{"id":82677,"date":"2022-11-07T07:26:13","date_gmt":"2022-11-07T07:26:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/nursingstudybay.com\/2022\/11\/07\/ppubh600-assessment-objectives-strategies-and-logic-model\/"},"modified":"2022-11-07T07:26:13","modified_gmt":"2022-11-07T07:26:13","slug":"ppubh600-assessment-objectives-strategies-and-logic-model","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/ppubh600-assessment-objectives-strategies-and-logic-model\/","title":{"rendered":"PPUBH600 Assessment Objectives, Strategies and Logic Model"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>PUBH6007_Assessment_2 Part A_Brief_ _Module Due 8 Page 1 of 11<br \/>\nASSESSMENT 2A BRIEF<br \/>\nSubject Code and Title PUBH6007 Program Design, Implementation and Assessment<br \/>\nAssessment 2:<br \/>\nPart A: Presentation: Project Plan: Objectives, Strategies and Logic<br \/>\nModel<br \/>\nIndividual\/Group Group<br \/>\nLength Part A: 10-minute presentation, 3-minute questions<br \/>\nLearning Outcomes a) Interpret the importance of performing needs analysis in<br \/>\npublic health program development. Apply different<br \/>\nmethodologies of needs assessment to establish and<br \/>\nprioritise community needs.<br \/>\nb) Develop a Program Logic Model and critically analyse the<br \/>\nlink between the components of Program Logic Model and<br \/>\nProgram Theory in Public Health program design<br \/>\nc) Develop an evidence-based Program and Assessment Plan<br \/>\nfor the implementation and Assessment of a Public Health<br \/>\nProgram.<br \/>\nd) Critically examine and apply the principles and strategies of<br \/>\ncommunity and stakeholder engagement.<br \/>\ne) Critically examine and apply the principles of Assessment,<br \/>\ncomparing the types and stages of Assessment utilised in<br \/>\nPublic Health Program development.<br \/>\nSubmission Part A: Online: Presentation recordings and powerpoint slides due<br \/>\nSunday of Module 8 at 11.55pm AEST.<br \/>\nOn-campus: Presentations and Powerpoint slides due Module 8 in<br \/>\nclass.<br \/>\nWeighting Part A: 20%<br \/>\nTotal Marks 100 marks<br \/>\n*Please Note: This time is AEST or AEDT (Melbourne, Sydney, Canberra). Please convert to your own<br \/>\ntime zone (e.g. Adelaide = 11:25pm).<br \/>\nAssessment Task<br \/>\nThe culmination of individual needs assessments will mean that your group now has a<br \/>\ncomprehensive and complex understanding of your target population. It\u2019s now time to start<br \/>\nplanning! In Assessment 2 your group will be required to present a blueprint of your program plan to<br \/>\nyour fellow students. In this presentation (10 min) your group needs to outline your programs<br \/>\nobjectives and strategies, and present your logic model. You will also be expected to answer<br \/>\nquestions (3 min) from your peers and your learning facilitator.<br \/>\nPUBH6007_Assessment_2 Part A_Brief_ _Module Due 8 Page 2 of 11<br \/>\nAssessment Flow Chart<br \/>\nPlease ensure that you read the Portfolio Assessment Brief before completing this assessment.<br \/>\nContext<br \/>\nThe ability to communicate and present ideas clearly is essential for your success as a public health<br \/>\nprofessional. Public health professionals rarely work in isolation, and as such collaboration skills are<br \/>\nessential to your career in Public health. In this assessment you will have the opportunity to learn<br \/>\nskills required to present and interact efficiently with stakeholders, as well as amongst your group<br \/>\nmembers. The successful completion of this assessment requires strong collaboration and<br \/>\nengagement from all group members.<br \/>\nTask Instructions:<br \/>\nIn this task you are required to create and present a 10 minute group presentation that<br \/>\nprovides a blueprint of your program plan. This presentation needs to include the<br \/>\nfollowing.<br \/>\n1. Include an overview of your group\u2019s presentation:<br \/>\n\u2022 A brief introduction of your group and topic (sample nursing essay examples by the best nursing assignment writing service).