Subject Code and Title PROJ6003 – Project Execution and Control
\nAssessment Project Status Reporting
\nModule 4-5 Discussion Forum
\nIndividual\/Group Individual
\nLength 1000 words (+\/- 10%) or equivalent
\nLearning Outcomes The Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful completion of the task below include:
\nb) Critically reflect on the project ( help with nursing paper writing from experts with MSN & DNP degrees) leadership and communication skills required to maximise project ( help with nursing paper writing from experts with MSN & DNP degrees) outcomes in the execution, control and closure phases of project ( help with nursing paper writing from experts with MSN & DNP degrees)s.
\nSubmission Due by 11:55pm AEST\/AEDT Sunday first half of Module 6 (Week 11).
\nWeighting 20%
\nTotal Marks 100 marks
\nTask Summary
\nIn this assessment, you will further analyse the case study that was introduced in Assessments 1 and 2. You will participate in the discussion with your classmates demonstrating your understanding of Project Status reporting by:
\nIdentifying effective project ( help with nursing paper writing from experts with MSN & DNP degrees) status reports and discussing their challenges and pitfalls, explaining the difference between the status reports provided for teams, sponsors, and steering committee considering their unique needs, as well as creating and justifying a sample of a status report that would be submitted to a chosen stakeholder of the project ( help with nursing paper writing from experts with MSN & DNP degrees) from the given case study.
\nThis assessment allows you to practice professional communication with peers, either face-to-face or virtually.
\nNote: At the discretion of the Learning Facilitator, this assessment can be delivered in class as a presentation\/discussion, using recordings or writing directly on the discussion forum. This might require to initiate the task ahead of the submission deadline and will be communicate by the Learning Facilitator.
\nPlease refer to the Task Instructions for details on how to complete this task.
\nContext
\nAs a Project Manager, you are managing the execution and control of the project ( help with nursing paper writing from experts with MSN & DNP degrees), but you are also ensuring that your stakeholders are aware of the project ( help with nursing paper writing from experts with MSN & DNP degrees)\u2019s progress with the level of detail that they need. How would you communicate project ( help with nursing paper writing from experts with MSN & DNP degrees) progress and status to key stakeholders? How would you ensure that they have sufficient information to make key decisions and Help you in further progress of your project ( help with nursing paper writing from experts with MSN & DNP degrees)? This will depend on the stakeholder group, their power and interest and their communication preferences and requirements.
\nTask Instructions
\nTo complete this assessment task, you must:
\n1. Ensure that you have read the given case study and resources from the subject, as all as any additional research you may find relevant and that will add value to your report. Review your subject notes, as well the Lecture slides and any other information provided by the Learning Facilitator in support of this assessment.
\nNote: At the discretion of the Learning Facilitator, this assessment can be delivered in class as a presentation\/discussion, using recordings or writing directly on the discussion forum. Options of can be combined to suit class size and schedule.
\n2. Prepare a script\/essay for the main post\/presentation to be submitted on the discussion forum of 850 words (+\/-10%) containing:
\na) Identify, at least 3, effective status reports used in project ( help with nursing paper writing from experts with MSN & DNP degrees) management.
\nb) Discuss challenges and pitfalls for each of these status reports.
\nc) Explain the difference between the status reports provided for teams, sponsors, and steering committee considering their unique needs.
\nd) Create and justify a sample of a project ( help with nursing paper writing from experts with MSN & DNP degrees) status report that would be submitted to a chosen stakeholder of the project ( help with nursing paper writing from experts with MSN & DNP degrees) from the given case study. OPTION 1 \u2013 Discussion in class \u2013 Presentation & Responses If presenting in class (F2F\/Virtual\/Online):
\n3. You will, then, present your script and respond to at least one (1) other classmate in class.
\n\u2022 Students will have between 5-8 minutes to present their script.
\n\u2022 Students can use a number of visual aids to support the presentation.
\n\u2022 Students will provide a response between 2-3 minutes to another classmate\u2019s presentation.
\n\u2022 Students will be marked for the presentation and response to other classmates in class and the scripts they have submitted on the forum.
\nOPTION 2 \u2013 Discussion in writing or as recording on Blackboard \u2013 Presentation & Responses If submitting on the discussion forum \u2013 recording\/written post (F2F\/Virtual\/Online):
\n3. You will, then, present your script and respond to at least one (1) other classmate on the discussion forum directly, either in writing or as a recording, as instructed by the Learning Facilitator.
