What is a Journal? Your journal should be a reflective document that provides a personal, thoughtful analysis of your individual
\nparticipation\/progress on the group project ( help with nursing paper writing from experts with MSN & DNP degrees) and your assessment of the group interactions that may have occurred during the week.
\nWhy keep a journal? Of course, one of the reasons is that it is a course requirement! However, more importantly, we know that the
\npersonal reflection and self-appraisal that is part of \u201cjournaling\u201d will help you articulate what you learned in the course and why you
\ndo the things you do\u2014we call this \u201cdeep learning\u201d since it comes about through your own self-analysis, rather than through lectures,
\nmemorization, or \u201cbook learning.\u201d This thoughtful introspection can help you tell a potential employer or a graduate school
\nadmissions officer who you are and what talents and interests you possess.
\nAs you complete the module record personal impressions, experiences, discoveries, or questions that happen during the
\ncourse. Opportunities for journal writing can include Notes from self-assessment exercises, reactions to case studies, thoughts about
\nwhat participants think they do well in their practice in regard to cultural competency and where they think they can improve, and
\nother notes as appropriate to the material.
\nThink about how do you communicate with your patients? Is Communication effective? How do you know? How does culture shape
\ncommunication with your patients? Effective Communication between patients and providers is important for building trust and
\nunderstanding diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up care. Speaking the same language does not ensure understanding. What are your
\nmost important insights on what we have covered so far?
\nUse the following prompts to create a comprehensive reflection piece detailing your thoughts and feelings about what you learned in
\nModule 1 and what you learned from it. You DO NOT need to answer every prompt.
\n\u2022 The following questions may help you write your journal:
\n\u2022 What did I learn?
\n\u2022 How did I learn it?
\n\u2022 Why does it matter?
\n\u2022 \u2022 What might\/should be done in light of it?
\n\u2022 Did I have an \u201caha\u201d moment?
\n\u2022 Why am I having a d\u00e9j\u00e0 vu moment?
\n\u2022 Did I consider an alternative perspective? Why or why not?
\n\u2022 Do I have a theory about why this is working or not working?
\n\u2022 What have I learned that is causing me to interact differently?
\n\u2022 What new behaviors do I plan on taking for what action?
\n\u2022 What does culture mean to you
\n\u2022 What are examples of culture
\n\u2022 How do you define competence
\nThe journal entry should be 200-300 words long.
\nRubric
\nReflective Journal
\nReflective Journal
\nCriteria Ratings Pts
\nThis criterion is
\nlinked to a
\nLearning
\nOutcomeDepth of
\nReflection
\n– exploring issues
\n– analyzing context
\n– critical thinking
\n30 to >26.1 pts
\nProfessional
\nDemonstrate a
\nconscious and thorough
\nunderstanding of the
\nwriting prompt and the
\nsubject matter. This
\nreflection can be used as
\nan example for other
\nstudents.
\n26.1 to >23.1 pts
\nProficient
\nDemonstrate a
\nthoughtful
\nunderstanding of
\nthe writing prompt
\nand the subject
\nmatter.
\n23.1 to >20.0 pts
\nCompetent
\nDemonstrate a
\nbasic
\nunderstanding of
\nthe writing prompt
\nand the subject
\nmatter.
\n20 to >18.2 pts
\nEmerging
\nDemonstrate a
\nlimited
\nunderstanding of the
\nwriting prompt and
\nsubject matter. This
\nreflection needs
\nrevision.
\n18.2 to >0 pts
\nNeeds work
\nDemonstrate little or
\nno understanding of
\nthe writing prompt
\nand subject matter.
\nThis reflection needs
\nrevision.
\n30 pt
\ns
\nThis criterion is
\nlinked to a
\nLearning
\nOutcomeUse of
\ntextual evidence
\nand historical
\ncontext
\n– links to theory
\n– comparing &
\ncontrasting
\n– an exploration of
\nthe
\npossibilities
\n30 to >26.1 pts
\nProfessional
\nUse specific and
\nconvincing examples
\nfrom the event or
\nreadings to support
\nclaims in your own
\nwriting, making
\ninsightful and
\napplicable connections
\nbetween issues. Fully
\ncomprehends and has
\ninsight into what has
\nmade a difference to
\nown practice and
\nmakes effective links to
\nchanges that have
\npositively influenced
\npatient care and\/or
\ncolleagues
\n26.1 to >23.1 pts
\nProficient
\nUse relevant
\nexamples from the
\nevent or readings
\nto support claims
\nin your own
\nwriting, making
\napplicable
\nconnections
\nbetween the
\nissues.