<br \/>\n\u2022 A brief overview of your public health issue based on need assessment.<br \/>\n2. Program and Assessment Plan blueprint:<br \/>\n\u2022 Program Logic model<br \/>\no Based on prioritised need for a chosen population.<br \/>\n\u2022 Overarching Goal<br \/>\no The overall aim that you want to achieve via your program following SMART<br \/>\ncriteria.<br \/>\n\u2022 Objectives<br \/>\no There should be at least 3 objectives following SMART criteria.<br \/>\n\u2022 Strategies<br \/>\no How you will go about achieving your goal and objectives;<br \/>\no The activities that will contribute to the achievement of the objectives.<br \/>\no A clear relationship between activities and outcomes Which activities are<br \/>\nbeing implemented through engagement of stakeholders to produce<br \/>\nprogress on which outcomes?<br \/>\n1. Needs assessment<br \/>\n(Individual)<br \/>\n2. Part A: Objectives,<br \/>\nStrategies &amp; Logic<br \/>\nModel (Group)<br \/>\n2. Part B: Program<br \/>\nPlanning,<br \/>\nImplementation &amp;<br \/>\nAssessment Plan (Group)<br \/>\n3. Reflection: Program<br \/>\nPlanning Process and<br \/>\nColaboration<br \/>\n(Individual)<br \/>\nPUBH6007_Assessment_2 Part A_Brief_ _Module Due 8 Page 3 of 11<br \/>\n3. Risks and Challenges<br \/>\n\u2022 Identify any potential challenges to the program<br \/>\n\u2022 What may occur that can put the program at risk, what are the<br \/>\nchallenges, and how will you address them?<br \/>\no For example, people may not enrol?<br \/>\n4. Brief Conclusion and summary<br \/>\n5. Slide with references<br \/>\n6. Questions<br \/>\n\u2022 Each group will spend 3 minutes answering questions from the Learning Facilitator<br \/>\nand from fellow students. Groups will be marked on both the quality of the answers<br \/>\nthey provide and the quality of the questions they ask other groups.<br \/>\nReferencing<br \/>\nIt is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. Please see more<br \/>\ninformation on referencing in the Academic Skills webpage.<br \/>\nSubmission Instructions<br \/>\nOnline<br \/>\nRecording Instructions<br \/>\n\u2022 You can record your group presentation using the web conferencing app of your preference,<br \/>\nfor example, Zoom, Skype, Microsoft Teams, etc.<br \/>\no Please note that ad-hoc university tech support for web conferencing apps is not<br \/>\navailable.<br \/>\n\u2022 Please refer to the following useful information to guide you in compressing and uploading<br \/>\nyour video presentation:<br \/>\no Steps required to record your video presentation.<br \/>\nYou will be teamed up with another group by your Learning Facilitator. You will need to organise a<br \/>\ntime that suits all members, and meet via Blackboard Collaborate Ultra, or via Zoom, to present your<br \/>\npresentations to each other. Each group must ask and answer 3 minutes of questions.<br \/>\nThis session is to be recorded and the recording link and slides need to be uploaded to the<br \/>\nAssessment 2 link in the main navigation menu in PUBH6007 Program Design, Implementation and<br \/>\nAssessment.<br \/>\nOn-Campus:<br \/>\nPUBH6007_Assessment_2 Part A_Brief_ _Module Due 8 Page 4 of 11<br \/>\nGroups will be allocated a time to present during the Module 8 class each group must ask and<br \/>\nanswer 3 minutes of questions. Presentation slides will need to be uploaded to Assessment 2 link in<br \/>\nthe main navigation menu in PUBH6007 Program Design, Implementation and Assessment the<br \/>\ncompletion of the Module 8 class.<br \/>\nThe Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the Blackboard portal.