\na. If submitting a recording:
\ni. Students will have between 5-8 minutes to present their script.
\nii. Students can use a number of visual aids to support the presentation.
\niii. Students will respond to at least (1) other classmate either in writing (250 words) or as a recording (2-3 minutes).
\niv. Students will be marked for the recording and response to other classmates on the forum and the scripts they have submitted on the forum.
\nb. If submitting only a written discussion:
\ni. Main post submission will contain 750 words (+\/-10%).
\nii. At least one (1) responding post to a classmate of 250 words (+\/- 10%). iii. Students will be marked for the main post and response to other classmates.
\n4. The essay\/script should consist of the following structure:
\na. A brief Introduction paragraph that will also serve as your statement of purpose for the discussion\u2014this means that you will tell the reader what you are going to cover in the discussion.
\nb. Body paragraphs in which you will cover all four (4) requirements listed above (a to d). This section will contain the information that is required to demonstrate your understanding of the case study and key Project Management concepts under discussion by applying them into your project ( help with nursing paper writing from experts with MSN & DNP degrees).
\ni. Any visual aids \u2013 tables\/diagrams\/illustrations \u2013 can be used to support the discussion.
\nc. A brief Conclusion paragraph summarising any findings or recommendations from the discussion.
\ni. There should not be any new information in the conclusion.
\nd. A list of References providing every source cited within your report.
\ni. Only cited sources are listed in the References.
\nii. They should be listed alphabetically. iii. They need to be valid and linked with the topic (sample nursing essay examples by the best nursing assignment writing service)\/content provided within the report.
\nReferencing
\nIt is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. Please see more information on referencing here in the Academic Writing Guide found via the Academic Skills website.
\nSubmission Instructions
\nIn submitting the written portion of your Assessment 3, you will use the Assessment link in the main navigation menu in PROJ6003 \u2013 Project Execution and Control. The link will take you to the discussion forum where you will select the existing thread created by the Learning Facilitator and reply to the first post by the Learning Facilitator and write directly on the forum (do not attach files). The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades.
\nIf submitting recording\/pictures:
\nIf your submission includes items (illustrations, recordings), you may attached them by clicked to add content and selecting to insert local files, click \u2018Browse Your Computer\u2019 to attach your extra files.
\nAcademic Integrity
\nAll students are responsible for ensuring that all work submitted is their own and is appropriately referenced and academically written according the Academic Writing Guide. Students also need to have read and be aware of Torrens University Australia Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure and subsequent penalties for academic misconduct. These are viewable online.
\nStudents also must keep a copy of all submitted material and any assessment drafts.
\nAssessment Rubric
\nAssessment Attributes Fail
\n(Yet to achieve minimum standard)
\n0-49% Pass
\n(Functional) 50-64% Credit
\n(Proficient)
\n65-74% Distinction
\n(Advanced)
\n75-84% High Distinction
\n(Exceptional) 85-100%
\nIdentify different status reports and critically analyse their
\nchallenges and pitfalls
\nPercentage for this criterion = 20% Fails to contribute to the identification of different status reports and their challenges and pitfalls by:
\n\u2022 Identifying other project ( help with nursing paper writing from experts with MSN & DNP degrees) reports that are not status reports.
\n\u2022 Critical analysis of their challenges and pitfalls are missing.
\n\u2022 Key components are missing from the discussion. Demonstrates limited awareness of project ( help with nursing paper writing from experts with MSN & DNP degrees) status reporting.
\n\u2022 A generic discussion of status reports focused on aspects and not format\/use\/content \u2013 e.g. only based on frequency.
\n\u2022 Challenges and pitfalls are addressed for status reports in general and not specific to the ones identified. Shows some understanding of project ( help with nursing paper writing from experts with MSN & DNP degrees) status reporting.
\n\u2022 Provides a discussion of different status reports.
\n\u2022 Challenges and pitfalls are addressed for each specific status reports with minor errors present in the analysis.
\nPresents a coherent and detailed analysis of project ( help with nursing paper writing from experts with MSN & DNP degrees) status reports.
