
\nrange indicates
\nthat a student:
\nTo meet this level you
\nwill achieve a
\ncumulative mark of
\n50-64%. A mark in this
\nrange indicates that a
\nstudent:
\nAt this lev
\nobtain a mark of
\n0-49%. A mark in this
\nrange indic
\nstudent:
\nIdentification
\nof relevant
\nlegal issues
\nCorrectly
\nidentifies all
\nlegal issues and
\nformulates them
\nclearly with
\nconsideration of
\nall links to
\nrelevant law,
\nwith no errors.
\nCorrectly
\nidentifies al l
\nlegal issues
\nand
\nformulates
\nthem with
\nconsideration
\nof links to
\nrelevant law,
\nwith only
\nminor errors.
\nIdentifies and
\ncorrectly
\nformulates most
\nmajor legal
\nissues, taking
\ninto
\nconsideration
\nmost links to
\nrelevant law.
\nIdentifies some legal
\nissues, with some
\nerrors in formulation.
\nConsiders some links
\nto relevant law.
\nIdentifies no r
\nissues or only a f
\nthem. Some of these
\nmay be uncle
\nformulated.
\nfew conte
\nto relevant law
\nExplanation
\nof law and
\ncitation of
\nrelevant
\nlegal
\nauthority
\nProvides a
\ncomplete
\nexplanation of
\nthe law, with no
\nerrors. Explains
\nall relevant legal
\nauthority.
\nProvides an
\nexplanation
\nof almost all
\npoints of the
\nlaw,
\nsubstantiated
\nby most of
\nthe relevant
\nauthority
\nwith only
\nminor errors.
\nProvides an
\nexplanation of
\nmost points of
\nlaw, with few
\nerrors,
\nsubstantiated by
\ncitation of most
\nof the relevant
\nlegal authority
\nwith few errors.
\nProvides a basic
\nexplanation of the
\nlaw, but with some
\nerrors, substantiated
\nby limited legal
\nauthority.
\nProvides inc
\nlimited explana
\nthe law using no le
\nauthority
\nApplication
\nof legal
\nprinciples to
\nthe facts
\nApplies the law
\nto the facts so as
\nto address all
\nissues with no
\nerrors. Argument
\ndiscusses
\nlinkages
\nbetween facts
\nand the law and
\nconsiders
\ncounterApplies the
\nlaw correctly
\nto the facts
\nso as to
\naddress all
\nissues, with
\nonly minor
\nerrors.
\nArgument
\ndiscusses
\nlinkages
\nApplies the law
\ncorrectly to most
\nissues arising
\nfrom the facts,
\nbut with some
\nerrors. Argument
\nsummarises
\napplication of
\nthe
\nlaw. Conclusion
\nsummarises
\nMakes a basic attempt
\nto apply the law to the
\nfacts, but applies
\nwrong law and \/ or
\ncontains significant
\nerrors in the
\napplication.. Resultant
\nlegal advice is
\nincomplete.
\nPaper does no
\ncorrectly apply law t
\nthe facts and \/ or
\napplies inc
\nlaw. May be
\ndescriptiv
\nthan putting f
\na reasoned ar
\nCharles Sturt University Subject Outline
\nLAW110 201930 S I
\nVersion 1 – Published 11 February 2019
\nPage 29 of 36
\narguments.
\nConclusion
\nclearly draws
\ntogether advice.
\nbetween
\nfacts and the
\nlaw.
\nConclusion
\nclearly draws
\ntogether
\nadvice.
\nadvice.
\nOverall
\nstructure.
\nUses ILAC
\nmodel.
\nExtremely well
\nstructured and
\norganised, with
\none main
\nargument per
\nparagraph,
\nsupported by
\nwell-written
\nsupporting
\nsentences.
\nUses ILAC
\nmodel. Well
\nstructured,
\nwith
\narguments
\nclearly
\ndifferentiated
\nbetween
\nparagraphs
\nUses ILAC
\nmodel and is
\nclearly
\nstructured.
\nSome attempt at use
\nof ILAC model in
\nstructuring of answer
\nbut with errors.
\nPoorly struc
\nInadequa
\nof paragr
\nhave disr
\nILAC model.
\nWritten
\nexpression
\nand editing.