<br \/>\nFeedback can be viewed in My Grade<br \/>\nAcademic Integrity<br \/>\nAll students are responsible for ensuring that all work submitted is their own and is appropriately<br \/>\nreferenced and academically written according to the Academic Writing Guide. Students also need<br \/>\nPUBH6007_Assessment_2 PartA_Brief_ _Module Due 8 Page 5 of 11<br \/>\nAssessment Rubric<br \/>\nAssessment<br \/>\nAttributes<br \/>\nFail<br \/>\n(Yet to achieve<br \/>\nminimum standard)<br \/>\n0-49%<br \/>\nPass<br \/>\n(Functional)<br \/>\n50-64%<br \/>\nCredit<br \/>\n(Proficient)<br \/>\n65-74%<br \/>\nDistinction<br \/>\n(Advanced)<br \/>\n75-84%<br \/>\nHigh Distinction<br \/>\n(Exceptional)<br \/>\n85-100%<br \/>\nOverview of the topic (sample nursing essay examples by the best nursing assignment writing service)<br \/>\nand demonstrated<br \/>\nunderstanding of the<br \/>\nissue<br \/>\nPrinciples of program<br \/>\nplanning, key<br \/>\ncomponents of<br \/>\nprogram planning<br \/>\nincluding; program<br \/>\nlogic model,<br \/>\nprioritisation of<br \/>\nneeds, goal,<br \/>\nOverview of the topic (sample nursing essay examples by the best nursing assignment writing service)<br \/>\ndoes not demonstrate<br \/>\nan understanding of the<br \/>\npublic health<br \/>\nissue\/problem being<br \/>\nexpored.<br \/>\nOverview of the topic (sample nursing essay examples by the best nursing assignment writing service)<br \/>\ndemonstrates a limited<br \/>\nunderstanding of the<br \/>\npublic health<br \/>\nissue\/problem being<br \/>\nexpored.<br \/>\nOverview of the topic (sample nursing essay examples by the best nursing assignment writing service)<br \/>\ndemonstrates a good<br \/>\nunderstanding of the<br \/>\npublic health<br \/>\nissue\/problem being<br \/>\nexpored.<br \/>\nOverview of the topic (sample nursing essay examples by the best nursing assignment writing service)<br \/>\ndemonstrates a very<br \/>\ngood understanding of<br \/>\nthe public health<br \/>\nissue\/problem being<br \/>\nexpored.<br \/>\nOverview of the topic (sample nursing essay examples by the best nursing assignment writing service)<br \/>\ndemonstrates a<br \/>\nsophisticated<br \/>\nunderstanding of the<br \/>\npublic health<br \/>\nissue\/problem being<br \/>\nexpored.<br \/>\nPUBH6007_Assessment_2 PartA_Brief_ _Module Due 8 Page 6 of 11<br \/>\nobjective, strategies<br \/>\nand challenges.<br \/>\nPercentage for this<br \/>\ncriterion =30%<br \/>\nPresentation and<br \/>\ndiscussion of the key<br \/>\ncomponents of<br \/>\nprogram planning<br \/>\nincluding logic model,<br \/>\nprioritisation of needs,<br \/>\ngoal, objectives, and<br \/>\nstrategies is limited or<br \/>\nlacking.<br \/>\nPotential challenges are<br \/>\nnot idenfitied<br \/>\nPresentation and<br \/>\ndiscussion of the key<br \/>\ncomponents of program<br \/>\nplanning including logic<br \/>\nmodel, prioritisation of<br \/>\nneeds, goal, objectives,<br \/>\nand strategies,<br \/>\ndemonstrates a limited<br \/>\nunderstanding of the<br \/>\nprogram planning process.<br \/>\nPotential challenges<br \/>\nidenfitied demonstrate<br \/>\nlimited understanding of<br \/>\nthe barriers that can occur<br \/>\nwithin program design and<br \/>\nplanning.<br \/>\nPresentation and<br \/>\ndiscussion of the key<br \/>\ncomponents of program<br \/>\nplanning including logic<br \/>\nmodel, prioritisation of<br \/>\nneeds, goal, objectives,<br \/>\nand strategies,<br \/>\ndemonstrates an<br \/>\nappropriate<br \/>\nunderstanding of the<br \/>\nprogram planning<br \/>\nprocess.<br \/>\nPotential challenges<br \/>\nidenfitied demonstrate a<br \/>\ngood understanding of<br \/>\nthe barriers that can<br \/>\noccur within program<br \/>\ndesign and planning.<br \/>\nPresentation and<br \/>\ndiscussion of the key<br \/>\ncomponents of program<br \/>\nplanning including logic<br \/>\nmodel, prioritisation of<br \/>\nneeds, goal, objectives,<br \/>\nand strategies,<br \/>\ndemonstrates an<br \/>\nimpressive<br \/>\nunderstanding of the<br \/>\nprogram planning<br \/>\nprocess.<br \/>\nPotential challenges<br \/>\nidenfitied demonstrate a<br \/>\nwell rounded<br \/>\nunderstanding of the<br \/>\nbarriers that can occur<br \/>\nwithin program design<br \/>\nand planning.<br \/>\nPresentation and<br \/>\ndiscussion of the key<br \/>\ncomponents of program<br \/>\nplanning including logic<br \/>\nmodel, prioritisation of<br \/>\nneeds, goal, objectives,<br \/>\nand strategies,<br \/>\ndemonstrates an indepth<br \/>\nunderstanding of the<br \/>\nprogram planning<br \/>\nprocess.