\nUnderstands what
\nhas made a
\ndifference to own
\npractice, to patient
\ncare and\/or
\ncolleagues
\n23.1 to >20.0 pts
\nCompetent
\nUse examples
\nfrom the text to
\nsupport
\ndiscussion with
\nsome
\nconnections
\nmade between
\nthe issues.
\nUnderstands
\nthere has been a
\ndifference to
\nown practice
\n20 to >18.2 pts
\nEmerging
\nUses incomplete
\nor vaguely
\ndeveloped
\nexamples to only
\npartially support
\ndiscussion with
\nno connections
\nmade between
\nthe issues.
\nUnable to say if
\nthere is a
\ndifference to
\nown practice
\n18.2 to >0.0 pts
\nNeeds work
\nNo examples from
\nthe scenario are
\nused and claims
\nmade in your own
\nwriting are
\nunsupported and
\nirrelevant to the
\nissues at hand. No
\nindication there
\nhas been a
\ndifference to own
\npractice
\n0 pts
\nNo
\nMarks
\n30 pt
\ns
\nReflective Journal
\nCriteria Ratings Pts
\nThis criterion is
\nlinked to a
\nLearning
\nOutcomeLanguage
\nuse
\n– appropriate
\n– convincing
\n– depth of thought
\n– creative &
\noriginal
\n30 to >26.1 pts
\nProfessional
\nUse sophisticated
\nlanguage that is precise
\nand engaging, with
\nnotable sense of voice,
\nawareness of audience
\nand purpose, and
\nvaried sentence
\nstructure.
\n26.1 to >23.1 pts
\nProficient
\nUse language that is
\nfluent and original,
\nwith evident a sense
\nof voice, awareness
\nof audience and
\npurpose, and the
\nability to vary
\nsentence structure.
\n23.1 to >20.0 pts
\nCompetent
\nUses basic but
\nappropriate language,
\nwith a basic sense of
\nvoice, some
\nawareness of
\naudience and purpose
\nand some attempt to
\nvary sentence
\nstructure.
\n20 to >18.2 pts
\nEmerging
\nUse language that is
\nvague or imprecise
\nfor the audience or
\npurpose, with little
\nsense of voice, and a
\nlimited awareness of
\nhow to vary
\nsentence structure.
\n18.2 to >0 pts
\nNeeds work
\nUse language that
\nis unsuitable for
\nthe audience and
\npurpose, with
\nlittle or no
\nawareness of
\nsentence
\nstructure.
\n30 pt
\ns
\nReflective Journal
\nCriteria Ratings Pts
\nThis criterion is
\nlinked to a
\nLearning
\nOutcomeCoherenc
\ne and Style
\n– structure is
\nevident
\nUse of APA
\nconventions
\n10 to >8.7 pts
\nProfessional
\nContains no
\ngrammatical or
\nspelling errors, in text citations and
\nreferences are
\nwithout error.
\nDemonstrate
\ncontrol of the
\nconventions with
\nessentially no
\nerrors, even with
\nsophisticated
\nlanguage
\n8.7 to >7.7 pts
\nProficient
\nContains no more
\nthan 1-2
\ngrammatical,
\nspelling errors,
\nand\/or errors in
\nreferencing.
\nDemonstrate
\ncontrol of the
\nconventions,
\nexhibiting
\noccasional errors
\nonly when using
\nsophisticated
\nlanguage.
\n7.7 to >6.7 pts
\nCompetent
\nContains no more than
\n3-4 grammatical,
\nspelling errors, and\/or
\nerrors in referencing.
\nDemonstrate partial
\ncontrol of the
\nconventions, exhibiting
\noccasional errors that
\ndo not hinder
\ncomprehension.
\n6.7 to >5.7 pts
\nEmerging
\nContains 4 or more
\ngrammatical, spelling
\nerrors, and\/or errors
\nin referencing.
\nDemonstrate limited
\ncontrol of the
\nconventions,
\nexhibiting frequent
\nerrors that make
\ncomprehension
\ndifficult.
\n5.7 to >0 pts
\nNeeds work
\nDid not follow APA.
\nShows a lack of
\nproofreading.
\nDemonstrate little
\nor no control of the
\nconventions, making
\ncomprehension
\nalmost impossible.
\n10 pt
\ns
\nTotal Points: 100<\/p>\n
READ: Culturally Competent Nursing Care and Promoting Diversity in Our Nursing Workforce<\/p>\n
WATCH:<\/p>\n