\nUses
\nappropriate
\nacademic
\nwriting which is
\nformal,
\nimpersonal and
\nwhich contains
\nno spelling,
\ngrammar and
\npunctuation
\nerrors. Paper
\ndemonstrates
\ncareful
\nproofreading.
\nUses
\nappropriate
\nacademic
\nwriting which
\nis formal, and
\nimpersonal
\nwith only
\nvery minor
\nspelling,
\ngrammar and
\npunctuation
\nerrors. Paper
\ndemonstrates
\ncareful
\nproofreading.
\nUses
\nappropriate
\nacademic
\nwriting which is
\nformal and
\nimpersonal, with
\na few spelling,
\ngrammar and
\npunctuation
\nerrors. Paper
\ndemonstrates
\nevidence of
\nproofreading.
\nSignificant spelling,
\ngrammar and
\npunctuation errors
\nbut the paper is
\nreadable and
\ndemonstrates some
\nattempt at
\nproofreading.
\nPoor grammar
\nspelling and\/ or
\npunctuation.
\ngives no e
\nhaving been pr
\nread.
\nTo access a Sample Paper and its solution, click on the link below:
\ndoms.csu.edu.au\/csu\/items\/a04c274e-489e-420a-a781-747865bfaf09\/1\/
\nCharles Sturt University Subject Outline
\nLAW110 201930 S I
\nVersion 1 – Published 11 February 2019
\nPage 30 of 36
\nMaterial provided by the university
\nTwo (12 Page) Answer Booklets and one General Purpose Answer Sheet (GPAS) .
\nMaterial provided by the student
\nThe exam is open book. Printed materials and resources, including textbooks are allowed. No
\ndictionaries will be permitted.
\nAssessment Information
\nAcademic integrity
\nAcademic integrity means acting with honesty, fairness and responsibility, and involves
\nobserving and maintaining ethical standards in all aspects of academic work. This subject
\nassumes that you understand what constitutes plagiarism, cheating and collusion. If you are a
\nnew student we expect you to complete the modules called Academic Integrity at CSU.
\n(https:\/\/interact2.csu.edu.au\/webapps\/blackboard\/execute\/
\ncourseMain?course_id=_16412_1&task=true&src=)
\nCSU treats plagiarism seriously. We may use Turnitin to check your submitted work for
\nplagiarism. You can use Turnitin to check for plagiarism (http:\/\/student.csu.edu.au\/library\/
\nintegrity\/referencing-at-csu\/checking) in your assessments before submission.
\nReferencing
\nReferencing is an important component of academic work. All assessment tasks should be
\nappropriately referenced. The specific details of the referencing requirements are included in
\neach assessment task description. Get referencing style guides and help
\n(http:\/\/student.csu.edu.au\/library\/integrity\/referencing-at-csu) to use for your assessments.
\nHow to submit your assessment items
\nOnline submission process
\nAssessment tasks that are not completed through the Subject site need to be submitted
\nelectronically via Turnitin site by the due date. You will be allowed to add yourself to the
\nTurnitin class once the class is set up by your Lecturer.
\nUnless advised otherwise, all Turnitin submissions are due by midnight (AEST) of the date
\nCharles Sturt University Subject Outline
\nLAW110 201930 S I
\nVersion 1 – Published 11 February 2019
\nPage 31 of 36
\nspecified. Please note that the time and the date of your Turnitin submission will be used to
\ndetermine your official submission time.
\nAll textual elements within an assessment must be submitted in a format that is readable by
\nTurnitin. Specific exceptions, where an assessment requires the insertion of image based
\nevidence of workings will be outlined in the context of the assessment. Students that
\ndeliberately attempt to insert content of assessments in a format that is not readable by
\nTurnitin may be subject to Academic misconduct investigations.
\nAdditional Submission Information:
\nIt is recommended that your name, student ID and page number are included in the header
\nor footer of every page of any assignment. You are also required to rename your assignment
\nfile before you submit via Turnitin as per below protocol:
\nSUBJECT CODE, SI, SURNAME, STUDENT ID, ASSESSMENT NUMBER, SESSION.
\nExample \u2013 LAW110 SI PATEL 11554466 A3 201930.doc
\nPostal submission process
\nPostal submissions will not be accepted for any of the assessments required.
