Q1: Half of those engaged or not do so because of their personality (Premuzic, Garrad, & Elzinga, 2018), which covers all those who got engaged and only a portion of those who were not (Premuzic, Garrad, & Elzinga, 2018; Robbins & Judge, 2018). The remainder is divided unevenly between other non-personality variables. Then, personality exerts a very high influence on employee engagement, perhaps because the company’s way of doing things simply does not fit the wide differences in human personality.
Q2: If we look at the engagement statistics as a Bell’s Curve, the rate of highly engaged employees (17-29%), as Robbins and Judge (2018) observed, is located towards the right-side outlier area, while those who tried to be engaged (96%), as Premuzic, Garrad, and Elzinga (2018) pointed out, constitutes most of the ‘bell’ shape itself. This means of the dominant population who tried, only the minority succeeded, which is a reasonable estimate, considering the enormous influence of personality, as described in Q1.
Q3: Individuals feel more enthusiastic about their jobs when they are naturally more energetic and enthusiastic. I agree with the authors more energetic and enthusiastic employees tend to be resilient against management-derived frustrations at work compared to the less energetic and enthusiastic. It is both intuitive and empirical.
Get a custom-written paper by an expert in this subject. Plagiarism-free, on time, any citation style.
- ✓ PhD & Masters qualified writers
- ✓ Turnitin-safe — 0% similarity
- ✓ Free revisions + money-back guarantee
From $11/page · All academic levels
Q4: Based on research, around half came from personality-defined responses. The other half may have “tried” to be engaged outside their unique personalities and failed.
Q5: Engagement in my organization, Premuzic, Garrad, and Elzinga (2018) authors suggested, largely depends on two elements: (a) personality predisposition of the employees and (b) an organizational environment that encourages those who are naturally predisposed to be enthusiastic or energetic.
References
Our expert writers specialise in this subject and deliver original, well-researched papers.
Nursing & Healthcare · PhD Edinburgh
Business & Law · MBA London
Premuzic, T.C., Garrad, L., & Elzinga, D. (2018, November 28). Is employee engagement just a reflection of personality? Harvard Business Review, https://hbr.org/2018/11/is-employee-engagement-just-a-reflection-of-personality.
Robbins & Judge (2018)
Join 12,400+ students who trust us with their academic success. Every order includes: free revisions within 30 days, plagiarism report, on-time delivery guarantee, and full confidentiality.
—-
Q1: Half of individuals who are or are not engaged do so due to their personality (Premuzic, Garrad, & Elzinga, 2018), which includes all those who were engaged and only a paortion of those who were not (Premuzic, Garrad, & Elzinga, 2018; Robbins & Judge, 2018). The remainder is distributed haphazardly among various non-personality characteristics. Then, personality has a very strong influence on employee engagement, possibly because the company’s style of doing things simply does not fit the huge range of human personality characteristics.
Q2: When viewed as a Bell’s Curve, the rate of highly engaged employees (17-29 percent), as observed by Robbins and Judge (2018), is located towards the right-side outlier area, while those who attempted to be engaged (96 percent), as Premuzic, Garrad, and Elzinga (2018) pointed out, are located towards the left-side outlier area.