\nWell demonstrated capacity to explain status reports and their challenges and pitfalls, including making connections with the case study. Critically analyses and evaluates project ( help with nursing paper writing from experts with MSN & DNP degrees) status reports with detailed challenges and pitfalls that are well linked with the case study and its key stakeholders.
\nContribution is comprehensive and advances the class discussion.
\nExplain the difference between key stakeholders in regards to their information
\nneeds
\nPercentage for this criterion = 20% Fails to demonstrate knowledge in stakeholders and communication management by:
\n\u2022 Not addressing
\nstakeholders in the discussion.
\n\u2022 Lack of explanation of the differences of each stakeholder.
\nLimited awareness of stakeholders and communication management principles.
\nResembles a recall or summary of key ideas.
\nNo link between the analysis of stakeholders and the status report suited for them.
\nDemonstrates awareness of the communication needs and preference of key stakeholders.
\nLink between the analysis of stakeholders and the status report suited for them is ill-developed.
\nDemonstrates advanced knowledge of the communication needs and
\npreference of key stakeholders.
\nLink between the analysis of stakeholders and the status report suited for them is well-developed. Demonstrates high level of communication and stakeholder analysis by identifying the uniqueness of each key stakeholder with added insights into how to engage them.
\nLink between the analysis of stakeholders and the status report suited for them is very welldeveloped, including examples to support discussion.
\nDevelop and justify a sample project ( help with nursing paper writing from experts with MSN & DNP degrees) status report for the given case study
\nPercentage for this criterion = 20% Limited application\/recommendat ions based upon analysis.
\nNo status report sample is provided. Resembles a recall or summary of key ideas.
\nProvides a sample status report that is generic and not aligned with the case study or its stakeholders.
\nLittle to no justification provided for the sample.
\nDemonstrates a capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts into the development of the status report.
\nJustification of the report is ill-developed or unclear in regards to the stakeholder of the case study.
\nWell demonstrated capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts into the development of the status report.
\nJustification of the report is well-developed and aligned with the stakeholder from the case study.
\nHighly sophisticated and creative application of concepts into the developed of the status reports, including the use of trending software in the field.
\nJustification of the report is very well-developed and presents additional insights that contribute to further learning.
\nEffective
\nCommunication
\nAdheres to structure of report and word count requirements. Appropriate use of terminology, paragraphs, sentence construction, spelling, and grammar.
\nPresents using a range of techniques to engage and sustain audience\u2019s interest. Specialised language and terminology from Project Management is rarely or inaccurately employed.
\nMeaning is repeatedly obscured by errors in the communication of ideas, including errors in structure, sequence, spelling, grammar, punctuation and\/or the acknowledgment of sources.
\nDifficult to understand for audience, no logical\/clear structure, poor flow of Generally employs specialised language and terminology from Project Management with accuracy.
\nMeaning is sometimes difficult to follow.
\nInformation, arguments and evidence are structured and sequenced in a way that is not always clear and logical.
\nSome errors are evident in spelling, grammar and\/or punctuation.
\nPresentation is sometimes difficult to follow.
\nInformation, arguments and evidence are presented in a Accurately employs specialised language and terminology from Project Management.
\nMeaning is easy to follow. Information, arguments and evidence are structured and sequenced in a way that is clear and logical.
\nOccasional minor errors
\npresent in spelling, grammar and\/or punctuation.
\nPresentation is easy to follow. Information, arguments and evidence are well presented, mostly Accurately employs a wide range of specialised language and terminology from Project Management.
\nEngages audience interest. Information, arguments and evidence are structured and sequenced in a way that is, clear and persuasive.
\nSpelling, grammar and punctuation are free from errors.
\nEngages audience interest. Information, arguments and evidence are very well presented; the presentation Discerningly selects and precisely employs a wide range of specialised language and terminology from Project Management.
\nEngages and sustains audience\u2019s interest. Information, arguments and evidence are insightful, persuasive and expertly presented.
\nSpelling, grammar and punctuation are free from errors.
\nEngages and sustains audience interest. Expertly presented; the presentation is logical,
\nPercentage for this criterion = 20% ideas, argument lacks supporting evidence.
\nLimited use of engaging presentation techniques. (e.g. posture; eye contact; gestures; volume, pitch
\nand pace of voice)
\nway that is not always clear and logical
\nSometimes uses engaging presentation techniques (e.g. posture; eye contact; gestures; volume, pitch and pace of voice) clear flow of ideas and arguments.
