Assignment (4-5 pages not including title and references page)
Get a custom-written paper by an expert in this subject. Plagiarism-free, on time, any citation style.
- ✓ PhD & Masters qualified writers
- ✓ Turnitin-safe — 0% similarity
- ✓ Free revisions + money-back guarantee
From $11/page · All academic levels
Should a counselor be able to prescribe psychotropic medications to a client? Why or why not?
When, if ever, can a counselor share their personal or professional opinions about prescribed medications, over-the-counter medications and/or supplements with a client? Explain your thoughts about this question.
Who is best qualified to diagnose and prescribe psychotropic medications? What qualifies them to be the best resource for diagnosis and prescribing? What are the relevant codes within the ACA Code of Ethics that support your answer?
When a client comes to you already on psychotropic medications, what is within your role and scope of practice? What is not within your role and scope of practice?
If a client needs further Assessment in order to determine their diagnosis and potential need for psychotropic medications, how can we frame the conversation so it is client-centered, empathic, ethical, and informative?
Your Assignment will be 4 to 5 pages in length, not including cover page or references page. Be sure to support your Assignment with specific references from the text, resources, and literature. In addition to the Learning Resources, search the Walden Library and/or the internet for peer-reviewed academic literature to support your Assignment. This Assignment must utilize appropriate APA format and citations.
Complete the “Putting It All Together: Summarizing Theories of Career Development” chart located in the Week 3 Learning Resources.
Our expert writers specialise in this subject and deliver original, well-researched papers.
Nursing & Healthcare · PhD Edinburgh
Business & Law · MBA London
Complete the reflections questions at the bottom of the chart. Compare and contrast traditional and recent theories of career development and discuss new insights you gained regarding the applicability of these theories to marginalized populations since the Week 1 Discussion.
N6753_Wk3
(https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/24309/modules/items/610607)
Career development plays a significant role in the counseling practice, regardless of the setting. Accordingly,
most counselor licensure and school counselor certification exams include questions concerning career
development theory and practice. In this assignment, you will summarize the primary aspects of the traditional
and recent career counseling theories discussed over the past two weeks. Keep these notes to help you
prepare for your credentialing exam(s) post-graduation.
To Prepare for the Activity
Review the Learning Resources concerning traditional and recent theories of career development
presented over the past two weeks.
Access the “Putting It All Together: Summarizing Theories of Career Development” template located in the
Week 3 Learning Resources.
PUTTING IT ALL TOGETHER: SUMMARIZING
THEORIES OF CAREER DEVELOPMENT
RESOURCES
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
WEEKLY RESOURCES (https:/waldenu.instructure.com/courses/24309/modules/items/610611)
BY DAY 7
COUN_6753_Week3_Assignment_Rubric
Complete the “Putting It All Together: Summarizing Theories of Career Development” chart located in the
Week 3 Learning Resources.
Complete the reflections questions at the bottom of the chart. Compare and contrast traditional and recent
theories of career development and discuss new insights you gained regarding the applicability of these
theories to marginalized populations since the Week 1 Discussion.
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft,
access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.
1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as COUN6753+WK3Assgn+last
name+first initial.
2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.
SUBMISSION INFORMATION
Criteria Ratings Pts
25 pts
12.5 pts
Adherence to
Assignment
Expectations:•
Complete the
“Putting It All
Together:
Summarizing
Theories of
Career
Development”
chart, located
in the Week 3
Learning
Resources.•
Complete the
reflections
questions at
the bottom of
the chart,
comparing
and
contrasting
traditional and
recent
theories of
career
development
and
discussing
new insights
you have
gained
regarding the
applicability of
these theories
to
marginalized
populations
since the
Week 1
Discussion.
25 to >22.4 pts
A
Thoroughly addresses all
required components of
the assignment with a
well-developed,
cohesive, and insightful
narrative that exceeds
expectations.
22.4 to >19.9 pts
B
Thoroughly addresses
all required
components of the
assignment with a welldeveloped narrative.
19.9 to >17.4 pts
C
Addresses some of
the required
components.
17.4 to >0 pts
F
Addresses few
to no required
components.
Assimilation &
Synthesis of
Ideas:Course
content is
synthesized
and
Join 12,400+ students who trust us with their academic success. Every order includes: free revisions within 30 days, plagiarism report, on-time delivery guarantee, and full confidentiality.
Synthesizes the
course content to
illustrate main points
and supports the
9.99 to >8.74 pts
C
Identifies key points
from the course
content and supports
the key points with
8.74 to >0 pts
F
Key points are
missing and minimal
to no information
from the learning
Total Points: 50
Criteria Ratings Pts
12.5 pts
supported
with
information
from the
learning
resources and
examples.
Assessment with
information from the
learning resources
and
personal/professional
experiences.
synthesis with
information from the
learning resources
and
personal/professional
experiences.
minimal information
from the learning
resources or
personal/professional
experiences.
resources or
personal/professional
experiences is used.
Expression
and
Formatting:
The extent to
which the
submission
demonstrated
writing quality.