PHIL 1100 Assignment

PHIL 1100 Assignment three, due August 9 earlier than 11:59 pm

Late penalty is 5% per day until there’s a documented medical excuse.

Don’t use any sources for this task besides the assigned readings, my lecture notes, and

my video recordings on Moodle. Your solutions must be acknowledged in your individual phrases and

supported by transient quotations from the readings. Cite the readings in textual content (Creator’s final title,

and web page quantity). You might also quote from lecture notes or video recording. As soon as once more,

references must be in textual content (Smolkin, lecture notes) or (Smolkin, Video Recording). Keep in mind,

don’t use the web or different exterior sources for this task. I would like you to reply the

questions by doing the assigned readings, and use my lecture supplies for further Help.

I, Identify:_________________Student #________________, certify that the solutions to this

task are my very own. I certify that I didn’t share my solutions with others, or take Help from

anybody else. I additionally certify that I didn’t use another sources apart from the assigned studying,

the lecture notes, and video recordings supplied on this course. I affirm that I didn’t use the

web to Help reply any of those questions. I acknowledge that violating any of the above will

lead to an computerized rating of “zero” and that there might be no likelihood to redo the task or

change it with another task.

Reply one of many following questions.

Reply the questions instantly. Don’t present an introduction or conclusion. Every Question Assignment

must be answered in roughly, 10 – 12 paragraphs.

1. Based on Kagan, what makes demise unhealthy for the one who dies? Take into account two main objections to this view that Kagan discusses. Clarify how he responds to every of those

objections. Increase one different problem to his view of what makes demise unhealthy for the one

who dies. Based on Kagan, would immortality be fascinating? Clarify his argument

for his view? Clarify the reminiscence loss/evolving character argument for the way

immortality may very well be fascinating. Clarify Kagan’s response to that argument. Talk about one

essential drawback for Kagan’s response. Within the ultimate Assessment, do you assume an immortal

life underneath very best circumstances may very well be fascinating? Why or why not?

2. What’s Kagan’s view on whether or not it’s applicable to concern demise? Clarify his argument for his view. Talk about an essential drawback for Kagan’s argument? How would possibly Kagan

greatest reply to that drawback? What feelings does Kagan assume are applicable when

fascinated about one’s demise? Clarify. Based on Kagan, how ought to the truth that you

will die have an effect on how you need to lead your life? Do you agree with Kagan, if not, why not,

and in that case, how would possibly you hope to implement these insights into your individual life?