\nHand delivered submission process
\nHand delivered submissions will not be accepted for any of the assessments required.
\nAlternative submission process
\nsee online submission above.
\nExtensions
\nIt is best to complete assessment items by the due date. However, when something
\nunavoidable comes up an extension may be possible. The following principles are used when
\nprocessing extensions
\n1. For in-session assessment items, an extension request for up to three (3) calendar days can
\nbe made by emailing your subject coordinator directly before the due date. In your email
\nplease state the reason why you need more time as well as what precisely you are requesting.
\nSupporting documentation is not required. If an extension is requested in the above format
\nwith a valid reason and your request does not disadvantage other students, the extension will
\nbe approved. Extensions cannot be granted for on-line tests, as these have to be done within
\na specific time frame, after which the answers are released to the class automatically.
\n2. For in-session assessment items, extension requests of more than three (3) calendar days
\nmust be made via the special consideration form: https:\/\/apps.csu.edu.au\/specialcons\/.
\n(https:\/\/apps.csu.edu.au\/specialcons\/)The request must be made before the due date and
\nmust include supporting documentation. Acceptable reasons are given in the Special
\nConsideration Policy
\nbe considered on a case by case basis. The request may not be granted. The maximum
\nextension possible will be seven (7) calendar days.
\nCharles Sturt University Subject Outline
\nLAW110 201930 S I
\nVersion 1 – Published 11 February 2019
\nPage 32 of 36
\n3. If you receive an extension, then you should expect the assessment item and its feedback
\nto be returned later. If you submit later than the extended due date you will receive late
\npenalties as per guidelines below.
\n4. Unless your extension permits otherwise, submissions received 10 days after the original
\ndue date will receive zero.
\n5. For end of session exams, you can request a supplementary exam via
\nhttps:\/\/apps.csu.edu.au\/specialcons\/. (https:\/\/apps.csu.edu.au\/specialcons\/)This request
\nmust be made within 3 working days of the date of exam and must include supporting
\ndocumentation. Acceptable reasons are given in the Special Consideration Policy
\n
\ncertificate is required. If the supplementary exam (SX) is awarded then your exam is moved to
\nthe next examination period. In order to preserve exam integrity and manage the logistics of
\nexams, the timing of a supplementary exam is heavily restricted.
\nHow to apply for special consideration
\nAcademic regulations provide for special consideration to be given if you suffer misadventure
\nor extenuating circumstances during the session (including the examination period) which
\nprevents you from meeting acceptable standards or deadlines. Find the form on the Student
\nPortal Special Consideration, Misadventure, Advice and Appeals (http:\/\/student.csu.edu.au\/
\nstudy\/academic-advice) page.
\nPenalties for late submission
\nPenalty for the late submission of an assessment task (without obtaining the Subject
\nCoordinator’s approval for an extension) will be:
\n10% deduction per day, including weekends, of the maximum marks allocated for the
\nassessment task, i.e. 1 day late 10% deduction, or 2 days late 20% deduction.
\nAn example of the calculation would be:
\nMaximum marks allocated = 20
\nPenalty for one day late = 2 marks (so, a score of 18\/20 becomes 16\/20 and a score of 12\/20
\nbecomes 10\/20).
\nIf an assignment is due on a Friday but is not submitted until the following Tuesday, then the
\npenalty will be four days (40% deduction or 8 marks in the example above).
\nSubmissions more than 10 days late will be acknowledged as received but will not be marked.
\nResubmission
\nResubmission of assessment items will not be accepted for any of the assessments required in
\nCharles Sturt University Subject Outline
\nLAW110 201930 S I
\nVersion 1 – Published 11 February 2019
\nPage 33 of 36
\nthis subject.
\nFeedback processes
\nFeedback will be provided in a timely manner. Students will be provided with individualised
\ncomments, in addition to general feedback.
\nAssessment return
\nYou should normally expect your marked assignment to be returned to you within fifteen (15)
\nworking days of the due date, if your assignment was submitted on time. If you submitted your
\nassignment on time but not received it back by the return date, you should make enquiries in
\nthe first instance to the subject coordinator.