<br \/>\nPotential challenges<br \/>\nidenfitied demonstrate a<br \/>\ncomprehensive<br \/>\nunderstanding of the<br \/>\nbarriers that can occur<br \/>\nwithin program design<br \/>\nand planning.<br \/>\nPUBH6007_Assessment_2 PartA_Brief_ _Module Due 8 Page 7 of 11<br \/>\nApplication and<br \/>\nanalysis<br \/>\nCritical analysis of<br \/>\nthe public health<br \/>\nproblem, analysis of<br \/>\nneeds and<br \/>\nchallenges.<br \/>\nApplication of key<br \/>\nplanning<br \/>\ncomponents; logic<br \/>\nmodel, goal,<br \/>\nobjectives, strategies<br \/>\nincluding use of<br \/>\nSMART crtieria.<br \/>\nPercentage for this<br \/>\ncriterion = 40%<br \/>\nCritical analysis of the<br \/>\npublic health issue is<br \/>\nlacking. Evidence is<br \/>\nrequired to support the<br \/>\ndiscussion of needs<br \/>\nanalysis and potential<br \/>\nchallenges.<br \/>\nKey components of the<br \/>\nprogram planning<br \/>\nprocess including logic<br \/>\nmodel, prioritisation of<br \/>\nneeds, goal, objectives<br \/>\nand strategies including<br \/>\nstakeholder<br \/>\nengagement applied<br \/>\nincorrectly, and key<br \/>\naspects are missing<br \/>\nRelationships between<br \/>\nactivities and outcomes<br \/>\nare not identified.<br \/>\nSMART criteria is not<br \/>\nutilised and<br \/>\ndemonstrated correctly<br \/>\nCritical analysis of the<br \/>\npublic health issue is<br \/>\nlimited. More detailed<br \/>\nevidence is required to<br \/>\nsupport the discussion of<br \/>\nneeds analysis and<br \/>\npotential challenges.<br \/>\nKey components of the<br \/>\nprogram planning process<br \/>\nincluding logic model,<br \/>\nprioritisation of needs,<br \/>\ngoal, objectives and<br \/>\nstrategies including<br \/>\nstakeholder engagement<br \/>\nare not applied correctly,<br \/>\nor key aspects are missing<br \/>\nRelationships between<br \/>\nactivities and outcomes<br \/>\nare not clearly identified.<br \/>\nSMART criteria is utilised,<br \/>\nbut aspects are not<br \/>\ndemonstrated fully<br \/>\nCritical analysis of the<br \/>\npublic health issue<br \/>\ndemonstrated, including<br \/>\nan evidence based<br \/>\ndiscussion of the needs<br \/>\nanalysis and potential<br \/>\nchallenges.<br \/>\nKey components of the<br \/>\nprogram planning<br \/>\nprocess including logic<br \/>\nmodel, prioritisation of<br \/>\nneeds, goal, objectives<br \/>\nand strategies including<br \/>\nstakeholder engagement<br \/>\nare utilised and applied<br \/>\ncorrectly, with no aspects<br \/>\nmissing.<br \/>\nRelationships between<br \/>\nactivities and outcomes<br \/>\nare clearly identified.<br \/>\nSMART criteria is utilised<br \/>\nand demonstrated<br \/>\ncorrectly<br \/>\nDetailed critical analysis<br \/>\nof the public health issue<br \/>\ndemonstrated, including<br \/>\na well developed<br \/>\nevidence based<br \/>\ndiscussion of the needs<br \/>\nanalysis and potential<br \/>\nchallenges.<br \/>\nKey components of the<br \/>\nprogram planning<br \/>\nprocess logic model,<br \/>\nprioritisation of needs,<br \/>\ngoal, objective and<br \/>\nstrategies including<br \/>\nstakeholder engagement<br \/>\nare utilised and applied<br \/>\nwell, with no aspects<br \/>\nmissing.<br \/>\nRelationships between<br \/>\nactivities and outcomes<br \/>\nare clearly identified.<br \/>\nSMART criteria is utilised<br \/>\nand demonstrated clearly<br \/>\nand correctly<br \/>\nExceptional critical<br \/>\nanalysis of the public<br \/>\nhealth issue<br \/>\ndemonstrated, including<br \/>\nan insightful and<br \/>\nsophisticated and<br \/>\nevidence based<br \/>\ndiscussion of the needs<br \/>\nanalysis and potential<br \/>\nchallenges.<br \/>\nKey components of the<br \/>\nprogram planning<br \/>\nprocess logic model,<br \/>\nprioritisation of needs,<br \/>\ngoal, objective and<br \/>\nstrategies including<br \/>\nstakeholder engagement<br \/>\nare applied correctly and<br \/>\nprofessionally.