\nUses engaging presentation techniques (e.g. posture; eye contact; gestures; volume, pitch and pace of voice) is logical, clear and wellsupported by evidence.
\nConfidently and consistently uses a range of engaging presentation techniques (e.g. posture; eye contact, expression; gestures; volume, pitch and
\npace of voice; stance; movement) persuasive, and well- supported by evidence, demonstrating a clear flow of ideas and arguments.
\nDynamic, integrated and professional use of a wide range of engaging presentation techniques (e.g. posture; eye contact, expression; gestures; volume, pitch and pace of voice; stance; movement)
\nConstructive feedback
\nto peers
\nPercentage for this criterion = 10% Fails to offer any feedback.
\nNo support or encouragement to peers.
\nNo awareness or
\nsensitivity to diversity amongst peers. Offers feedback but rarely constructive or useful.
\nFeedback is not always clear or specific to guide peers.
\nLittle support or encouragement to peers.
\nDemonstrates little awareness of and\/or sensitivity to diversity amongst peers. Offers feedback that is sometimes constructive or useful.
\nFeedback is provided with examples to guide peers.
\nSome support and encouragement to peers.
\nDemonstrates some level of awareness of and sensitivity to diversity amongst peers. Offers constructive feedback regularly.
\nFormulates the merits of alternative ideas or proposals and communicates them to peers.
\nOffers support and encouragement to peers.
\nDemonstrates a high level of awareness of and sensitivity to diversity amongst peers. Always offers detailed constructive feedback that is specific and appropriate.
\nExpertly articulates the merits of alternative ideas or proposals and communicates them effectively to peers.
\nProvides expert Helpance, support, and encouragement to peers.
\nConsistently demonstrates a high level of awareness of and sensitivity to diversity amongst peers.
\nCorrect citation of key resources and evidence
\nPercentage for this criterion = 10% Demonstrates inconsistent use of good quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas.
\nReferencing is omitted or does not resemble APA.
\nDifferent formats are provided and references do not align with content. Demonstrates use of credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas, but these are not always explicit or well developed.
\nReferencing resembles APA, with frequent or repeated errors.
\nDifferent formats are provided and references do not fully align with content. Demonstrates use of credible resources to support and develop ideas.
\nReferencing resembles APA, with occasional errors.
\nReferences align with content. Demonstrates use of good quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop arguments and statements.
\nShows evidence of wide scope within the organisation for sourcing evidence.
\nAPA referencing is free from errors.
\nReferences align with content. Demonstrates use of highquality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop arguments and position statements.
\nShows evidence of wide scope within and outside the organisation for sourcing evidence.
\nAPA referencing is free from errors.
\nReferences align with content.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Subject Code and Title PROJ6003 – Project Execution and Control Assessment Project Status Reporting Module 4-5 Discussion Forum Individual\/Group Individual Length 1000 words (+\/- 10%)\u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8773,8771,8772,8770,8775,8776,7685,8774,8769],"tags":[1400,613,142,7594,1394,7598,7595,7593,7597,7599,7601,7590,7596,133,7655,7656,7591,7592],"class_list":["post-91998","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-all-assignment-help","category-assessment-help-online","category-assessment-help-online-in-australia","category-assessments-help","category-australia-assignment-help","category-instant-assignment-help","category-my-assignment-help","category-sample-assignment-help","category-thesis-help","tag-best-custom-essay-writing-services","tag-best-dissertation-writing-services-uk","tag-best-online-essay-writing-services","tag-cheap-custom-essay-writing-services","tag-custom-research-paper-writers","tag-custom-research-papers-writing-service","tag-essay-writer-websites","tag-essay-writing-service-quality-cheap","tag-free-research-paper-writing-service","tag-help-me-write-a-research-paper","tag-i-need-help-with-my-dissertation","tag-professional-dissertation-writing-service","tag-quick-essay-writing-service","tag-research-paper-writing-service-cheap","tag-service-writing-my-essay-write-custom","tag-someone-to-write-my-paper","tag-top-rated-dissertation-writing-services","tag-top-uk-dissertation-writing-services"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/91998","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=91998"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/91998\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=91998"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=91998"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.studyproessays.com\/help\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=91998"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}