\nStudent Feedback & Learning Analytics
\nAssessment of subjects
\nCSU values constructive feedback and relies on high response rates to Subject Experience
\nSurveys (SES) to enhance teaching. Responses are fed back anonymously to Subject
\nCoordinators and Heads of Schools to form the basis for subject enhancement and recognition
\nof excellence in teaching. Schools report on their Assessment data; highlighting good practice
\nand documenting how problems have been addressed. You can view a summary of survey
\nresults via the Student Portal SES Results (https:\/\/student.csu.edu.au\/study\/subjectexperience-survey-results) page.
\nWe strongly encourage you to complete your online Subject Experience Surveys. You will be
\nprovided with links to your surveys via email when they open three [3] weeks before the end of
\nsession.
\nChanges and actions based on student feedback
\nThe subject reflects feedback provided by students from previous cohorts.
\nLearning analytics
\nLearning Analytics refers to the collection and analysis of student data for the purpose of
\nimproving learning and teaching. It enables the University to personalise the support we
\nprovide our students. All Learning Analytics activities will take place in accordance with the
\nCSU Learning Analytics Code of Practice. For more information, please visit CSU’s Learning
\nAnalytics (https:\/\/www.appessaywriters.com\/write-my-paper\/csu.edu.au\/division\/student-learning\/home\/analytics-and-Assessments\/
\nlearning-analytics) website.
\nData about your activity in the Interact2 site and other learning technologies for this subject
\nwill be recorded and can be reviewed by teaching staff to inform their communication,
\nsupport and teaching practices.
\nBased on past analytics, changes made to the subject include designing and making available
\nto students the following resources:
\nCharles Sturt University Subject Outline
\nLAW110 201930 S I
\nVersion 1 – Published 11 February 2019
\nPage 34 of 36
\n\u2022 Revision quizzes,
\n\u2022 Interactive flowcharts,
\n\u2022 Video lectures,
\n\u2022 Business in law scenarios,
\n\u2022 Grading Activity
\n\u2022 Glossary
\n\u2022 PDF version of the modules, and
\n\u2022 Activities aligned to assessment preparation.
\nServices & Support
\nYour Student Portal (http:\/\/student.csu.edu.au\/) tells you can how you can seek services and
\nsupport. These include study, admin, residential, library, careers, financial, and personal
\nsupport.
\nDevelop your study skills
\nDevelop your study skills (https:\/\/student.csu.edu.au\/study\/skills) with our free study services.
\nWe have services online, on campus and near you. These services can help you develop your
\nEnglish language, literacy, and numeracy.
\nLibrary Services
\nCSU Library (https:\/\/student.csu.edu.au\/library) provides access to the eBooks, journal
\narticles, books, and multimedia resources needed for your studies and assessments. Get the
\nmost out of these resources by contacting Library staff either online or in person, or make use
\nof the many Library Resource Guides, videos and online workshops available.
\nCSU Policies & Regulations
\nThis subject outline should be read in conjunction with all academic policies and regulations,
\ne.g. Student Academic Misconduct Policy, Assessment Policy – Coursework Subjects,
\nAssessment Principles Policy, Special Consideration Policy, Academic Progress Policy,
\nAcademic Communication with Students Policy, Student Charter, etc.
\nPlease refer to the collated list of policies and regulations relevant to studying your subject(s)
\n(http:\/\/student.csu.edu.au\/administration\/policies-regulations-subjects) which includes links
\nto the CSU Policy Library (https:\/\/www.appessaywriters.com\/write-my-paper\/csu.edu.au\/about\/policy) – the sole authoritative source
\nof official academic and administrative policies, procedures, guidelines, rules and regulations
\nof the University.
\nSubject Outline as a reference document
\nThis Subject Outline is an accurate and historical record of the curriculum and scope of your
\nsubject. CSU’s Subject Outlines Policy (https:\/\/policy.csu.edu.au\/view.current.php?id=00267)
\nrequires that you retain a copy of the Subject Outline for future use such as for accreditation
\nCharles Sturt University Subject Outline
\nLAW110 201930 S I
\nVersion 1 – Published 11 February 2019
\nPage 35 of 36
\npurposes.
\nCharles Sturt University Subject Outline
\nLAW110 201930 S I
\nVersion 1 – Published 11 February 2019
\nPage 36 of 36<\/https:><\/https:><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"