<br \/>\nRelationships between<br \/>\nactivities and outcomes<br \/>\nare identified and<br \/>\ndescribed clearly and<br \/>\nsuccinctly<br \/>\nSMART criteria is utilised<br \/>\nand demonstrated<br \/>\nclearly, correctly and<br \/>\nrealistically<br \/>\nPUBH6007_Assessment_2 PartA_Brief_ _Module Due 8 Page 8 of 11<br \/>\nQuality of questions<br \/>\nand answers<br \/>\nPercentage for this<br \/>\ncriterion = 10%<br \/>\nGroup did not provide<br \/>\nappropriate answers<br \/>\nGroup did not ask<br \/>\nquestions<br \/>\nGroup provided answers,<br \/>\nthough detail is lacking .<br \/>\nGroup questions<br \/>\ndemonstrate a limited<br \/>\nlevel of engagement and<br \/>\ninquiry<br \/>\nGroup provided accurate<br \/>\nanswers.<br \/>\nGroup questions<br \/>\ndemonstrate a good level<br \/>\nof engagement and<br \/>\ninquiry<br \/>\nGroup provided accurate<br \/>\nand well articulated<br \/>\nanswers.<br \/>\nGroup questions<br \/>\ndemonstrate an high<br \/>\nlevels of engagement,<br \/>\ninquiry and analysis.<br \/>\nGroup provided accurate<br \/>\nand well articulated<br \/>\nanswers that<br \/>\ndemonstrated a<br \/>\nsophistication of<br \/>\nthinking.<br \/>\nGroup questions<br \/>\ndemonstrate a<br \/>\nimpressive levels of<br \/>\nengagement, inquiry and<br \/>\nanalysis.<br \/>\nPUBH6007_Assessment_2 PartA_Brief_ _Module Due 8 Page 9 of 11<br \/>\nGroup contribution,<br \/>\ncollaboration and<br \/>\ndynamic.<br \/>\nGroup member<br \/>\nengagement and<br \/>\ncontribution. Group<br \/>\norganisation and<br \/>\ndynamic<br \/>\nPercentage for this<br \/>\ncriterion = 10%<br \/>\nMinimal group<br \/>\nmembers were active in<br \/>\nthe presentation.<br \/>\nMinimal group<br \/>\nmembers engaged in<br \/>\nasking and answering<br \/>\nquestions.<br \/>\nPresentation lacks<br \/>\ngroup cohesion and<br \/>\norganisation.<br \/>\nSome group members<br \/>\nwere active in the<br \/>\npresentation.<br \/>\nSome group members<br \/>\nengaged in asking and<br \/>\nanswering questions.<br \/>\nPresentation<br \/>\ndemonstrates limited<br \/>\ngroup cohesion and<br \/>\norganisation.<br \/>\nMost group members<br \/>\nwere active in the<br \/>\npresentation.<br \/>\nMost group members<br \/>\nengaged in asking and<br \/>\nanswering questions.<br \/>\n.<br \/>\nPresentation<br \/>\ndemonstrates a good<br \/>\nlevel of group cohesion<br \/>\nand organisation<br \/>\nAll group members were<br \/>\nhighly active in the<br \/>\npresentation.<br \/>\nAll group members<br \/>\nengaged in asking and<br \/>\nanswering questions.<br \/>\nPresentation<br \/>\ndemonstrates a very<br \/>\ngoodlevel of group<br \/>\ncohesion and<br \/>\norganisation.<br \/>\nAll group members were<br \/>\nhighly active and<br \/>\ndynamic in their<br \/>\ninvolvement in the<br \/>\npresentation.<br \/>\nAll group members<br \/>\nengaged in asking highly<br \/>\nrelevant questions and<br \/>\nproviding clear and well<br \/>\narticulated answers.<br \/>\nPresentation<br \/>\ndemonstrates a high<br \/>\nlevel of group cohesion<br \/>\nand organisation.<br \/>\nPUBH6007_Assessment_2 PartA_Brief_ _Module Due 8 Page 10 of 11<br \/>\nQuality of<br \/>\nPresentation<br \/>\nPercentage for this<br \/>\ncriterion = 10%<br \/>\nPresentation is<br \/>\ninsufficient in terms of<br \/>\ncontent and<br \/>\npresentation time<br \/>\nPresentation does not<br \/>\nflow and there are<br \/>\ngrammatical errors.<br \/>\nLimited research<br \/>\nevident<br \/>\nThere are numerous<br \/>\nmistakes in using the<br \/>\nAPA Style<br \/>\nPresentation is lacking in<br \/>\nterms of content<br \/>\nPresentation flows though<br \/>\nthere are grammatical<br \/>\nerrors.<br \/>\nMore extensive research is<br \/>\nrequired<br \/>\nThere are limited mistakes<br \/>\nin using the APA Style<br \/>\nPresentation is well<br \/>\narticulated in terms of<br \/>\ncontent and presentation<br \/>\ntime<br \/>\nPresentation flows well<br \/>\nand has no grammatical<br \/>\nerrors.<br \/>\nRelevant research<br \/>\nsources used to support<br \/>\nand develop arguments<br \/>\nand position statements.