This discussion board is worth 12 points. Refer to the discussion board rubric. Please remember the Thursday/Sunday rule: initial posts due Thursday nights; responses due Sunday nights.
Get a custom-written paper by an expert in this subject. Plagiarism-free, on time, any citation style.
- ✓ PhD & Masters qualified writers
- ✓ Turnitin-safe — 0% similarity
- ✓ Free revisions + money-back guarantee
From $11/page · All academic levels
Your initial post is due by Thursday night, February 3, 11:59 p.m. CST. Two responses to classmates’ initial posts are due by Sunday night, February 6, 11:59 p.m. CST.
For your initial post, thoroughly answer the following questions about “Cask of Amontillado” and “The Man in the Well”:
Our expert writers specialise in this subject and deliver original, well-researched papers.
Nursing & Healthcare · PhD Edinburgh
Business & Law · MBA London
1. Although the man in the well appears to be in the well accidentally and Poe’s Fortunato was confined in the wall on purpose, presumably the man in the well and Fortunato both die. Montresor, obviously, murdered Fortunato in “cold blood.” How might the children be seen as equally culpable as Montresor?
Join 12,400+ students who trust us with their academic success. Every order includes: free revisions within 30 days, plagiarism report, on-time delivery guarantee, and full confidentiality.
2. In both stories, the victims plead with their nemeses. Are they using the right strategies? Could the man in the well and/or Fortunato have said anything differently in order to change their fates? If you were these characters, what would your argument be to get out of the predicament?