<br \/>\nThough more evidence is<br \/>\nrequired. Shows<br \/>\nevidence of limited<br \/>\nreading beyond<br \/>\nthe key reading.<br \/>\nThere are no mistakes in<br \/>\nusing the APA Style<br \/>\nPresentation is very well<br \/>\narticulated in terms of<br \/>\ncontent and presentation<br \/>\ntime<br \/>\nPresentation flows<br \/>\nlogically, and has no<br \/>\ngrammatical errors.<br \/>\nQuality, credible and<br \/>\nrelevant research sources<br \/>\nused to support and<br \/>\ndevelop arguments and<br \/>\nposition statements.<br \/>\nShows evidence of<br \/>\nreading beyond the key<br \/>\nreading.<br \/>\nThere are no mistakes in<br \/>\nusing the APA Style.<br \/>\nPresentation is expertly<br \/>\narticulated in terms of<br \/>\ncontent and<br \/>\npresentation time<br \/>\nPresentation flows<br \/>\nlogically and<br \/>\nprofessionally, and has<br \/>\nno grammatical errors.<br \/>\nHigh\u2010quality, credible<br \/>\nand relevant research<br \/>\nsources used to support<br \/>\nand develop arguments<br \/>\nand position statements.<br \/>\nShows extensive<br \/>\nevidence of reading<br \/>\nbeyond the key reading.<br \/>\nThere are no mistakes in<br \/>\nusing the APA Style.<br \/>\nPUBH6007_Assessment_2 PartA_Brief_ _Module Due 8 Page 11 of 11<br \/>\nThe following Subject Learning Outcomes are addressed in this assessment<br \/>\nSLO a) Interpret the importance of performing needs analysis in public health program development. Apply different methodologies of needs<br \/>\nassessment to establish and prioritise community needs.<br \/>\nSLO b) Develop a Program Logic Model and critically analyse the link between the components of Program Logic Model and Program Theory in<br \/>\nPublic Health program design<br \/>\nSLO c) Develop an evidence-based Program and Assessment Plan for the implementation and Assessment of a Public Health Program.<br \/>\nSLO d) Critically examine and apply the principles and strategies of community and stakeholder engagement.<br \/>\nSLO e) Critically examine and apply the principles of Assessment, comparing the types and stages of Assessment utilised in Public Health Program<br \/>\ndevelopment.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>PUBH6007_Assessment_2 Part A_Brief_ _Module Due 8 Page 1 of 11 ASSESSMENT 2A BRIEF Subject Code and Title PUBH6007 Program Design, Implementation and Assessment Assessment 2:\u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7725,1386,7831,7836,7829,7727,7835,7830,7837,7833,7832,7834],"tags":[3959,7839,7838,7841,630,7840,6,435,2447,2776,7842,7843],"class_list":["post-82677","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-best-research-paper-writing-services","category-best-research-paper-writing-services-in-usa","category-companies-that-write-research-papers","category-custom-research-paper-writing-service","category-free-research-paper-writing-service","category-legit-research-paper-writing-services","category-need-help-with-writing-a-paper","category-pay-someone-to-write-my-paper","category-research-paper-writing-service-reddit","category-research-papers-written-for-you","category-write-my-research-paper-for-me","category-write-my-research-paper-online","tag-best-dissertation-writing-service-uk","tag-best-essay-writing-services","tag-best-thesis-writing-services","tag-cheap-custom-essay-writing-service","tag-college-paper-writing-service","tag-custom-essay-writing-services","tag-medical-research-paper-writing-service","tag-professional-thesis-writing-service","tag-research-paper-writer-online","tag-research-paper-writing-service-free","tag-thesis-writing-service-online","tag-thesis-writing-service-uk"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/82677","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=82677"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/82677\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=82677"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=82677"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=82677"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}